updated with each submitted documentation report.Thorough task plans are only required to be detailed for the few weeks after each documentsubmission since the project can take a different turn in that time. The team leader is responsiblefor preparing this section with the team’s input. Each successive report adds to the previousschedule. The schedule helps the team to think ahead, plan for the future, and it helps instructorsevaluate the direction the project is taking.(2) Communication: Each week, project teams are required to contact a representative from thePeruvian community with which they are working. A contact log is utilized to document theprocess. The contact log is a gold mine of information for future project teams since students
capabilities and interestsof the individual through a variety of methods, explaining the institutional goals, self-allocatingthose goals, and analyzing them in teams to identify projects. Eight individuals specificallymentioned the identification of projects as a benefit. The presentation material was liked by eightindividuals – most of them liked audio visual clips. Seven participants liked meditation andseven liked the delivery style of the workshop faculty. Four participants liked opportunities tomake presentations on their goal realization plans to other groups and four participants likedinteractive nature of the workshop. Some of them referred to increased engagement because ofthe interactive nature. Four participants liked the way workshop
rates greatly out of balance with natural flow regimes. Manyof these issues arise from a centralized approach to water resource management in urban areas,and a decreased reliance on large centralized water infrastructure projects may help decrease thefeedbacks which themselves may negatively impact our water supplies, or at least contribute tothe uncertainty of regional and global climate.Additionally, the Metropolitan Area Planning Commission has stated in its report on reuse in theBoston area that: “[A] deliberate and sustainable approach to water resources [must be taken] ifwe are to expand economic development and maintain our high quality of life... [One strategy is]reclamation and reuse of treated wastewater for non-potable uses such as
engineering Chemical engineering, IT Major of Indian Comp engineering Instrumentation Comp engineering Comp engineering students and control, comp engineering Online meeting Once None Once Once with India *The project had 7 Japanese students but only 3 travelled to India and fully participated in the program ** The project had 4 Japanese students but only 3 travelled to India and fully participated in the program2014 ProgramIn 2014, we planned two projects, ‘cultural portal’ for regional
mathematics and science. Project TESAL (Teachers Engaged in Science And Literacy)is a three year Math Science Partnership providing proximal context for developing this model.Project TESAL involved two weeks professional development each summer, two days eachsemester, and classroom observations/support. Teachers participated all three years and createdthen implemented and refined two lesson plans per year. Project TESAL involved 24participating teachers from four counties with 41% to 67% low-income students, less than 80%highly qualified mathematics or science teachers, and below average mathematics and sciencetest scores in a state well below the national average.Our model includes the following steps:Step 1: Identify mathematics and science
assess and address more successful curricular applications andteaching methods in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Departments.Currently, the senior-level course in Sustainability is required for Environmental Engineers andserves as an environmental elective for the majority of Civil Engineers. Environmental and Civilengineers at Florida Gulf Coast University share the same course template for the first two years.Performance in the senior level Sustainability in Engineering course varies even though thetopics reflect all varieties of infrastructure including energy efficiency, construction,transportation and water and waste infrastructure as well as project planning, life cycle analysesand economic topics. Students in both disciplines
290 video card orgreater. A photo after deconstruction of the wall between the classroom and the storage room canbe seen in Figure 1, and a full floor plan can be seen in Figure 2.Figure 1: The computer classroom right after the wall was removed. Figure 2: Floor Plan of the Creative SpaceWith the new space, sixty-one items were added to enrich the Tool Library. Twenty-nine werecables, adapters and chargers.The other thirty-two are all related to the three central themes of the creative space:Prototyping four types of 3-D scanners drawing tablets various measuring and hand tools needed to build items from scratchVirtual Reality Oculus Rift headset Movio BT-300 augmented reality headset leap motion
university-specific information reflecting the university’soverall vision and purpose ((Kibuuka, 2001), as cited in Creamer and Ghoston (2013)), and areoften developed through strategic planning in institutions. Thus, multiple research studies haveacknowledged mission statements to be important in describing institutions intent and goals(e.g.,Tierney, 1999; Young, 2001), and have argued that institutions need to be more strategic indeveloping statements which truly reflect their characteristics (e.g., Barnett (2003) in Kreber andMhina (2007)). In describing contradicting views on the significance of mission statementsKreber and Mhina (2007) cite Detomasi (1995) to describe how the latter suggest that missionstatements are “embarrassingly vague, and
utilitarian goals supportingcareer development and professionalism to more holistic goals of citizenship and broadliberal education. The goal of this work is to support ongoing conversations in highereducation about integrative and interdisciplinary education efforts by providing a sharedlanguage and classification system for understanding these efforts.Higher education wrestles with the balance of what Kwame Appiah has called its“utopian” and the “utilitarian” instincts: the “utopian” motivation to educate citizensbroadly, regardless of their future plans; and the “utilitarian” goal of burnishing theircredentials for the job market. Stewart-Gambino and Rossmann (2015), surveyingevidence of the effectiveness of integration efforts both historically
manufacturing equipment to safeguard the machine operator from moving robotic equipment traveling at above‐head level. The company provided the project specs. The students set to design and simulate cages design using SolidWorks CAD/CAM software. Students, the faculty advisor, and the graduate student visited the company during the project execution and had regular contact with the company advisor, during the semester, to seek feedback and test their designs. By the end of the project, the students were able to successfully design new cages to meet the company requirements. This paper describes the project in more detail, how team members worked together, the company’s feedback, guidance to students, and the company’s plans to implement the final
checks; helps toschedule and staff the build sessions; and plans and runs the capstone events. Makers receive anhonorarium, project materials, a capstone event budget, and a small travel stipend. Theseexpenses are partially funded by a small grant from the Parents Council and other donors.The first MIR was an amateur astronomer who led students in the fabrication of a telescope.Using this telescope, more than 500 students and community members have been able to viewthe moon, planets and stars during the capstone event as well as other events both off campusand at the planetarium on campus. The second MIR was a local engineering professional who ledworkshops in the fabrication of Arduino-based musical circuits. Students played their
positions. Project teams that moved forward were presented Figure 1. Our interdisciplinary approach with the opportunity to participate in a semester- long course designed to support them as theyworked through the iterations necessary to create a plan for market readiness and a full proposalapplication for funding consideration. Although participation in the course was not required inorder to submit a full proposal application, it was “strongly recommended,” and 95% of applicantschose to participate in the course. Applicant teams were given the option of having existingstudents working on their
the experienced during the process. process. Table 8: Rubric for LO5 Assessment (Manufacturing a Part in the AFL). Assessment: Meaningful Assessment Evaluation Hansen argues that for assessment to be meaningful, it must assess for understanding. Assessment for understanding “requires careful planning and a variety of assessment approaches” (Hansen, 2011, p. 94). Hansen lists 8 principles for meaningful assessment, again adapted from Wiggins (Wiggins, 1998). Below, Hansen’s 8 principles, applied mostly to LO5, use manufacturing processes to manufacture a part, show how meaningful assessment is accomplished in this course: 1. Use
be piloted with a handful of consortium members.As it was key to the VIP program from the beginning, the 2014 Consortium Planning Meetingparticipants articulated a key element for learning outcomes that focus on the development ofboth disciplinary and professional skills. In VIP teams, students apply skills from theirrespective disciplines to advance their projects, and at the same time, learn and applyprofessional skills in planning, teamwork, communication and conflict resolution. The large-scale, long-term projects mirror situations students will encounter in the workforce. As they joinlarge ongoing projects, they will be on-boarded by peers, but will also take responsibility fortheir own learning as they get up to speed. They will deal
the Initiating, Planning,Monitoring, Executing, and Closing Process Groups, with the primary focus on the PlanningProcesses and very minimal focus on the Closing Processes. The second half of the semester isdedicated to the same Economics topics covered in the original course, but are covered in a muchmore concise way.Guidelines for project acceptance criteria were formalized. Among other things, it wasdetermined that more emphasis was needed on developing industry-sponsored andmultidiscipline projects. In order to increase the availability of true multidiscipline projects, aformal agreement was formed with the Mechanical Engineering Senior Capstone program tocreate official multidiscipline teams in which both groups of students now report to
students, andexamples of classroom application as well as select student artifacts from this class are includedfor illustration. However, the instructional ideas presented are expected to be broadly applicable.JustificationCritical thinking is defined by characteristics such as “interpretation, analysis, evaluation,inference, explanation, and self-regulation” (Facione, 1990, 2011; Romkey & Cheng, 2009). Itis linked with responsible decision making and the level of intellectual curiosity and inquirynecessary to research societal challenges, solve complex problems, and discover new solutions(Facione, 1990; Schafersman, 1991). Effective critical thinking incorporates other higher-levelskills such as planning, written and verbal communication, and
undergraduate careers,2) students who were enrolled in traditional engineering majors before an industry experience(either engineering or education) convinced them to switch into the E+T (or just teaching)pathway, and 3) students who were enrolled in E+T but then left the program for a traditionalengineering major. After Table 4, short narrative statements for each of the interviewees provideadditional detail on how they tell the stories of their E+T involvement. Table 4. Summaries of spring and fall 2016 interview participant trajectories. Trajectory to E+T Status in E+T Plans Immediately Following Student Degree Pathway Program
identified in Lean Manufacturing. 18.4% What are the 5 major goals or principles of lean manufacturing? 15.4% What does 5S stand for? 11.2%In the first survey only a small number of students were able to apply actual lean manufacturingideals to their project. Most of the responses stated that teams could reduce material waste andscrap, design for easier manufacturing, or make cost effective decisions when procuringmaterials. Additional responses also included being more environmentally conscious, makinglightweight designs, and planning more effectively.Overall, the results from the second survey demonstrated that comprehension was muchimproved when
provide a description of ourmethods, which includes the site where the intervention was conducted, the design of theintervention, the data collection process, and the data analysis approach. Then, we present theresults of the intervention and provide a summary of the conclusions, implications, andrecommendations for our planned next steps in this research direction. The results of this studyare meant to inform a more thorough, mixed methods assessment of the simulation game’s nextimplementation, as well as to refine and iterate the game’s design.BackgroundContemporary engineering work primarily involved solving problems related to decision-makingamong alternatives, troubleshooting malfunctioning systems, and design, all of which requiresome level
learn about designing andbuilding a system from the ground up.Despite the different physics responsible for generating the light, both components of the datacollection module, the Cherenkov and charge detectors, use identical readout electronics. Studentsare responsible for all aspects of designing the readout electronics, including selecting the SiPMvendor and model, designing the SiPM biasing electronics, testing the SiPMs, designing theintegrator circuit, and implementing the SiPM bias and integrator designs on PCBs. Students arealso responsible for soldering surface mountcomponents onto these PCBs, designing andimplementing a test-plan, and debugging circuits. Forthe schematic circuits shown in Figure 3, the studentsconstruct the circuits
the students tocollaborate on their research experiments, help them learn how to participate in scientificquestioning, and provide them with a framework for their research experience. It also fostersstudent-student relationships as they work together to plan their presentations and regularly learnabout the group members’ research experiences. In one expanded weekly meeting, the REUgroup takes a half-day field trip to tour a local industry or governmental partner to focus oncareer options.At the conclusion of the 10-week research experience, the students present their researchfindings in a competitive formal poster session to research faculty, staff, and students at the RiceUniversity Summer Research Colloquium. Participants complete
future when hecontinues, “In view of that, I’ve been doing some internships. I’ve had a couple of internships. Ithink it’s enough to help me lecture, but to get out in that field more is going to be helpful.”Mark perceived he will not have enough industry experience, which led to him to plan a moreimmediate future goal in industry. He is able to directly find usefulness in his graduate-leveltasks to his future because he put a lot of thought into defining his future self. For this study, the five participants displayed different conceptualizations of task value.Note that each participant was not asked about how tasks directly relate to their defined futures,but rather how they valued the tasks they were performing. Mark is the only
exploited in the design and construction of authentic problem-based projects related to understand. Demonstrations and Evaluations: Under this focus area, performers were asked to develop a demonstration and test plan that allows for the evaluation of the methods, tools and materials being developed in Focus Areas 1, 2, and 3. The demonstrations were to be carried out at a defense training facility and/or a civilian training facility (e.g., vocational technical school) and/or a non-traditional learning environment (e.g., a Makerspace).CurriculumThe curriculum is divided into two main sections: 1) electromechanical systems-specific moduleswhich taught core concepts, and 2) quadcopter kit-specific modules which taught how to use
Paper ID #20321Use of Model-Based Definition to Support Learning of GD&T in a Manufac-turing Engineering CurriculumDr. Derek M. Yip-Hoi, Western Washington University Dr. Yip-Hoi received his Ph.D. from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Michigan in 1997. His dissertation research focused on developing Computer-Aided Process Planning methods and software tools to support automation of machining on Mill/Turn machining centers. Follow- ing his Ph.D., he worked for several years with the NSF Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Machining Systems at the University of Michigan. His work
. Students were tasked with developing two general designs of a multi-purpose event center, considering maximum capacity, ways for people and vehicles to enter and exit the property, and a layout of a general plan for the property. 2. Water runoff. Students created a 100-year flood plan in which they calculated the total runoff for a 100-year flood plan and designed two drainage systems, describing the advantages and disadvantages of each. 3. Structures. Students designed a simple 3D model of the building and produced elevation sketches for the front, side, and back of the building. Additionally, students were tasked with incorporating novel features to make the structure eco-friendly. 4
. Y-circles are engaging in a process of discovery and inquiry to bridge theengineering education research-to-practice gap. Research studies have been planned and will beconducted to answer questions to understand (1) how educators involved in X-teams use designthinking to create new pedagogical solutions; (2) how professional formation pedagogy in themiddle years affects student professional ECE identity development as design thinkers; (3) howECE students overcome barriers, make choices, and persist along their educational and careerpaths in the middle years; and (4) the effects of department structures, policies, and procedureson faculty attitudes, motivation and actions.This paper describes the project, efforts that led up to the project
/satisfactory or competent. The student performance isestimated in percentage for each performance indicator for any selected learning outcome.Figure 29 shows the assessment results for Design learning outcome where student performanceis depicted for each of the performance indicators associated with Design outcome. As seen, thestudents performed above 75% for all the performance indicators. It appears that studentperformance is the lowest in developing design strategy/planning/timeline along with designanalysis using governing equations. These performance indicators will need further attentions forfuture projects. Performance Indicators1) Design 2) Experimentation 3) Oral 4
Undergraduates (REU) programs shows that 91% of these research experiences are provided tojunior and senior students21. Developing successful research programs is particularly challengingin community colleges, most of which do not have on-going research programs. Establishingcollaborations between research universities and community colleges is key to engaging studentsin research early in college.This paper is a description of how a small engineering program in a Hispanic-Serving communitycollege has developed a research internship program that is specifically designed for communitycollege students. The paper will also highlight the results of the first year of implementation of theprogram and future plans for improvement.2. Overview of ASPIRES Program
prior to the implementation of the reform effort. Hence, it iscritical to develop and employ a change strategy that extends the typical “best practice” approachthat is typical in STEM reform efforts [15]. Rather, successful strategies of a comprehensivechange approach should be continual, coordinated, and focused, and should address bothchanging the pedagogical conceptions of key and varied stakeholders in a STEM instructionalsystem, as well as affording stakeholders with an iterative cycle of performance evaluation andcontinual feedback [16]. To address these issues, the ADI Workshop will develop and implementa comprehensive and expansive dissemination plan, derived from the Four Categories of ChangeStrategies model [17], and developed in an
antibiotic resistance as a significant global threat to health and development and have noted that we are on course to quickly enter a post-antibiotic era – an end to modern medicine. In recognition of this threat, the May 2015 World Health Assembly is expected to adopt a Global Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance (AMR). The conservation of current antibiotics is particularly important for combatting AMR. The development of new therapeutics is critical, but ultimately a temporary fix if the global community does not practice measures to conserve antibiotics. Antibiotic stewardship is challenging because it hinges on a variety of social and behavioral phenomena. Social science, while