design office, andthe other student assumes the role of a superintendent at a construction site. The teams competeagainst each other in an attempt to verbally communicate information. Specifically, the“designer” must communicate the floor plan drawing shown in the bottom of Figure 1 to the“superintendent,” relying only on telephone (i. e., verbal) communication. (Figure 2.) 390Figure 1. Digital model of building (top); floor plan of building (bottom). Not to scale.Figure 2. Architecture student teams in the process of playing the communication game: senders(left) and receivers (right).Game resultsTable 1 shows a sample of the results or the outcomes of the communicated information.Although all teams
?," Small Business Economics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 41-58, 2006.[20] N. Taylor and L. Clarke, "Everybody’s hacking: participation and the mainstreaming of hackathons," in CHI 2018, 2018: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1-2.[21] P. McGowan and S. Cooper, "Promoting Technology-Based Enterprise in Higher Education: The Role of Business Plan Competitions," Industry and Higher Education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 29-36, 2008, doi: 10.5367/000000008783876968.[22] J. Zimmerman, "Using business plans for teaching entrepreneurship," American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 727-742, 2012, doi: 10.19030/ajbe.v5i6.7395.[23] C. W. Mui Yu, "Capacity building to advance entrepreneurship education
summative assessment.Initial course delivery offered an opportunity to refine the course design throughout the semesterbased on instructor observations, formal and informal student feedback, and changingenvironmental conditions. End of course surveys and assessment data were used to evaluateinstructional effectiveness and inform future iterations of the course design.Introduction & Instructional ContextAfter the initial emergency shift to remote learning in March 2020 due to the global Covid-19pandemic, careful preparation for future semesters of continued uncertainty and disruptionbecame a necessity. Beginning in Summer 2020, planning for the Fall 2020 semester began inearnest. An undergraduate course, Engineering Management 2110 – Managing
courses on various skills within the major is not possible due to unit restrictions.Thus, our program evaluates how to imbed interpersonal and professional skills instructionthroughout the core of the Civil Engineering and Construction Engineering and Managementcurricula.This pilot study evaluates students’ ability to function effectively on a team where membersprovide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks,and meet objectives (ABET Student Outcome No. 5) [2]. Teamwork is a topic that falls under abroader category of professional skills [4] taught to engineering students. In fact, Kalturel-Konaket al. [4] assessed professional skills as ethics, teamwork, global awareness, and creative
responsibilities, family obligations, etc…) withinthe course schedule [2] or have social interaction preferences [3]. However, challenges do existfrom both the student and instructor perspectives. One study highlighted the online students’frustration due to lack of instruction interaction, inability to chat with peers to clear up questions,and difficult in paying attention online versus in-person [4]. Another study noted the high quantityof planning and preparation required of faculty teaching in a HyFlex mode in order for the learningto be effective [5]; since faculty cannot predict how many students will participate in each formatfor each class session, they may need to make changes on the fly to accommodate group work, forexample.Virtual Synchronous
intent that these changes will have impacts on improving the culture of the departmentand the educational experience for students. This department is planning on using Scrum as theirprimary mechanism for departmental operations.ScrumScrum is an agile methodology that encourages the collaboration among members of a ScrumTeam in the incremental development of a product [18]. The development emphasized achievinga minimal viable product. This product is developed over a series of Sprints (timeboxes). Sprintscan last one to four weeks long. During a Sprint the Scrum Teams works on items from a productbacklog that lead to the release of the product. The product backlog is generated by productowner. Each backlog item is prioritized for its value and
, clients, and other stakeholders. The in-person event was modified by requiring teams topre-record their poster presentations, then followed up with a live, virtual session for furtherdiscussion. An unanticipated benefit of this change was that many project clients who arenormally scattered across the globe could view the pre-recorded presentations and attend the live,virtual discussion session. Students were able to directly interact with their clients, when intypical years, that would not have been feasible.Additionally, as project materials were abandoned on campus as students retreated, many teamsno longer had the necessary resources to continue with their earlier plans. Instructors helpedguide teams to work on other significant final
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at California State University, Fullerton (CSUF). Her research interests include traffic flow modeling, statistical methods for transportation data analysis, and sustainable transportation planning. Her work has been published in several peer-reviewed journal publications and conference papers, and presented at numerous academic conferences. Dr. Reina has also served as an advisor of undergraduate research and applied projects such as those conducted by the student chapter of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) and awardees of the Dwight David Eisenhower Transportation Fellowship. American c Society
arenot location and schedule bound. The extended Q&A period allowed a due diligence phase oftenutilized in business plan competitions and helped mimic how investors might make investmentdecisions [2]. The overall scores were lower than in previous years, indicating a more thoroughevaluation. Other benefits included the elimination of order bias [3] and less stress for thestudents.Based on our experiences from last year and feedback from our judging panel, we will beimplementing this new format to the competition moving forward. These changes enable betterevaluation of the project teams and ensure that the best ideas are evaluated and win thecompetition. This paper provides an in-depth understanding of how we decided to add a due-diligence
than what is required to sustain economic need (President's Council of Advisors onScience and Technology Policy Report, PCAST, 2012). Poor quality introductory courses are citedas reasons why STEM students do not persist in their planned majors (O'Neal et al., 2007; PCAST,2012). Graduate TAs teach many of these courses, and although they are not cited as a majorreason for STEM majors leaving, can certainly contribute to overall success or failure of a course(O'Neal et al., 2007). TAs may not have prior teaching experience and/or any training to teach, as graduateprograms typically focus largely on research training. Furthermore, they may not haveopportunities for teaching professional development. This can lead to challenges, not only
projects, campus scavengerhunts, themed hands on activities, and strategies for academic and career planning will be used tohighlight student engagement and course improvements.Summary of Related Literature A consistent factor that influences learning is the powerful impact of engagement,defined as the level at which students invest physical, psychological, emotional, and intellectualenergy in educationally related activities [1]. Successful engagement early in a student’s courseof study is critical as early engagement is sometimes insufficient at large universities, wherestudents do not normally feel “belonged” early due to large class sizes or lack of interactionamong students for a variety of reasons [2]. FYS classes have a statistically
reduce the number of exams in the semester, and could be completed remotely.This Work-In-Progress paper will discuss the efforts to implement this project in a remote/hybridinstruction fall semester, including comparison between student performance on the exams andprojects, and feedback from students.BackgroundA transition to online learning driven by the COVID-19 pandemic in the spring 2020 semester,continued through an entirely online semester in the summer, provided some preparation forhybrid teaching in fall 2020. Exams, the likely planned means of assessment and which hadoriginally been planned and scheduled to be held in-class, were now taken online. While thiscould require some adjustment and planning, the impact could potentially be
less important than the students experiencelearning how to use the presented technologies to implement their design. Working through arealistic design process prepares students for future professional work on the next generation ofIoT products, one of our desired goals.We encountered many external challenges throughout the development of this course, including apandemic, that drastically changed many of our original plans. This paper documents ourexperiences, shares the positive results we achieved and outlines future plans for courseimprovements.Motivations for the CourseThe conceptual framework for the course originated through conversations with industry partnerswho were concerned with the technical know-how of recent college graduates
develop a plan tomitigate the risk. Asking the teams for pitfalls in several deliverables was another way to give usvisibility to challenges and offer feedback throughout the project. Note that asking for challengeswas a theme throughout the deliverables, but we won’t explicitly mention each time it was askedin the remaining short descriptions.PR2: Conceptual Design Candidates – Due week 7At this point in the project, we asked each team to identify which design or pair of designs theyare continuing to pursue, along with rationale for both the continuation and abandonment ofother options. In the lecture portion of the class, we discussed techniques for effective decisionmaking and design narrowing. To reinforce the value of these techniques, we
Procedure (ELFP)The class stopped short of seismic analysis beyond the ELFP, as the topics were deemed tooadvanced for this student level.Class exercisesAs mentioned, an incorporation of active learning exercises was a major pedagogical strategy inthe development of the course. This paired with force diagrams and images of real-lifestructural scenarios helped make the connections between loading principles and theirapplications. These exercises are described in Table V. Table IV: Class Exercises“Smarties” ExerciseThe goal of this exercise was to demonstrate the concept of load transfer and teach tributarywidth. Students are given a floor plan printed on a piece of paper with a grid imposed on topat scaled 1’x1
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Dr. Gambatese’s expertise is in the broad areas of construction engineering and management, and structural engineering. He has taught many courses over his career on a variety of subjects including: construction safety, contracts and specifications, planning and scheduling, structural analysis and design, temporary construction structures, construction site systems engineering, and engineering economics. He has performed research and published numer- ous articles on construction worker safety, work zone design and safety, prevention through design, risk management, sustainability, constructability, innovation, and construction contracting. He is a licensed Professional Civil Engineer in
critical success factorin engineering. It is taught by an engineering professor. Engineering and scientific know-how aregiven added power when communicated with clarity and simplicity in presentations that arethoughtfully planned and effectively executed. Each student makes a large number of shortpresentations to sharpen their skills and increase their confidence. Students grapple withcapturing the essence of complex technical subjects and expressing it through key words, dataand images. Students develop a wide range of skills: visual representation of data, systems andmechanisms; structuring and sequencing a talk; delivering speeches with vivid voice and bodylanguage; and finally, skills in connecting with an audience and achieving the desired
spectrum concepts to undergraduate engineeringstudents in courses such as those mentioned above who are unable to, or had not planned to takea full course in RF / microwave engineering or wireless systems and networks.Over a decade ago Katz and Flynn developed and used tutorials [2] based on the GNU Radioopen-source software-defined radio (SDR) toolkit [3] and GNU Radio Companion (GRC) [4] toteach and reinforce introductory material on communication systems including analogmodulation and demodulation. More recently, many SDR-based labs have been developed andmade available by the GNU Radio community [5] and by others, e.g. [6]. These include tutorialsfocused on use of specific software or hardware as well as some more general tutorials.Reference
develop and establish mentoring plans without any formal training in how to beeffective mentors. Since the start of this initiative, over 300 faculty, postdoctoral associates and graduatestudents have been trained on promising practices, strategies, and tools to enhance their research mentoringexperiences. In addition to formal mentor training, opportunities to foster a community of practice withcurrent mentors and past mentor training participants (sage mentors) were provided. During theseinteractions, promising mentoring practices were shared to benefit the mentors and the different mentoringpopulations that the EFRI-REMs serve. The community of practice connected a diverse group of institutionsand faculty to help the EFRI-REM community in its
which through brief lectures, extensive experimental exercises, and two major hands-on team projects, a number of the most significant concepts from various areas of engineering, in general, and from aerospace sciences/engineering and aviation in particular were introduced and explained. Also, the plan was for the students to have an opportunity to tour several MSU engineering laboratories and Mankato Airport, fly in a flight simulator and in an airplane. A series of guest speakers, one each day, involving a number of administrators and faculty members from the MNCEME and MSU have also been contacted and agreed to address the Camp participants during lunch. A detailed plan for the Pilot Program Camp is given in
other, likely better, approaches with the benefit of more advanced planning. In thefuture we will plan from the beginning to use electronic display materials both for the efficienciesgained and to avoid the possibility of a sudden change in plans if a virtual review is required.We found that photographs of tri-fold project boards were adequate for evaluator review. We laidthe boards flat on the floor in a well-lit classroom and took pictures, using a mobile scanning app(such as Microsoft Office Lens 5) to correct for angle distortion.We organized our display material documents in a directory structure of folders and shared it withour ABET evaluation team using cloud storage (in our case OneDrive). Our EAC evaluation teamrequired transcripts to
continue his studies in dynamic control systems and data analytics.Mr. Tristan Brouwer, University of the Incarnate Word Tristan Brouwer is an undergrad at the University of the Incantate Word (UIW) studying Mechanical Engineering, graduating in December 2020. He has done internships with Precision Drilling Cooperation where he learnt about rig layouts as well as how to use Inventor. He has been a part of the UIW Men’s soccer team throughout his time there, in addition he is a member of the honors program. He is planning to continue his education at UIW pursuing a master’s in Finance.Mr. Nick Julian Castillo IV,Dr. Okan Caglayan, University of the Incarnate Word Okan Caglayan is an associate professor in the Department of
to study various factors that impactstudent academic performance and learning to ensure that the course is fulfilling itseducational responsibilities. A key component of this evaluative process has been thedevelopment and implementation of a multi-faceted assessment plan. The paper providesan exploratory analysis of the most recent assessment instruments used to evaluate eachstudent and team in the class from fall 2006, spring 2007, and fall 2007. Using multiple-regression modeling, we examine the predictive effectiveness of intermediate assessmenttools (e.g. midterms, project proposals) in terms of summative course outcomes. Whileassessment tools in fall 2006 and fall 2007 generally functioned as appropriate predictors,the specific
Summer 2021 program in an online or hybrid environment, we will summarizelessons learned from the 2020 experience.Cohort 1 Student OutcomesEighteen rising sophomores participated in the first cohort of the Engineering Fast-ForwardProgram in 2017. All eighteen students have been retained in a STEM degree program (100%STEM retention). Fifteen of the eighteen graduated in Spring 2017, fourteen with undergraduateengineering degrees and one with a mathematics degree (83% 4-yr graduation). The threeremaining Cohort 1 students are on-track to complete their degrees during the next year, two inengineering and one in biology. Both engineering majors have intentionally chosen a five-yeardegree plan to enrich their education: one is in the process of
theTechnical Manager, or TM). The project begins with a kickoff meeting between the team, TM,and Client to introduce and familiarize all parties with the project requirements. Following thekick-off meeting, the team prepares a Project Definition document which acts as a record of theagreed upon scope and requirements. Next, the team enters the conceptual design phase, whichculminates in an external presentation to the sponsor in a Preliminary Design Review (PDR).The outcome of the PDR is the Client’s selection of a single conceptual design option. At thispoint, the team has an adequate understanding of their project to proceed with developing aProject Plan consisting of a work breakdown structure and a Gantt chart. The remainder of thefirst semester
competencies and interest, 3)future plans, and 4) camp satisfaction. Listed in Table 2, these subscales were either developedby the research team to detect specific constructs (e.g., confidence describing industries), oradopted for use because they had prior evidence of validity and reliability (e.g., STEMSemantics Survey). All subscales were tested and found to be reliable and sufficient to cover theconstructs under study. This instrument was administered to all cadets prior to and uponcompletion of their JROTC camp experience (Academy or JCLC camp) as well as at the end oftheir spring semester of their senior year of high school. The instrument also includes open-ended response questions to help better understand the student experience in his/her
of the module was to help undergraduate students learncritical skills identified by stakeholders, such as sterile technique, cell culture, biomaterialdesign, experimental planning, and quantitative analyses. Further, the module sought to aidstudents in the development of important professional skills, such as problem-solving, teamwork,and communication. During module design and implementation, a variety of SCL teachingstrategies (Table 1) were applied to achieve the learning outcomes within the short timeframe ofthe module (Figure 1). A detailed description of implementation follows below.Table 1. Summary of SCL techniques and their methods of implementation. SCL Technique Interventions Situated
dataanalysis and results, the discussion of the results and conclusions and future work.Related workIn the field of Education, ICTs have enjoyed a sustained increase in their implementation andusage in areas as diverse as evaluation, planning, teaching, and educational management. Furtheranalysis into these facts, made by Llorente and Marín [7], have led them to state that the rate ofstudent learnings, regardless of their educational level, is mediated by the use Information andCommunication Technologies, which in recent times have undergone a continuous process ofevolution and growth.Present reality is that most students, particularly those subject to this study, are digital natives.According to Delgado [8], a digital native can be understood as
been a Visiting Associate Professor at the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Michigan State University. From 2014 to 2016, he has been a Visiting Professor with the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Missouri. Currently, he is As- sociate Professor with the Engineering Department, Colorado State University-Pueblo. He is the author of two book chapters, more than 73 articles. His research interests include artificial intelligence systems and applications, smart material applications, robotics motion, and planning. Also, He is a member of ASME, ASEE, and ASME-ABET PEV.Dr. Nebojsa I. Jaksic, Colorado State University - Pueblo NEBOJSA I. JAKSIC earned the Dipl. Ing. (M.S
ofreference for all the other courses. Both situations seem to work almost equally well, though dodepend on the pre-existing knowledgeThe core of the course is the same for all (see Figure 2). Firstly the teams of students are beingmade. These teams are the shipping companies in the game and they consist of three students.Normally between 5 and 35 of these shipping companies take part in a course. These teams do atrial run to familiarise the students with the gameplay (1). In the next phase, a business plan (2)has to be written by each company in the game, before the teams start to play the game. In thethird phase, the game will be played and the teams need to execute their business plan (3).Finally, the teams need to develop a year report (4) and