Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division Poster Session

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Il-Seop Shin, Western Illinois University; Eun Go, Western Illinois University; Colin Ross Harbke, Western Illinois University; Thomas Mark Scaife, McGraw-Hill Education

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

– .47 .63 .45 .42 .41 .00 3. Perceived Usefulness .33 .42 – .66 .75 .70 .72 .12 4. Perceived Ease of Use .44 .58 .65 – .69 .70 .69 .09 5. ILTs Compatibility .23 .38 .73 .66 – .73 .79 .10 6. Attitudes toward ILT s .30 .38 .67 .71 .70 – .78 .11 7. ILTs Behavioral Intentions .22 .33 .69 .66 .77 .78 – .07 8. GPA -.04 .04 .13 .13 .11 .12 .09 – Note. Parametric (i.e., Pearson) correlations are below the primary diagonal and non

Conference Session

Evaluation of Ethical Development

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edwin R. Schmeckpeper P.E., Ph.D, Norwich University; Ashley Ater-Kranov, Washington State University; Steven W. Beyerlein, University of Idaho, Moscow; Jay Patrick McCormack, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Patrick D. Pedrow P.E., Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

focuses on a group of five to six students discussing a complex, real-world scenario that includes current, multi-faceted, multidisciplinary engineering issues. Beforethe 30-45 minute long discussion begins, student participants all read a short scenario thatpresents some technical and non-technical details of the topic.Table 1 presents a summary of sample scenarios. As part of the EPSA, students are asked todetermine the most important problem/s and to discuss stakeholders, impacts, unknowns, andpossible solutions. Examples of the scenarios used in the EPSA are presented in Appendix A. Page 24.1349.2  Table 1. Summary of Sample ScenariosEnergy

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session 1 - Educator's Tools

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Toluwalase Opanuga, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Logan Andrew Perry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln; Grace Panther, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators Division (NEE)

highlighted the need for a more consistent SDL assessment inengineering education. Of the SDL assessment scales discussed, Cadorin et al.’s [21] SRSSDLwas considered suitable for the validity current study for two reasons. First, its items alignedwith the skills to be examined in engineering students as part of a larger study that explores theimpact of metacognitive learning strategies on their self-directed learning. Second, it had beenwidely used in nursing education and its validity has been confirmed in related disciplines [48,60]. Examining the SRSSDL’s validity in a different setting- engineering education, wasnecessary to ascertain its suitability for the SDL assessment of engineering students.III. MethodsA. Instrument DesignCadorin et

Conference Session

Research Methodologies – Session 2

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Xingchen Xu, Arizona State University ; Li Tan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

system users andother practitioners. For example, the LSRM may enhance the CATME system by accuratelymodeling longitudinal social relations data, and thereby improving the evaluation of teamdynamics and identifying potential areas for improvement. Ultimately, this may help instructorsbetter support their students' collaborative learning experiences and foster a more inclusivelearning environment. ReferencesAgrawal, A. K., & Harrington-Hurd, S. (2016). Preparing next generation graduates for a global engineering workforce: Insights from tomorrow's engineers. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 29(4), 5-12.Alsharif, A., Katz, A., Knight, D., & Alatwah, S. (2022). Using

Conference Session

Committee on Educational Policy Presents: Pillars of Professional Development

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ellen Zerbe, Georgia Institute of Technology; Adjo A. Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kevin Haas, Georgia Institute of Technology; Robert Benjamin Simon, Georgia Institute of Technology; Janece Shaffer

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering Division (CIVIL)

Paper ID #38852Applications of Teams and Stories: Augmenting the Development ofEntrepreneurial Mindset in EngineersDr. Ellen Zerbe, Georgia Institute of TechnologyDr. Adjo A. Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Adjo Amekudzi-Kennedyˆa C™s research, teaching and professional activities focus on civil infrastructure decision making to promote sustainable development. She studies complex real-world sys- tems and develops infrastructure decision support systemDr. Kevin Haas, Georgia Institute of Technology Associate Chair of Undergraduate Programs, School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringDr. Robert

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 4

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Taylor Tucker, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Alexander Pagano, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 11: Projects

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gerald Tembrevilla, Mount Saint Vincent University; Andre Phillion, McMaster University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs Division (FYP)

complicated impacts of learning technologies and design on K-12 STEM curriculum, pedagogy, and institutional policies in the Philippines and Canada.Prof. Andre Phillion, McMaster University AndrA©˜ Phillion is an Associate Professor in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Director of the facultyˆa C™s Experiential Learning Office at McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. His research interests focus on mathematical modelling ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 First-Year Students in Experiential Learning in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature ReviewDr. Gerald TembrevillaGerald Tembrevilla is an Assistant Professor at Mount Saint Vincent

Collection

ASEE Zone 1 Conference - Spring 2023

Authors

Sadan Kulturel-Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus; Abdullah Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus; David Robert Schneider; Khanjan Mehta, Lehigh University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

aframework comprising 12 attitudes and 17 behaviors that align with the 3Cs.Parallel to the entrepreneurial mindset, we can define an innovation mindset as a set of beliefsand attitudes that lead to developing the capacity to produce valuable novelty. There is also adistinction between individual innovativeness and the innovation mindset. For example, Hunteret al.’s conceptual model of innovativeness [11] includes constructs such as knowledge, skills,and abilities, while the innovation mindset emphasizes dispositions, attitudes, and propensities[12]. Couros [13] describes eight characteristics of an innovator’s mindset: empathic, problemfinders/solvers, risk takers, networked, observant, creators, resilient, and reflective.This paper investigates

Conference Session

PCEE Session 11: Engineering Outreach / Summer Programs

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joseph Tang, Western Carolina University; Nelson Granda Marulanda, Western Carolina University; JennieV. Sorrells, Western Carolina University; Robert Pierce, Western Carolina University

work on any n- 3D cars - projects10:00: S ON SET- S ON SET- Brainstorm Printing, Build a Scott00 AM UP AND UP AND ing Robot simple- 11:00 TEACH TEACH Solutions Programm THEM TO THEM TO circuitAM ing DO THE DO THE ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES LUNCH LUNCH11:00: . . - Former - Faculty

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kaitlin Mallouk, Rowan University; Darby Riley, Rowan University; Jacob Troutman, University of Texas at Austin

majordifferences between coping networks of students who are able to successfully manage stress versusthose who are not able to? To answer these questions, we surveyed graduate engineering studentsat a mid-sized Mid-Atlantic institution. The survey consists of three major sections: (1) thePerceived Stress Questionnaire (S. Levenstein, et al. J. Psychosom. Res., vol 37, no. 1, pp. 19-32,1993.), which is a validated instrument that assesses an individual's perceived stress level, (2) asection for respondents to identify and rank major sources of stress, and (3) a section forrespondents to identify and rank major coping strategies. The survey identified research, grades,and issues relating to mental health as major stressors for all groups, and people

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacqueline Genovesi, Drexel University; Ian Marcus, Drexel University; Kimberly Sterin, Drexel University; Dominique Thomas, Drexel University

applying a holistic-content narrative analysis [70] to each interview,focus group, or journal. Next, we employ open coding which gleans from elemental methods:descriptive, in vivo, and process coding and affective methods: emotion, values, and evaluationto identify emerging patterns in the data [73]. Then, we apply axial coding to identify subthemes[74] and thereafter, group themes and sub-themes across all interviews and focus groups,formulate meaning through the clustering of themes [69], which will ultimately lead to theemergence of key findings.Research FindingsPreliminary Findings with EngWINS ParticipantsQuantitative Findings:Descriptive statistics from the S-STEM Pre (n=15) and Post (n=11) Surveys were calculated, asdisplayed in Table 3 and

Conference Session

Unassigned (6 available)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jill Heemstra, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Luis Rodriguez; Anna-Maria Marshall, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Erin Cortus, University of Minnesota - Twin Cities; John Classen, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Jacek Koziel, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Alison Deviney

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 14: Introductory Programming Assessment, Plagiarism, Motivation, Engagement, and Textbooks

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

P.K. Imbrie, University of Cincinnati; Jeff Kastner, University of Cincinnati; Dylan Ryman, University of Cincinnati

test a substantiallygreater number of mutations and samples when compared to this work. However, the results inCheers et al. are unable to answer this paper’s research question because the purpose of Cheers etal.’s work is to measure similarity robustness in isolation, and does not attempt to evaluatedetection correctness [15, Sec. 4.1]. The gap between the work of Cheers et al. and this paper’sresearch question is filled by the development of the sensitivity preservation metric that considersonly the similarity robustness that is a result of correctly detected plagiarism. Additionally,Cheers et al. note that “...the interpretation of the second comparative metric poses a threat to thevalidity of results in this work. As discussed, it is not a

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session - Innovative Teaching Strategies II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa Moorehouse, United States Military Academy

and rds. AY AY ta, d th th ions. tud c nda to s ent nati . Deve tion EV310 Aquatic Science

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malle R Schilling, Virginia Tech; Jacob R Grohs, Virginia Tech

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

, meaningful connections to existingstructures in the community will be leveraged to continue research and outreach. AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1943098. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation. References[1] C. A. Carrico, “Voices in the Mountains: A Qualitative Study Exploring Factors Influencing Appalachian High School Students’ Engineering Career Goals,” 2013.[2] S. Ardoin, College aspirations and access in working-class rural communities

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 13

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Grace Burleson, University of Michigan; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan; Kentaro Toyama, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

projects. The preliminary learning outcomes and framework presented in this studycan guide students through multiple stages where incorporating contextual factors is relevant andprovide prompts for reflection and methods to do so iteratively throughout their designprocesses. The findings from this work have implications for engineering design pedagogy and,ultimately, the potential to improve engineering graduates’ abilities to develop contextuallysuitable solutions.References[1] C. B. Aranda-Jan, S. Jagtap, and J. Moultrie, “Towards A Framework for Holistic Contextual Design for Low-Resource Settings,” Int. J. Des., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 21, 2016.[2] P. Clyde et al., “25 Years of Health Care Delivery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Conference Session

Computers in Education 11 - Modulus 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Brown, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Mesbah Uddin, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Erfan Al-Hossami, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Daniel Janies; Samira Shaikh, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Zhuo Cheng, University of North Carolina at Charlotte

dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time,” Lancet Infect. Dis., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 533–534, May 2020. [3] S. X. Zhang, Y. Wang, A. Rauch, and F. Wei, “Unprecedented disruption of lives and work: Health, distress and life satisfaction of working adults in China one month into the COVID-19 outbreak,” Psychiatry Res., vol. 288, p. 112958, Jun. 2020. [4] A. El Masri and E. Sabzalieva, “Dealing with disruption, rethinking recovery: Policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in higher education,” Policy Design and Practice, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 312–333, Jul. 2020. [5] A. F. Tasso, N. Hisli Sahin, and G. J. San Roman, “COVID-19 disruption on college students: Academic and socioemotional implications,” Psychol. Trauma, vol. 13, no. 1, pp

Conference Session

Computers in Education 4 - Online and Distributed Learning 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sherif Abdelhamid, Virginia Military Institute; Andrew Katz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

Metaphor F-M Perceptual metaphor F-M-P Figurative Language F Lexicalized metaphor F-M-L Personification F-P Simile F-S Synecdoche F-Y Metonymy F-M Analogy F-A Question S-Q Illustrative S-E Teaching Style S Example Imagination S-I Repetition

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Endeavors: Mechatronics, Robotics, and Technology

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alyson Grace Eggleston, The Citadel; Robert J. Rabb P.E., The Citadel

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

communication skill-building in engineering-specific technical communication classes,resulting in engineers who can more effectively propose, lead, and manage teams remotely [11,12]. Instructional technology has developed at the same time as pedagogical approaches haveexpanded to serve more diverse learners [13]. Engineers cross-trained in VMC in addition totheir discipline-specific skills will highly contribute to their professional growth.Professionalization also entails a successful life-stage transition from student to employee, whichcorresponds with a change of responsibilities and expectations. Transitioning, defined as “anyevent or non-event that results in changed relationships, routines, assumptions, and roles,” [14]includes four-S dimensions

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session (Works in Progress)

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Yah-el Har-El, Temple University; Thomas V. Edwards Jr., Temple University; Ruth Ochia P.E., Temple University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

University Dr. Ruth S. Ochia is a Professor of Instruction with the Bioengineering Department, Temple Univer- sity, Philadelphia, Pa. Her past research interests have included Biomechanics, primarily focusing on spine-related injuries and degeneration. Currently, her interests are in engineering education, curriculum development, and assessment at the undergraduate level. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021Introduction:There has been much work on the development of entrepreneurial thinking in engineering students.[1,4,5] These studies emphasize the needs to train our students to be innovative and entrepreneurialminded to meet the changing technological

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tuncay Aktosun, University of Texas at Arlington; Yolanda Parker, Tarrant County College; Jianzhong Su, University of Texas at Arlington

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

Paper ID #32725Broadening the Participation of Underrepresented Minorities in theMathematical SciencesProf. Tuncay Aktosun, University of Texas at Arlington Dr. Aktosun is a professor of mathematics at the University of Texas at Arlington. His research area is applied mathematics and differential equations with research interests in scattering and spectral theory, inverse problems, wave propagation, and integrable evolution equations. He is involved in various men- toring and scholarship programs benefiting students. He has been the GAANN Fellowship Director in his department since 2006, the NSF S-STEM Scholarship

Collection

1981 North Midwest Section

Authors

Arnold M. Flikke

followed by a series of plans which saw rapid ad-vancements in industry, agriculture and education. Engineering enroll-ments increased to over 75,000 each year. Engineering schools were ex-panded at home, and in addition, students were sent to study in Russianuniversities. At the same time, the government developed its philosophyof education. Mao s support during the liberation depended on the peasants and 1workers and while Mao recognized the need for an educated populace, hewanted to place restrictions on the development of an intellectual class.The result was that the state or rulers took the right and responsibilityto improve society by using education to improve the moral conduct of thepeople. While this may mean many different

Conference Session

Computers in Education 10 - Technology 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Christian E. Lopez, Lafayette College; Omar Ashour, Pennsylvania State University; James Devin Cunningham, Carnegie Mellon University; Conrad Tucker, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

suspension of disbelief on the part of the student. In Deshpande etal.’s [23] review of simulation games in engineering education, they found many advantages ofteaching engineering concepts through simulated environments over traditional classroominstruction, including but not limited to connecting theory to practice, customizability ofdifficulty to match students comprehension level, reduction of resistance to accepting innovativeideas and concepts, and greater retention of concepts over time. Another advantage ofsimulation-based learning is its compatibility with online learning, which continues to be agrowing trend, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic [11], [18], [31], [32].Using virtual systems to augment education is not only limited to

Collection

2021 First-Year Engineering Experience

Authors

Matt Caputo, Penn State Shenango; Georgia Macris, Penn State University; Daudi R Waryoba, Pennsylvania State University, DuBois Campus

PBL assignment that incorporatesscientific principles into an engineering design course. The PBL assignment challenges studentsto evaluate the OneCarTM and then redesign, manufacture and assemble a modified design. Infuture work, this project is envisioned to be expanded to consider student feedback in an attemptto evaluate project effectiveness.References[1] H. A. Hadim and S. K. Esche, “Enhancing the engineering curriculum through project-based learning,” in 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education, Nov. 2002, vol. 2, pp. F3F-F3F, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2002.1158200.[2] K. Edström and A. Kolmos, “PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 539–555, Sep. 2014, doi

Conference Session

Biomedical Division Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey Craig Powell, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Johanna L. Okerlund; Richard Jue-Hsien Chi, University of North Carolina at Charlotte ; David Wilson

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

extracurricular project-based experiential learning,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017. [2] E. Wenger, Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, 1998. [3] A. Ostrowski, J. Lee, S. Daly, A. Huang-Saad, and C. Seifert, “Design in biomedical engineering: Student applications of design heuristics as a tool for idea generation,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017. [4] R. M. Miller, S. Maiti, and M. E. Besterfield-Sacre, “Effect of a project-based learning activity on student intrinsic motivation in a biomechanics classroom,” in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017. [5] J. Parry-Hill, P. C. Shih, J. Mankoff, and D. Ashbrook, “Understanding

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nick Lux, Montana State University; Brock J. LaMeres, Montana Engineering Education Research Center; Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University; Shannon D. Willoughby, Montana State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

STEM Career Choices: Using Expectancy-Value Perspective to Understand Individual and Gender Differences in STEM Fields," Developmental review : DR, vol. 33, no. 4, p. 10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001, 09/13 2013.[4] D. B. Clark, E. E. Tanner-Smith, and S. S. Killingsworth, "Digital Games, Design, and Learning:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Review of Educational Research, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 79-122, 2016.[5] C. S. Green and D. Bavelier, "Action-Video-Game Experience Alters the Spatial Resolution of Vision," Psychological science, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 88-94, 2007.[6] N. Martín-Dorta, J. L. Saorín, and M. Contero, "Development of a Fast Remedial Course to Improve the Spatial Abilities of Engineering

Conference Session

Project-Based Student Learning: Part I

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Saeed Foroudastan, Middle Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

, Page 14.575.2such as seniors and juniors, to supervise and mentor younger college students. A faculty advisorPage 14.575.3Page 14.575.4 The amount of students who choose Engineering Technology majors within thedepartment has increased from 12 to 14 percent and is expected to continue in this trend (seeTable 2). Table 2: Percent Engineering Technology Per Academic Semester F 08 S 05 14% 12% F 05 S 08

Collection

1996 Annual Conference

Authors

Richard J. Reid

animation, interactive control of the simula-tion time is provided, so every change can be observed. Networks to be simulated are implemented by declaring the signals involved and connecting those signals to the componentinputs and outputs. The general format of component specification is: (, , cOutput(s)>);as C++ function invocations. Consider the following simple example, written in C++, of a two-input And gate activated by Switches and monitored by a digi-tal Probe: #include maino { Signal a, b, c; // Declaration of signals Switch (” la”, a, ‘a’ );// Position Switch at schematic position “la”, and associate keyboard ‘a’ key with Signal a Switch (” la

Conference Session

Engineering Education & Capacity Building in Developing Countries

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ali Mehrabian, University of Central Florida; Walter Buchanan, Texas A&M University; Alireza Rahrooh, University of Central Florida

Tagged Divisions

International

, plot the unit step response of thesystem for any point selected on the root locus, and turn on/off the grid. The system must berepresented by the transfer function in the following form:Y(s) ams m + am-1 sm -1 ... + a1s + a0s—— = ————————————U(s) bnsn + bn-1s n-1 + ... + b1s + b0s:The options in Design module allow the user to select any desired value for the gain, time andfrequency parameters of the system to see how the closed—loop poles will be affected.The time-domain design parameters that can be changed are rise time, delay time, time constant,settling time, maximum overshoot, peak time, damping factor, natural undamped frequency, anddamped frequency. The frequency-domain design parameters that are included in the programand can be

Conference Session

ChE: Curriculum Reform & Assessment

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey Froyd; Jean Layne, Texas A&M University; Lale Yurttas, Texas A&M University; David Ford, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Chemical Engineering

futurecurriculum renewal projectsAcknowledgementThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC-0530638. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography1. Thompson, T., Flick, L, Gummer, E., and Fiez, T. (2004). Enhancing Campus Collaborations Through Design Research in Engineering Education Reform. Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/acPapers/code/getPaper.cfm?paperID=7942, 6 December 20052. Fisher, P. D., Fairweather, J. S., and Amey, M. (2001). Systemic Reform in Undergraduate Engineering