directors, who then alternate years. • We have been pleased we have been able to provide some financial assistance for students, since these programs are expensive. We have found that donors like to support these programs. Many of them have “lived this experience” in their professional careers and are anxious to provide support for what they feel is “the real world.” • We have also faced some challenges. One challenge was unexpected and more physical in nature—three faculty developed blood clots (two while abroad) directly related, we think, to sitting down for long periods of time while flying. One faculty member suffered a heart attack while in China. Fortunately we had two faculty directors on
affiliated with science, technology, engineering and mathematics.This attraction was also pronounced in the female sample. Over 79 percent of the participantsintended on starting their future career in this sector as a result of the rewarding experiencesthey had had in the Lab. 6. DiscussionThe main aim of the study was to evaluate the status of the courses offered to students usingexperiments. Our results clearly indicate the positive effects that the various experiments hadon participants during their visit, which in turn is seen to affect the participants’ desire tostudy STEM fields in the future. The visits have had positive impacts on students and haveaffected their future career plans.Over the past couple of years, a great deal of effort has
navigate anxiety and culture shock that mayaccompany undertaking a new endeavor in an unfamiliar place. Additionally, the advisor canhelp students network by making new contacts and gaining exposure to other faculty, advancedstudents, and members of their broader professional community.6,7 The advisor-advisee relationship is complex and life-changing; one’s advisor can help togenerate ideas about and support for postgraduate career choices, and help influence students’professional identity.8 In fields like engineering, where the academic advisor may also serve as astudent’s research supervisor,8 the advisor-advisee relationship includes myriad power dynamics.As a result, the advising relationship could have positive and/or negative effects
overalleffectiveness of using robotics in engineering education4.Finally, longitudinal tracking of student progress in the upcoming few years should be evaluated,which would provide data to directly assess the long-term outcome of the program. Forexample, three of the juniors who participated in the research projects have applied for top pre-college research programs. Although their status was not actively tracked, they requestedreference letters from both faculty members. Ultimately, what is of interest is whether thestudents gain an appreciation and greater understanding of the STEM disciplines and how thatmanifests itself by participating students electing to pursue a career in STEM fields. This can betracked by the percentage of students enrolled in STEM
Paper ID #13509An Analysis of Engineering Credits in ABET Accredited Engineering Man-agement ProgramsDr. Paul J. Kauffmann P.E., East Carolina University Paul J. Kauffmann is Professor Emeritus and past Chair in the Department of Engineering at East Car- olina University. His industry career included positions as Plant Manager and Engineering Director. Dr. Kauffmann received a BS degree in Electrical Engineering and MENG in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from Penn State and is a registered Profes- sional Engineer in Virginia and North Carolina.Dr. John Vail Farr
research fields with the last fifteen years in higher education. Natalia is currently an Institutional Research Analyst at Cabrillo College and for the past seven years has worked on the following grants and programs: USDE Title III STEM grant, the Academy for College Excellence program, the Career Technology Education program, the NSF EA- GER Engineering Abroad grant, and the NSF S-STEM grant. Natalia is passionate about education and enjoys being part of research projects that promote student success.Brandon Faria, Cabrillo College Brandon Faria is a mechanical engineering student at Cabrillo College. He was part of Cabrillo College’s first Engineering Abroad Program during to 2014-15 academic year. He has worked on
learning and help develop new understanding, knowledge, and skills. Thestudents get ample opportunity to develop theoretical understanding, by means of hands-onlearning, and apply the knowledge to designing, building, modeling, simulation, andexperimental testing of real-world engineering problems. It has been found, based on industryfeedback, that with the involvement in multidisciplinary and real-world projects, studentsdemonstrate increased readiness for career in the industry. Students have also shown increasedinterest to graduate degrees.The paper also describes the strategies to retain, recruit, and train lower level students for themultidisciplinary project, which is expected to continue for several years into the future withfunding support
foundthere were some differences between those working in community policing environments andthose who did not. Police involved in community policing tended to be Problem Solvers.Ausburn and Brown (2006) studied career and technical education students and found that mostwere Engagers.28 To date there have not been any studies to determine the ATLAS-definedlearning strategy preferences of engineers, the occupational group of interest here.Verbal-Visual PreferenceA major dimension of learning or cognitive style with implications for instructional design is theverbalizer-visualizer dimension.29,30 Unfortunately, there is no consensus on terminology for thisdimension as it has been called a cognitive style, a learning style, and a learning preference
women and underrepresented minorities. He received his M.S. in Industrial & Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech and his B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using
production and retention of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) talent is currently a major threat to the country2. In fact, to address heightened concern regarding the United States’ global position, several national efforts have been implemented to increase the number and diversity of students pursuing degrees and entering STEM careers. In 2012, the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology announced that by 2022, the country would need 1 million more STEM professionals than projected to be produced18. One critical asset to reaching this capacity lies in the cultivation of competent, adaptable engineers prepared
Paper ID #11847Using Humor to Create a Positive Learning EnvironmentProf. Ralph Ocon, Purdue University Calumet (College of Technology) Page 26.1667.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Using Humor to Create a Positive Learning EnvironmentAbstractHow to enhance student learning is a critical issue in academia. Throughout the author’sacademic career, teaching effectiveness has always been an on-going challenge.Consequently, he has experimented with different teaching techniques and approaches.The author’s
to emphasizemeasures related to having political power as matters of importance13. The disparity between thevalues of an institution and that of an individual can make it difficult to promote integration ofthe two entities. Thus, failure to adapt to the mainstream collegiate culture may have detrimentaloutcomes for a first-generation student and influence their ultimate success.A bachelor’s degree is the surest path to higher socioeconomic status and for a first-generationstudent to earn a comparable salary as their continuing-generation peers14. The field ofengineering is a growing sector of the economy that offers some of the best paid careers in theUnited States, which makes it a desirable degree for a lot of students15. However, it is
American Society for Engineering Education.Dr. Peter Rogers, The Ohio State University Dr. Peter Rogers, Professor of Practice Engineering Education Innovation Center The Ohio State Univer- sity Columbus, OH 43210 Rogers.693@osu.edu Rogers joined the university in October, 2008 bringing with him 35 years of industrial experience. His career includes senior leadership roles in engineering, sales, and manufacturing developing products us- ing multidisciplinary teams to convert customer needs to commercially viable products and services. He brings this experience to the university where he leads the effort in developing experiential, multidisci- plinary learning. Rogers co-led the development of an ABET approved
Paper ID #14185An Integrated Curriculum Design for Teaching Flying Qualities Flight Test-ingDr. M. Christopher Cotting, United States Air Force Test Pilot School Dr. Chris Cotting is the Master Instructor of Flying Qualities at the United States Air Force Test Pilot School. During his professional career he has also worked for the NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and the Lockheed Martin Skunkworks. He has worked on numerous experimental aircraft projects in- cluding the X-43A and X-43C, X-35, and X-33. He has a BS and MS in Aerospace Engineering from Mississippi State University, and a PhD in Aerospace Engineering from
asmuch as many of his friends. Simply put, his “resilience” appears to stem largely from his desireto graduate from a school of great renown and because others are able to do it, not necessarilybecause of his passion for the major or desire to pursue a STEM career. He is not necessarily“bouncing back” as much as wading through setbacks without addressing the academicchallenges he’s facing. This combination of factors and lower classman status may putEmmanuel in a particularly precarious position with regard to whether he does in fact persist andbounce back from setbacks in his major and build the confidence necessary to successfullypursue his STEM degree.DiscussionOverall, interviews exploring the experiences of Black undergraduates in
Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulderinaugurated a flexible, customizable and design-focused multidisciplinary undergraduateengineering degree program, built on a common engineering core, with a hands-on engineeringdesign focus throughout all four years. Predicated upon the belief that students know what is bestto meet their own career and personal interest needs, the curriculum branches out so studentschoose many courses to pursue their individual passions. Different than the traditional restrictiveengineering curricular models that act as barriers to student migration into engineering programs,the curricular flexibility and choice in the Engineering Plus (e+) program makes transferring intothe program more navigable
only five cost items and these were consideredcohesive, no cost subcategories were isolated.Table 3. Subcategories of Value and Expectancy Items Construct Sub-category n Example item Using this strategy/tool fosters positive value for students 8 Value student attitudes towards learning. value for self 3 Using this strategy/tool aids my career. My students lack the skills necessary to based on students 5
students from the U.S. participated in a twoweek residential engineering leadership camp, entitled Setting Up Collegiates for Careers in Engineering through Social Support (SUCCESS) alongside 30 Liberian undergraduate female engineering students from three Liberian universities (Stella Maris Polytechnic, University of Liberia, St. Clements University College). The camp was held in Kakata, Liberia, West Africa and carried out by 5 U.S. graduate students. The camp was structured in a workshop format with an average of three workshops a day. The workshops included academic and professional skills sessions covering topics related to graduate school application process, personal statement writing, leadership development, crosscultural communication
’ perception of how much they learneddramatically shifted towards the above average and well above average categories after theimplementation of the 3D technology project. Another set of questions in which the majority of the students agree on their perceivedlearning is shown in Figure 6 for the first year and Figure 8 for year two. In this set of questions theagreement of the students was higher than 60% and lower than 70% for year one and between 80%and 82.6% for year two. Here we can see that the 3D technology project had a high impact in theareas of time management, engineering career awareness and planning, research methods andtechniques, critical thinking concepts, and unit systems and conversions. From previous research wehave confirmed
Paper ID #14607Twelve Years of Growth and Success at Douglas L. Jamerson ElementarySchool Center for Mathematics and EngineeringDr. Marilyn Barger, Florida Advanced Technological Education Center of Excellence Dr. Marilyn Barger is the Principal Investigator and Executive Director of FLATE, the Florida Regional Center of Excellence for Advanced Technological Education, funded by the National Science Founda- tion and housed at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa, Florida since 2004. FLATE serves the state of Florida as its region and is involved in outreach and recruitment of students into technical career pathways
visualize, but the technical aspects of learning thesoftware were difficult at first. Students also noted the high level of construction knowledgerequired for this course. The study pointed out that students were very motivated to learn thissoftware and concluded that “properly structured BIM courses would provide industry-requiredknowledge to prepare student to successful careers in the AEC industries” 33.Members of the Associated Schools of Construction Education (ACCE) have been working onimplementing BIM into their curriculum 30. The have recommended that educators should beinvestigating how this powerful tool can enhance their curriculum. Building InformationModeling can better integrate a construction curriculum 2. During a class
by year in school.By examining many different possible models from the multiple linear regression analysis, twocandidate models were selected that can provide some insight. The first candidate model is amultiple linear regression with no interaction terms (Table 5). Student major is clearly animportant consideration. The model estimates that non-majors score about nine points lowerthan majors. Also quite significant was the year term. Earlier academic career students hadabout four points higher per year modeled scores. The gender effect is not as significant but theestimated effect is four points lower for women. The cohort coefficient is the least significant.Table 5: One candidate multiple linear regression model used to describe the
Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 16(3-4), 377-401.[12] Forsyth, D. R. (2009). Group dynamics. Boston: Cengage Learning.[13] Wilkinson, S. (1996). The factors affecting the career choice of male and femalecivil engineering students in the UK. Career Development International, 1(5): 45-50.[14] Huang, G., Taddese, N., Walter, E. (2000). Entry and Persistence of Women andMinorities in College Science and Engineering Education. Education StatisticsQuarterly, 2(3): 59-60.[15] Takahira, S., Goodings, D. J., Byrnes, J. P. (1998). Retention and performance ofmale and female engineering students: An examination of academic andenvironmental variables. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(3): 297.[16] Stephen, M. (2007). A study into the factors that
-Marcos School ofEngineering at the University of San Diego is working to produce and disseminate a model forredefining the engineering education canon with the goal of developing “ChangemakingEngineers.” One of the strategies for achieving this goal is to infuse traditional engineeringclasses with new materials that address this changemaking theme. The goal is for students todevelop the same fundamental skills that they currently acquire, but to see better how these skillscan be applied to problems and situations that don’t appear in traditional textbooks. This greaterperspective will encourage some students to pursue non-traditional career paths, and other topractice with greater awareness of the impact of engineering on society.In Fall 2017
international experiences including study abroad, internships,volunteer work, and faculty-led study tours. Western faculty plays an active role in their student’slives, not only in the classroom but also through advising student groups, supporting individualstudent career aspirations, and mentoring programs. The Engineering & Design Department atWWU is a new department formed in 2014 out of the former Engineering Technology departmentas part of a state-funded effort to transition the engineering technology programs to accreditedengineering programs. The department offers five undergraduate-only programs withdistinguished faculty in each program; the Electrical Engineering (EE) program, theManufacturing Engineering (MfgE) program, and the Plastics
Guidelines are imperative for undergraduateeducation and the subsequent professional career. However, due to the lack of active learningtools and the dearth of engaged student learning, software engineering education may not beeffectively delivered, resulting in non-coverage by the instructors or non-retention by thestudents of the required software engineering knowledge area. A three years NSF TUES grantawarded to the authors institute in 2013 has specifically addressed these pedagogical issues. Theproject which involved partnerships in academia and industry developed 44 delivery contacthours of new Active Learning Tools, deployed to enhance knowledge delivery and retention inSoftware Verification and Validation (SV&V), specifically in these
career engineers to experienced engineering leaders. Someglobal technical organizations go to extraordinary lengths to develop working environments thathone the creative skills of their employees, while an increasing number of academic institutionsstrive to deliver curricula focused on creativity from a variety of perspectives. Despite these efforts,engineering professionals and academics continue to debate the best ways to embed and facilitatecreativity in engineering programs. In this exploratory study, we investigated how engineeringstudents perceive creativity and whether we could positively influence their acceptance ofcreativity as part of their leadership development. We analyzed a sample of graduate-levelengineering students’ perceptions
offerings. For example,Architectural Engineering was taught first by a local architect and then by our campus architect.A course on Building the High-Tech Start-up has been taught by the manager of a localtechnology incubator. And for a number of years, an Internship course was facilitated by a localengineer with a lengthy career in a prominent firm. These adjunct faculty members havebroadened and enriched the courses available not only to Engineering Studies majors but to allstudents on campus.The program is thriving, yet challenges remain. Our campus culture professes to value“integration of engineering and the liberal arts,” but as a campus, we continue to struggle with
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Virginia Tech, with courtesy appointments in Computer Science and the School of Architecture + Design. He is the co-director of the Virginia Tech E-textiles Lab and the associate director of the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology. He received his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University and his B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Cincinnati. His research and teaching interests include wearable computing, electronic textiles, and interdisciplinary design teams for pervasive computing. In 2006 he was selected for the National Science Foundation’s Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers
strategies workshops (27% versus 9%), and to seek assistance from disability services (33% versus 16%). LGBTQ+ students were more likely than straight students to reach out to family members or close friends about difficulties with school (64% versus 43%), to get advice from a mentor outside of the university (64% versus 32%), to receive tutoring (43% versus 21%), to seek help from the career center (43% versus 29%), and to seek assistance from disability services (29% versus 12%).Students with disabilities were also more likely to reach out to family members or close friends about difficulties with school (69%). While students with disabilities were also more likely than other students to seek assistance from disability services (44%), the majority