program offered acommunity of diverse, like-minded peers and faculty mentors for the students. The studentsmentioned that their peer group was almost entirely based on knowing others from PreF orPathways Fellows. They felt they had experienced much together socially and that they felt theywould always have someone to go to talk about academic struggles. The trip taken by the groupto Peru, discussed more below, also played an important factor in the retention of some of thestudents as engineers, because it shed light on the way engineers can positively affect acommunity in need.Academically, the PreF program hosted at Penn State the summer before the students’ freshmanyear had the most significant impact on them. They reported that this program
, hiring committees and faculty mentors follow this implicit model of astraightforward academic pathway to the detriment of a diverse professoriate. We address thisby presenting an alternate model that better reflects alternate pathways that currently exist andcould be better encouraged and supported through infrastructure and social means.A Traditional Model of a Faculty CareerA traditional engineering faculty career moves from high school, to a bachelors degree, to a PhDprogram and then into a tenure track position, followed by promotions to associate and fullprofessor and then eventually a happy retirement, perhaps with an emeritus position to maintainan active mind until death. This is shown in Figure 2. In attempting to follow the
engineering design alongside content physics.This study, part of a larger participant observation dissertation study of engineering integration inhigh-school physics, investigated how a physics teacher, “Leslie,” integrated engineering designinto a projectile motion lesson to address the question of how a physics teacher’s existingresources, or bits of knowledge and reasoning, help the teacher be productive in teachingengineering design in physics class. Some of Leslie’s inquiry facilitation commitments andhabits of mind such as requiring student reasoning, not giving away steps or answers, requiringgood data, giving up teacher authority, providing rich contexts, constructivist and socialconstructivist mindsets, and a growth model of learning
Paper ID #18607Embracing Ambiguity: A Framework for Promoting Iterative Design Think-ing Approaches in Engineering and Design CurriculaAnnie Abell, Ohio State University Annie Abell is an Assistant Professor of Practice at The Ohio State University in the Department of Me- chanical & Aerospace Engineering. Abell received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from Valparaiso University and a MFA in Design Research & Development from The Ohio State University with an em- phasis on Industrial Design. She teaches project-based, product design courses to senior-level and gradu- ate engineering students, as well as an
Paper ID #20451Tricks of the Trade: Navigating teaching opportunities in the research-basedengineering PhDAna Cristina Estrada, University of Virginia Ana Estrada is a PhD Candidate in Biomedical Engineering at the University of Virginia. She earned her undergraduate degree in Bioengineering from Rice University in 2013. She currently works on computa- tional modeling of post-myocardial infarction cardiac growth under the mentorship of Dr. Jeff Holmes.Dr. Lindsey Taylor Brinton, The Ohio State University Lindsey Brinton is a Postdoctoral Researcher at The Ohio State University in the laboratory of Dr. John Byrd. She earned
), 865-872.Menekse, M., Stump, G., Krause, S., and Chi, M. T. H., 2013, “Differentiated Overt LearningActivities for Effective Instruction in Engineering Classrooms,” Journal of EngineeringEducation. 102: 346-374.Shavelson, R.J., Ruiz-Primo, M.A., and Wiley, E.W., 2005, “Windows into the mind,” HigherEducation, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp 413–430.Smith, E.S. and Kosslyn, S.M., 2006, Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain; Chapter 5:Encoding and Retrieval from Long-Term Memory, Pearson, NY.Stewart, S. A., 2013, “The design, enactment, and impact of an inquiry-based undergraduateastronomy laboratory learning environment,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Syracuse University, ScienceTeaching - Dissertations. 25, http://surface.syr.edu/scied_etd/25.Volkmann, M. J., &
), engineering is now an integral part of K12 STEM education. Inparticular, engineering education is expected to “(1) focus on design and problem solving; (2)incorporate appropriate science, technology and mathematics (STEM) concepts; and (3)‘promote engineering habits of mind. (Sanders, 2009; NRC, 2012)” This has led to thedevelopment of new strategies and practices to integrate engineering curricula into traditionalK12 science classrooms (Berland). However, there are few studies that evaluate theeffectiveness of these innovative approaches to K12 STEM education to fully understand theirimpact on understanding of STEM concepts.In order to comply with the recent reform focused on integrating engineering into moretraditional science classrooms, teachers
Paper ID #18670Implementation of a First-Year Engineering Course and Active Learning Strate-gies at a University in IndiaDr. Walter McDonald, Virginia Tech Walter McDonald is an assistant professor at Marquette University in the Civil, Construction & Envi- ronmental Engineering department. He received a B.S. in civil engineering from Texas Tech University, a M.S. in civil engineering from Texas A&M University, and a Ph.D. in civil engineering from Vir- ginia Tech. He has extensive experience in urban stormwater management, hydrology, and engineering education research. He has developed and implemented
just the electronics education, but also theteam engineering experience, which proved beneficial as preparation for a career in engineering.Introduction The deficit of scientists and engineers compared with the rising need for experiencedprofessionals in all technical fields reveals a need for stimulating interest in science andengineering with America’s youth. Educational programs need to find new and better ways ofengaging young minds to foster a desire to explore technical subjects to prepare the nextgeneration of engineers. One approach to cultivate this desire is to design challenging hands-onprojects that require teamwork to accomplish the design goals. By emulating the process of anengineering manufacturing team, students can
Off a Learner’s Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning". Educ Psychol. 2003;38(1):5–13.4. Tofel-Grehl C, Feldon DF. "Cognitive Task Analysis–Based Training A Meta-Analysis of Studies". J Cogn Eng Decis Mak. 2013 Sep 1;7(3):293–304.5. Bianchini JA, Whitney DJ, Breton TD, Hilton-Brown BA. "Toward inclusive science education: University scientists’ views of students,instructional practices, and the nature of science". Sci Educ. 2002 Jan 1;86(1):42– 78.6. Powell H, Brandt-Pearce M, Williams R, Weikle R, Harriott L. "Incorporating Studio Techniques with a Breadth-First Approach in Electrical and Computer Engineering Education". In ASEE Conferences; 2016 [cited 2016 Nov 4]. Available from: http
global preparedness, which also varies by academicdiscipline; e.g., intercultural competence (international education researchers) versusmulticultural competence or intercultural maturity (diversity scholars). Engineering educationresearchers have focused on global competence. Defining and measuring global preparedness hasproven to be even more difficult.12Hunter13 working with an international panel of experts, developed a working definition ofglobal competence: “having an open mind while actively seeking to understand cultural normsand expectations of others, leveraging this gained knowledge to interact, communicate and workeffectively outside one’s environment.” Deardorff14 summarized intercultural competency as“the skills to listen, observe
. -Explore engineering tools including novel ones. -Develop insights into key engineering principles spanning all disciplines. -Build mindfulness and awareness of multiple programming environments and/or languages. -Develop confidence and experience in algorithmic problem solving. -Develop a knowledge of component integration to create functional subsystems. B. Develop data collection and analysis skills. -Build skills interfacing hardware and software. -Choose between and develop competence using multiple analysis platforms, such as Excel, Matlab, Arduino, etc. C. Team formation and collaboration -Explore
2017 Pacific Southwest SectionMeeting: Tempe, Arizona Apr 20 Paper ID #20683Upper Division Students Teaching Engineering Skills to Lower Division Stu-dents through Underwater RoboticsAndrew W Hostler, Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo Andrew Hostler is an Electrical Engineering student Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. He loves cables and connections of all sorts, be it ethernet, an ROV tether, or even a surfboard leash whenever he can. Most of his academic interest lies in embedded systems, hardware design, and systems engineering, especially for CNC machines and underwater
Paper ID #19928Transformation of an Introductory Computer Engineering Course UtilizingMicroprocessors and a Focus on Hardware LimitationsMr. Charles Carlson, Kansas State University Mr. Charles Carlson is a Graduate Teaching and Research Assistant in Electrical and Computer Engineer- ing at Kansas State University, and he is currently pursuing his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering. He works in the biomedical lab, and is a teaching assistant for ECE 241: Introduction to Computer Engineering. He is interested in engineering education, biotechnology, and bioinstrumentation.Dr. Dwight Day, Kansas State University Dwight Day
Paper ID #18644Skills and Knowledge Important in Bioprocessing Design - A Survey of Prac-ticing EngineersDr. Christine Kelly, Oregon State University Dr. Kelly earned her BS in Chemical Engineering from the University of Arizona and her PhD in Chem- ical Engineering from the University of Tennessee. She served as an Assistant Professor for 6 years at Syracuse University, and has been an Associate Professor at Oregon State University in the School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering since 2004, where she also served for three and half years as the Associate Dean for Academic and Student Affairs of the College
Paper ID #17801Implementation and Evaluation of an Engineering-Focused Outreach Pro-gram to Improve STEM Literacy (Evaluation)Dr. Kuldeep S. Rawat, Elizabeth City State University KULDEEP S. RAWAT is currently the Chair of Department of Technology and Director of Aviation Sci- ence program at Elizabeth City State University (ECSU).He has earned an M.S. in Computer Science, 2001, an M.S. in Computer Engineering, 2003; and, a Ph.D. in Computer Engineering, 2005, from the Center for Advanced Computer Studies (CACS) at University of Louisiana-Lafayette. He serves as the Site Director for NASA MUREP Aerospace Academy program at
studentsfeel intrinsically motivated to behave in proactive, open minded and collaborative manner, theexpected level of effort is high, and the expected level of persistence to arrive at an acceptablefinal design is high as well. Motivation of students needs to be across the curriculum [Sheppardet al, 2010], and it is important to consider how to best support early year engineering students’motivation and self-regulating learning [Nelson et al, 2015], due to the fact that in these years iswhen students are more likely to drop out [Gainen, 1995].There are many studies regarding the variety of factors, internal and external, that might affectmotivation in an individual. In fields closed to engineering and applicable to engineeringstudents, list goals
modulation and demodulation theory. It is specifically designed to stir theinterest of junior or senior level electronics minded electrical engineering students. In thisproject, a double sideband large carrier waveform is produced using a simple switchingmodulator circuit. The resulting amplitude modulation (AM) waveform is then demodulatedusing an envelope detector circuit. The proposed project requests that students perform a circuitsimulation as well as an actual circuit implementation. The circuit behavior is studied via bothanalysis using software tools and measurement using hardware components. The project furtherrequires that the electrical signals are visualized in both the time and frequency domain toenhance concept understanding. The paper
parts of the project,including sample chain of custody and were expected be productive, contribute significantly, andunderstand all aspects of analysis required for the project. The experimental design proposal wasthe starting point for experiments.Data Collection and Program EvaluationOnce experiments were underway, students needed to adjust and refine their procedures andhypotheses since instrumental analyses rarely worked the first time exactly as planned. Problemsoccurred and new questions arose. Students modified their experiments to solve the problemsand/or answer those questions. This process was repeated multiple times over the course of thePBL and semester and cemented the process of engineering design in the mind of the students.PBL
people in aperson's life such as parents. teachers, managers and coaches who can strengthen self-beliefs.The emotional and physiological state of a human mind also influences judgment of one's self-efficacy such as positive emotions that can increase self-confidence. 2 © American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 2017 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceRelevance of Self-efficacy to Engineering EducationSelf-efficacy is an important factor that contributes to students' academic achievements. Meta-analysis of self-efficacy studies has shown that the contribution of self-efficacy to studentacademic
Paper ID #19941Work in Progress: Quantification of Learning through Learning Statementsand Text MiningMr. Jackson Lyall Autrey, University of Oklahoma Jackson L. Autrey is a Master of Science student in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Ok- lahoma from Tulsa, Oklahoma. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Oklahoma and currently is involved with research into design-based engineering education. After completion of his Master’s degree, Jackson plans to pursue a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering.Jennifer M. Sieber, University of Oklahoma Jennifer M. Sieber recently graduated
., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 4. Brereton, M. (2004). Distributed cognition in engineering design: Negotiating between abstract and material representations Design representation (pp. 83-103): Springer 5. Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. International handbook of research on conceptual change, 61-82. 6. Chi, M. T. H. (2011). Theoretical perspectives
Paper ID #18567Evaluating the Potential of fNIRS Neuroimaging to Study Engineering Prob-lem Solving and DesignDr. Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech Jacob Grohs is an Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with Affiliate Faculty status in Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics and the Learning Sciences and Technologies at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics (BS, MS) and in Educational Psychology (MAEd, PhD).Dr. Tripp Shealy, Virginia Tech Tripp Shealy is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech and prin- cipal faculty in the Myers-Lawson School
students in this program, and what evidence, if any, do you have that these goals may have been met?5. Do you see a difference in their interest in STEM since the beginning of the year? girls versus boys?6. I wonder if you saw any kind of increase or less messing around and more doing the work.7. Can you give an example of something that comes to mind of what they are interested in?Appendix COpen-ended Survey Questions The Future 1. What do you want to be when you grow up? 2. Why do you want to be that when you grow up? 3. I think girls belong in engineering because__________________________________ 4. An example I know of how engineering makes the world a better place
Charlie by surprise: “When you first start, you think you can just go talk to whomever, which is the way it should be. [However] it was kind of eye-opening. You have to be a bit reserved sometimes as to who you talk to, about what.”This is an important change in outlook, and shows how an organization’s culture might influencethe perceptions and behaviours of early career engineers. As Charlie reflected: “It's very toughfor you to actually learn [if] you sit there and you're afraid to ask questions. Asking questions ishuge.” By putting doubt into his mind about which questions he could ask of whom caused himto reflect on whether his leadership behaviours were appropriate, arguably hindering hisdevelopment. On the other hand, it
Paper ID #18578Challenges and Benefits of Applied Experience as an Engineering Returnerin a Ph.D. ProgramMs. Erika Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a PhD candidate in Higher Education at the University of Michigan. She also earned a Master’s in Higher Education at Michigan and a Bachelor’s in Psychology and Sociology from Case Western Reserve University. Before pursuing a PhD, Erika had a dual appointment in UM’s College of Engineering working in student affairs and as a research associate. While grounded in the field of higher education, her research interests include engineering education
to validate the findings and to learn how minority stu-lished during the summer and carries over into the academic dents persist in pursuing an engineering or computer scienceyear. During the academic year, HOME Program stu- degree. As for data collected on leadership roles, awards re-dents participate in monthly gatherings in where they partici- ceived, employment, and enrollment in graduate programs,pate in various professional development workshops. HOME the authors propose that a unique senior exit survey be imple-Program students begin to develop relationships with like- mented. In addition, because of the manageable size of stu-minded individuals and these relationships are often main
Paper ID #20266MAKER: A Sound Introduction to Engineering Technology and Product De-velopmentProf. Mark Diller P.E., University of Dayton Mark Diller is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at the University of Dayton (UD). His areas of interest include mechanical design methodologies, 3D printing, and product development. Prior to teaching, he spent 18 years in industry leading the mechanical design of new medical products for companies such as Midmark Corporation and Battelle Memorial Institute. He has received eight patents for devices ranging from insulin injectors to procedure chairs. Diller earned
2017 ASEE Mid Atlantic SectionSpring Conference: Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland Apr 7 Paper ID #20818Improving fluid intelligence critical thinking via spatial reasoning ability incommunity college pre- engineering physics classesProf. Vazgen Shekoyan Dr. Vazgen Shekoyan is a professor of physics and his experiences include pedagogy, CubeSat, etc.Dr. sunil Dehipawala, Queensborough Community College Sunil Dehipawala received his B.S. degree from University of Peradeniya in Sri Lanka and Ph.D from City University of New York. Currently, he is working as a faculty member at Queensborough Community College of CUNY.Dr
Paper ID #19743Modular System of Networked Embedded Components for a First-YearMr. Michael Henry Schulz, The Ohio State University Michael H. Schulz is a teaching assistant with the Fundamentals of Engineering Honors program at The Ohio State University. He is currently the lead developer of the robot course software development team, of which he has been a member for three years. As a Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) student, he will graduate in May, 2017 with his B.S.C.S.E and a minor in Music, Media, and Enterprise.Mr. Evan J. Danish, The Ohio State University Evan J. Danish is a Computer Science and Engineering