Asee peer logo
Displaying results 3631 - 3660 of 8955 in total
Conference Session
Curricular Innovations in Computing -2
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sarah L. Harris, University of Nevada - Las Vegas; Yingtao Jiang, University of Nevada - Las Vegas; Christine Clark; Ed Jorgensen; Tiberio Garza, Florida International University; Norma A Marrun, University of Nevada - Las Vegas; Valerie L. Taylor
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Electrical and Computer Engineering Division (ECE)
studentcohort model (for each incoming group of students) and also providing supports to buildcommunity across cohorts as well as including students’ families in their college experiences,our program aimed to increase student satisfaction and academic success. We recruited twocohorts of nine incoming students each across two years, 2019 and 2020; 69% of participantswere from underrepresented racial or minority groups and 33% were women. Each participantwas awarded an annual scholarship and given co-curricular support including peer and facultymentoring, a dedicated cohort space for studying and gathering, monthly co-curricular activities,enhanced tutoring, and summer bridge and orientation programs. Students’ families were alsoincluded in the
Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Technical Session 2: Student Success and Resources
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katherine Drinkwater, Duke University; Karis Boyd-Sinkler, Duke University; Rebecca Simmons, Duke University
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
should join, and any differences between the two.The research questions that guided this study were: RQ1: How do undergraduate engineering students perceive the amount of time spent engaging in engineering clubs? RQ2: Why are undergraduate engineering students motivated to join engineering clubs? RQ3: What are the perceived benefits of engineering club participation?Students are motivated to join engineering clubs to find community with peers [3], applyknowledge to real-world settings [4], prepare for their careers [5], develop new skills [6], [7],and pursue personal interests [8]. Design clubs (both competition and impact-focused teams)provide additional opportunities to practice the design process [9], manufacture parts
Conference Session
TELPhE Division Technical Session 2: The Broadening Face of Engineering Education
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado Boulder
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering
compassionand empathy with respect to education (numbers identified in Table 2). A Web of Science search[48] found that the term empathy (or empathetic) was a much more common idea in highereducation and engineering than compassion, which in turn was much more common thankindness. Papers that resulted from the search on kindness and education were generally relatedto PK12 or medical settings (nursing and medical school). The pre-college papers tended tofocus on teaching kids and students to be kind in their behavior toward peers and more broadly.This had a focus on fostering kindness in pupils among an array of prosocial behaviors,sometimes included with social-emotional education. The medical school settings tended tofocus on teaching future
Conference Session
Designing and Evaluating Engineering Leadership Programs
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Harindra Rajiyah, California State University, Sacramento; Lorenzo M. Smith Ph.D., California State University, Sacramento; Susan L. Holl, College of Engineering & Computer Science, California State University, Sacramento
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Leadership Development
August of 2011, Dr. Smith accepted a position as associate dean in Oakland University’s School of Engineering and Computer Science. Dr. Smith has published over 40 articles across various dissemination venues, including peer re- viewed journals and conference proceedings. His sponsored research activities are supported by a variety of sources: William Beaumont Hospital, Department of Energy (through the USAMP), United States Au- tomotive Manufacturing Partnership, Ford Motor Company, Chrysler Group, Pacific Northwest National American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Carlotta A. Berry, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Audrey Bowden, Vanderbilt University; Monica Farmer Cox, The Ohio State University; Tahira N. Reid, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Leroy L. Long III, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
2010 Annual Conf. and Expo., Louisville, KY, USA. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/advance-peer-mentoring-summits-for-underrepresented-minority-wo men-engineering-faculty​. [Accessed: 07-Mar-2021].[2] “National Institute for Faculty Equity.” Serc.carleton.edu. ​. [Online]. Available,: https://serc.carleton.edu/facultyequity/index.html​. [Accessed: 07-Mar-2021].[3] “2019 Symposium.” Arlnetwork.org​. [Online]. Available: https://arlnetwork.org/symposium/2019/​. [Accessed: 07-Mar-2021].[4] D. Bell, “Who’s afraid of critical race theory?,” ​Univ. of Illinois Law Review​, pp. 893–910, 1995.[5] K., Crenshaw, N. Gotanda, G. Peller, and K. Thomas, Ed., ​Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings
Conference Session
Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 6 - Technology & Simulation
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Long Duy Nguyen P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University; Robert O'Neill P.E., Florida Gulf Coast University; Simeon J. Komisar, Florida Gulf Coast University
Tagged Divisions
Construction Engineering
. A meta-analysis of 225 studies in undergraduatescience, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses found that “averageexamination scores improved by about 6% in active learning sections, and that students inclasses with traditional lecturing were 1.5 times more likely to fail than were students in classeswith active learning”4.Many student-centered approaches have been introduced to foster active learning. Theapproaches that can be employed to engage a larger number of students include graffiti walls,inside-outside circles, think-pair-shares, quick writes, physical movement, and student responsesystems5. Among them, the use of student response systems (SRSs), also known as audienceresponse systems, personal response systems and
Conference Session
Sustainability & Environmental Issues
Collection
2007 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
David Richter, Virginia Tech; Sean McGinnis, Virginia Tech; Maura Borrego, Virginia Tech
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
complex to modelthoroughly, so the LCA software was critical for the quantitative analysis; the size of the teamallowed good coverage for all aspects of the product. The students were required to identifytheir specific roles within the team, complete the analysis, and present the analysis in reportformat as well as a 20 minute presentation to the class. To encourage teamwork within themultidisciplinary project, the assessment of the students was based on several components. 40%of the project grade was given to the project team as a whole for the written report and oralpresentation, 40% of the grade was based on the individual roles that the students assignedthemselves on their team, and 20% of the grade was based on the students’ peer assessment
Conference Session
NSF Grantees: K-12 Session 2
Collection
2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Constance M. Syharat, University of Connecticut; Alexandra Hain, University of Connecticut; Arash E. Zaghi, University of Connecticut
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
HyperactivityDisorder (ADHD) possess significant creative and risk-taking potential, they have remainedhighly underrepresented in engineering programs. Past studies have indicated that students withADHD have an extremely high risk of academic failure and dropout, and are more than twice aslikely than their peers without ADHD to leave university. Traditional engineering programs arefailing to attract and retain neurodiverse learners, and thus do not benefit from these students’high potential for creative thinking. The disconnect between the traditional educationenvironment and the abilities of students with ADHD is not unique to higher education. In fact,high school students with ADHD have significantly lower GPAs and are over eight times morelikely to drop out
Conference Session
Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Melissa Danforth, California State University, Bakersfield; Charles Lam, California State University, Bakersfield; Ronald Hughes, California State University, Bakersfield; Stephanie Salomon, California State University, Bakersfield
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
mentoring.Dr. Ronald Hughes, California State University, Bakersfield ACADEMIC RESPONSIBILITIES: (2017-Present) Associate Professor for the STEM Affinity Group, School of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, California State University, Bakersfield. Duties included teaching responsibilities in Undergraduate Biology. Additional duties included grant writing, manage- ment, and evaluation. RESEARCH INTERESTS: Include teaching and learning cognition skills, informal learning environ- ments and strategies, and science/technology curriculum design/implementation/evaluation.Mrs. Stephanie Salomon, California State University, Bakersfield c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Enhancing
Conference Session
Women in Engineering Division: Pre-college Student Experiences
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lynsey Mitchell Kissane, Ryerson University; Liping Fang, Ryerson University ; Ruth Jean Silver, Groundswell Projects
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Women in Engineering
at whichthey are opting out of academic math and science classes and , often unknowingly, closing theiroptions for engineering in post-secondary education. As such, the primary target group identified Page 26.772.6became girls who had the aptitude for STEM subjects but who were not choosing STEM coursesin grade 10. The secondary target was the girls’ key influencers: parents, teachers, guidancecounselors, and peers. The overall program was later named WEMADEIT.Members of the partnership took on projects that played to their institutional strengths in fieldsoutside of engineering. For example, Western University led the development of teacher
Conference Session
Multidisciplinary First-year Experiences
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Malinda S. Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder; Jaclyn L. Cunitz, University of Colorado Boulder; Marissa H. Forbes, University of Colorado, Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado-Boulder
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Multidisciplinary Engineering
11 55 Page 26.816.10 Table 5. Attributes of Value for the GE+ Community Top 6 Attributes Valuable for Highly Valuable GE+ Community n % Faculty Accessibility 15 75 Career Counseling 15 75 Upperclass Student Mentoring 14 70 Common Classes 11 55 Peer Tutoring 10
Conference Session
First-year Programs Division Technical Session 12: Teaching and Advising Students in that Critical First Year
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Iryna Ashby, Purdue University; Marisa Exter, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs
faculty andtextbooks to tell them what to do [9]. To transition towards independence and interdependence intheir learning and as a result in their ability to advance in their professional field, students needto gain such skills as persistence, positive attitude towards learning, ability to organize andmanage time effectively, seek resources and help with their learning, collaborate with peers togain new knowledge, assess their own work and work done by others, as well as develop and useeffective strategies to conquer new topics or deepen knowledge of familiar topics [16]. In otherwords, they need to develop self-directed lifelong learning skills.It is challenging to teach these types of competencies and skills in a classroom, and
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session I
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University; Priya Manohar, Robert Morris University; Walter W Schilling Jr., Milwaukee School of Engineering; Peter Y Wu, Robert Morris University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
University, Pittsburgh, PA. He has a Ph. D. in Materials Engineering (1998) and Graduate Diploma in Computer Science (1999) from Uni- versity of Wollongong, Australia and holds Bachelor of Engineering (Metallurgical Engineering) degree from Pune University, India (1985). He has worked as a post-doctoral research fellow at Carnegie Mel- lon University, Pittsburgh (2001 – 2003) and BHP Institute for Steel Processing and Products, Australia (1998 – 2001). Dr. Manohar held the position of Chief Materials Scientist at Modern Industries, Pitts- burgh (2003 – 2004) and Assistant Manager (Metallurgy Group), Engineering Research Center, Telco, India (1985 – 1993). He has published over 70 papers in peer-reviewed journals and
Conference Session
Track: Faculty - Technical Session I
Collection
2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity
Authors
Meagan R. Kendall, University of Texas, El Paso; Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University; Ines Basalo, University of Miami; Gemma Henderson, University of Miami
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Faculty
methods for involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction.Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Florida International University As an assistant professor of engineering education at Florida International University, Dr. Alexandra Coso Strong works and teaches at the intersection of engineering education, faculty development, and complex systems design. Alexandra completed her doctorate in aerospace engineering at Georgia Tech in spring, 2014. Prior to attending Georgia Tech, Alexandra received a bachelor’s degree in aerospace engineering from MIT (2007) and a master’s degree in systems engineering from the University of Virginia (2010). Alexandra comes to FIU after completing a
Conference Session
Track: Learning Spaces, Pedagogy & Curriculum - Technical Session 11
Collection
2019 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity
Authors
Catherine E. Brawner, Research Triangle Educational Consultants; Catherine Mobley, Clemson University; Rebecca Brent, Education Designs, Inc; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University; Maya Rucks, Clemson University; Cindy Waters, Naval Surface Warfare Center
Tagged Topics
Diversity, Learning Spaces, Pedagogy & Curriculum Design
-in Help Tutoring and study Academic help Provided for students Center for all students groups through center; writing help in Engineering LLC staffed by TA’s for minority student office center and Women in STEM help with early- LLC for common curriculum high failure Peer mentoring also Engineering college science and classes. includes tutoring in the offers Structured engineering courses small mentoring Supplemental
Conference Session
Research and Graduate Studies
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Erika A. Mosyjowski, University of Michigan ; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Diane L Peters, University of Michigan; Steven J. Skerlos, University of Michigan
Tagged Divisions
Graduate Studies
National Science Foundation has called for additional pathways to and through engineering programs, and returners represent one such pathway3. 2. Returners bring a different perspective to their graduate work as well as their post- graduate endeavors than their direct-pathway peers. They have experiences in a variety of contexts, which often includes previous work in academia, industry, military, or government in addition to their graduate work, which may influence their research and research outcomes18. Research and theory describe the connection of ideas from across various contexts as an important source of innovation4. 3. Returners contribute to the diversity of the university community. Diversity has
Conference Session
Problem-based and Challenge-based Learning
Collection
2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Fatin Aliah Phang, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Khairiyah Mohd-Yusof, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Syed Helmi Syed Hassan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia; Mimi H. Hassim, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
of the semester, due tomade them felt anxious misunderstanding about CPBL, the division of tasks among theand near to giving up group members was ineffective. This caused them to feel that the learning cycle was too fast and difficult to follow. There was a sense of the shortage of time to submit reports and write peer- teaching notes.CPBL requires more on The responsibility of learning in CPBL lies with the students. Inself-efforts and fewer on CPBL, students were not given conventional lectures but werelectures as conventional required to spend some time for group and class discussions inclasses correcting concepts and
Conference Session
Aerospace Division Technical Session 3
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Steve Gorrell, Brigham Young University; C. Greg Jensen, Brigham Young University; Brett Stone, Brigham Young University; Edward Red, Brigham Young University; Michael Richey, The Boeing Company; Fabian Zender, The Boeing Company; Michael Wright; David E. French, The Boeing Company; Shigeo Hayashibara, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Prescott; Carl Johnson, Georgia Institute of Technology; John P. Sullivan, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
investigated how amulti-disciplinary team could coordinate tasks using a novel Computer Aided Design (CAD) toolthat enables multiple users to simultaneously access and modify a model [10]. The projectdemonstrated that students from three institutions in three time zones could effectivelycollaborate on the design of an aircraft wing assembly. The 2012 – 2013 project successfullyimplemented a “multi-site, cloud-based capstone design project” within a cross-cultural, peer-to-peer design-build-test environment [11]. Within this environment students were exposed to theindustrial principles of collaborative digital design and manufacturing, targeting complex cyber-mechanical systems. These previous projects were evaluated in order to develop a betterprogram
Conference Session
Focus on African-American and Hispanic Engineering Students’ Professional and Academic Development
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kalynda Chivon Smith, Howard University; Lorraine N. Fleming, Howard University; Inez N. Moore, Howard University; Silas E. Burris, Howard University; Fabiana Bornmann
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
Paper ID #10767African American Undergraduate Success in Engineering: ”Proving themDr. Kalynda Chivon Smith, Howard University Dr. Smith earned a Ph.D. and an M.S. in Social Psychology from Howard University in Washington, D.C., and her B.A. in Psychology and English from Truman State University in Kirksville, MO. Dr. Smith has managed a three year longitudinal NSF-funded research project across four campuses, which has included collecting, analyzing/interpreting and reporting data through article writing and conference presentation. She has also taught various psychology courses.Dr. Lorraine N. Fleming P.E., Howard
Conference Session
Engineering Education Research
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Alisha Waller
. Page 9.850.6 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering EducationScientific Principle 6: Disclose research to encourage professional scrutiny and critique In the NRC report, the authors state “Regardless of the medium, the goals of researchreporting are to communicate the findings from the investigation; to open the study toexamination, criticism, review, and replication (see Principle 5) by peer investigators; andultimately to incorporate the new knowledge into the prevailing canon of the field” (p. 72). Thissecond goal points out again the need for more explicit reporting of STEM education
Conference Session
Student Division (STDT) Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eliot Nathaniel Wachtel, University of California, Santa Cruz; Qingyuan Cao, University of California, Santa Cruz; Matthew Kaltman, University of California, Santa Cruz; Khanh Tran, University of California, Santa Cruz; Miguel Robles Hernandez, University of California, Santa Cruz; Tela Favaloro, University of California, Santa Cruz
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Student Division (STDT)
Paper ID #44485Board 174: Fostering Inclusivity and Engagement while Learning by Doing:A New Paradigm in Engineering Education Based on Student-Designed, Student-TaughtCoursesMr. Eliot Nathaniel Wachtel, University of California, Santa Cruz Eliot Wachtel is a fourth year Robotics Engineering Student, Student Instructor, Undergraduate Researcher, and Club leader at UC Santa Cruz. He has been involved in teaching and mentoring undergraduate peers in engineering concepts for three years, acting as the formal lead instructor for two undergraduate courses. When not teaching, or learning, he is doing research in the Braingeneers
Conference Session
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 17
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University ; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
developing feedback literacy. The framework also draws from Nicol and Macfarlane-Dick's [20] principles of good feedback practice, emphasizing the role of peer and self-assessment in feedback processes. In the context of Scrum, this dimension reflects the framework's collaborative nature, where feedback sources are not limited to the traditional instructor-student dynamic but include peers and self-reflection [22]. 2. Feedback Timing: Timeliness in feedback is highlighted by Hattie and Timperley's [19] model of effective feedback, which emphasizes the importance of immediate feedback in learning processes. This aspect is mirrored in the Scrum methodology, where regular sprint reviews and retrospectives [23] provide
Conference Session
Computers in Education General Technical Session II
Collection
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Purdue University; Quintana Clark, Purdue University; Geovon Boisvenue, Purdue University; Stephen Paul Woodall, Purdue University
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education
solid argument for the need to help young adults acquire theknowledge they need to be safe online.Another explanation for young adults’ risky online behaviors is the way they think aboutthe Internet and privacy in general. Many young people think of the Internet as their ownpersonal space where they interact with their peers, and fail to recognize that theinformation meant for peer groups, as well as conversations among peers, are available tomany other, unintended audiences6. Similarly, a large study of 7,000 American collegestudents found that passwords, social security and credit card numbers were included inthe respondents’ notion of online privacy, but postings on social networking sites such asFacebook were not a matter of concern7
Conference Session
Improving Introductory Experiences in Chemical Engineering
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Richard L. Zollars, Washington State University
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering
discussion and feedback. Third, students’ peers critique their solutions andprovide comments. Finally, students are given the opportunity to respond to these comments and Page 24.1135.2criticisms, and to modify their solutions appropriately. Note that SBL, as defined above, differs from a variety of other instructional techniques that also use the terminology “studio”. Among the more notable is the Scale-Up4 program introduced at North single or individual or
Conference Session
Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Selen Güler, University of Washington; Rae Jing Han, University of Washington; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington; Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Sriram Mohan, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Faculty Development Division (FDD)
the programare represented in the dataset, with members from a mean of 12 teams (min=5; max=17)participating in each of the meetings, alongside the REDPAR leadership, and guest attendees.Seven out of the 31 meetings (23%) featured guest presenters.At the time of writing, two more cohorts have been funded by the RED program, for a total of 30teams. We expect the underlying structure of the community meetings and the types ofinteractions analyzed here to be similar in more recent CoT meetings.For the analysis, we transcribed and qualitatively analyzed the meetings using Dedoosequalitative data analysis software. Our codebook includes the variety of topics covered at eachmeeting (e.g., sustainability of change, building strategic partnerships
Conference Session
Cooperative and Experiential Education Division Technical Session 1
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lisa Bosman, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Jeongjin Park, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Bhavana Kotla, Purdue Polytechnic Graduate Programs
haveseveral advantages that other conventional internships do not have. Virtual internships offerflexibility that not only enables students to complete tasks on time but also creates an optimizedwork-life balance. Additionally, students can work from anywhere across the globe andcollaborate with peers and mentors from multiple countries and disciplinary backgrounds.Furthermore, virtual internships have been found to increase motivation and enable students tolearn better [2] by allowing them to have more flexibility, mobility, and autonomy in their work[3]. Yet, little is known about how to facilitate, expand, and market virtual internship processes.The purpose of this study is to respond to the following guiding research question: Whatinternship
Conference Session
WIED: Community
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sharon Mason; Margaret Bailey, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Carol Marchetti, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET); Maureen Valentine, Rochester Institute of Technology (CET)
faculty and enhance plans of work associated with tenure andpromotion preparation and overall career advancement. The goal is to drive discovery andlearning within an environment that supports the development of project proposals and theprocess of peer review. These mini-grants encourage leadership and career development,mentoring, networking and research collaboration, while enhancing and advancing theuniversity’s multifaceted initiatives and scholarship infrastructure. In support of the overarchinginstitutional transformation project, successful grant proposals are also required to align with oneor more of the AdvanceUniX project goals. In addition to directly supporting careeradvancement with funding, the grant design and structure also
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Edward Sander, The University of Iowa; Joshua Lobb, The University of Iowa; James Ankrum, The University of Iowa; Nicholas Bowman; Solomon Fenton-Miller, The University of Iowa
new to reading peer-reviewed literature. There were two main deliverables for students, a poster they would present at the end of the summer and a 2-page IEEE-style abstract. Students were taught in interactive sessions how to structure a scientific paper, how to find and cite papers in the literature, how to make their writing flow, the importance of editing, how to visualize data, and best practices for presenting and discussing their work orally. All class exercises directly contributed to the student’s completion of their poster and IEEE abstract and did not add any additional “busy work” to their schedules.• Weekly Seminar and Journal Club Series: Every Thursday at 10 AM, students met for either a seminar or
Conference Session
Student Teams and Teamwork
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephanie Claussen, San Francisco State University; Fatemeh Khalkhal; Xiaorong Zhang, San Francisco State University; Ana Karen Biviano; Yiyi Wang, San Francisco State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
engineering students to work effectively in teams, writing that“because of the increasing complexity and scale of systems-based engineering problems, there isa growing need to pursue collaborations with multidisciplinary teams of experts across multiplefields” [1, pp. 34–35]. ABET has similarly dedicated one of its seven student outcomes toteamwork, wording it as: “An ability to function effectively on a team whose members togetherprovide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks,and meet objectives” [2]. Research studies have also repeatedly underlined the importance ofdeveloping engineering students’ abilities to work in teams to meet industry needs [3], [4].As a result, there has been an increased
Conference Session
Work-in-Progress Session: Understanding Issues Faced by Graduate Students and Faculty
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Eduardo Rodriguez Mejia, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)
2003,with many students only graduating after a period of 10 years. On average, the completion ratesfor engineering doctoral programs after 3 to 4 years were just below 20% [3]. Hasbun et al. [4]found that for many students, coursework can be an external motivator as it imposes deadlinesand encourages them to interact with fellow students. Whereas, students perceive the writingphase as the most difficult. Common concerns with this last portion of the doctoral programinclude not having the necessary writing skills to communicate effectively, while beingchallenged to publicly demonstrate competence. Many students also shared concerns regardingtime management, questioning their abilities (personal and academic), isolation, and the expectedtime