, rather than developing the concept in depth or Deleted: ttackling the challenges of achieving the ideal in a curriculum. Nonetheless, there still appears to Deleted: edbe a significant amount of creative curriculum design and rigorous assessment aimed at makingthe T-shaped ideal a reality.How and Why Is the German Discourse Different?We began this research expecting to find more similarity than we ultimately did. This section ofthe paper offers a few possible explanations for how and why the German discourse is so Deleted: somedifferent. The discussion about T-shaped engineers appears only as a very thin thread because Deleted: offersthe German literature on this topic is rare and not
, attempting to distill best practices and impacts, but are limited by a relativelyshallow literature pool. [19] Suggestions about how to develop rubrics are widespread (e.g. [20]),but the literature is sparse with respect to combining standards-based scores across assignmentsor formulating an overarching course grade in a standards-based system.The primary purpose of this work is to propose a methodology-based classification schemethrough which to frame future discussion around standards-based grading score aggregation. Aseries of exemplars of the grade aggregation methods encompassed by the classification schemeare provided. The exemplars were generated by applying various schemes to a set of hypotheticalstudent profiles for a first-year engineering
towards general environmental engineeringand specifically towards water desalination. The exercises were designed to teach basiclaboratory methods and techniques essential for environmental engineering careers either as apracticing engineer or as a graduate student or professional pursuing research. The objectivewas to enhance their learning experiences in laboratory setting. The students were introducedto advanced level desalination experiments based on capacitive deionization (CDI), anemerging and novel purification and desalination technology for low salinity water.Electrochemical Methods and Concept of CDI DesalinationElectrochemical methods such as electro-kinetics and capacitive deionization have been usedin environmental engineering by
students need for four individual assignments and two group assignments. In theinterest of clarity for the user, the guide does not include specific resources for all assignmentsthat occur throughout the semester. Instead, the team identified the best candidates forbibliographic instruction relative to timing during the semester, the knowledge practices neededto complete an assignment, and skills needed across the entire course (see Appendix 2). Forexample, the course coordinator had identified poor student performance in using crediblesources as a major problem, so identifying sources and assessing credibility is emphasizedthroughout the redesigned Research Guide.Tabs were created for individual assignments as follows:• Review of an engineering
at a non-‐profit or NGO □ Research assistant □ Teaching assistant □ Work-‐study student □ University-‐sponsored extracurricular activities □ Other (please specify):________________________________ □ Briefly tell how any of these experiences have impacted your perspective in this survey. [text box] 13. Future employment: immediately following graduation, which of the following are you most likely to pursue as your primary position? [Select one] □ Working for a “traditional” engineering company (at least 50% focus on engineering practice within one engineering discipline) □ Working for a
interviews, in addition to counseling sessions to helpstudents discern their vocational aspirations. In terms of unconscious bias training and learningto work with other students with empathy, there is a proposal to do that within the context ofCore curriculum classes for all first-year students in the university. This issue is not peculiar toengineering, but needs to be addressed campus-wide.That said, we are creating a task force to look at the first-year experience of engineering. Thetask force is charged with researching best practices elsewhere and making recommendationsregarding what may work at SCU. 6. Make alterations to syllabiCurrent syllabus statements include several mandatory sections, including on reportingdiscrimination and
CEE Department chair from July 2008 to July 2011. Dr. Bulleit teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in structural engineering. He received the Univer- sity Distinguished Teaching Award for an Assistant Professor in 1986 and was one of top five candidates for the Distinguished Teaching Award for an Associate Professor or Professor in 1996, 1997, and 2014. He has been involved in a wide range of research in structural engineering, including reinforcement of wood materials, reliability of wood members and wood structural systems, design of traditional timber frame structures, development of structural design code criteria, and computational intelligence. Much of his research and teaching has considered the need
engineer with a passion for teaching the next generation of engineers to be well-rounded professionals who consider the broader impacts and effects of their work beyond the technical. Her cur- rent research interests include investigating pedagogical interventions in the classroom to build technical, professional, and lifelong learning skills.Dr. Linda A. Battalora, Colorado School of Mines Linda A. Battalora is a Teaching Professor in the Petroleum Engineering Department at the Colorado School of Mines (Mines) and a Shultz Humanitarian Engineering Fellow. She holds BS and MS degrees in Petroleum Engineering from Mines, a JD from Loyola University New Orleans School of Law, and a PhD in Environmental Science and
and high school teachers • Development of a multi-tiered advanced manufacturing program • Implementation of a program designed to promote increased awareness among underrepresented community college students regarding applying to medical and graduate school • Collaboration with federal labs and universities to prepare HCC students for summer research projects as part of a Homeland Security award • Development of specialized topic seminars in high-performance computing and programming • Numerous student and faculty research experiences at regional universities and federal agencies, and • Development and
Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering de- partment, with a specialty in structural engineering and bridge structures. She works closely with KU Engineering’s post-doctoral Teaching Fellow and oversees the overall Engaged Learning Initiative in the School of Engineering. Caroline is responsible for overseeing KU Engineering’s active-learning class- room design and usage, prioritizing course assignments in the active-learning classrooms, helping faculty to advance their pedagogy by incorporating best practices, and advancing implementation of student- centered, active-learning approaches in the School of Engineering. Caroline is also active in contributing to university-level discussions in the area of
younger youth andthe relatively slow uptake of this technology in formal and informal settings is the way UAVs areperceived as “toys” (see, for example, [13]), rather than as autonomous aerial vehicles with thepotential to revolutionize engineering curriculum [17]. We drew on these prior UAV outreachactivities to understand the types of activities that participants found to be engaging, such asaerial surveys, and to ensure that we were building on recognized practices for ensuring students’safety while learning in the presence of potentially multiple flying objects.Since our goal was to create a relatively long and in-depth STEM program, we also drew onresearch and best practices in STEM curriculum design. Within formal educational settings
Education: A Review of Best Practices” 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 14-17, 2015, Seattle, Washington, USA.[6] Bayless, David J. and T. Richard Robe, “Leadership Education for Engineering Students”, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington DC, Oct 27-30, 2010.[7] Farr, J. V., & Brazil, D. M. (2009). Leadership skills development for engineers. Engineering Management Journal, 21(1), 3–8.[8] Farr, J. V., Walesh, S. G., & Forsythe, G. B. (1997). Leadership development for engineering managers. Journal of Management in Engineering, 13(4), 38–41.[9] Goodale, M. J. (2005). The right stuff: Traits and skills of effective leaders. Leadership and Management in
seniors worked with five or six first year female students in WISE;the mentors received a stipend for their efforts. They met weekly for six hours to informallydiscuss social and academic issues, work on course assignments, and develop a supportivenetwork. The participation of the first-year students was mandatory. The 11 mentors weresurveyed and/or interviewed in spring and fall of 2017.Design and methods. A phenomenological research design [16] was employed, whereby thecommon experiences of the subjects as undergraduate women mentors in STEM were explored,with a particular focus on the impact of mentoring on self-efficacy beliefs, personal growth, andleadership development. Common constructs were elicited to generate a new explanatoryframework
, and Estimation of Stochastic Pro- cesses.Mr. Dana Hickenbottom, Itek Energy/Western Solar Dana has worked in the solar industry for 5 years. He started his career at itek Energy, a domestic solar module manufacturer based in Bellingham, WA. During his time as Technical Support Manager he worked to ensure product functionality in the field, assisted with research and development, and provided technical training to customers. He has since moved on from itek Energy and is now working as a project manager at Western Solar Inc, a solar installation company in Bellingham, WA. His work involves system design, operations and maintenance support, customer and technical support, product research, and community outreach
Paper ID #23599Developing an Entrepreneurial Mindset Using the KEEN Framework for aDigital Communication System CourseProf. John M. Santiago Jr., Colorado Technical University Professor John Santiago has been a technical engineer, manager, and executive with more than 26 years of leadership positions in technical program management, acquisition development and operation research support while in the United States Air Force. He currently has over 16 years of teaching experience at the university level and taught over 40 different graduate and undergraduate courses in electrical engineer- ing, systems engineering, physics
same exam can be accomplished by usinggrading rubrics, grading the same question for all students at the same time, and giving similarquestions each semester. However, there are still natural tendencies and preferences that affecthow an individual professor grades. The objective of this research was to quantitatively assesshow professor grading biases influenced exam scores in the same upper level course offered atmultiple universities. The course selected for analysis was an introduction to the design of reinforced concretestructures, a common course in many civil engineering curricula. Three professors at threedifferent universities taught similar topics using their unique teaching styles and methods.During the semester, the same exam
their very first discipline-specific class.On the graduate and Ph.D. level of both universities, original research and professionalpublication come again to the forefront. In recent years, there has been a growing push on manycampuses for additional Undergraduate Research programs where not only graduate students, butalso undergraduate students take an active part on current faculty research, including, in somecases, co-authoring with faculty on research articles. This changing environment offers newopportunities for information literacy training and engineering librarian partnerships withresearch groups.This diversity of needs means that the new engineering librarian must take time to carefullystudy the engineering college’s website and to
widely documented to have a positive impact on retention and studentexperience [2]–[5].Although the importance of such programs is clearly recognized, an understanding of how andwhy such programs have an impact is less well-developed. In a review of programmatic studentsupport initiatives, Lee and Matusovich [6] presented a comprehensive analysis of diversitysupport practices, and then called for more interplay between research and practice on diversitysupport. Narrowly framed, a relationship between an empirical base and implementationstrategies might be summarized as determining “evidence-based best practices.” However, Leeand Matusovich noted that “while the practice of providing students with co-curricular supporthas been evaluated, theory
Engineers and Scientist (AAEES), and registered as a Chartered Engineer (CEng) by the U.K. Engineering Council. He is recognized as a Diplomate of the American Academy of Sanitarians (D.AAS). His scholarship, teaching, service, and professional practice focus in the fields of environmental biotechnology and sustainable development where he specializes in promoting Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WaSH), food and nutrition security, energy efficiency, and poverty alleviation. Oerther’s awards for teaching include the best paper award from the Environmental Engineering Division of ASEE, as well as recognition from the NSPE, the AAEES, and the Association of Environmental Engineering and Science Professors (AEESP). He
color in engineering [13]. The research has beenconducted by the National Society of Black Engineers in collaboration with ExxonMobil. Therecommended strategies include engagement of the institutional leadership, summer bridge programs,collaborative learning and living environments, facilitated study groups, early alert systems,scholarships, positive self-efficacy development, positive identity development, and facultydevelopment programs. The paper provides research-based explanation of why each of these strategiesworks as well as best practices and challenges for their implementation.In [14], the authors perform a study of retention of students in STEM fields. They found that 48% ofstudents at bachelor’s degree level and 69% at the
, students will be prepared topass the patent bar examination and become certified to practice patent law before the U.S.Patent and Trademark Office. Hence, graduates of the ESIP-Project will have new career optionsincluding choices for becoming patent engineers and patent agents, in addition to traditionaltechnical career choices.This paper includes an overview of the three-course sequence, as well as evaluation results of theimplementation of the first course. A survey was designed by the investigators and implementedpre and post course. The survey included three constructs: Knowledge of IP Concepts, InnovativeProduct Design, and Careers in Patent Law. Following reliability testing procedures, studentresponses to these constructs were compared
for data visualization, analysis, and interpretation. The coursethen progresses to explore topics in Materials Science, and Civil and Mechanical Engineering.Midway through the semester, a bridge competition is held and the students work on a StudentEducational Plan that projects their coursework all the way through graduating with theBachelors of Science degree. Finally, the course finishes up in Electrical and ComputerEngineering with topics in electronics and test equipment, sensors and measuring physicalphenomena, microcontroller programming and data acquisition, and select topics in robotics witha design competition.Two design project competitions are integrated into the curriculum, with experiments built intothe schedule for students to
internshipprograms as means of building practical industry experience. However, designing courses toinclude cross-disciplinary topics, such as smart grids (SGs), distributed generation or renewableenergy systems (RES) or to keep students from diverse backgrounds engaged can be quite achallenge for instructors14,19-28. In our view, these curricular and pedagogical challenges can beaddressed by bringing research topics, projects and integrated laboratory experiences into powerand energy courses. One of the advantages of these approaches is that the impacts on the existingcurriculum, space, equipment and financial requirements are minimal23-25, 28.This paper describes efforts being undertaken at our university to revise, revitalize and updatethe power
Paper ID #22127Where Should We Begin? Establishing a Baseline for First-year StudentAwareness of Engineering EthicsMs. Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Tech Natalie Van Tyne is an Associate Professor of Practice at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univer- sity, where she teaches first year engineering design as a foundation courses for Virginia Tech’s under- graduate engineering degree programs. She holds bachelors and masters degrees from Rutgers University, Lehigh University and Colorado School of Mines, and studies best practices in pedagogy, reflective learn- ing and critical thinking to inform enhanced student
examining issues of social justice and educational equity. Currently, she is on a research team examining the impacts of an out-of-school STEM summer program for racially underrepresented youth.Dr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech Dr. Walter Lee is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the assistant director for research in the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech.Dr. David B Knight, Virginia Tech David Knight is Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in the De- partment of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. He is also Director of International Engagement in Engineering Education and affiliate faculty with
others switched gears to focus more on coursemodule development because they felt the research was too hard to grasp within such shortperiod of time. Below are two example comments that show the difference due to theirknowledge of subject matter and research: There’s not much we can pull [from the RET program] for geometry and algebra II. I thought the research was going to be us researching best practices for teaching. I didn’t know that our research was us tagging along on the professors’ research. The program was fantastic. I learned a lot. But the downside is that I don’t have a course [to implement the RET experience], and I don’t have time to design a curriculum. I’m a little non-standard in that I
sessions in the international conferences for the past 30 years. Professor Zilouchian is currently an associate editor of the International Journal of Elec- trical and Computer Engineering out of Oxford, UK. Professor Zilouchian is senior member of several professional societies including Tau Beta Pi, Sigma Xi, Phi Kappa Phi, ASEE and IEEE.Dr. Nancy Romance , Florida Atlantic University Dr. Romance is Professor of Science Education in the College of Education at Florida Atlantic Univer- sity (FAU) and a graduate faculty member in both the College of Engineering and Computer Science and the College of Science at FAU.Her research interests address meaningful learning in complex STEM do- mains, applying a learning sciences
suggested that this extra time to graduation acts as a barrier to entry and that theprofession would be best-served by curricula that could be completed in four years.The curricula of all three of the universities that we have studied reflect these changes. Todiffering degrees, all three have molded their curriculum to include practice-based skills. AtWCU this has resulted in the adoption of a project-based learning curriculum and a strong focuson engineering practice. Both ECU and WCU offer the Bachelor of Science in Engineeringdegree. Curricula of these programs were designed so that students could realistically expect tograduate in four years.At all three universities, room in the curriculum for practice-based skills has been created byreducing
study will inform programmatic decisions in engineering graduate programs andfacilitate targeted interventions that promote motivation and identity development of students.This work also aims to shape graduate education best practices for recruitment, retention, andtraining in engineering disciplines.Project MotivationThe significant, positive impact of federal funding mechanisms on engineering doctoral researchtraining programs is clear on the development of graduate students. On the contrary, engineeringdoctoral degree granting institutions and departments have been slow to make programmaticdecisions informed by evidence derived from rigorous engineering education research.Additionally, engineering is one of the least studied fields in the
associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Introduction and Assessment of iNewton for the Engaged Learning of