] Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board. (2008, Accreditation criteria and procedures. Canadian Council of ProfessionalEngineers.[2] V. R. Neufeld and H. S. Barrows. (1974, 11). The "McMaster philosophy": An approach to medical education. J. Med. Educ.49(11), pp. 1040-1050.[3] M. Harris and R. Cullen. (2009, 06). A model for curricular revision: The case of engineering. Innovative Higher Education34(1), pp. 51-63.[4] M. Savin-Baden. (2008, 04). Problem-based learning in electronic engineering: Locating legends or promising problems? IntJ Electr Eng Educ 45(2), pp. 96-204.[5] W. E. Eder and V. Hubka. (2005, 02). Curriculum, pedagogics and didactics for design education. J. Eng. Des. 16(1), pp. 45-61.[6] D.A. Kotys-Schwartz, D. Knight, G. Pawlas
q. ITEC 3290 Technical Writing r. ITEC 3292 Industrial Safety s. ITEC 3300 Technology Project Management t. ITEC 3800 Cost and Capital Project Analysis u. ITEC 4293 Industrial Supervision v. ITEC 4300 Quality Assurance Concepts w. CHEM 1020 General Descriptive Chemistry Page 22.392.8 x. ITEC 3200 Introduction to Statistical Process Control y. MATH 1074 Applied TrigonometryIssues with a Bearing on the Creation of the New BS-PSET Program:Two additional issues that were identified as extremely important in the structuring of theprogram were the selection of the accreditation agency
, and identify effective strategies. Attempt a truly open ended design experience for teachers; and observe subsequent results with students. Seek to establish collaborative teaching efforts with existing teachers and programs that already teach creativity; e.g., bring Art and STEM teachers together to lead students in an open ended design experience. Continue to promote international exchange of educators who have experience with the use of design at all levels of education (K-20).Bibliography 1. Macho, S. (2010). American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE): K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division, AC 2010-2063, and
. (1995). The problem-based learning approach as an enhancement factor of personal meaningfulness of learning. Higher Education, 29(1), 93-101. 7. Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. San Francisco: Jossey-‐Bass 8. Ford, M. E., & Nichols, C. W. (1991). Using goal assessments to identify motivational patterns and facilitate behavioral regulation. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 7: Goals and self-regulatory processes (pp. 57–84). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 9. Ford, M., & Smith, P. (2007). Thriving with
. “Employers are looking for[AEE’s] CEM…and did not know what the LTU CEEM was all about….” The graduate alsoimplied that adding a co-op or internship would help.On the same scale, graduates were asked to rate the statement, “The amount of work required toearn a CEEM was appropriate.” The average rating was 3.68 with 73.7% agreeing or stronglyagreeing. One of the graduates who disagreed commented that he wanted more hands-on work!Another graduate who agreed to the statement loved the practical experience and wanted more tosupplement the coursework. The authors are encouraged to add more.Next, the graduates were asked to complete the statement, “The level of material that we coveredin the course(s) was….” On a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 being too easy and
experiment, organize, plan, examine, prepare questionOutcome Recognizes Indicates how Uses existing Examines the Formulates the Determines the Accepts theElement: applicable existing theory/history in measure(s) of control and data that are limitations and analytical theory/history developing an effectiveness by evaluating appropriate to extensions that aDesigning models, or differs/compleme experiment which the alternatives
Operated Device - Develop a battery-operated device that addresses one of thefollowing categories: quality-of-life improvement, improvement in education, commercialvalue and/or entertainment. The device should be portable, self-contained, and able to operateindependently of other supplementary equipment, should not interface with any line-powereddevice(s), and is restricted to alkaline AAA, AA, C, D, 9-volt, and/or lantern batteries. Eachproject should include a mathematical model that calculates the lifetime of the device and thepower consumption.The bridge and catapult design presented formidable challenges in several ways. Students donot have access to workshop areas so a supply of basic tools, saws, glue guns, scales, measuringdevices, were
discussions, will be important in future studies. The focus of the preceding research,however, is the instructional design of distance learning. The Guided Distance Learning Modeltakes a step forward in the integration of traditional educational techniques into distanceeducation courses.Bibliography1. Davis, J.L., Computer-assisted distance learning, part II: examination performance of students on and off campus, Journal of Engineering Education, 85, 1, 77-82, (1996).2. Daily, B. and Daily, M., Effectiveness of a multimedia televised distance education program for engineering majors, Journal of Engineering Education, 83, 4, 383-387, (1994).3. Boulet, M.M. and Boudreault, S., Using technology to deliver distance
Composite S-video Digital (Firewire IEEE 1394) Page 4.425.10 Table 4: Standard comparison of 3 different kinds of video format.VII. Serving and Hosting Streaming VideoThe major concern in configuring a server for hosting streaming videos is the networkbandwidth. Without determining the bandwidth that the user’s Internet connection can handle,the streaming video will not be continuous. For example, if the streaming rate is set higher thanthe maximum data rate a user can receive, then the video will be pausing half of the time and thiscan be very
Intuitive Edge, Los Angeles, California, Jeremy B. Tarcher, Inc.Hanks, Belliston, Draw! A Visual Approach to Thinking, Learning and Communicating, Los Altos, California,William Kaufmann, Inc.Hollins, B., and Pugh, S., Successful Product Design, Kent, England, Butterworths PressIngle, K. A. 1994. Reverse Engineering, New York, McGraw-Hill Inc. (excellent ME/EE reverse engineeringexamples)Koberg, D., and Bagnall, J., 1976, The Universal Traveler, Los Altos, California, William Kaufmann, Inc.Laithwaite, E., 1994, An Inventor in the Garden of Eden, Cambridge, England, Cambridge University PressMcKim, R.H., Thinking Visually; A Strategy for Problem Solving, Belmont, California, Lifetime LearningPublications, Division of Wadsworth, Inc.McKim, R.H
consideration of graduate construction coursework, faculty course loads andcapabilities, student and local industry needs and limitations, and departmental resources.Setbacks to commencing the graduate program occurred due to limited initial course enrollmentand the need for additional marketing of the program. Based on the local constructionindustry’s interest in the program and level of construction activity, it is expected that theprogram will eventually provide graduate education meeting the demand for a higher level ofconstruction knowledge.I. IntroductionGraduate construction programs are certainly not new, having been started at some institutionssuch as Stanford University in the mid-1950’s.1 Since that time more than 40 similar programsin
Women in Agricultural and/or Biological Engineering. NACTA Journal. pp. 49-53.5. Rosser, S. 1990. Female friendly science: applying women’s studies methods and theories to attract students. Pergamon Press. New York, NY.6. Trautner, J.J., Chou, K.C., Yates, J.K., and Stalnaker, J. 1996. Women Faculty in Engineering: Changing the Academic Climate. Journal of Engineering Education. 85: 45-51. Page 4.43.11 11
Department at SIUE. In particular, we would like to thank JulieSchroeder and Barry Carpenter who oversee the Mentor Graphic’s Higher Education Program.Without their help and devotion to higher education, the success of this course would not havebeen possible.References1. Weste, N. & Eshragian, K. Principles of CMOS VLSI Design: A Systems Perspective. Addison Wesley (1994)2. Palnitkar,S. Verilog HDL: A Guide to Digital Design and Synthesis. SunSoft Press, A Prentice Hall Title (1996)3. Engel,G & Vedachalam R: A Paper on “ Effective Use of Mentor Graphics Tools in an IC Design Course”, MUG ’98 proceedings.4. URL: http://www.ee.siue.edu/~mentor/EE484/EE484.htmlRAMA K. VEDACHALEMRama Vedachalem is a Master's degree candidate in the
) determine the radius of the circular trajectory and the corresponding value of the angular velocity for the steady state solu- tion. 3. Numerically integrate the equations of motion and plot the trajectory of the mass during the interval of time 0 < t < 5 s. Verify that the trajectory will, at some point, coincide with the circle determined in Item 2. 4. Finally, repeat the operations done in Item 3 for two other sets of arbitrarily assigned ini- tial conditions and verify that, regardless of initial conditions the motion of the mass will converge to the steady state solution. Provide a physical explanation for this behavior.3.2 Dynamics of Particle Systems: Two Masses Connected by a SpringThis activity
examination of students in these twogroups (baccalaureate only and baccalaureate and additional degree(s)) differed by 2.7 percentin favor of the students holding additional degrees, a difference that is not statisticallysignificant. However, the average of both groups in the cooperative classes exceeded theaverage of the students in the classes that used the lecture/discussion format. Adjusting theaverage score of the cooperative classes for the differences in educational attainment betweenthe baccalaureate only and additional degree groups would result in an approximately 0.8%decrement in the average score of the cooperative classes. Thus, level of education apparentlyhas too small an effect to account for the observed differences in average test
-workers excellent orgood. Findings from the data revealed that over half (57%) of the students felt that thelevel of responsibility, their learning benefit, and the salary was either good or excellent.Forty-six percent of the students did not respond to questions regarding whether or nottheir coursework had prepared them for the co-op experience nor to any of the questionson Career Services (C.S.) except for the question on preparation meetings offered by C.S.(See Table 1) The “no response” column in Table 1 shows that students either did not fillout the evaluation form or chose not to answer the question(s). Page 5.115.3Rose-Hulman Institute of
, “Documentation – Presentation of scientific andtechnical reports”, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, 15 March 1982. Markel, M., 1995, “Using Design Principles to Teach Technical Communication,” Journal of Business andTechnical Communication, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 206-218. Petraglia, J., 1995, “General Writing Skills Instruction and its Discontents”, Reconceiving Writing,Rethinking Writing Instruction, Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Mahwah, N. J. Thomas, S., 1995, “Preparing Business Students more Effectively for Real-World Communication”,Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 461-474. Tuve, G. L. and L. C., Domholdt, 1966, Engineering Experimentation, McGraw-Hill, New York
(1996). “Consensus! Students Need More Management Education,” Jounalof Manament in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 12, No. 6. pp. 17-29.2. Eschenbach, T. G. and J. W. Ra. (1997). “Shift from Lecture/Exam Paradigm in EngineeringManagement Education,” Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 42-49.3. Lamancusa, J. S., Jorgensen, J. E. and Zayas-Castro, J. L. (1997) “The Learning Factory—A NewApproach to Integrating Design and Manufacturing into the Engineering Curriculum,” Journal ofEngineering Education, Vol. 86, No. 2, 103-112.4. Sullivan, F. J., and R. Baren, (1998) “Simulating the Workplace in an Engineering Technology Course:A Rhetorical Model,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp.279-284.5. “Engineering Criteria
., Skillman, D.N., and Conrad, S. (1994). "The Implementation of Design Projects in aFreshman 'Introduction to Engineering' Course," 1994 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, p. 2325. 7. Herzog, J.H. (1994). "Stimulating Creative Problem Solving in Freshman Orientation: Thirteen PracticalSuggestions for Implementing a Successful Course," Proc. 1994 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Vol. II, p.2309. 8. The needs were communicated by a panel of public-school teaches, principals and administers at a April,1994 meeting called by the Sigma Xi chapter at the University of South Alabama to address improving science andmathematics education in K-16. 9. Huff, C. R. and Martin, C.D. (1995) “The Consequences of Computing: A Framework for
things I could useand I may find more.” “Assessment techniques are key. Self-assessment - if I can do this, I can continue toimprove. Realized the absolute #1 status of KNOWLEDGE.” “Yes. Improved energy and excitement.” “Yes. -- Identifying my deficiencies & assets as a teacher was very valuable. I know thethings I need to work on and the priorities. Knowing that I have assets & what they are gives meconfidence to work on the deficiencies & risk falling flat on my face.” “I believe my teaching will improve via constant contact. I expect my ability to keep theclass engaged throughout a class will improve because of the many questioningtechniques/objectives/board tech(s) we have been exposed to, this week
. Norton & Company.Gioia, D. (1992). Pinto fires and personal ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 384-5.Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (1995). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Luegenbiehl, Heinz. (1996). “Message from LED Division Chair Heinz Luegenbiehl”, ASEE Liberal Education Division April 1996 Newsletter, School of Engineering & Mathematics, Lake Superior State University.Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (1989). Ethics in Engineering (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. Page 2.469.9Mehalik, Matthew M. & Stocker, Julie M. (1996). “Site
instrumentsalready existed but would have to be revised. Others would have to be developed. Still others,such as student portfolios, might not be used at all. Recall, one of the operating principlespreviously stated: "Different assessment instruments may serve different purposes; however, theset of all assessment instruments must provide adequate coverage of the stated programeducational objectives." We recognized that developing assessment instruments would becomean iterative process. We needed to determine the best assessment instrument(s) for eacheducational program objective.Accreditation Recommendation: The task force unanimously recommended that the College ofEngineering proceed with plans to have its undergraduate engineering programs reviewed
chairmen in state and land-grant institutions [Electronic version]. Research in Higher Education, 3, 243–259.16. Nakayama, M. & Sutcliffe, N. G. (2007, April). Perspective-driven IT talent acquisition [Electronic version]. Proceedings of the 2007 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference on Computer Personnel Doctoral Consortium and Research Conference: the Global information Technology Workforce (St. Louis, Missouri). SIGMIS-CPR '07. ACM, New York, NY, 171-178.17. Noll, C.L., & Wilkins, M. (2002). Critical skills of IS professionals: A model for curriculum development [Electronic version]. Journal of Information Technology Education 1 (3), 143-154.18. Ramlall, S. (2004). A review of employee motivation theories and their implications for
appropriateshould be part of the curriculum as well.Bibliography1. D’Agostino, B., Mikulis, M., & Bridgers, M. (2007). FMI & CMAA Eighth Annual Survey of Owners. Raleigh,NC: FMI2. National Demolition Association. (2010). 10 Common Misconceptions about the Demolition Industry. Retrievedon January 3, 2010 fromhttp://www.demolitionassociation.com/PUBLICRELATIONS/10CommonMisconceptions/tabid/108/Default.aspx3. Institute of Demolition Engineers. (2008). Trading hard hats for mortar boards. Demolition Engineer. 2007(3),8-9. Page 15.1227.114. Beckman, K., Coulter, N., & Khajenoori, S. (1997). Collaborations: closing the industry-academia
for the past ten years: ≠ All faculty who advise capstone design projects (MQPs) should have participated in the teaching of ECE 2799 (or at least sat in on the lectures. This would communicate to the faculty the breadth and depth of the design process and would make them better understand the methodology their students are familiar with. ≠ All capstone design projects (MQPs) should follow the design methodologies taught in ECE 2799 and this methodology should be encouraged by the project advisor(s). ≠ Faculty should reaffirm the need for ECE 2799 success as a prerequisite to being accepted on a capstone design project (MQP) team. Current reductions in ECE 2799 class
that the department’s quest to slay theHydra—fully infusing the program with the BOK2 outcomes—could not be accomplished byselectively tweaking courses. Rather, as this paper discusses, a complete review of every aspectof the program was necessary, including the educational objectives, the program outcomes, andthe objectives for each required course. Ultimately, it was a two-year process of programassessment, evaluation and modification to fully implement the BOK2.I. IntroductionA. Overview of the Department of Civil EngineeringLawrence Technological University (Lawrence Tech) is located in Southfield, Michigan, asuburb of Detroit. The present-day Department of Civil Engineering (Department) commencedoperations in the early 1990’s, and was
15.453.11CREATIVITY AND ORIGINALITY 2Positive PointsIt is nice that the authors introduce theproblems and issues that the reformedcourses are designed to address (Attrition andskill and knowledge deficit). Also, it is nicethat the authors identify the three componentsthat constituted the pedagogical scaffoldingand summarize them in a graph.Thing(s) Can Be ImprovedThe paper needs to show how the re- There have not been any data concerning thedeveloped courses help to solve the problems effect of introduction of PBL on the attritionand issues mentioned in the introduction. I rate. The reason for the relatively highwould like to see some qualitative or attrition rates at VU could be due toquantitative assessment that shows
Engineering Project. Cambridge, MA: Goodman Research Group.12 Chen, H. L., L. R. Lattuca & E. R. Hamilton. (2008) “Conceptualizing engagement: contributions of faculty tostudent engagement in engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education, 97 (3), pp. 339-353.13 Correll, S. (2001). “Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self-Assessments.” The AmericanJournal of Sociology, 106, 1691-1730.14 Shapiro & Neuberg (2007) “From Stereotype Threat to Stereotype Threats.” Personality and Social PsychologyReview, 11, 107.15 Chen, H. L., L. R. Lattuca & E. R. Hamilton. (2008) “Conceptualizing engagement: contributions of faculty tostudent engagement in engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education, 97 (3), pp. 339-353.16
), 489-495. doi:DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2008.09.016.12. Smith, K. (2008). Institutional repositories and e-journal archiving: What are we learning? Journal of Electronic Publishing, 11(1). doi:DOI: 10.3998/3336451.0011.107.13. Reih, S. et.al. (Unpublished). Perceived Values and Benefits of Institutional Repositories: A Perspective of Digital Curation. Retrieved 1/8/2010 from http://www.ils.unc.edu/digccurr2007/papers/rieh_paper_6-2.pdf Page 15.928.1314. Swiss National Science Foundation. Retrieved 1/2/2010 from http://www.snf.ch/E/current/Dossiers/Pages/OpenAccess.aspx15. Open Access Conference Berlin Declaration
of Engineering Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 1050, Baltimore, MD: Accreditaion Board of Engineering and Technology; 2009.2. Krystofolski A, Batterson B, Budarz S, Clark R, McNamara K, Miller M, Fagan J, Thomas Bianchi, Peters C, Brusseau K and others. NASA Moonbuggy Lunar Vehicle Design - 2008. Project report. New Britain: Central Connecticut State University; 2008.3. Six F. Moonbuggy Rules and Penalties. NASA; 2008.4. Hrenko J, Danenberg A, Summers K, Shaw H, Varghese P, Geagea E, Cook C, Elhwali A, Cegelka N. 2009 Great Moonbugg Race. Project report. New Britain: Central Connecticut State University; 09.5. Naoumov V, Al-Masoud N. NASA Project in ME Senior Capstone Design Class: Experience and