: An Analysis of First Year Engineering StudentsAbstractThis work-in-progress research paper addresses issues related to the measurement of teameffectiveness. The study is motivated by recent changes in the ABET Criterion 3 accreditationguidelines, which state that students are mandated to demonstrate "an ability to functioneffectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative andinclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives." In addition to ABET,the use of teams in engineering education has become a widespread pedagogical tool to facilitatethe learning of technical content, as well as to prepare students for professional practice. Thus,having the ability to
; 3D modeling for construction planning; autonomous 3D model generation; and virtual reality.Dr. Eduardo Luis Isatto, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Eduardo Isatto is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) and a member of the Building Innovation Research Unit (NORIE) since 1997. He has a doctoral degree in Civil Engineering and a master’s degree in Industrial Engineering, from the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. His main research interests are connected with the application of lean production to the construction industry, comprehending research areas as BIM, project management, production systems design, procurement
conceptual under-standing of signals and systems. We briefly discuss conceptual understanding, one way to measure it, and previousresults in engineering-related disciplines. We then describe the Model of Educational Productivity as a frameworkfor studying student, instructional, and environmental factors that may influence conceptual understanding and dis-cuss results from previous studies that suggest additional influencing factors. Finally, we present our planned mixedmethods approach, consisting of an exploratory qualitative stage to identify possible factors that influence conceptualunderstanding, a quantitative analysis to measure understanding and these factors, and an explanatory qualitative phaseto add depth to our quantitative results. The
areas in ESM are very diverse, spanning from materials science to photonics, totheoretical mechanics, to neuroscience. This diversity is reflected in the student population thatapplies for admission into the ESM program. Many ESM students have a physics background,others have a more traditional engineering background, and, more recently, we have studentswith bioengineering or biology training. The first year for incoming graduate students is typicallydevoted to taking foundational subjects in their research area (the ESM qualifying exam has fivebroad areas of concentration: mechanics, materials, electromagnetics, nano- and bio-science, andneural engineering). Students preparing for the qualifying exam typically concentrate theiracademic plan to
Tech University. His technical research focuses on the intersection of soil-structure interaction and structural/geotechnical data. He encourages students pushing them toward self-directed learning through reading, and inspiring enthusiasm for the fields of structural and geotechnical engineering. Dr. Wood aims to recover the benefits of classical-model, literature-based learning in civil engineering education.Dr. William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel William J. Davis is D. Graham Copeland Professor of Civil Engineering and Dept. Head of Civil, Environ- mental and Construction Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. His academic experience includes transportation infrastructure planning and design, infrastructure
sought and attained viatheir participation. Additionally, the survey seeks to characterize their pre- and post-participation status with regards to several key metrics. Students will also be asked to indicate towhat extent they attributed the gains that they reported to program participation. Questions arealso planned regarding activities that students participated in and the outcomes achieved. Thisdata will be analyzed to identify contest and benefit correlation and demographic characteristicsand benefit correlation.The paper discusses the value of contest participation and then presents planned future work.This includes a larger scale study and longitudinal tracking of current participants.2. BackgroundCybersecurity competitions are a form of
Paper ID #31439Beyond the Capstone: National Competition and Community Engagement inATimber Bridge Senior ProjectDr. Bin (Brenda) Zhou P.E., Central Connecticut State University Dr. Zhou is an Associate professor in the Engineering Department at Central Connecticut State University (CCSU). Her research enthusiasm lies in quantitative analyses and modeling techniques, and her field of expertise is transportation planning and engineering. After joining CCSU, she expanded her work into STEM education, student outreach, and community engagement.Sylwia Tanski, Fuss & O’Neill, Inc. Sylwia is a Civil Engineer working in the
Entrepreneurship Program, which was started by an ad-hoc committee to provide theorganizational framework for building resources and infrastructure to promote entrepreneurialendeavors on campus and in the community. Co-chaired by the authors, the committee engagedwith campus and the regional business community to devise an action plan. The three pillars ofthe plan included a faculty entrepreneurial learning experience, developing a makerspace, andenhancing outreach to the public and private business community. The focus of this paper is onhow the makerspace was developed, challenges that were faced and overcome, initial results,lessons learned, and future direction.Makerspace DevelopmentThe overarching goal for the makerspace was to create and foster a
midterm exam, but with a suggestion thatthey may also give feedback about the media. Out of 61 open ended responses, sixteen containedfeedback about the two deployed media. Nine were outright positive, one was negative, while sixgave suggestions for improvement, listed in Table 7, together with our planned response. Four ofthem mentioned that being able to go at their own pace was a good point. This feedback is key toour original intention for the bigger project – to cater to students with different prior knowledge.The survey question and full text of the student feedback is in Appendix E. Attempt Rate of Lecture 9 vs Date 80% Typical Attempt Rate
. Pereira et al. [6] integrated UAVs and photogrammetry into a buildinginformation modeling (BIM) course, part of a construction engineering program, where studentspiloted UAVs and used photos to create three dimensional models of objects located indoors.Autodesk software was used in that project: Recap was used to generate the point cloud that wasthen imported into Revit [6]. Sharma and Hulsey [7] used a UAV for aerial photogrammetry asan exploratory task to investigate its potential in the university setting although it did not appearthat they were integrating UAVs into teaching. Other faculty reported plans to use UAVs formapping in a Construction Surveying course as part of a Civil and Construction EngineeringTechnology program [8]. Opfer and
analysis of the initial design and all subsequent designswith the manufacturing processes planned to create them.Problem Statement of the projectStudents were expected to develop a problem statement of their challenge to solve, and below is theproblem statement developed by our students for PSBIS.Based on recent studies, , a company is expected to spend about $1.4 million, on average, if an employeedies on the job [1], on top of the lowered morale, inefficiencies created by an inexperienced replacement orthe emotions experienced by the family all of which vary from case to case and are extremely difficult toprepare for. In 2016, 5,190 workers were killed on the job, of that 9.4% where struck by objects and 7.3%were caught in/between objects [2
education in Australia, enabling strategic andsustainable collaborations and partnerships, ventures and initiatives. This attitude of opportunity-seeking and openness allowed an equal space for any organisation, individual or university tocontribute. In the education sector, academics at many universities have worked very closely,generating enhanced learning opportunities for students and consortium funding. The collegialspirit fostered by EWB-A helped to create cohesion in a uniform development of HumEng andallowed continued and supported growth.NCP fundingNew Colombo Plan (NCP) Mobility Grant funding from the Australian Government is a keyenabler of overseas programs such as the Design Summits. The NCP supports Australianundergraduate students to
. The Series 8345 Prime-Focus be remotely controlled. Main Antenna The faculty underestimated the complexity and scope of the project and thought this could be accomplished within a year. This turned out not to be the case for this capstone. This year-long course begins in the summer semester, usually the research and design portion of the project, and finishes in the spring semester during the build and test portion of the project. A fall Co-op semester separates the two semesters. Typical capstone design projects require that the students research their project, plan and design an appropriate solution, and then in the spring semester build and refine the
trainees will register for this seminar course, which will be co-taught by the corefaculty and by guest speakers with expertise in different areas and which will be open to allSTEM graduate students. Training will be offered for the development of each skill both duringthe seminar and beyond (through practical training in subsequent years); however, beyond theseminar course trainees will only be required to participate in a manageable number of activitiesmost directly relevant to their individual development plan (vide infra).Completing the interdisciplinary and seminar courses described above will give students 6 of the12 credit hours needed to attain a topical certificate established through this NRT. Trainees willearn the other 6 credits by
Paper ID #29513Enhancing teamwork skills through an engineering service learningcollaborationDr. Pilar Pazos, Old Dominion University Pilar Pazos is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engi- neering at Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA. Her main areas of research interest are collabo- rative work-structures, virtual teams and team decision-making and performance.Mr. Francisco Cima, Old Dominion University Francisco Cima is a PhD student of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering at Old Dominion University. He obtained his Masters in Business Planning and Regional
Fall 2019, as well as performance inofferings of the same estimating course before OER implementation.BackgroundConstruction Management involves the study of courses in areas of practice such as plan readingand production, cost estimating, safety, scheduling, and project management. Students are oftenrequired to purchase textbooks, equipment, and software for these courses at great expense. Theauthor has previously considered [1] the high level of expenses for engineering and technology,in general, and Construction Management, in particular, and the high rate of increase in the costof these over time through a number of sources. These included costs of over $300 for individualtextbooks [2] and over $1200 a year [3], and a rate of increase of
and a tool to defineacademic curricula due to the lack of a comprehensive definition of it. The model provides acomprehensive overview of educational environments and considers not only the internal factorsthat influence a particular curriculum or program, but also several external stakeholders that havean impact on them. This model has been used previously in research about courses, degreeprograms, colleges and even institutions as a whole [16]–[22]. The academic plan modelrecognizes the importance of multiple internal and external key stakeholders and their rolesinfluencing decision-making processes. The academic plan model provides a holistic approach tohow we analyze students’ perceptions of one of the most important external influences
responsiblefor conducting selection of scholarship recipients, ensuring that recipients understood theirobligations to the program, assigning mentors, meeting with students regularly, and monitoringtheir progress. LEAP Scholar Selection CriteriaStudents were selected based on the following criteria: 1) U.S. Citizen or Permanent Resident. 2) Must be admitted in a four-year Computer Science program at UVU or a two-year Pre- Engineering program at UVU with the plan to transfer into an Engineering four-year program. 3) Demonstration of financial need in accordance with the U.S. Department of Education rules for Federal financial aid. 4) Full-time student majoring in Computer Science, Computer Engineering, Software
for Engineering Education, 2020 Global Business Management Education to Industry Professionals: A Decade of Experiences from a Professional Graduate ProgramAbstract This paper outlines ten years of experience in designing, teaching, planning, andexecuting a graduate class on global distribution for working professionals in a professionalgraduate program. The course involves a one-week international trip. The paper outlines theimmersive learning experiences such as (1) applied content (2) live case studies with companiesin a foreign location (3) one-week trip to a foreign location (4) executive panel discussions, and(5) industry experiences through videos, interviews, and podcasts
needs within realistic constraints 5. Describe introductory concepts of disability studies and how they relate to engineering practice 6. Engage in and evaluate the co‐design process with community members with disabilities 7. Identify the principles of inclusive design and how they benefit diverse communities 8. Devise an action plan to promote inclusivity and accessibility in engineering practiceCourse topics include: (1) disability studies, (2) universal design, (3) participatory design, (4) thehuman centered design process, and (5) prototyping. (See Table I describing course content andsyllabus in Appendix A.) Table I. HuskyADAPT Accessible Design Course Topics and Assignments Topic
areprovided novel lesson plans and materials for two hands-on activities that can be used in their K-12 classrooms. Graduate students from eleven engineering and science departments collaborate todevelop these materials and ensure they meet the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS).Teachers earn continuing education credits for attending. REACT is an opportunity not only forteachers to learn about the cutting-edge research happening at University of Michigan, but alsoserves as a professional development tool for graduate students, giving them the opportunity towork on science communication skills as well as participate in curricula development. Theprogram has also developed a unique funding model, where university professors and departmentssponsor
Sample quotes from “If you plan to start or expand your mindfulness practice, what ways will you use to do so?” 1: Not at 1 2% I don’t have any plans to start mindfulness all 2 9 16% Breathing, going on walks, taking one thing at a time, etc. Utilize awareness more often Sitting down and observing closing my eyes Exercise more 3 25 43% I’ll probably start doing the breathing exercises we did in class because they helped me clear my mind Tell my roommates
Paper ID #30835Student-Developed Learning Objectives: A Form of Assessment to EnableProfessional GrowthMs. Lauren Singelmann, North Dakota State University Lauren Singelmann is a Masters Student in Electrical and Computer Engineering at North Dakota State University. Her research interests are innovation-based-learning, educational data mining, and K-12 Out- reach. She works for the NDSU College of Engineering as the K-12 Outreach Coordinator where she plans and organizes outreach activities and camps for students in the Fargo-Moorhead area.Mr. Enrique Alvarez Vazquez, North Dakota State University Experienced Systems
statements from the students about thelectures they attended and the assignments they completed. The value of these learning statementsis anchored in that instructors and teaching assistants can analyze the learning statements andunderstand what students have individually and collectively learned and whether the outcome isin keeping with what the instructors planned. One option to do this is to have instructors andteaching assistants manually read the learning statements and assess student learning. The keydisadvantage of this option is that manually dealing with a huge amount of text-based data (12,000learning statements per semester) is labor-intensive and time-consuming. We did this for the firsttwo years and found that maintaining consistency in
in astudy by Anagnos, Lyman-Holt, Marin-Artieda and Momsen [15]. The study was grounded inthe premise that ambassadors would benefit from self-efficacy for outreach and its associatedcomponents, including engineering knowledge and professional communication skills. Most ofthe 51 ambassadors responded that they perceived gains in skills to motivate others, resolveinterpersonal conflicts, adjust when things were not going to plan, manage time, engage inteamwork, explain technical concepts, and speak in front of an audience. Ambassadors’confidence in their abilities was also high as a result of participating in outreach. Longer time inthe ambassador program and more senior roles were associated with high rates of studentagreement that they had
to re-turn in a part-time capacity as ‘Master Teachers’. A maximum of five participants were slotted intothe program to return as Master Teachers; 4 teachers took advantage of this opportunity in 2017and 4 again in 2018. The primary role of the Master Teachers was to attend and lead collaborationmeetings with new participants, typically held once per week. Master Teachers also provided sup-port to new teachers in the development of their final deliverables (lesson or unit plans) that werepresented at the showcase of lessons and developed (and presented) a new lesson or unit plan fortheir own classrooms. The 2017 and 2018 summer trainings also hosted science curriculum special-ists from JeffCo and Denver Public Schools. The inclusion of a
development goals Plan (UN, 2018), The Santander(Colombia) Development Action Plan (Plan de Desarrollo Departamental 2016) and the Future ofJobs (World Economic Forum 2016). Also, various interviews with: government advisors, regionalentrepreneurs, and the Executive Director of the Cluster of Information Technology Industries ofSantander – Colombia, were considered as a reference in order to identify the challenge´s subject.Main findings related to work with experts is shown in Table 2. Interviews were held on a semi-struc-tured basis, and they lasted 1 hour on average. The questions included: (a) In the current context,what is your opinion regarding the competences of young engineers? Do they match the marketneeds? (b) As things are now, do you
student’s time as an undergraduate student. But the cost for a student toattend Tapia is high. In 2020, the student registration fee alone will be $500.Responses to post surveys show that Tapia is at least as effective as GHC in achieving its goalsfor students. Students consistently report being inspired to complete degrees in computing atrates of over 80%, and of having made new connections and learned about new opportunities incomputing at rates of over 90% [24].4 The CDC merged with the CMD-IT in 2016.5 Two cities have hosted Tapia twice—Atlanta (2003, 2017) and Orlando (2007, 2018); Houston, thelocation of Tapia 2001, will host it for the second time in 2020.6 Charts in this figure are from the Tapia 2019 Academic Plan II Benefits Brochure
conceptual knowledge and skills required to solve suchproblems, the lab portion of AGEN 352 was redesigned by incorporating PBL-basedcollaborative activities. The implemented changes were expected to achieve the followingoutcomes required by ABET, which are especially challenging to achieve in a traditional lecture-based learning environment: • An ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives • An ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions • An ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as
education to enhance curricula andpedagogy. The fourth and final workshop was held at Lawrence Technological University inSouthfield, Michigan, September 28-29, 2019. This workshop differed from the first three in thatit was a stand-alone event, in contrast to the conference affiliations of the other workshops,allowing more time to consider the topics in greater depth.At the conclusion of each workshop, participants completed an online survey intended to assesstheir expectations of, and experiences in, the workshop, as well as their plans for implementingMRE in their respective institutions. The final workshop produced another outcome – a set of draftinventories and commitments by the working groups to refine and publish their findings [10-14].4