lesson development by providing ideasfor creating assignments (for both before and after class), discussion points, activities, and otherlesson materials to teach undergraduate and graduate students about the effects of infrastructureinequities and how to mitigate negative effects. The framework will provide a solid foundationfor faculty to take a case study or historical example and create lesson objectives, design studentexercises to be used before, during, or after a class session, and create materials to supportstudent learning. The CIT-E community of practice is also applying this framework to createseveral lessons using case studies that are currently under development and will be available foruse by any faculty member in the
repetitive tasks, visualize important trends,analyze large data sets, perform parametric sensitivity studies to support design decisions, andstudents cultivate a logical problem-solving process. Furthermore, as the industrial landscapecontinues to rapidly advance with increasing penetration of automation and big data analysis,students will need to graduate ready to utilize modern tools in their engineering practice. Inmechanical engineering courses, computer-based assignments have significant potential toincrease experiential learning for students. For instance, in thermodynamics, instead of a studentanalyzing a Brayton cycle at a fixed set of conditions to generate one set of values for the poweroutput and efficiency, they can repeat the analysis
Paper ID #45077Full Paper: Supporting Students’ Educational Robotics Experiences throughGenerative AI ChatbotsDr. Ethan E Danahy, Tufts University Dr. Ethan Danahy is a Research Associate Professor at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) with secondary appointment in the Department of Computer Science within the School of Engineering at Tufts University. Having received his graduate degrees in Computer Science and Electrical Engineering from Tufts University, he continues research in the design, implementation, and evaluation of different educational technologies. With particular attention to engaging
researches structures that contribute to underrepresentation in STEM majors and is currently a Graduate Assistant for the UBelong Collaborative.Dr. Allison Godwin, Cornell University Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an associate professor in the Robert Frederick Smith School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at Cornell University. Her research focuses on how identity, among other affective factors, influences diverse students to choose engineering and persist in engineering. She also studies how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belonging and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and
. In 2011, began as an Assistant Teaching Professor in First-year Engineering Program where she redesigned the curriculum and developed courses with sustainability and clean water themes. In 2017, she moved to ChE Department where she has taught core courses and redesigned the Capstone design course with inclusion pedagogy practices. She has also developed and ran 9 faculty-led, international programs to Brazil focused on Sustainable Energy. She has won several teaching awards including ChE Sioui Award for Excellence in Teaching, COE Essigmann Outstanding Teaching Award, and AIChE Innovation in ChE Education Award. She also won best paper at the Annual ASEE conference in both Design in Engineering Education
upper-levelundergraduate and graduate students at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. The datasetcontains a mix of 100 correct and 400 incorrect submissions and underwent an extensivefine-tuning process with OpenAI’s advanced GPT-3.5-turbo-1106 model [15]. Therefore, ourresearch questions include: • RQ1: How can a proof of concept be designed and implemented to assess the feasibility of utilizing a generative AI model for providing semantic error feedback in educational settings, ensuring that the system avoids disclosing correct answers while enhancing the learning experience? • RQ2: How does the feedback from the fine-tuned GPT model differ in specificity and relevance compared to standard GPT models in the
biomedicine. He is a recipient of UCSB’s Center for Control, Dynamical Systems, and Computation Best PhD Thesis award and a UCI Chancellor’s Award for Excellence in Undergraduate Research Mentorship. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 An Investigation of Psychological Safety in Student-Led Undergraduate Engineering Design Projects through Student InterviewsAbstractTo supplement classroom learning and prepare students to transition from school to industry,many undergraduate engineering students participate in team-based design projects, both indesign-focused courses and as extracurricular activities. These projects can be largely organizedand
expose the students to the tech-nical topics in AI. We teach technical topics in deep learning using applied research projects toreal-world healthcare datasets (such as tumor growth, cancer, and more). Other than teachingtechnical skills, the program was also aimed to enable students to produce novel contributions tothe domain of diagnostic artificial intelligence. The program required students to present their re-search projects in a capstone seminar and submit a research report similar to a conference paper.To accomplish these goals, discussions on research practices and academic communication wereincluded in the course design, facilitated by a dedicated communication TA for these aspects.The 5E approach used in course: The 5Es approach [24
I acquired my Doctoral Degree in Engineering Education. After serving as a postdoctoral associate within the MIT-SUTD Collaboration for three years, and 7 years as a research scientist, I am currently appointed as a Principal Research Scientist at the MIT Open Learning Office. My research interests reside in the areas of Early Engineering, Engineering and Technology Curriculum Development and Teacher Training, Online Education, and International Educational Development. Specialties: Engineering and Technology Education, Instructional Design, STEM Curriculum Development, Digital/Online EducationMs. Kathleen D Kennedy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Senior Director, MIT Horizon; Executive Director, MIT
Paper ID #44435Leveraging the CARE Methodology to Enhance Pedagogical and InstitutionalSupport for Blind or Low-Vision (BLV) Learners in Electrical and ComputerEngineering (ECE)Aya Mouallem, Stanford University Aya Mouallem (she/her) is a PhD candidate in Electrical Engineering, minoring in Education, at Stanford University. She received a BEng in Computer and Communications Engineering from the American University of Beirut. Aya is a graduate research assistant with the Designing Education Lab at Stanford, led by Professor Sheri Sheppard, and her research explores the accessibility of introductory engineering education
different undergraduate research projects. He then moved on to Michigan State University and took a position as a teaching specialist concentrating on undergraduate classroom instruction. Scott finally settled at York College of Pennsylvania. He has been at York College for over ten years and feels as if he has found a place where the focus on teaching and students aligns well with his background and interests.Dr. Stephen Andrew Wilkerson P.E., York College of Pennsylvania Stephen Wilkerson (swilkerson@ycp.edu) received his PhD from Johns Hopkins University in 1990 in Mechanical Engineering. His Thesis and initial work was on underwater explosion bubble dynamics and ship and submarine whipping. After graduation he took
.[36], through an investigation into the roles of faculty mentors in an undergraduate researchexperience, grouped their mentoring styles as laissez-faire, democratic or autocratic, while Ralphand Walker [37] developed the adaptive mentoring model for undergraduates in engineering,nursing and education context.Mentoring is an essential component of the undergraduate research experience [31], [36], [38].Mentored undergraduate research has been identified as an high impact practice that enhancesteaching and learning in higher education [5]. It influences student outcomes [5] and leads totheir development of a professional identity [22], [27]. The extent of progress that undergraduateresearchers attain in the research process is largely influenced
International University Stephen is an Assistant Professor Engineering and Computing Education at Florida International University. He has a prior academic and professional background in engineering, having worked professionally as an acoustical engineer. He has taught a number of courses on design, sociotechnical contexts, education, and learning. He conducts research on equity and culture in engineering education and supports undergraduate and graduate student researchers through the Equity Research Group. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Student engagement with undergraduate teaching assistants (UTAs) in an introductory computer programming courseAbstractDespite
; ● practice telling their personal story about their GCSP experiences and leveraging GCSP accomplishments in job searches/graduate school applications; ● connect with the GCSP community; ● communicate GCSP progress to GCSP faculty and revise plan for remaining semesters; ● become more aware of GCSP graduation requirements and processes; ● make progress toward GCSP graduation requirements; ● become more aware of opportunities to engage in the ASU GCSP and international GCSP Network communities as an alumnus; and ● learn about opportunities to continue their work in their GCSP theme after graduation.Each of these two courses was designed to be assignment-based and does not include lecturevideos or materials. More
-year experiences [4], [5], usually in the form ofcourses which bring students together with faculty or staff on a regular and recurring basis, arehigh impact practices – that is, practices that “educational research suggests increased rates ofstudent retention and student engagement” [3]. The best of these first-year experiences focus ondeveloping habits of critical inquiry, writing, information literacy, and team-based learning [5].Surveying faculty, alumni, and employersThe Task Force surveyed and received responses from 133 faculty, 516 recent alumni, and 46employers to determine what technical proficiencies and professional proficiencies they believedwere most important for contemporary engineering graduates. While a detailed accounting of
. What is your definition of a successful interdisciplinary initiative? 3. What do you consider to be the key factors for success in a interdisciplinary initiative? Do these change over time (i.e., short, medium and long term). 4. How do you measure success within your institute, and what metrics do you use to track progress and evaluate the impact? 5. How important are industry partnerships and collaborations for the success of your institute? 6. What are the best practices for attracting research funding, specifically multidisciplinary grants? 7. How do you attract top talent, both internally and externally, to participate in the efforts of the multidisciplinary institute? 8. How do you develop and design
scholars, STEM, Graduate student poster, Lean principles.IntroductionLean management originated from the Japanese automobile industry in the early fifties of the20th century for improvement of production performance by removing unnecessary losses whichwere reported daily [1]. Two main pillars support the “Toyota Way”: Continuous Improvementand Respect for People. Toyota believes the success of their business is created by individualeffort and good teamwork [1]. After successful application in the production sector, otherindustries, including healthcare, construction, and service, found their benefit in applying Leanmanagement practices. Based on the success of Lean management practices in a number ofindustries, there is now interest in applying
education for student growth and societal advances. While directing the Micro Medical Device Engineering Research Labo- ratory (M.D. – ERL), she has managed, as PI or co-PI, ˜$13 million, yielding 93 research graduates*, a patent, and >100 publications [*12 PhDs (64% women, 18%UR)]. Her favorite quote is by Ray Mc- Dermott, ”Culture is not a past cause to a current self. Culture is the current challenge to possible future selves.”Sonia Goltz, Michigan Tech Sonia Goltz earned her PhD in industrial/organizational psychology at Purdue University and is the Mickus Endowed Faculty Fellow of Business Impact in the College of Business at Michigan Tech, where she has served as Co-PI on two NSF ADVANCE grants.andrew storer
State University of New YorkJacqueline Handley, Purdue University, West Lafayette Jacqueline Handley is a Visiting Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at Purdue. Her background is in Material Science and Engineering, with an emphasis on Biomaterials Design. She is interested in, broadly, how best bridge engineering prac ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Paper ID #41430Dr. A Lynn Stephens, The Concord Consortium Lynn Stephens is a research scientist with the Concord Consortium. Among her interests is investigating how students respond to innovative technologies and
activities in undergraduate and graduate courses.Summary and ImpactThere are no existing systems that meet the requirements of delivering an engaging learningexperience with Industry 4.0 technologies in the process industry at a scope to match PurdueUniversity’s new Smart Manufacturing curriculum. It is not practical for the industry to developan educational system, nor feasible for faculty to create a genuinely representative industrialsolution. Resource and knowledge requirements are too large. A collaborative effort betweenindustry and academia provides the best opportunity to meet the challenges of producing alearning environment capable of supporting the development of a technically skilled workforcecapable of efficiently implementing the
Program for transfer students aims to mitigate someof the challenges encountered by these students during their transition to the University ofArkansas. This paper explores the benefits gained as a result of participating in the piloted peermentoring program for transfer students and the impact this extension could have on participants’academic careers.MethodologyThe FEP Peer Mentoring Program, established in 2007, has played a key role in enhancing first-year engineering students' retention, preparing them for their sophomore year, and contributingto improved graduation rates. Each first-year student in the cohort is assigned a dedicated peermentor, that is an upper-class student. The program mandates weekly meetings with thesementors and is an
Research Assistant in Dr Colleen Josephson’s j-Lab in Smart Sensing. Matthew has mentored students throughout the last four years, serving roles as a tutor and student-instructor, finding that the best way to truly learn a concept is by teaching to others. Matthew is expected to graduate in the summer of 2024 after completing his senior thesis in the development of a solar-powered sensor utilizing Visible Light Communication (VLC).Mr. Khanh Tran, University of California, Santa Cruz Khanh Tran is a 3rd year Electrical Engineering undergraduate at the University of California, Santa Cruz. He is the vice president of the UCSC Rocket Team, serving as a technical lead, mentoring undergraduate students and designing rockets
) and a liberal arts college (Saint Mary’s College of California). Our experience shows thatthe removal of prerequisites, making the course readily available for those interested in pursuingCS, had no significant impact on student performance. Having minimal prerequisites has beneficialeffects in terms of diversifying the CS student body as well as enabling students to begin CScoursework early, often in the first semester, potentially impacting persistence, but also enablingstudents to decide, early, if CS is right for them. Programs should evaluate what prior knowledge isrequired to be successful in a CS program. The high success rate of students of various backgroundstaking CS certificates and pursuing graduate school also shows that
students, laying the groundwork for targeted interventions and curriculum enhancements.Moving forward, it would be valuable for future research to explore whether exposure to a well-designed semiconductor module influences the motivation of non-electrical engineering studentstowards semiconductors and how this exposure may impact their career intentions. Bycontinuing to investigate these areas, we can further refine educational strategies and developinitiatives to better engage students and prepare them for their involvement in the semiconductorindustry.In summary, this study contributes to the ongoing efforts to address workforce challenges in thesemiconductor industry by providing actionable insights and suggesting avenues for futureresearch and
and further strengthenedthrough reflective practices such as focus groups and/or concept maps [2], [3]. Finally, thestudents create value by designing a solution that considers needs of different populations thussupporting a better “global” solution to impact the most people.Many STEM international experiences align with the National Academy of Engineering (NAE)grand challenge themes which are shown to support connections between the experience,disciplinary knowledge, multicultural awareness, and EM [2-4]. This is particularly valuable forSTEM majors, as some research indicates they lag behind their non-STEM peers in multiculturalawareness. Initially, the NAE grand challenges consisted of fourteen goals for improving lifewhich have now been
, “A Practical Strategy for Training Graduate CS Teaching Assistants to Provide Effective Feedback,” in Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1, (Turku Finland), pp. 285–291, ACM, June 2023.[10] D. Mirza, P. T. Conrad, C. Lloyd, Z. Matni, and A. Gatin, “Undergraduate Teaching Assistants in Computer Science: A Systematic Literature Review,” in Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, (Toronto ON Canada), pp. 31–40, ACM, July 2019.[11] E. Patitsas and P. Belleville, “What can we learn from quantitative teaching assistant evaluations?,” in Proceedings of the Seventeenth Western Canadian Conference on Computing Education
education; infrastructure; sustainable design; and clean, renewable energy. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Work-In-Progress: Application of Employee Appraisal Forms to Facilitate Assessment of Student Outcomes in the Engineering Capstone CourseAbstractA critical component of educating civil engineering students and preparing graduates to enterprofessional practice is the engineering capstone course. This paper describes a work-in-progress to evaluate the use of employee appraisal forms to facilitate self-reflection andcounseling as a metacognitive strategy in engineering education. The authors have developed a“capstone support form” that mimics an employee evaluation report support form
engineering from the New York Institute of Technology, Old Westbury, NY, USA, in 2016, and the B.S. degree in intelligent transportation engineering from Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China, in 2014. He was Graduate Teaching Assistant for ECE1013 Foundations in ECE, ECE1022 Foundations in Design, ECE4713/6713 Computer Architecture, and ECE4753/6753 Introduction to Robotics at the undergraduate level and as a guest lecturer delivered graduate-level courses, ECE 8743 Advanced Robotics and ECE8833 Computational Intelligence. He received the ECE Best Graduate Researcher Award from the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Mississippi State University in 2023. He received the Research Travel Award
2023 and recently concludedin spring 2024 semester. The preliminary impact of the proposed approach is planned to beevaluated using a combination of qualitative and quantitative research methods, which couldinclude, pre- and post-surveys, interviews with students, faculty, sponsors, and Expo judges, aswell as scores provided by Expo judges. These results will help educators assess the benefits ofthe approach and develop a framework to integrate effective communication teaching andpractice skills within the curriculum for engineering design courses.1. Introduction1.1 BackgroundEngineering Capstone Design courses offer immersive experiential learning opportunities,including the opportunity to practice communication across a wide range of
of engineering education, particularly at the undergraduatelevel (Lee, 2009; Turns et al., 2004) – but what about at the doctoral level? 1 Across the U.S., mechanical engineering PhD programs prepare students for conductingindependent, innovative research in a variety of fundamental areas. PhDs are granted for thecreation of new knowledge within specific disciplines. Research within mechanical engineeringcan include mechanics, materials, thermal-fluid sciences, dynamics, design, and more. Scholarsagree that scholarship in these areas is critical for the advancement of engineering practice andpedagogy (Hubka & Eder, 2012). However