Asee peer logo

An Exploratory Analysis of an Electrical Engineering Technology Curriculum Using Bernstein’s Instructional Discourse

Download Paper |

Conference

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Portland, Oregon

Publication Date

June 23, 2024

Start Date

June 23, 2024

End Date

June 26, 2024

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Division Curriculum Development

Tagged Division

Engineering Technology Division (ETD)

Page Count

16

DOI

10.18260/1-2--46556

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/46556

Download Count

78

Paper Authors

biography

Ashish Agrawal Rochester Institute of Technology

visit author page

Ashish Agrawal (he/they) is an Assistant Professor in the College of Engineering Technology at Rochester Institute of Technology. His research interests include exploring the intricacies of STEM curricula, studying the influence of curricular features on students’ experiences, and designing equitable interventions and assessing their influence on student learning. He has taught several introductory engineering courses using student-centric approaches such as project-based learning and flipped classroom.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

This paper analyzes the undergraduate electrical engineering technology curriculum at an engineering technology college at a private R2 (based on Carnegie Classification) university in the USA. The purpose of this analysis is to identify key elements of the curriculum being studied including selection, sequencing, pacing of the course content, and evaluation criteria. Data for this work include the undergraduate plan of study, course outlines, and course syllabi for the required discipline-specific courses at the research site. Data analysis was guided by the theory of the pedagogic device developed by the British sociologist Basil Bernstein. Bernstein notes that disciplinary knowledge is recontextualized into the curriculum through the pedagogic discourse. The framing element of recontextualization focuses on the process through which the disciplinary knowledge is transformed into the disciplinary curriculum. Framing involves both regulative discourse (related to social order and relation between actors) and instructional discourse (related to the content and delivery). Data were analyzed using Bernstein’s concept of instructional discourse to highlight the selection, sequencing, and pacing of the course content, and its evaluation criteria in the curriculum under study. Findings highlight how curricular requirements are distributed across major vs. general education courses and required vs. elective courses; how major-specific required courses are sequenced and paced across semesters; and how course requirements expect students to demonstrate their learning. These exploratory findings point to the need for future studies to better understand how different aspects of the curriculum came into being and how they shape students’ learning experiences, academic success, and development as future professionals.

Agrawal, A. (2024, June), An Exploratory Analysis of an Electrical Engineering Technology Curriculum Using Bernstein’s Instructional Discourse Paper presented at 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Portland, Oregon. 10.18260/1-2--46556

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2024 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015