development, and the application of both in local communities. She also serves as Chair of her department and in this capacity prioritizes strategic planning, consensus building, curricular innovation, extracurricular student development, and stakeholder engagement.Dr. Alison Conway, City University of New York, City College Alison Conway is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at the City College of New York. At CCNY, Dr. Conway teaches an introductory course in civil engineering, as well as courses is transportation planning, transportation systems engineering, urban freight and city logistics, and urban street design. Dr. Conway conducts research primarily in the areas of urban freight and city logistics, freight
adult inform their research work.Dr. Kirsten A. Davis, Purdue University Kirsten Davis is an assistant professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research explores the intentional design and assessment of global engineering programs, student development through experiential learning, and approaches for teaching and assessing systems thinking skills. Kirsten holds a B.S. in Engineering & Management from Clarkson University and an M.A.Ed. in Higher Education, M.S. in Systems Engineering, and Ph.D. in Engineering Education, all from Virginia Tech.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University Senay Purzer is a Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research is
and 2019 have completed their engineering degreeprogram. We assessed their experiences through exit interviews and report in this paper asummary of their responses. The students noted that being able to identify themselves asbelonging to the RAMP community was a positive outcome of their participation during thesummer, an identity they appreciated throughout their engineering program. The potential forsummer bridge programs to create community and sense of belonging has been discussed insurveys of STEM summer bridge programs [8,9]. Characterized as a psychosocial goal of theprogram, improving student sense of belonging to a community has been found to influencestudent motivation, academic achievement, and well-being [8]. The Meyerhoff
common goal.6. The workshops and speakers were valuable too.7. The community-centered research.The student responses above indicate what elements participants found valuable about ROLE,confirming the importance of interacting with others, shared values through their culture, andcommunity building. When participants were interviewed, they reflected on more specificexamples. For instance, participants were aware of ROLE’s research space created to encourageresearch activities among minority and underrepresented students in engineering. Someparticipants reflected on their ethnic and engineering identities. Troy vented, “Being a Latinoengineer, it's definitely a minority in the engineering field…it made me sort of form more of abond if I see
engineering faculties and educators. First, there is a need forwhat Stevens refers to as “socio-technical engineering education” [22], which combines the socialand technical development of engineering students, in order to better prepare them for the transitionfrom university to employment. The three graduates were able to build their social knowledge andskills through co-curricular rather than curricular activities, which do not prioritize the socialdevelopment among students and are, as Stevens, Johri, and O’Connor argue, “the bastion for thetechnical rationalist view of engineering” [23, p. 133]. By incorporating the social aspect intocurricular activities, engineering educators can strengthen the stock of capital among all studentsand
makerspace has developed three mainstrategies for driving a diverse and larger set of students from its engineering, math, and physicalscience majors into the space to serve as a platform for design practice, cross-disciplinaryexploration, and community building. The first strategy aims to introduce the makerspace tostudents as early as possible, hopefully developing an early familiarity and connection to thespace. The second is the development of collaborative and structured learning opportunities thatencourages the teaching of broad skills and sharing of information within the makerspace,whether in the form of for-credit courses or short and accessible Microcourses. The third is toleverage web and social media to create excitement around student
. Kajfez and L. McNair, “Graduate student identity: A balancing act between roles,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2014.[4] D. L. Liddell, M. E. Wilson, K. Pasquesi, A. S. Hirschy, and K. M. Boyle, “Development of professional identity through socialization in graduate school,” J Stud Aff Res Pract, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 69–84, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1515/JSARP-2014-0006/MACHINEREADABLECITATION/RIS.[5] T. Luft and R. Roughly, “Engaging the Reflexive Self: The Role of Reflective Practice for Supporting Professional Identity Development in Graduate Students,” Supporting the Success of Adult and Online Students Proven Practices in Higher Education, pp. 53–62, 2016.[6] H. L. Perkins, M. Bahnson, M. A
Education Research & Development, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 565-578, 2019.[4] G. M. Sallai, J. Vicente, K. Shanachilubwa, and C. Berdanier, “Coping landscapes: How graduate engineering students’ coping mechanisms correspond with dominant stressors in graduate school,” In American Society for Engineering Education 2022 Annual Conference, Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 26-29, 2022.[5] L. Osbeck, N. Nersessian, K. Malone, and W. Newstetter, Science as psychology: Sense-Making and identity in science practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 2010.[6] B. A. Burt, “Toward a theory of engineering professorial intentions: The role of research group experiences,” American Educational Research Journal
, presentation, and business skills; and inspire their students, through examples of real-world applications, to pursue careers in STEM and create technology ventures.3. Assess program activities and disseminate outcomes.As elaborated below, PBL, engineering research, and entrepreneurship and industry experiencesare purposefully integrated in this PD program so that educators can link classroom teaching andlearning in STEM disciplines with real-world STEM practices.To develop a technically literate workforce, educators must not only teach STEM knowledge butalso address students’ question: “Why do I need to know this?” Engagement of industry in PD canallow teachers to inform students about job opportunities based on their own experiences. Such
critical design pedagogy, and the ways in which the pedagogy and underlying studio environment inform the development of de- sign thinking, particularly in relation to critique and professional identity formation. His work crosses multiple disciplines, including engineering education, instructional design and technology, design theory and education, and human-computer interaction.Dr. Marisa Exter, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Marisa Exter is an Assistant Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the College of Education at Purdue University. Dr. Exter’s research aims to provide recommendations to improve or enhance university-level design and technology programs (such as Instructional
G.P. Berdanier is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She earned her B.S. in Chemistry from The University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Exploring the evolution of engineering doctoral students’ academic and career goals in the first year of graduate schoolABSTRACT The purpose of this
, geographically distributed, collaborative research projects among scholars, and with underserved communities. She is also a lecturer in the Mechanical Engineering department where she currently teaches a course Global Engineers’ Education.Ms. Sneha Ayyagari, Stanford University Sneha is a student studying engineering at Stanford University. She is interested in understanding the role of education in solving pressing health and environmental issues. Through her experience in non-profit work, she has developed an interest in learning how to work with underserved communities to create sustainable solutions.Mr. Jonathan Edward Pang, Stanford University I am an undergraduate studying mechanical engineering at Stanford University
] proposes using design thinking as a modelling tool and the organization of trainingand development programs for teachers to improve or redefine the engineering profession'straditional and outdated curriculum structures. Dym [11] underscores the importance ofenhancing the creative thinking skills of leaders of engineering programs, educational qualitymanagers, and curriculum leaders [37] through the adoption of an iterative design thinkingapproach. Integrating resources and disciplines is crucial to guide and improving curriculumprograms. Moreover, pre-service teachers [38] and prospective teachers [39] should also strive toimprove their design thinking skills.Build the teaching platform:The widespread use of design thinking in the business sector
better prepare developmental math community college students for transfer into STEM bachelor’s degree programs or entry into the STEM workforce.Cheryl Martinez, Growth Sector STEM Program ManagerIvanna Abreu ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Paid Pre-College STEM Bridge Programs: “Just-In-Time” Support and Engagement for Community College STEM LearnersINTRODUCTIONWhile America’s “Innovation Economy” continues to thrive and drive strong employment trendsin technology, advanced manufacturing, R&D, and defense, our country’s postsecondaryinstitutions fail to produce enough qualified graduates to meet employer demand (O'rourke,2021). To further
our research activitiesnot only lead to fundamental discoveries, but also product & technology development throughindustrial partnerships. Hence, our main goal has been to reshape our graduate program to giveour students tools to develop and pursue scalable solutions for real-world needs by advancinginnovation and entrepreneurial mindsets.The strong support and expertise of the VentureWell team within the frameworks ofsustainability, and innovation and entrepreneurship, was boosted with the implementation of CoPfor Faculty Development. Our participation in the CoP benefited our project and our ownprofessional development. First, we were given the opportunity to join a community of facultyfellows who were pursuing similar educational goals
Paper ID #49489A Literature Review of Transdisciplinarity in Engineering EducationShuyu Wang, The Ohio State University Shuyu Wang is a Ph.D. student in the Department of engineering education at the Ohio state university. Currently, she is a graduate research associate in an NSF-funded project aiming to train students to become wicked scientists through transdisciplinary approaches. Shuyu is also a member of the Research on Identity and Motivation in Engineering research group, led by Dr. Rachel L. Kajfez, focusing on studying the intersection between motivation and identity to improve engineering students’ success.Dr
helpengineers and their communities meet their needs, and clarifies that engineering does notinherently require technocratic solutions to communal problems and needs.PositionalityThe primary and secondary authors are both engineers, labor organizers with the AmericanFederation of Teachers (AFT) local GEO-3550, and children of union members fromworking-class backgrounds. Both were participants in the 2020 GEO-3550 abolitionist strike fora safe and just campus for all [29]. The first author was also taking graduate coursework inintroducing the concepts of engineering education research during the writing of this paper,which provided a critical reflective space for learning and grappling with theoretical frameworksand their applications. We reached out to
Development. He graduated from the University of Alabama in August 2012 with a PhD ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Teaching Social Justice in Infrastructure: A Community of Practice Framework for the use of Case StudiesAbstractThe Center for Infrastructure Transformation and Education (CIT-E) was created in 2013 as acommunity of practice (CoP) for those interested in the scholarship of infrastructure educationand has developed a model introductory infrastructure course with over 40 lessons available toany instructor to use or modify. In the summer of 2023 CIT-E held a workshop “TeachingStudents about Equitable Infrastructure”. As a result of that workshop, one of the ongoing
internationalization uniformly spanning all engineering, math and natural science disciplines at NAU.Dr. Harvey Charles, Northern Arizona University Dr. Harvey Charles is vice provost for International Education at Northern Arizona University. He pro- vides institutional leadership on strategic planning around global education, helps to facilitate global learning opportunities for students, supports faculty development opportunities through international teaching and research, and consults with colleges and universities on curriculum and campus interna- tionalization. The Global Science and Engineering Program is one of the signature programs housed in the Center for International Education that he directs
those traditionally underrepresented in rigorous courses and programs in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). She knows that an education in a STEM field leads students to life enriching, family supporting, and community building careers. Morrell brings an entrepreneurial spirit to every effort she undertakes. From developing and leading a research center for advancing women and IT at the University of Maryland Baltimore County to creating an international effort on behalf of women and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) for the United Nations and the World Bank to serving as the Chief Operations Officer for the National Alliance for Partnerships in Equity (NAPE). Morrell has developed
response.They also complete a truss building exercise. The second lab option offered through aninterdisciplinary pairing with architecture is a tour of a space habitat that was developed as aprototype for The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). And, the thirdoffering highlights the lighting portion of architectural engineering with a tour and demonstrationof the lighting dome – counting natural lumens.Although participation in NLD is positive outreach for the STEM community, it has yet toproduce a student at the school of architecture. However, the numbers are small and it is onlyoffered for a few hours, once a year. Also, students are required to attend as a high school groupso the interest is varied.WONDERtorium:The local children’s
Life As a 2017 graduate from Tufts University, Marian served as Student Outreach Coordinator for Tisch College of Civic Life for the 2017-2018 academic year. In this capacity, she supported many initiatives around the College, including programs, communications, and research. Long interested in the fusion of civic engagement and education, Marian was proud to participate in the development of this project. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Preparing Engineering Faculty for Inclusion of Civic Engagement in Curriculum “21st century engineers are faced with unprecedented challenges of developing a sustainableworld in balance with the
Page 26.773.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Filling in the Gaps: An Interdisciplinary Approach for Teaching Professional Literacies to Graduate Engineers (A Work in Progress)The need: Engineering employers cite skills gap in new graduatesIn recent years, multiple reports have noted the need for engineering graduates to demonstratemore than just technical competence in order to enter and thrive in workplaces1-3. In a 2010 NSFsponsored study on engineering practice and identity, engineers themselves noted the gap in theirfluency with certain skills such as communication and essential business concepts includingeconomic analysis, project management, and team leadership4. Highlighting
, interpersonal interactions, organizations, and institutional change. There areexceptions, perhaps even increasingly so; these “exceptional” courses may be seen as part of alarger movement in engineering education to integrate ethics, human-centered design, leadershipdevelopment and community-based project work—considerations of people, in other words—into more traditional technical coursework [2] - [5].At the center of this paper is one such course newly offered at Stanford in the winter term of2017. The name of the course was ENGR 311C/FEMGEN311C Expanding Engineering Limits(EEL): Culture, Diversity, and Gender. The course was developed to address a curricular gap inthe school of engineering: the absence of an engineering-based formal learning
prescribed what a PhD degree in electrical engineeringdemanded from its candidates and therefore regulated one’s work. But I, an individual withaspirations to reconceptualize the structure of the engineering education institution to upliftmarginalized communities, wanted to take a different path, one that was far less traveled, onethat would take me through both personal and intellectual fulfillment while furthering my career.By bargaining my time and prioritization of scientific projects over education ones, I was able tocarve a path for me to achieve all of my goals and set myself up for a multidisciplinary educationin graduate school. In doing so, I get the opportunity to produce rigorous, personally fulfillingsocial justice-oriented research
, Florida State University Faye R. Jones is a Senior Research Associate at Florida State University’s College of Communication & Information. Her research interests include STEM student outcomes and the exploration of student pathways through institutional research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Assessing Educational Pathways for Manufacturing in Rural Communities: An Investigation of New and Existing Programs in Northwest FloridaAbstractA subset of manufacturing, the AM sector is defined using two criteria: high levels of spendingfor research and development (R&D) and a high share of STEM jobs within companies. In NWFlorida, AM employment is concentrated in two sub-sectors
with the help of Oculus Rift headsets in a controlled environment. This research propelsthe learner into an immersive environment to learn about building systems through VR instead ofusing two-dimensional construction drawings. The subjects’ understanding of the materials isgauged using an online pre- post quiz. With a design-based research approach, we assess theimpact of VR tools on construction student knowledge, how students respond to this hybrid modelof instruction, and whether it holds any value compared to other traditional methods of instruction.Incorporating such educational tools and practices can increase the prevalence of more focusededucational knowledge transfer while protecting the students’ health by reducing personal
education improvement.Dr. Faye R. Jones, Florida State University Faye R. Jones is a Senior Research Associate at Florida State University’s College of Communication & Information. Her research interests include STEM student outcomes and the exploration of student pathways through institutional research. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Assessing Educational Pathways for Manufacturing in Rural Communities: Research Findings and Implications from an Investigation of New and Existing Programs in Northwest FloridaAbstractIn northwest Florida, advanced manufacturing (AM) job outstrip the number of middle
, takeaways for future development of this and other comparable communitiesof practice for student participants in engineering education are considered.1.1 BackgroundThe EECS Design Student Community of Practice Program at Oregon State University in theSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science was originally developed and piloted in2017 as a means to interweave aspects of academic, extracurricular, career preparation, andprofessional identity-building in the engineering discipline based upon the model presented byWenger [1]. Over the 6 years since the pilot, program leaders have conducted developmentresearch that has guided advancements in basic organization, educational practice, resourcefocus and overall implementation methodology [2-4
and chapters, her research centers on the intersections of career, change, leadership, and resilience. Fellow and past president of the International Communication Association, she has received numerous awards for her research, teaching/mentoring, and engagement. She has worked on Purdue- ADVANCE initiatives for institutional change, the Transforming Lives Building Global Communities (TLBGC) team in Ghana through EPICS, and individual engineering ethical development and team ethical climate scales as well as everyday negotiations of ethics in design through NSF funding as Co-PI. [Email: buzzanel@purdue.edu]Dr. Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Andrew O. Brightman serves