andplanning stage of the project. This article in greater detail presents a clear framework for digital manufacturingstartups, focusing on the integration of Systems Engineering and Digital Transformation tools toboost product design and operational efficiency. Drawing from the Department of Defense'ssystems engineering plan and life cycle models from the Department of Transportation andINCOSE, it advocates for a combined use of the Vee model and Deloitte’s digital transformationapproach. The article addresses ethical considerations and industry standards, offering apractical, structured method for startups to navigate digital challenges, foster innovation, andachieve sustainable success. Potential obstacles like software interoperability and
course emphasizes the development of communication skills necessary for successful project delivery, including negotiation, conflict resolution, and client management. • Emphasis on Professionalism and Ethical Behavior: The course emphasizes the importance of professionalism and ethical behavior within the construction industry. Students are expected to adhere to industry standards and codes of conduct while navigating various project challenges. • Collaborative Learning Environment: The capstone course fosters a collaborative learning environment, with students working in teams to tackle real-world construction projects. This collaborative approach mirrors the dynamics of professional construction
give a professional presentation at the end of the course. 4. Learn about engineering ethics, continuing education, contemporary issues, global context, etc. 5. Learn about the importance of using computers and software in solving engineering problems. Course textbook: • Kirk D. Hagen, Introduction to Engineering Analysis, 4th Ed. Pearson. Course topics: Design Project: • What’s Mechanical Engineering? The student teams are assigned to predict the • Trigonometry Review and Units speed and distance traveled by a Hot Wheels toy • Vectors and Applications car along a defined track. Each team was • Forces and Applications
academia, as postdoctoral fellows, and as facultymembers at universities [6], [14]. Thus, training as well as personal mentoring experiencesshape the ways graduate students come to approach their mentoring practice [6].Other studies have noted some key challenges associated with graduate student mentoring [8],[15]. For one, graduate students struggle to balance the time commitments necessary for astructured training program with coursework and other academic program requirements. Further,we must consider the ethical concerns and risks associated with graduate students mentoringundergraduates due to the power differential that arises from the differences in their levels ofdevelopment and life experience. Despite these concerns, however, most
pm. The data collection and analysis for this research was consideredexempt by the school’s institutional review board, and all necessary protocols were followed forstudent data protections.Theoretical Framework: This activity is inspired by Nel Nodding’s theory of Ethics of Carewhere it is suggested that caring is a universal human attribute and caring is ethically basic tohumans [14]. This theory supports the message that educators are responsible for caring for theirstudents and believing in their success outside of the classroom [15]. The theory can beextended to say that the goal of an engineering educator is to ensure that engineering students areable to leave the degree program as not only successful engineers but also as successful
more common in educational institutions,carefully considering the ethical issues they can cause is imperative. Educators must ensure thatAI-driven assessments are fair and unbiased, aligning with their institution’s educational valuesand ethical standards. Evaluating data quality, algorithmic transparency, and bias reduction arecritical factors in improving ethical AI integration in EE education.The successful integration of AI in EE education requires comprehensive training of educators. Itis essential for educators to not only have AI literacy but also the skills and ability to utilize AItools effectively. Educators must be able to identify and select appropriate AI tools for varyingeducational objectives. They also need to guide students in
studyreviewed by the institution’s Research Ethics Board. This paper is part of a larger study on beingthing-focused versus people-focused within design education. The subject of this paper is on thereflections themselves, adopting the Aronson advice to “reflect on the process of teachingreflection” [12]. The two research questions for this paper are as follows: I. Do students perceive reflections as useful? II. Does the act of reflecting change throughout the design process?This is an exploratory examination of 1,278 reflections that were recorded during these two yearsof design projects.Background InformationLand Acknowledgement and Positionality StatementsIn order to understand the context in which this paper was written, we offer the
curriculumrequirements and address NCEES and ASCE curriculum criteria [10], [11]. At some universities,required curriculum topics are lumped together in a single course. For example, CEPC topicssuch as principles of sustainability, basic project management concepts, business, public policy,leadership, professional ethics, and professional licensure are frequently included in a seniorseminar or capstone design course [1]. Every civil engineering program has the discretion todetermine how it will meet the CEPC criteria, and embedding required curriculum topics in asingle course or several courses are two common methods. The following study investigateshow civil engineering programs are addressing the current ABET requirements in the 2023-24academic
30 Introductions, Motivations, Aspirations 30 Keynote: Integrating Electricity Access and Sustainable Business 75 Discussion Overview 15 Discussion #1a: Enhancing the Classroom Experience 45 Discussion #1b: Enhancing the Classroom Experience 60 Student Panel 30 Discussion #2a: Implementing Sustainable, Ethical, and Beneficial Projects 45 Discussion #2b: Implementing Sustainable, Ethical, and Beneficial Projects 45 Day 1 De-Brief
lead to the development of a degree program in AI. The project seeks toenhance Hispanic-Serving community college (HSCC) capacity to interest and train students inAI. This four-year project is a collaboration between a CC, a university, a non-profitorganization, industry partners, evaluators, and social scientists to understand how to expandHSCC computing pathways.2. Program Details The main objectives for the project include developing and implementing aninterdisciplinary AI certificate at the HSCC and, subsequently, creating courses that could beincorporated into a four-year degree at the HSCC. The interdisciplinary AI HSCC Certificate hasfour courses: AI Thinking, Applied AI in Business, AI & Ethics, and Machine
engineering. We are aware of our limita�ons and blind spots. Through our collabora�vedialogue and reflec�on, we remain open to challenging our assump�ons and biases. We strive toembrace our differences and are commited to conduc�ng research that is conscien�ous and relevant.Ethical Considera�onsEfforts were made to iden�fy and mi�gate publica�on bias by systema�cally searching mul�pledatabases and sources, including unpublished studies and grey literature. The review aimed to include adiverse range of studies, regardless of their outcomes, to minimize the impact of selec�ve repor�ng onthe overall findings. Transparency in repor�ng all relevant data, regardless of sta�s�cal significance, wasa guiding principle. Ethical considera�ons were not sta�c but
assessing theengineering and engineering technology programs look very similar. Both sets of criteria requirethe graduates to solve engineering problems using the knowledge of math, science, andengineering; solve engineering problems through design; conduct experiments to analyze andinterpret data to draw conclusions; consider ethical and professional responsibilities and publichealth and safety while assessing the impact of the proposed engineering solutions by situatingthem in the current local, societal, and global contexts; effectively communicate on technical andnon-technical environments; and contribute to teamwork [4], [5]. The only marked differencelies in the nature of problem solving or design that the graduates from the two degrees
Engineering,University of Connecticut)sophia.fenn@uconn.edu 1 ASEE 2024Abstract: How does a Human Rights framework in engineering curriculum affectundergraduate students’ attitudes and opinions of sustainability and human rights? Deepeninginequality worldwide, aggravated by climate injustices and the effects of the COVID-19pandemic, has increased engineering scholars’ awareness of the necessity of developing a newengineering pedagogy and corresponding ethical framework to prepare an engineeringworkforce that can perform successfully and efficiently in multicultural and globalized settings.The University of Connecticut (UConn) has pioneered in developing a curriculum
develop crucial leadership and communication skills as they spearhead efforts to raise awareness about cybersecurity in their communities.We created a Cybersecurity Ambassador Pledge, a testament to the core values that anchor theCybersecurity Ambassador Program. This pledge embodies the ethos of our mission – toeducate, protect, and inspire proactive digital citizenship. By adopting this pledge, ourambassadors affirm their dedication to upholding the highest digital safety and ethics standardsand serving as pillars of trust and knowledge within their communities.Cybersecurity Ambassador PledgeAs Cybersecurity Ambassadors, we commit to upholding the highest standards of ethical conductand promoting a culture of safety, respect, and inclusivity
. Thesediscussions were facilitated by educators uninvolved in the teaching of the cohort to maintainobjectivity. All participants were assured of anonymity to encourage candid feedback, and alldata were handled in compliance with ethical standards for educational research.Quantitative data from surveys are subjected to within-subject analysis using SPSS software. Bycomparing individual students' pre- and post-intervention responses, we can isolate thecurriculum's effect. This within-subject analysis, particularly for longitudinal data, is crucial foridentifying genuine progress and areas for improvement. Constant formative assessment andfeedback throughout project phases evaluate students' comprehension and application ofengineering design concepts. This
Transformational Resistance (Solórzano and Bernal,2001) • Classes that taught social justice theory Data Data which are identified by a student either: Barriers to students' resistance, such as: • Worrying about ethics in working in marginalized high degree of influence on career expectations (Bandura, 1997): Analysis
self-efficacy. As a result, elementary teachersmight then be better equipped to build students’ engineering identity and encourage them toconsider engineering as a potential career option.In addition to helping students develop engineering identities, exposure to engineering inelementary school is also beneficial for developing students’ engineering habits of mind(EHoM). EHoM are internalized dispositions and ways of thinking that engineers draw uponwhen confronted with problems [4] and include things such as optimism, persistence,collaboration, creativity, systems thinking, and attention to ethical considerations [5]. TheseEHoM can be beneficial to all students, regardless of career choice, but as with all habits,EHoM take time to develop. As
The ability to formulate well-defined questions, Domain Knowledge - Q1-Q6, Q19-Q20, creating a road map for successful project execution, Scientific Research Q34, Q42, Q47 while incorporating critical thinking, strategic Knowledge & Ethic Researching and 8 Knowledge. Planning Skill reasoning, and the ability to navigate, follow, and evaluate both the process and the outcome The capability to comprehend and utilize statistical Statistical Proficiency Q16, Q18, Q20-Q23, Analysis
outcomesresult from being involved out-of-classroom experiences, defined as Greek life (i.e. fraternitiesand sororities), community service, design teams, co-ops, and internships [4]. While students arepart of many clubs and organizations, experiencing out-of-classroom life, including service to thecommunity, at this university, they also tend take advantage of many of the employmentopportunities available. It is worth noting the benefits of a busy out-of-classroom lifestyle, canalso be a detriment if time-management skills are challenged. Capstone projects at this universityinvolve ethical engineering practices, including study of national organizations’ ethical codes ofconducts, help tie in-and out-of-classroom environments together.Passow and Passow
1. Spring 2020 sponsor survey results.Questions Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly AgreeThe students were well prepared academically. 2 4The student team communicated well (oral and written) with us during the course of this project 6The student team seemed very committed to this project with professional and ethical responsibility
a. Yes c. Agree b. No d. Strongly agree 49. I choose certain products for ethical or42. I frequently check that we are environmental reasons, even if they are a understanding each other correctly. bit more expensive. a. Strongly disagree a. Yes b. Disagree b. No c. Agree 50. I sign environmental or social petitions d. Strongly agree online.43. I listen carefully to what they say. a. Yes a. Strongly disagree
.[13] G. E. Walker, C. M. Golde, L. Jones, A. Conklin Bueschel, and P. Hutchings, Eds., The formation of scholars: rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century, 1st ed. in Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2008.[14] T. J. Yosso, “Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth,” Race Ethn. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 69–91, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1080/1361332052000341006.[15] M. Brabeck and K. Brabeck, “Feminist perspectives on research ethics,” in The Handbook of Social Research Ethics, 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2009, pp. 39–47. doi
increased over time, these groups remain underrepresentedin engineering relative to the overall workforce, and this underrepresentation increases as level ofeducation increases (i.e., engineers with doctoral degrees are a less racially and ethnically diversegroup than those with bachelor’s degrees [1]). Increasing the diversity of engineers is importantbecause more diverse teams can produce more creative, innovative, and effective solutions toproblems [6, 8]. In addition, the background characteristics of engineers may impact the types ofproblems they examine and the populations that benefit from their work (e.g., [5]). The bestengineers are adaptable team players who work to include a diversity of views while also attendingto ethical obligations
: ME manufacturing & supply chain (business); micro:bit processing signals from inputs & outputs (EngrTech) Goal: Develop a proposal for relocating microchip manufacturing to the US (business); Design lock to protect physical classified files (EngrTech) 9 Let the Chips Fall Where They May (7th – 10th, Geometry) ME Fuse: microchip manufacturing process Goal: Design an efficient layout for microchip dies on a silicon wafer 10 The Past, Present, and Future of Microelectronics (7th – 9th, Career Preparation) ME Fuse: ME products, careers, impact and importance Goal: Debate the use of ME from ethical, social, economic, and environmental perspectives 11 You Light Up
hands-on experience and opportunities for critical thinking, this projectequips them to become informed and responsible global citizens.To further enhance the impact of such projects, it is crucial to incorporate diverse perspectives,promote collaboration, and encourage students to communicate their findings effectively. Byemphasizing the importance of data ethics and responsible data use, we can empower future datascientists to contribute to a more equitable and sustainable world.Acknowledgements. I would like to express my gratitude to Megan J. Green and Victor H.Gonzalez for their efforts in organizing the 2023-2024 KU CTE Course InternationalizationSeminar. The seminar provided invaluable guidance and inspiration for this
[15]. First-year engineering students as the engineers-to-be should be empowered toform their own ethical views on how they would like to learn and do engineering with generativeAI. Therefore, tinkering-based learning environments have the potential to empower engineeringstudents with various existing perceptions to form new perceptions on using generative AI asengineers.This study describes an introductory engineering course re-designed for first-year engineeringstudents to tinker with generative AI. During the course, students were encouraged to useChatGPT to generate code to program robots and build websites for documentation. Throughthematic analysis of students' responses to the surveys before and after the course, we report onthe themes
undergraduateengineering student. They appear to develop a critical eye for the ethical dimensions of differentengineering professions and these are often in contrast and conflict with the values studentsconstruct while preparing to become an engineer.In this study, I aim to characterize the tensions engineering students experience when doingidentity work related to their future careers. The study is based on a thematic analysis of in-depthinterviews with 6 engineering students at a private university in New England. The interviewprotocol was developed to explore their identity work in engineering school. I seek to understandthe nature of engineering students’ identity work when they consider their career trajectories andoffer engineering schools recommendations
(Table 3) ABET4 Recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgements, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions inSignificant global, economic, environmental, and societal contextsLearning - ABET5 Function effectively on a team whose members togetherProfessional provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives ABET7 Acquire and apply new knowledge as needed, using appropriate learning strategies Table 3. “What” code levelsLevels
, 5. Network security, 6. Operating systems security, 7. Cloud security, 8. Software security, 9. Vulnerability analysis, 10. Penetration testing/ethical hacking, 11. Risk management, 12. Digital forensics, 13. Cybersecurity law and policy.BiometricsBiometrics information is playing a significant role in the field of cybersecurity. Three majorareas of biometric information processing in cybersecurity are listed below. 1. Access control: Biometric information is used to verify and authenticate any individual requesting access to confidential information and/or a secure facility. 2. Forensics: Biometric information can be analyzed to identify the person responsible for a malicious activity. 3. Biometric
, they do contextualize how these methodswere implemented previously.The first mini session explores a simple survey, distributed to students at the beginning of the fallsemester and again at the end of the spring semester. This survey's objective is to provide a high-level overview of how students develop as engineers over their first year. The focus of this minisession is on the process of survey design. Our survey synthesized a variety of existing andvalidated instruments to investigate a broad spectrum of topics: technical and sociotechnicalproficiencies, confidence in performing engineering work, STEM (Science, Technology,Engineering and Mathematics) identity and belongingness, teamwork and ethical competencies,and major and career planning