Salt Lake City, Utah
June 23, 2018
June 23, 2018
July 27, 2018
Pre-College Engineering Education
Today, technology is pervasive and it is reshaping every aspect of our lived experience. Unfortunately, similar to the vast majority of adults in our society, K-12 students generally lack an understanding of the engineering foundation of the tech-gadgets that have become an integral part of their lifestyles. As technology undergoes accelerating and converging advances, it is paramount that K-12 students receive high quality STEM education so that they have the potential to join the future engineering workforce as contributors to our innovation-driven economy. In recent years, hands-on, problem- and project-based learning has been gathering momentum in K-12 education. Such an approach can benefit students in gaining a greater understanding of subject material and allow teachers to support students of diverse learning styles. Even as hands-on STEM learning aims to incorporate real-world applications, many implementations of learning activities and practices are restricted to the classroom environment and constrained by the scale and resource availability. Teachers and students seldom get opportunities to explore authentic, real-world challenges, primarily due to the lack of teacher knowledge and experiences with modern technologies. These dynamics continue to reinforce students’ misperception that science and math are activities that students do in the classroom, disconnected from the real-world. Thus, to develop a technically literate workforce, educators must not only teach STEM knowledge but also address the students’ question, “Why do I need to know this?” Guided by the internship efficacy research, we posit that through exposure to hands-on engineering and industry experiences, teachers can become better equipped to inform students about how classroom science and math connects to real-world career opportunities.
This paper documents activities and outcomes of a teacher professional development (PD) program, which allows participants to have authentic experiences in engineering, technology, entrepreneurship, and industry. An engineering department at a higher education institute hosted nine teachers for a six-weeklong summer PD, beginning with a two-week hands-on, structured learning followed by a four-week collaborative research and periodic industry interaction experiences. During the structured learning, teachers performed numerous hands-on experimental activities to learn and understand scientific and mathematical foundations of mechatronics and robotics. Moreover, through experiential activities, including visit to a technology startup incubator, they learned fundamental concepts of entrepreneurship, such as business model canvas, minimum viable product, intellectual property, raising funding, etc. In the four-week research phase, to experience the process and challenge of conducting engineering research, the teachers worked in teams to collaborate in and contribute to ongoing projects involving graduate researchers, undergraduate and high-school students, and faculty mentors. Moreover, talks from industry professionals, including a two-day workshop by an industry partner, and visits to startup and factory sites provided ample industry exposure, giving teachers a unique opportunity to develop their innovation, entrepreneurship, and networking skills as well as to gain a real-world understanding of engineering workplace and careers. Teachers created lesson plans to share educational, technical, entrepreneurial, and industry aspects of their summer experience, to provide a foundation for college-level education to their students, and better inform their students about engineering career opportunities. Through follow-up sessions over the academic year, teachers continue to receive additional support for implementing authentic, engineering-based lesson plans.
The participants made significant contributions to research projects in four engineering labs. Illustrative research includes the design of a wirelessly controlled robot to study marine environments, development of an affordable game-based telerehabilitation solution for stroke victims, etc. Based on pre- and post- technical quizzes conducted during the PD, the teacher’s understanding of scientific and mathematical foundations of the concepts improved from 49% to 64%. Final submission of this paper will provide a detailed overview of PD curriculum, activities, research projects, and teacher outcomes (e.g., technical quiz, self-efficacy, and external evaluation).
Krishnamoorthy, S. P., & Borges Rajguru, S., & Kapila, V. (2018, June), Fundamental: A Teacher Professional Development Program in Engineering Research with Entrepreneurship and Industry Experiences Paper presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.18260/1-2--30547
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2018 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015