adaptations abstractconstructs can be used to form an image in the student’s mind to aid in the experiential learningprocess. For example, the technical memo case study example used an imaginary company withthe professor as the CEO to frame a worked jet engine propulsion problem to be solved insteadof simply listing the problem with no context. In the student’s mind, the problem is nowsomewhat removed from the traditional class work ‘plug and chug’, and with a little imaginationthe student can find the right mindset for satisfying the ‘place’ aspect of experiential learning.Alignment to ABET Student Learning OutcomesThe ABET criteria for accrediting engineering programs lists seven student outcomes that mustbe met by any engineering program [18
made it possible toconduct the competition smoothly. In addition, the students really enjoyed the lunch in theuniversity cafeteria.For our engineering students, they had the chance to meet with the young and future engineeringstudents and played the “professor” roles for one day as proctors and graders. More importantly,they accumulated service hours towards their course completion.From the university point of view, this was an excellent marketing opportunity. We were able toinstill in the young mind the possibility of future engineering careers, and the possibility ofcoming to our university to pursue an engineering degree. We had anecdote facts showing thatsome of the previous competing students enrolled in our engineering programs. Some
, control of how potential NGO partners develop andenact accountability towards constituents and values, ETH programs can have influence onhow NGO partners put effectiveness into practice. For example, ETH design projects can bethought through from the outset with embeddedness in mind by ensuring that data-gatheringin community only happens after enough trust building has taken place between thecommunity and NGO partners. In doing so, engineering teams can ensure that the quality ofthe data informing design projects is reliable and trustworthy.ETH teams can also influence what NGOs do with their organizational flexibility. Forexample, engineering teams can invite NGO staff to have more involved participation inproblem definition/solutions with
‘how’ typically results in a methodological solution, rather than a solution that conveys understanding. Asking ‘why’ instead of ‘how’ has resulted in a better understanding of the reasoning behind things, as well as an increased awareness of the methodology.” • “Contextual understanding is the greatest strength a senior engineering studies (EGRS) major possesses and while other Engineers are trained to problem solve with their design goals in mind, EGRS majors are taught to go beyond the straight-forward analysis and consider other, non-technical factors. EGRS look towards social, economic, and political factors (among others) to fully comprehend the problem at hand. In doing so, EGRS majors
Accreditation Commission of ABET, Inc. The Biomedical Engineering and Software Engineering programs are preparing for accreditation in the next review cycle. Also, a special interdisciplinary General Engineering program is offered that is not accredited. At SJSU, BS Engineering programs are treated as accredited, since all programs are designed with assessment and accreditation in mind. Rationalization for the Course Sequence: The 120 Unit Plan Discussions of reduction in units to earn a baccalaureate degree have occurred within the California State University (CSU) system since the 1990’s. Much progress was made to reduce programs in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s. By 2008 approximately 81% of degree programs met the 120-unit
to the recognition of the need for moresystemic change. Combined with department chair support, a diversity/inclusion initiative andthe vision of a group of faculty, a project emerged from over two years of efforts.The project uses a cross-functional, collaborative instructional model for course design andprofessional formation, called X-teams. X-teams are reshaping the core technical ECE curriculain the sophomore and junior years through pedagogical approaches that (a) promote designthinking, systems thinking, professional skills such as leadership, and inclusion; (b) contextualizecourse concepts; and (c) stimulate creative, socio-technical-minded development of ECEtechnologies. An X-team is comprised of ECE, design and engineering
: MIT, 1995.[27] N. Cross, Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work, Berg, 2011.[28] Goel, V., & Pirolli, P., "The structure of design spaces," Cognitive Science, vol. 16, no. 3, p. 395–429, 1992.[29] Barlex, D., & Wright, R., "Using the internet as an information gathering tool for the design and technology curriculum," IDATER ’98, p. 160–168, 1998.[30] Lewrick, M., Link, P., & Leifer, L., The design thinking playbook: Mindful digital transformation of teams, products, services, businesses and ecosystems, Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2018.[31] M. Lande, "Scaffolded Prototyping Activities in Product-Based Learning Engineering Design," 2017. [Online]. Available: https://istl.asu.edu
-exposed to the topics. This basic recollection, however,illuminated the lack of mathematical readiness to excel at the Precalculus level where basics arenot addressed and the content moves quickly to conceptual understanding with the need to applyone’s mathematical understanding.At Methodist University it was determined we required a solution that would 1) address theimpact of beginning the mathematics sequence in College Algebra on the Engineering Programand 2) address the need for a brief review of the basic mathematical concepts taught in CollegeAlgebra to be included in the beginning of more advanced courses. In researching possiblesolutions, we had to keep in mind the size, capabilities, and restrictions of our small institution.The
Paper ID #26253Changing the Manufacturing Perception of Millennial and Generation Z En-gineering StudentsDr. Paul C. Lynch, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College Paul C. Lynch received his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering from the Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Lynch is a member of AFS, SME, IIE, and ASEE. Dr. Lynch’s primary research interests are in metal casting, manufacturing systems, and engineering education. Dr. Lynch has been recognized by Alpha Pi Mu, IIE, and the Pennsylvania State University for his scholarship, teaching, and advising. He received the Outstanding Industrial Engineering
Paper ID #26262Exploring the Learning Outcomes of International Engineering Students fromChinese UniversitiesMiss Guoyang ZhangJiabin Zhu, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Jiabin Zhu is an Associate Professor at the Graduate School of Education at Shanghai Jiao Tong Uni- versity. Her primary research interests relate to the assessment of teaching and learning in engineering, cognitive development of graduate and undergraduate students, and global engineering. She received her Ph.D. from the School of Engineering Education, Purdue University in 2013.Mr. Yang Da Wei c American Society for Engineering
average engineering and computer science students. Asnoted, the faculty input indicated that some consideration of the development of self-sufficiencyis necessary in the definition. In addition, the greater importance placed by faculty and industryon teamwork indicates that that should be considered of greater importance than independentwork. With these factors in mind, the definition of a successful URE for average engineeringstudents is now proposed as follows.The goals for a successful URE for average engineering students are1) The URE should develop applied engineering, problem solving, and critical thinking skills ofthe students to help prepare them for a career as an engineer, likely in industry.2) The URE should improve the communication
interest in engineering in general, and provide information onhow to pursue interests in engineering including eventual career paths. It is therefore crucial thatengineering students remain involved in the program to serve as role models and team memberswho are comfortable with the content knowledge applied in the activities. However, it is believedthat Access Engineering also could benefit greatly from leadership by those with experience inchildcare and education. With these considerations in mind, pre-service teachers were employedas leadership team coordinators (i.e., activity leaders), and engineering students were retained asleadership team (i.e., activity assistants).Novel Opportunities for Pre-Service Teachers In addition to helping
, because I work best when I know what Ineed to be doing, my mind is settled, and I am not distracted.” Although Mary intended to solveher distraction problem by studying alone, cutting herself off from others, working ineffectivelywith others, or not attempting her homework alone first, these strategies may have prevented herfrom learning from others what she did not realize she did not know. Mary is able to connecther work as a student broadly to her future career as an engineer when prompted and expresses adesire to use her Industrial Engineering degree to do good in the world. Mary received Bs innon-STEM courses, Ds in engineering and chemistry, and a failing grade in math.Geoffrey: Geoffrey initially had difficulty adjusting to the pace of the
Incorporating Leadership Training in a Sophomore Engineering Design Course Linda McCloskey Jane Reel Christine Allard Director Lecturer Lecturer Archer Center for Student Leadership Development Deborah A. Kaminski Associate Professor Department of Mechanical, Aeronautical, and Nuclear Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, NY 12180-3590Abstract A novel course module to develop the interpersonal skills of engineering studentsis integrated into a sophomore design course. The module
State University, Northridge (CSUN) is alsoincreasing its focus on entrepreneurship. Currently as part of their Master’s program inEngineering Management, a course on entrepreneurship and innovation management ismandatory for all students. The authors of this paper taught this course in Fall 2012 and Fall2013.The primary learning objectives of this course in Fall 2012 were: (i) Understanding how to put together a business plan (ii) Getting an in-depth analysis of identifying a target market (iii) Evaluating intellectual property related to their project (iv) Applying engineering economy concepts such as Rate of Return, Payback period, Sensitivity Analysis and Breakeven point.Keeping in mind the philosophy of
who seriously question the use of technology in theclassroom. Among several others, Todd Oppenheimer3 questions whether a heavy focus on theuse of technology in education is actually resulting in a better educational experience for Page 10.1387.1students. Oppenheimer, author of “The Flickering Mind,” suggests that educators shouldapproach educational technologies very skeptically. His opinion is that computers are often Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationoverused since they allow teachers
). Women's ways of knowing: Thedevelopment of self, voice and mind. New York: Basic Books.6. Wankat, P.C., & Oreovicz, F.S. (1993). Teaching engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.7. Fullilove, R., & Treisman, P.U. (1990). “Mathematics achievement among African American undergraduates atthe University of California Berkeley: An evaluation of the math workshop program,” Journal of Negro Education,59(3): 463.8. Mead, P.F., Moore, D., Natishan, M., Schmidt, L., Brown, S., Latham, C., & Mouring, S. (1999). “Faculty andstudent views on engineering student team effectiveness,” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science andEngineering, 5, 351-363.9. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2000). “Teams in organizations.” In. M.M. Beyerlein (Ed.), Work
, focused all his resources toward music.For him, any knowledge he had, regardless of the field, became a servant to his musical goals.Science for science's sake, so apparent with Nabokov, Leonardo, and Borodin, held no meaningfor Bach.For students, the process of thinking through their own life experiences, while becomingintimately acquainted with such models of multidisciplinary thought, effectively holds up amirror in which passion, hard work, resourcefulness, and imagination play out before their eyesand ears. These individuals teach much to any who enter their worlds, providing singular modelsfor life and work, while triggering inquiring minds in unexpected ways. They offer particularlymeaningful paradigms to those engineering students
Engineering Technologycurricula specifically needs further attention. This gap highlights the need for enhancingentrepreneurship education in this field, considering the industry's demand for graduates whoare both technically skilled and entrepreneurially minded. This research explores theintegration of entrepreneurship into an Engineering Technology (ET) program, with a focus ona sustainable building course. It employs innovative educational strategies such as micro-moments, bisociation, virtual reality, entrepreneurial tasks, and a project-based approach todevelop real-world problem-solving skills. The effectiveness of this approach was assessedthrough a quantitative and qualitative survey to understand student perceptions. Findings revealstudents
participate in SeniorDesign Projects and Enterprises with an engineering service component. Some examples of theseprograms include Engineers without Borders and International Senior Design as part of MichiganTech’s International Sustainable Engineering Initiative.Design Activity DevelopmentWith the interests and motivations of the current students in mind, design modules are beingdeveloped to engage the students in current societal and engineering issues. The learningobjectives provided to the three groups (undergraduates, graduate students and faculty) were: 1. Develop activities that enhance students’ critical thinking, creativity, communication, data analysis and design skills. 2. Outline the activities such that first-year students
student’s perspective, “Honestly, no, I had no idea what engineering was, I was just like, ‘Okay, math and science school; we got it,’ and then like somehow that just kind of became synonymous with engineer-, with that definition. They’re like, ‘Oh you can be an engineer,’ I’m like, ‘Okay, I guess so?’ And I only really got a feel for what I’d be doing [after I got] up here....I don’t know what it [engineering] is.” (p. 12, [12])This frame of mind is pervasive among students in their first year of a program. However, there is alsoevidence to suggest that students still do not understand the nature of engineering practice upongraduating from an engineering program, especially when their engineering design
Paper ID #42851Examining the Characteristics and Traits of Young Engineers’ Moral ExemplarsMr. Darius Grandvil Carter, San Francisco State University I am the middle child of African American Darius Carter and Filipina Geraldine Goyena Carter. As a child I loved space and planets, as I grew older I enjoyed making spaceships and machines out of lego. After highschool I decided to go to San Francisco State University where I am a 4th year studying Mechanical Engineering. I have been working with Dr. Stephanie Claussen in the Engineering Ethics Lab for 1 year where I have been working on a research paper studying the moral
come back for more business. Companies are business-minded and end-results driven, whereas university courses are both learning minded and driven.Approach to Design. At the undergraduate level, the process of design is constructed fromabstract technical descriptions of professional design. Students are being taught regimenteddesign methodologies, which gives them a false sense of the exact processes professionalengineers use. In industry, engineers rarely use just a linear design methodology as a roadmap for Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2014, American Society for Engineering Education
University of Maryland. She has expertise in physics education research and engineering education research. Her work involves designing and researching contexts for learning (for students, educators, and faculty) within higher education. Her research draws from perspectives in anthropology, cultural psychology, and the learning sciences to focus on the role of culture and ideology in science learning and educational change. Her research interests include how to: (a) disrupt problematic cultural narratives in STEM (e.g. brilliance narratives, meritocracy, and individualistic competition); (b) cultivate equity-minded approaches in ed- ucational spheres, where educators take responsibility for racialized inequities in
AC 2012-3526: INTEGRATION OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, AND SO-CIETY (STS) COURSES INTO THE ENGINEERING CURRICULUMDr. Wesley Marshall P.E., University of Colorado, Denver Wesley Marshall is an Assistant Professor of civil engineering at the University of Colorado, Denver, and Co-director of the Active Communities Transportation (ACT) research group. He focuses on transporta- tion research dedicated to building a more sustainable infrastructure, particularly in terms of improving road safety, active transportation, and transit-oriented communities. Other recent research topics involve transportation planning, congestion pricing, human behaviors, parking, and street networks. A native of Watertown, Mass., Marshall is a
-stakes assessments.4. The homework load reduces as students can solve problems quickly.5. Teamwork skills and leadership skills are developed.6. Based on the results of weekly quizzes, instructions could be upgraded immediately.References1. J.D. Bransford, A.L. Brown, and R.R. Cocking, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000.2. C.C. Bonwell and J.A. Eison, Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ASHE- ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1, Washington, D.C.: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development, 1991.3. M. Prince, "Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 93, no. 3, pp
thetheoretical background necessary to provide a meaningful opportunity for students to performanalysis in the laboratory portion of the class. The purpose of this activity is to bring students toa common level of proficiency so that they can perform an iterative engineering designexperiment investigating the performance of a small vertical axis wind turbine, VAWT.BackgroundBeing mindful of how students acquire knowledge, Turns and Van Meter [1] discuss teachingmethods to improve problem solving, informed by cognitive science. Part of the objective of thisintroduction to engineering and technology course is to show students that engineers work tosolve concrete problems and improve solutions. For many of the students, they are embarking onthe first step
]. Theymust now demonstrate their ability to “adopt an inclusive approach to engineering” [22]. TheRoyal Academy of Engineering [24] define six engineering habits of mind; systems thinking;adapting; problem-finding; creative problem-solving; visualizing; and improving. These areaccompanied by the following learning habits of mind: ethical consideration; curiosity, openmindedness; resilience; resourcefulness; collaboration; and reflection. It is therefore clear thatthis ‘new’ engineer of the future must have skills beyond the technical domain and Spinks,Silburn and Birchall [25] define three roles of an engineer: the first as a technical specialist;the second as an integrator who can work across boundaries in complex environments; andthird as a change
criteria: ● Discussed women in the engineering professoriate ● Study and/or discussion included retention, persistence, or both Figure 1. Systematic Review ProcessData AnalysisTo analyze the papers collected, we first conducted a deductive analysis by reading all papertitles and abstracts and identifying content relevant to our research questions and search criteria.With these criteria in mind, to ensure quality, at least two authors read the titles and abstracts ofeach article and removed those that clearly did not meet the criteria. We also documented inMicrosoft Excel our rationale behind the decision to include or exclude specific papers in orderto ensure transparency and trustworthiness [10] of the systematic
Paper ID #36759Constructive Controversy: Optimizing Decision Making inEngineering Design TeamsShaghayegh Abbasi (Assistant Professor)Jordyn Wolfand (Assistant Professor)Shazib Vijlee Dr. Shazib ”Shaz” Vijlee earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin. He then spent three years at Boeing Phantom Works in Seattle, WA. He completed his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Washington in 2014 and joined the faculty at the University of Portland in 2014. He spent several summers as a visiting engineer/researcher with the Sandia National Labs and the Air