AC 2011-1294: CURRICULAR EXCHANGE BETWEEN A STEM UNI-VERSITY AND A RURAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: THE ESTABLISH-MENT OF AN INTERACTIVE VIDEO LINKVan Stephen Blackwood, GK-12 Colorado School Of Mines GK-12 NSF Fellow I am a mechanical engineering graduate student at Colorado School of Mines. I am funded by National Science Foundation GK-12 teaching fellowship. I research chemically reacting flow with respect to hy- drogen/nitrous oxide combustion chemistry.Barbara M. Moskal, Colorado School of Mines Barbara Moskal received her Ed.D. in Mathematics Education from the University of Pittsburgh. She is a Professor of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, the Interim Director of the Trefny Institute for Educational Innovation
each year to meet global collaborators, competitors, and leaders through an intensely immersive learning experience that goes beyond classroom studies. Other programs reflecting Wei’s international reach include the college’s Poverty Alleviation/Service-Learning program and Engineers Without Borders. This global perspective is rooted in a vision of SJSU as a preeminent producer of forward-thinking problem-solvers. With this goal in mind, Wei has established the Silicon Valley Engineering Scholarship, a program that provides $5,000 of annual support for high-achieving students to pursue engineering careers. Wei is also a Principal Contributor to CSU (California State University) Engineering Academies, a statewide
EXPERIENTIAL LEARNINGAbstractThe Mechanical Engineering Technology program at Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT)has implemented an alternative to the capstone project technique commonly used to satisfy theABET Criterion 5 Curriculum section d. (Capstone or other integrating experiences must drawtogether diverse elements of the curriculum and develop student competence in focusing bothtechnical and non-technical skills in solving problems.)1A majority of Engineering Technology and Engineering Science programs rely upon a capstoneproject for providing an integrating experience which, by their very nature, are burdensome tothe program resources and invariably suffer many disadvantages in their operation. Due to thesize and complexity of capstone
. Page 22.1368.5The course delivered a curriculum that emphasized open-ended, ill-structured25 design problemsas a capstone activity worth 20% of the student‟s course grade. Students begin the semesterlearning how to use the software competently and then engage in a design project requiring thedevelopment of a manufacturing robot. Students were given approximately six weeks to workon the activity. Specifically, students were asked to mechanically design and model a “gripper”and accompanying robotic arm for a pneumatically activated robot. Students are expected toaccomplish this task using a solid modeling software package. They are given a theoreticalbackground or setting for the design requiring it to be implemented in an assembly line
the workforce. An analysis of student reflections from exit interviews of graduatingstudents from 2018 and 2019 cohorts and journal entry data collected from students from therecent 2023 cohort is presented in this work. The themes emerging from this analysis show thatboth graduating students and current students seek to strengthen the RAMP community beyondthe summer program. Their recommendations point to the need for continuing support in bothpersonal achievement and for advocating the needs of their peers. With over a hundred RAMPparticipants now established across the engineering majors and the workforce, theserecommendations will be integrated in the participatory action research framework that anchorsthe design of RAMP. We will address
. The second individual concept(Concept 1b) used Change surface properties to integrate soft material into the device as a cover.Neither of these individually generated concepts was used in the development of the alphaprototype (Concept 2) or the beta prototype (Concept 3). The beta+ prototype (Concept 4)synthesized the wooden scooter shape of the beta prototype with Concepts 1a and 1b. The first ofthese synthesized concepts (Concept 1a) – an abstraction of Animate – was synthesized into thebeta+ prototype by transforming the original idea of creating a device in the shape of somethingapproachable and recognizable, and instead created a device with images of somethingapproachable and recognizable – in this case, Mickey Mouse. The second of
we seek to addressare: ● How does integration of project-based lab and lecture contribute to students’ perceptions of value, motivation and success? ● How does integration of project-based lab and lecture contribute to instructors’ perceptions of value and motivation to modernize instruction?In this paper we discuss the historical approach to the design of the course, which we discoveredwas from the early 1980s, the time of the last major curriculum revision. In addition, using theMUSIC Model of Academic Motivation together with course data, we present baseline data fromcurrent students and instructors in regards to overall performance. Finally, using the MUSICModel and course data from instructors and students in
in the curriculum typically involve an internal client (such asfaculty). Those later in the curriculum introduce external competition-based projects. The projects bringreal world considerations into the mix, such as design constraints, scheduling, logistics, financing andvarious other project management concerns.The design curriculum culminates in a two-semester capstone design project that encompasses the fullscope of engineering design and standard program outcomes [2]. The capstone design projects areintended to be a design/build/test project for an external audience. Students are assessed for the technicalwork and independent learning necessary in the design phase, the ability to assemble the overallprototype, and the quality of testing
were glad they had something to give back to the college, andthe college benefitted from their volunteer work and increased giving. One engineering alumni,who is a retired vehicle dynamics engineer from Ford, offered our students free training on somebasic vehicle dynamics terminology and concepts. He also critiqued the students‟ initial designthis year. The engineering department organized an industry advisory focus group meeting in fallof 2010. Many of the advisors that attended the meeting came through our connections to thelocal SAE community. They offered valuable advice on curriculum improvement and a range ofother things to enhance our engineering program.Fundraising and budgetingStudents must function as a team to not only design
. (1982). The influence of the eighth grade science teacher's gender, classroom laboratory emphasis, level of understanding of science and career interest on eighth grade girls' science and engineering career interests. Florida Institute of Technology, University Microfilms International. [6] Sheppard, S. D., 1992, "Mechanical Dissection: An Experience in How Things Work," Proceedings of the Engineering Education: Curriculum Innovation & Integration, Santa Barbara, CA. [7] Sheppard, S., 1992, "Dissection as a Learning Tool," Proceedings of the IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Nashville, TN, IEEE. [8] Agogino, A. M., Sheppard, S. and Oladipupo, A., 1992, "Making Connections to Engineering During the First Two
on a host ofdifferent design and project management tools. The Empathy module was a collaborative effortthat required one month of time to complete. Students were administered an empathymeasurement survey prior to and after completing the module to determine if the moduleimpacted student’s empathy. In the module, students learned learn the general process ofselecting stakeholders, generating requirements, and integrating empathy in design. Through themodule, students recognize that empathy has an impact on the requirements elicitation in design(a sign of your connection with the product/user) and the value students can generate forstakeholders9,10 .While the researchers do not present formal research questions, the goal of this study is
AC 2009-1520: THE ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS: AN ASSESSMENT OFSTUDENT PERCEPTIONS AND LEARNING AT THE FRESHMAN LEVELThomas Schubert, University of San Diego Thomas F. Schubert, Jr. received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of California, Irvine, Irvine CA in 1968, 1969 and 1972 respectively. He is currently a Professor of electrical engineering at the University of San Diego, San Diego, CA and came there as a founding member of the engineering faculty in 1987. He previously served on the electrical engineering faculty at the University of Portland, Portland OR and Portland State University, Portland OR and on the engineering staff at Hughes Aircraft
Paper ID #33093Student Perceptions of an Iterative or Parallel Prototyping StrategyDuring a Design CompetitionAlexander R. Murphy, Georgia Institute of Technology Alexander Murphy is a graduate candidate at the Georgia Institute of Technology pursuing a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering. He received a B.S. in mechanical engineering with a minor in creative writing from the University of South Florida in 2016. In the Spring of 2018, Alexander received an NSF GRFP fellowship in the area of STEM Education and Learning Research. In graduate school, his research has focused on functional modeling, mental model representations of
integration of their first year curricula and second year curricula as they saw itapplicable. ‘Integration’ ranged from organizing courses with interdependent topics back-to-back [3] to team-taught courses by physics, math, and engineering faculty [4] to creating 12-credit-hour courses, which included an array of common topics from amongst the disciplines [5].Of the lessons learned, one that stood out was the fact that there is no ideal way or structure forcurriculum integration.At TAMUK, the first year of the curriculum was integrated through scheduling those traditionalcourses most engineering students take during each semester back-to-back in two to three hourblocks. The course alignment (shown in Table 1.) was followed by a review and revision
study. Of the 70 students, 7 identified as female (10%) and 3 wereinternational students (~4.3%). Twenty-five students (~35.7%) noted having completed a designcourse at another point in their undergraduate curriculum, while 44 students (~63%) describedhaving industry experience, either through a co-op or internship.The objective of the year-long design course sequence, as defined in the syllabus, is to providestudents experience in conceptual design, including integrating methods for vehicle sizing,configuration selection and layout determination, propulsion system design, vehicle performanceanalysis and cost analysis. The focus of this study is data collected in the first semester of thedesign sequence. During the first semester, the course
through 12th grade (K-12) students in the USand South Africa, an academic partnership was established in 2012 between the University ofAlabama in Huntsville (UAH) in Huntsville, Alabama (AL), and the Cape Peninsula Universityof Technology (CPUT) in Cape Town, South Africa. The partnership is referred to as theALLiance for International Excellence among the future Space workforce (ALLIES). One of theprimary goals of ALLIES is to design and develop STEM tools within engineering capstonedesign classes at UAH and CPUT. Upon completion, the STEM tools are donated to various K-12 schools in the US and South Africa. The STEM tools adhere to stringent curriculum andproduct requirements-with safety as a top-level requirement. Another critical goal of
in a metacognitive process about their learning strategies. At the beginning of thesemester, texts on learning strategies, reading, concept mapping, emotional competencies, changeand stress were distributed to each student and discussed in the classroom. We emphasized theimportance for students not only to monitor their performance during the semester but also to lookback on their learning strategies and, if necessary, to improve them. To that end, we askedstudents to periodically write in a personal learning journal their thoughts about their learningstrategies. As an incentive, we told them that, as one of their final exams, they would have towrite a 7 to 10-page essay about their learning strategies. They were also informed that they
Intentionally ReflectiveKolb +Bloom (IRK+B) model developed by one of the workshop coordinators, Amy Bradshaw[5]. A concrete takeaway from these efforts were two clearly differentiated set of competencies,namely, task specific competencies that make a learner competitive today and meta-competenciesthat enables a learner to adapt to future needs. IRK+B provides an instructor with a conceptualframework to understand and evaluate (using Bloom’s taxonomy) where a learner is today andwhere he/she needs to be in future and thereby determine the scaffolds (using Kolb’s experientiallearning) a learner would need in attaining the goal. These experiences were foundational to the design a curriculum that embodies the need fora systemic development of
Paper ID #9073Student Experiences In An Interdisciplinary Studio-Based Design Course:The Role Of Peer ScaffoldingMs. Bushra Tawfiq Chowdhury, Virginia Tech Bushra Tawfiq Chowdhury is highly motivated, focused and result oriented individual, pursuing a career which provides a challenging and a dynamic environment. Holding a Master’s in Information security and having a strong leadership attitude.Takes advantage of communication, organizational, multitasking and technical skills with a diverse work experience involving academics and in the IT industry. Currently a PhD student in the in the Department of Engineering Education
generationmethods. In summary, there is a clear need for a tool to help a designer select an appropriatemethod without the need of extensive professional expertise. The objective of this paper is tointroduce an expert system that engineering students can use to select methods whileunderstanding the reasoning mechanism as part of their educational process.2 Background of the Expert System2.1 Design EducationDesign skills can be divided into three levels, 1) design science, 2) design process, and 3) designinnovation1. Engineering curriculum mostly focuses in technical and analytical tools (level 1)including the design process knowledge (level 2) as in senior or capstone design. Designinnovation (level 3) is seldom taught since traditional engineering
Engineering Education, 2006 The Introduction of Environmental and Industrial Health and Safety Issues and Emerging Technologies in a Beginning Manufacturing Processes CourseAbstractIntroductory courses pertaining to manufacturing processes have traditionally beenincluded in the curriculums of associate and baccalaureate programs in mechanicalengineering technology. The majority of these courses emphasize such topics as forging,rolling, casting, welding, and machining, among others. While these courses typicallyprovide an outstanding foundation in the particular subject area and process mechanics,many have not included any significant coverage in the areas of environmentalmanagement or industrial health and safety. In
already overcrowded curriculum. This paper presents thegoals, design approach, implementation, and selected outcomes of one integrated project-basedcourse (using Paul Revere and other case studies to integrate materials science with the history oftechnology) and uses it to discuss the advantages of disciplinary integration, particularly withrespect to improved student self-direction and contextual understanding. Assessmentsadministered during and after class suggest that this integrated course successfully engenderedhigh student motivation along with an increase in student aptitudes over the course of thesemester without a corresponding loss of discipline-specific knowledge. The implementation ofthis integrated course and the evaluation of its
adequate foracademically introducing students to the basics of construction methods and materials, it fails toadequately expose the students to how all the fundamental topics are interrelated nor does itnormally provide meaningful hands-on experiences on real job sites. This paper reports on theresults of a project that targets the course in ―Construction Materials‖ to affect an evolutionarytransformation marked by active-learning by augmenting instruction with real-world hands-onconstruction experience at local job sites. This paper discusses the integration of studentinvolvement in a nonprofit, ecumenical housing program known as Habitat for Humanity.The Courses: “Construction Methods” and “Construction Materials” The ―Construction Methods
various facets of this evolving technology in the ETcurriculum. Integration of emerging technologies, such as Industry 4.0, technological skills tomeet the demand of the regional workforce can be accomplished by few methods. One suchmethod is integration of professional publications in the coursework. This paper will elucidatethe results of successful implementation of Industry 4.0 concepts in ET curriculum through apilot summer course, Control Systems. Additionally, the authors aim to present the opportunitiesfor expansion to include other professional journals for continued implementation in the variousconcentrations of ET.This paper aims to discuss and present the key findings in the following areas: (1) Explicateintegration of student
. Czekanski et al. studiedthe challenges in engineering education from both educators' and industrials points of view. Theyproposed a vertical and lateral method based on incorporating the strength of existingeducational systems and integrating them with fundamental engineering core courses. From theirstudy, they found that the use of this proposed vertical and lateral learning method can narrowthe gap between academic, industrial, and students' expectations. Their study was based on afour-year curriculum though and it did not zoom on the challenges of the individual courses [16].The question remains how to deliver an educational environment where engineering studentsgraduate with a good comprehension of general engineering design skills, practical
AC 2008-1786: INTEGRATING EXPERIMENT, MODELING AND DESIGN USINGA HANDS ON HYDRAULIC POSITIONING LABORATORY FOR MECHANICALCONTROL SYSTEMS EDUCATIONJames Widmann, California Polytechnic State University Jim Widmann is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. He received his Ph.D. in 1994 from Stanford University. Currently he teaches mechanics and design courses. He conducts research in the areas of design optimization, machine design, fluid power control and engineering education.Charles Birdsong, California Polytechnic State University Charles Birdsong has expertise in vibrations, controls, signal processing, instrumentation
Paper ID #44193A Case Study of Integrating Leadership Competencies in a Global EngineeringDesign Course: A Work in ProgressAnuli Ndubuisi, University of Toronto Anuli Ndubuisi is an educator and doctoral candidate in Curriculum and Pedagogy with a Collaborative Specialization in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. She has over a decade of experience in the engineering profession, education, and research. Her research is at the intersection of leadership, global learning and boundary crossing in engineering education.Philip Asare, University of Toronto ©American Society for
Peer Assessment,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 16, No. 1, Spring 1999, pp. 40-43.3. Leah M. Akins and Ellena E. Reda, “Implementation of an Integrated Project for the Electrical Engineering Technology Curriculum,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 15, No. 2, Fall 1998, pp. 38-43.4. Glen, C Gerhard, “Teaching Design with Behavior Modification Techniques in a Pseudocorporate Environment,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 42, No. 4, November 1999, pp. 255-260.5. Peter, J. Shull, “Collaborative Learning and Peer Assessment to Enhance Student Performance,” Journal of Engineering Technology, Vol. 22, No. 1, Spring 2005, pp. 10-15.6. Malgorzata, S. Zywno, “Using Collaborative Learning and Peer Assessment
Paper ID #30981Integration of C programming and IoT in a Raspberry Pi Controlled RobotCar in a Freshmen/Sophomore Engineering Core ClassDr. Shaghayegh Abbasi, University of San Diego Shaghayegh Abbasi received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Washington in 2011. In her thesis, titled ’Integrating top-down and bottom-up nanomanufacturing: Controlling the growth and composition of seeded nanostructures’, an innovative nanomanufacturing method is explored and optimized. Upon graduation, she started her career as Senior System Design Engineer at Lumedyne Technologies. She worked on design, simulation, and
experience. This platform enables theexploration of a broad range of ECE concepts, both independently and integrated into an entiresystem, is flexible, to encourage creative solutions, is capable of being applied to real-worldchallenges, and is easily connected to the curricular theme. This paper describes the curricularobjectives and key course elements which guided the development of this course, the process bywhich the course was created, and the resulting content and structure.1. Introduction1.1 ECE Curriculum RedesignThe Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Duke University is undergoing acomprehensive curriculum redesign. Large-scale planning and development for the newcurriculum has been conducted in earnest since early 2003