Institute of Engineering & Technology (IET) in 2015 and inducted as a charter member of the University of Arkansas Academy of Computer Sci- ence and Computer Engineering in 2017. He established an endowed faculty award in Computer Science, an endowed undergraduate scholarship in Chemical Engineering and an endowed undergraduate scholar- ship to attract under-represented students to Engineering to help establish the College of Engineering’s Early Career Awareness Program (ECAP). Dr. Schubert lives in Tontitown, AR, USA with his wife Kathryn, and son Tucker.Dr. Manuel D. Rossetti P.E., University of Arkansas MANUEL D. ROSSETTI is a Professor in the Industrial Engineering Department at the University of Arkansas. He
theother four. Studies like this show the academic significance of examining diversity in the use ofCCW among students from systemically marginalized racial/ethnic groups. In particular, weargue that it is useful to focus on STEM students in this study because, while students who areracially and ethnically marginalized in STEM fields are as likely to enter STEM majors as theirwhite counterparts [6], the proportions of Hispanic, Pacific Islander, American Indian/AlaskaNative, and Black students awarded STEM bachelor’s degrees are lower than that of Asian andwhite students [7]. Moreover, racial and ethnic inequality in persistence to STEM degrees ismore pronounced than in non-STEM fields [8]. Research shows that careers in STEM fields havethe
-solving, whereasEuropean educators focus on preparing students for career mobility by restructuring degrees,expanding nontechnical contents and creating student-exchange programs. Zhou and hercolleagues (2015) found a push-pull difference of teacher-student relationship between China andthe U.S., in that teachers are regarded as the owner of learning and need to push their students tolearn in China, whereas U.S. students perceive themselves to be the owner of learning. Lessresearch is focused on the culturally-shaped values and orientations of engineering learnersthemselves. Drawing on a learning pathway perspective, Nasir, et al., (2020) analyzed howidiosyncratic upbringings and educational cultures would channel engineering students
Engineering at York University, Canada. Before beginning his academic career, Dr. Czekanski worked for over 10 years in the automotive sector. Dr. Czekanski attention is dedicated to newly established Lassonde School of Engineering (York). He devotes his efforts towards the enrichment of Renaissance Engineering program by including interdisciplinary learning, industry collaboration and designing for positive social impact which contributes to the uniqueness of York’s engineering program. As an active participant in the establishment of the undergraduate and graduate Mechanical Engineering programs, his attention is devoted to providing students with both experiential learning and soft skills
concern, arguingthat graduate student1 ability to “communicate well both in written and oral forms is essential fora successful career” (p. 1) and the ability to write “will profoundly shape both initial and longterm post-PhD career opportunities” (Maher et al., 2013, p. 707). Moreover, in the United States,research suggests that engineers spend more than 30% of their time writing (Covington et al.,2007; Kreth, 2000). In a survey of U.K. engineers, more than 50% of the respondents spent morethan 40% of their time writing (Sales, 2006).This important shift of emphasis towards improving the written proficiency of engineeringstudents has led to an increasing amount of research that has investigated how to supportstudents in successfully engaging in
socioeconomically just engineering education.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Chemical Engineering (by courtesy) at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the prac- tice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent
influence – often negatively – their pursuit of careers in engineering and computerscience [2], [5]–[9].While at one time, computer science was seen as a profession that was both welcoming and open todiverse membership [10]–[15], this vision was either never realized or quickly lost [16]–[19]. Culturaland gendered expectations (what everybody `knows` and commonsensically `performs`, but fewactually think about) that have been part of the lived reality of this technological society seem to havefound their way into computer science, and it is not working in everybody’s favor. Faced with claimsthat computer science’s `face` as stereotypically white or Asian, and male, is somehow reflective of asort of evolutionary inevitability – `that’s just the way
expe- rience. I plan to continue on a path of lifelong learning as I hope to obtain a graduate-level education in the future. My engineering identity and career are underpinned by a hunger for knowledge and a desire to serve.Dr. Nathan E. Canney, Seattle University Dr. Canney teaches civil engineering at Seattle University. His research focuses on engineering educa- tion, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sustainability education. Dr. Canney received bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stan- ford University with an emphasis on
, theirpractice and belief systems. Your What you think Chinese Your Answer Chinese students students’ Answer before class would answer answer After class 1. What is engineering ethics? 2. Do you think engineer ethics mean individual virtue? Why or why not? 3. How do you define a successful engineer? 4. Does ethics education contribute a successful engineering career? 5. Who is your role model in engineering? 6. What are the top 3 most important qualities of being an
Gulf Region at the start of their academic career, and argues thatthe introduction, early on, of “well thought out” professional development strategiesof engineering educators would raise their self-confidence as teachers and help inequipping them with the tools they need in disseminating knowledge in theclassroom. This does not mean that learning and teaching does not go on in Region’scolleges of engineering; I think that a great deal does. But there is every reason tobelieve that introducing a higher level of professionalism would enable young facultyto create and sustain a more powerful form of engineering education for the Region.The author draws on his own experience in the Region, as a faculty member and anadministrator, and looks
these difficulties and survive in this maelstrom of indecisiveness anduncertainty? What is the role of the institution in assisting young faculty inovercoming the initial hurdles at the start of their journey?The paper addresses issues and concerns that beset the majority of young engineeringfaculty in the Arab Gulf Region at the start of their academic career, and argues thatthe introduction, early on, of “well thought out” professional development strategiesof engineering educators would raise their self-confidence as teachers and help inequipping them with the tools they need in disseminating knowledge in theclassroom. This does not mean that learning and teaching does not go on in Region’scolleges of engineering; I think that a great deal
Entrepreneurship-related Factors Teachers consistently discussed how they valued teaching engineering andentrepreneurship to their students, but their reasons for valuing this content differed. One highschool teacher noted the importance of teaching students about understanding your customer andrecognizing that business decisions entail constant risk analysis and cost-benefit tradeoffconsiderations; his reasoning behind the value of entrepreneurship education focused on specific,practical considerations within a business setting. An elementary school teacher noted thatlearning about entrepreneurship can prompt a variety of career interests, possibly ones thatstudents had not previously considered; her value on entrepreneurship education relates
pursue STEM as a major and career is a significant concern1,2 for educators, scholars,and policymakers. The prevailing situation suggests a need for reform-oriented teaching practices(RTPs) in K-12 STEM education. The Next Generation Science Standards3 (NGSS) and the NRCFramework for K-12 Science Education4 emphasize the necessity of RTPs that enhance studentunderstanding of the nature of science and practices of engineering. The Common Core StateStandards of Mathematics5 (CCSSM) also describe their reform efforts on how teachers need totransform their teaching style from the traditional instructional methods to more reform-orientedmethods.Recent research suggests that effective technology integration has the potential to promote STEMlearning
A&M University Delivering significant results in pivotal roles such as Sr. Consultant to high-profile clients, Sr. Project Manager directing teams, and Executive Leader of initiatives and programs that boost organizational effectiveness and optimize operations have been hallmarks of Dr. Wickliff’s career spanning more than 24 years with leaders in the oil & gas and semiconductor industries. As an expert in the areas of Executive Leadership and Team Development, Strategy Design & Execution, Supply Chain Optimization, Change Management, System Integration and LEAN Process Improvement (technical and business), Dr. Wickliff is passionate about Organizational Wellness and the Holistic Well- ness of
but when I talk with other engineering students it’s cool to be on the same level. [To be] able to have engineering discussions with them. I fit in, in that aspect… If there’s some new technology out there and we’re like, “Oh they, they did this, they built that.” We’re like, “Oh wow! That’s, I wonder how they did that.”… Or if it was a non-engineer they’d be like, “Oh, Okay?” – Henry. Yes, definitely [I feel I belong in engineering]… Because I don't fit into the other careers or majors. Often times if I'm speaking to an arts or a biology or anything like that, there's a disconnect. Just the way they see the world, and they don't seem very interested in [the world around them]... They almost
attitudes towards becoming engineers, their problem solving processes, and cultural fit. His education includes a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, a M.S. in Bioengineering and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing and Science Education from Clemson University.Dr. Allison Godwin, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Allison Godwin, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr
researchmethods, theories, and philosophical stances.”28Unlike direct pathway graduate students, returners enter graduate school with more variedrhetorical experiences due to their years of writing in industry. They have already learned howto write in a new context when they began their professional careers and continued this learningprocess as they needed to produce different types of documents, either in a new position in thesame company or after moving to other employment. The amount of time they devote to writingat work is substantial and rises as engineers move up the corporate ladder.29 Thus, they may havemore “cultural capital” (similar to the previously mentioned “experience capital”) on which todraw in the transfer process than their classmates
, and modeling of motor performance and con- trol in Parkinson’s disease. She previously held a faculty position at the University of British Columbia at Vancouver, and postdoctoral positions at Sandia National Laboratories and at the National Ecological Observatory Network. She is the recipient of the UNM Regents’ Lectureship, the NSF CAREER Award, the UNM Teaching Fellowship, the Peter Wall Institute Early Career Scholar Award, the Truman Post- doctoral Fellowship in National Security Science and Engineering, and the George Bienkowski Memorial Prize, Princeton University. She was a Summer Faculty Fellow at AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, and a Science and Technology Policy Fellow at The National Academies.Dr
Paper ID #19626Integration of Critical Reflection Methodologies into Engineering Service-Learning ProjectsDr. Scott A. Newbolds P.E., Benedictine College Dr. Newbolds is an assistant professor in the engineering department at Benedictine College, Atchison, Kansas. After graduating from Purdue University in 1995, Dr. Newbolds started his career in construction as a Project Engineer for the Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT). He returned to Purdue for graduate school in 1998 and subsequently took a position in the INDOT Research and Development office. While completing his graduate degrees, Dr. Newbolds conducted and
system for that project. Prof. Anderson was a participant in the first cohort of the NCWIT Pacesetters program, a program de- signed to recruit more women to the field of computer science and encourage them to pursue their careers in technology. As part of his Pacesetters efforts, Prof. Anderson led the charge to create a new BA in CS degree at CU that allows students in Arts and Sciences to earn a degree in computer science. This new degree program was first offered in Fall 2013 and had 240 students enroll during its first semester and now has more than 1200 majors five years later. He also organizes and hosts the annual NCWIT Colorado Aspirations in Computing Award for the past seven years. This award recognizes the
the Faculty of Engineering, Tel-Aviv University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #30260Prof. Zoran Kostic, Electrical Engineering, Columbia University Zoran Kostic completed his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering at the University of Rochester and his Dipl. Ing. degree at the University of Novi Sad. He spent most of his career in industry where he worked in research, product development and in leadership positions. Zoran’s expertise spans mobile data systems, wireless communications, signal processing, multimedia, system-on-chip development and applications of parallel
%,and 0.3% of tenured and tenure track science and engineering faculty, respectively. One statistical model showed that, even given exponential growth in the pool of Ph.D.graduates from URM groups, the composition of faculty would remain stagnant even through theyear 2080 [16]! Those truly invested in repairing the ‘leaky pipeline’ should question solutionswhich deflect the burden of underrepresentation onto persons from underrepresented groupsthemselves. We must instead shift attention to understanding why institutions are failing toattract and retain talent that already exists. In other words, we must question why URM Ph.D.graduates are pursuing careers outside of academia, in some cases leaving the professoriate to doso [18]. Are
bibliometrics.Christine Brodeur, Polytechnique Montr´eal Christine Brodeur holds a bachelor’s degree in education and science from McGill University, in Montr´eal. She taught high school for 6 years before enrolling at Universit´e de Montr´eal to complete a Master of Information Sciences. She has been working as a librarian at Polytechnique Montr´eal since 2013, doing a variety of tasks, with a focus on bibliometrics and teaching information literacy.Manon Du Ruisseau, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal Manon Du Ruisseau has been working at the Polytechnique Montr´eal Library for more than 30 years. During the first years of her career, she worked as a library technician and since then she occupied various positions that allowed her to
understand issues of diversity and inclusion in engineering. Specifically, she investigates how language influences who engages in the technical fields. She was recently awarded the Stanford DARE fellowship. Globally, she is part of the Galapagos research-practice partnership that seeks to improve the teaching of science for underserved communities through education for sustainability. Before coming to Stanford, she was a bilingual educator at Plano ISD. In Plano, she served in the Gifted and Talented Advisory Committee and the Elementary Curriculum Design team. Prior to starting her career in education, Greses was a project manager for engineering programs funded by the European nonprofits in the Caribbean. She holds a
experience engineering as an evolving, creative, and interdisciplinary career that impacts global society and daily life. 2. Provide students with the opportunity to develop process-driven problem solving skills that recognize multiple alternatives and apply critical thinking to identify an effective solution. 3. Provide students with the opportunity to integrate math & science in an engineering context. 4. Create motivated & passionate engineering students by challenging them with authentic engineering problems across multiple disciplines. 5. Instill in our students the professional, personal & academic behaviors and common competencies needed to move to the next stage of their
education, advising and mentoring, students’ persistence, engineering career pathways, and school-to-work transition of new engineers. He holds a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and a M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology. Prior to beginning his doctoral studies, Hassan worked for five years at General Electric where he graduated from their Edison Engineer- ing Development Program (EEDP) and then worked as a gas turbine fleet management engineer. In addi- tion to his technical role, Hassan supported the recruiting, interview, and selection process of the EEDP Program, where he mentored interns, co-ops and Edison associates from the Middle East and Africa
loss of self-efficacy.13 Once a student loses confidence in their ability to perform a task, theytend to feel uncomfortable or out of place. Similarly, Tinto identified that the most important factorin a student’s academic performance is a measure that he termed “student commitment”. This is ameasure of the student’s ability to integrate themselves into the academic community.14,15 Whilethere have since been many studies examining other contributing factors, the underlying tone inall of the research is the student’s comfort, confidence, and motivation in their area of study.14–17 2.2. Student GenderThere exists an implicit bias that science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) aremasculine career fields. Though women make up
campus SHAWN JORDAN, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Com- puter Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?,” and is a Co-PI on the
’ understanding ofengineering as a possible career path and, at worst, fosters misconceptions about the nature ofengineering. Furthermore, treating engineering as a solely technical field may be particularlydetrimental to students from underrepresented communities and to women, groups for whichsocial concerns and community relationships are often of importance.Despite significant effort on the part of the engineering community, engaging future engineers inways that support their trajectories into engineering careers remains a substantial challenge forengineering education programs3. In particular, recruitment and retention of women and studentsfrom underrepresented minority populations have proven difficult to increase1.Recently, several scholars have