students for rapid changesthat will surely come during their careers, it is not the sort of disciplinary barrier-breaking thatmatches the visions in the aforementioned reports.We are motivated by efforts to substantially integrate the humanities and engineering,particularly at the introductory level. UC Berkeley Professor J. M. Prausnitz foreshadowed the1994 ASEE report when he argued in 1989 that “[undergraduate] engineering should be taught ina social context” [7, p. 14]. Draw lessons from the humanities, he expands (addressing a likelyreticent audience): Yes, teach science, teach phenomena, experiment, theory, and correlation. Yes, teach technology, plant design, and product development. But don't stop there. Teach also, or at
inpeople, e.g., faculty, students, and administrators in academia, and employees, clients, and publicstakeholders in industry. Bringing out our best performances increases career satisfaction andproductivity. Yet we also recognize that the engineering education and industry cultures weinhabit often fall (far) short of that ideal.Many of us in engineering education are working towards the transformation and healing of theengineering profession and engineering education cultures – while individually striving to bemore authentically ourselves. We recognize that our inner work is directly linked to our outercommunity. This panel represents the collective thinking of a group of six engineering educatorsin different paths and stages in our careers. We
that the interaction of gender and thedevelopment of engineering identity is complex and multilayered and that it requiresunderstanding of how women and men develop understanding of what engineering identity is.Jorgenson examines the construction of engineering identities among female students [17] andfinds that many of the participants of the study were reluctant to acknowledge that genderrelations have any consequences in their career. Women who were interviewed for this studystrongly identified themselves with their career but acknowledged the male environment theyworked in was challenging. Many mentioned having to prove themselves before they were takenseriously as professionals. However, they strongly associated themselves with the notion
afour-year period for a cohort of ten students who began in engineering in 2013. Several of themost effective and traditional of the interventions identified most in the literature can becategorized into three areas: financial support, academic enhancement and strong learningcommunities [2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Examples include full or partial scholarship support andstipends, summer bridging programs, tutoring, mentoring, cohort building, special living housingoptions. The strongest programs were long term, with retention programming throughout,varying with maturity level of the students over the academic career. In addition to traditionalinterventions applied to underrepresented students, other interventions were examined that werenot typically
, there is nothing I can do about the problems of the world. (1, -) 19. I put the needs of others above my own personal wants. (2b) 20. Designers should only consider local constraints when creating a solution. (2a, -) 21. I feel confident in my understanding of metrics for measuring the sustainability of a project or solution. (1) 22. Designers must consider the effect of their decisions both locally and internationally. (2a) 23. I am confident in my ability to create environmentally sustainable solutions in my field. (1) 24. Design decisions will always have social implications. (2b) 21. I feel confident in my ability to create socially just solutions in my career. (1) 22. Designers must think about the kind of world
. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and
and ability to teach course content. Instead, the SPVEL connects students’ 1)appreciation for laboratory discipline content and relevance to their career aspirations, 2)engineering role identity development as a function of participation within the lab, and studentsociocultural identities (race, ethnicity, and gender).Research QuestionSPVEL was used to answer two research questions. How do student’s sociocultural identitycharacteristics relate to their perceptions of value in a virtual engineering lab? How are students’perceptions of virtual lab value related to the sociocultural identities and lab report grades?Research Methodology and EnvironmentThis study was conducted in a capstone senior Mechanical and Aerospace engineering
engineering and product design.Dr. Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University - Bozeman Bryce E. Hughes is an Associate Professor in Adult and Higher Education at Montana State University. His research interests encompass diversity and equity in engineering education, with a focus on LGBTQ students. He was recently awarded an NSF CAREER grant to study the experiences of LGBTQ under- graduates in STEM fields. He holds a Ph.D. in education from the University of California, Los Angeles, an M.A. in student development administration from Seattle University, and a B.S. in general engineering from Gonzaga University.William J. Schell William J. Schell holds a Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering aˆ C” Engineering
different points in their career paths, including early-, mid-, and late-career experience. Thesefactors influence their perspectives and lens on collaborative work and CI partnerships, both ingeneral and related to this Alliance. Understanding the basic heterogeneity of members involvedin this Alliance is important for interpreting the nuances of the findings and wider Alliance insights.All are collectively working towards the broader goal of increasing the number of students fromhistorically marginalized groups that are graduating from post-secondary institutions, approachingthe work through different lenses and networks.This study is important since NSF-funded alliances are a significant award designed to supportorganizations that seek to
focused on “biomedicalengineering” as a whole, so the data is solely collected using keyword search, no data selectionis needed. Furthermore, a total of 36 job ads are under investigation in this research, which isa relatively small sample size. [16] studies civil engineering jobs in the Turkish constructionsector, in light of the Turkish construction industry's global growth. The study has a specifiedfocus on early-career civil engineer graduates (i.e., no more than 3 years of experience). A widevariety of job titles are found, and a total of 427 job ads are identified for research.Qualifications are statistically analyzed in 5 areas: technical skills, software skills, languageskills and interpersonal skills. Compared to the rest of the
Large Universities," Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, 2020.[32] "The 2018 Status Report on Engineering Education: A Snapshot of Diversity in Degrees Conferred in Engineering," The Association of Public and Land-grant Universities, 2018.[33] J. B. Main, L. Tan, M. F. Cox, E. O. McGee and A. Katz, "The correlation between undergraduate student diversity and the representation of women of color faculty in engineering," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 843-864, 2020.[34] M. Gray and K. D. Thomas, "Strategies for Increasing Diversity in Engineering Majors and Careers," Advances in Higher Education and Professional Development, 2017.[35] "ASEE Diversity & Inclusion
transform the social conflicts and building peace and democracy. In her careers in international development at UNICEF and Education Development Center, in the Middle East and East Africa, Najme had been working to strengthen institutional capacity to promote equity and justice for minoritized populations and women. Before switching into education, Najme was a civil engineer for eight years. Her passion for education and development made her to quit engineering and switch to social sciences. Her current role, as the research associate, bridges her engineering background to her passion and endeavors for social justice and gender equity.Prof. Aimy Bazylak, University of Toronto, Canada Prof. Aimy Bazylak is a Professor
were established, HBCU’shave historically provided Black students with safe learning environments which affirm theirtalents in the context of their race, especially in STEM subjects [6], [23]. Students are alsosupported along their journey toward the doctorate by more readily receiving advising andmentorship from faculty who are of their same race, which matters in the mentorship andadvising of Black students. Only a few HBCUs are classified as doctoral granting institutions,yet these institutions are responsible for producing large numbers of doctoral students who mayaspire to pursue careers as academics [6]. This work offers a chance to explore further into howstudents navigate transitioning between these two seemingly conflicting cultures
to have learned modelling techniques - “… would do the modeling to check how a power system network would operate undercertain conditions and check that it actually meets the standards.” Power electronics were a specific technology that had great significance in generation ofelectricity and are pivotal in converting renewable energy to more useful forms and yet, an Table I. Interview Questions. No. Junior Engineer Senior Engineer 1 Please introduce yourself and give a brief Please introduce yourself and give a brief background into your career. background into your career. 2 How do you see your current line of work
Pacific University in 2021.Jabari Kwesi, Duke UniversityAlicia Nicki Washington, Duke University Dr. Nicki Washington is a professor of the practice of computer science and gender, sexuality, and femi- nist studies at Duke University and the author of Unapologetically Dope: Lessons for Black Women and Girls on Surviving and Thriving in the Tech Field. She is currently the director of the Cultural Compe- tence in Computing (3C) Fellows program and the NSF-funded Alliance for Identity-Inclusive Computing Education (AiiCE). She also serves as senior personnel for the NSF-funded Athena Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI). Her career in higher education began at Howard University as the first Black female fac- ulty
students exhibiting highermath/science self-efficacy and identity were more likely to pursue careers in science, technology,engineering, and math (STEM). Further there is a technological divide in underrepresentedcommunities driven by financial factors, school structures, traditional pedagogical practices, andpeer dynamics informed by gender, race, and socioeconomic factors [6], [7], [8]. Master andMeltzoff [9] propose the STEMO (STEreotypes, Motivation, and Outcomes) to understandcultural stereotypes and foster a sense of belonging in STEM to counteract gender gaps. Theyrecommend interventions to broaden stereotypes, strengthen belonging, and foster a growthmindset to counteract preexisting dynamics contributing to a lack of belonging among
Paper ID #39567Sense of Belonging in the Cybersecurity Field of StudyDr. Robin A.M. Hensel, West Virginia University Robin A. M. Hensel, Ed.D., is a Teaching Professor in the Benjamin M. Statler College of Engineer- ing and Mineral Resources at West Virginia University and an ASEE Fellow Member. Throughout her career, she has supported engineering teams as a mathematician and provided complete life-cycle man- agement of Information Systems as a Computer Systems Analyst for the U.S. Department of Energy; taught mathematics, statistics, computer science, and engineering courses and served in several adminis- trative
University of South Dakota, her M.S. in Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering and her PhD in Engineering Education from Purdue University. Her research expertise lies in characterizing graduate-level attrition, persistence, and career trajectories; engineering writing and communication; and methodological development. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Synthesizing Indicators of Quality across Traditions of Narrative ResearchMethods: A Procedural Framework and Demonstration of Smoothing FramesAbstractThe purpose of this methods paper is to describe and discuss one of the main indicators ofquality in narrative analysis, which is the process of narrative smoothing. Narrative analysisrefers
Dominion University the senior project is a twosemester course, which is the case in most of the undergraduate programs. The Introduction toSenior Project is a first semester 1 credit course, which covers a series of career related topicsrelated to engineering technology such as engineering codes and standards, engineering ethics,technical report writing, job search and resume writing techniques, patents and property rights,and professional engineering licensure. By the end of this course the students are expected todecide on a project topic, establish partnership with a faculty advisor for the project and submita project proposal. In the second semester, the actual Senior Project is a 3 credits course inwhich students work under advisor
ecosystem model capturesthe broad spectrum of mobilities, relationships and interdependencies that exist within andoutside of the expected engineering career path [3], [4], [5]. Using ecosystem metaphors enablesus to ask questions about the quality of pathways, the availability and flow of resources, and thestructures and processes that create and sustain inequalities. Observing that systems are designedto reproduce themselves, Vanasupa and Schlemer argue that “the apparent problems of lack oflearning and lack of diversity are outcomes of a system functioning as designed rather thansomething ‘going wrong’” [6, pp. 6]. Observable leakage, which is often a primary driver in apipeline metaphor due to projected inefficiencies, is merely the “tip of the
having to satisfy very real requirements such as having thecontent ready on time, integrating the newly-developed content to the already-preparedcurriculum, and how all of this would impact my end-of-semester student-teacher evaluations(which are extremely important for an early-career educator, particularly one from amarginalized identity). I was putting a lot of trust in these students to make something amazing,and it felt incredibly vulnerable. The experience worked out in the end, but it also presented challenges to my values whentrying to be fair to all the students in the course. I had initially planned to allow the cogen teamto drop their grade for one homework assignment in exchange for their education labor.However, about halfway
Master of Public Health and Bachelor of Arts, major in Psychology, from the University of Virginia. She is beginning her professional career as an Associate Clinical Research Coordinator at the Mayo Clinic. Prior research experience has involved neurodegenerative disorders, pathogens, mental health outcomes and policies, and engineering ethics education.Araba Dennis, Purdue University Araba Dennis is a second-year PhD student studying race, culture, and institutional definitions of inclu- sion. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Exploring values and norms of engineering through responsible innovation and
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Connecticut. He received his PhD in 2009 from the University of Nevada, Reno, and continued there as a Research Scientist. His latest research endeavor is on creativity and engineering education, with a focus on the unique potential of students with ADHD. Supported by multiple grants from the National Science Foundation, his research was highlighted the American Society of Engineer- ing Education’s Prism Magazine. He received a CAREER Award in 2016 to study the significance of neurodiversity in developing a creative engineering workforce.Ms. Connie Mosher Syharat, University of Connecticut Constance M. Syharat is a Research Assistant at the University
. Fast forward through coast-to-coast moves to Boston, San Diego and finally Rochester, Kathy spent many years in the fitness industry while raising her daughter, wearing every hat from personal trainer and cycling instructor to owner and director of Cycledelic Indoor Cycling Studio. Kathy draws upon these many diverse career and life experiences while directing WE@RIT. In the spring of 2020, Kathy earned her Master of Science degree in Program Design, Analysis & Manage- ment through RIT’s School of Individualized Study, combining concentrations in Project Management, Analytics and Research, & Group Leadership and Development. An unabashed introvert, Kathy enjoys reading and spending time with her family
three personas have been developed using the 2020 application pool. While thetarget personas used for the rubrics were developed using the process noted above, thesepersonas were developed using the student responses to the applications. For a more in-depthdiscussion of the method used, see our prior work [19].General Applicant Persona: Mark JohnsonMark is from North Carolina. He didn’t attend a community college before coming to thisuniversity. Both of his parents are college graduates. Mark is a second-year student in themechanical engineering concentration. Making the leap from an easy high school career to amuch more difficult undergraduate engineering career and learning how to effectively study isthe biggest academic challenge Mark has
engineering education profession, develop a vision of engineering education as more inclusive, engaged, and socially just. She runs the Feminist Research in Engineering Educa- tion Group, whose diverse projects and group members are described at pawleyresearch.org. She was a National Academy of Engineering CASEE Fellow in 2007, received a CAREER award in 2010 and a PECASE award in 2012 for her project researching the stories of undergraduate engineering women and men of color and white women, and received the Denice Denton Emerging Leader award from the Anita Borg Institute in 2013. She has been author or co-author on papers receiving ASEE-ERM’s best paper award, the AAEE Best Paper Award, the Benjamin Dasher award, and co
degree to which students perceiverespect from peers in their classes is positively and significantly correlated to satisfaction withtheir chosen engineering major and their long-term interest in pursuing and remaining in anengineering career [13]. Through the personal validation that strong peer support provides,students are better able to cope in college [14], which in turn results in improved academicoutcomes [15].Peer Support is a multi-faceted ConstructExisting research underscores the importance of studying how students perceive support fromtheir peers rather than only measuring time spent with them. However, Thompson and Mazer[16] delved further into perceived peer support by developing four different scales from 15 totalpeer support items
Engineering.Dr. Amy Clobes, University of Virginia Dr. Amy M. Clobes is committed to supporting current and future graduate students as Director of Grad- uate Programs for the University of Virginia School of Engineering and Applied Science. In her current role, Dr. Clobes collaborates to support existing programs and develops new initiatives in graduate stu- dent recruitment, training, education, and career and professional development. Dr. Clobes holds a B.S. in Biology from the University of Michigan and Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her combined experience in STEM research and education, program development, and student advising are key to her dedication and success in creating
Paper ID #32502Assessing Emphasized Engineering Practices and Their Alignment withEngineers’ Personal ValuesDr. Erika A. Mosyjowski, University of Michigan Erika Mosyjowski is a research fellow and lecturer focusing on engineering education at the University of Michigan. She earned a B.A. in sociology and psychology from Case Western Reserve University and an M.A. and Ph.D. in Higher Education from the University of Michigan. Her research interests include cultural beliefs about what engineers do and who they are, students’ career thinking and trajectories, and ways to effectively facilitate more diverse, inclusive, and