’ understanding ofengineering as a possible career path and, at worst, fosters misconceptions about the nature ofengineering. Furthermore, treating engineering as a solely technical field may be particularlydetrimental to students from underrepresented communities and to women, groups for whichsocial concerns and community relationships are often of importance.Despite significant effort on the part of the engineering community, engaging future engineers inways that support their trajectories into engineering careers remains a substantial challenge forengineering education programs3. In particular, recruitment and retention of women and studentsfrom underrepresented minority populations have proven difficult to increase1.Recently, several scholars have
interest, identity, and career aspirations, gains in 21st century skills, and possiblelearning gains [6], [7]. Leveraging these environments requires curricula that are appropriate forthe OST setting. Such curricula can engage learners, respond to their backgrounds and interests,and connect with home and communities [8]. High-quality OST engineering curricula thus canenhance youth learning and engagement, and are important tools for OST educators. Recently,engineering curricula have been developed specifically for the OST community. To engage alllearners, it is important that engineering curricula provide opportunities for youth to activelyengage in the practices of engineering, to see relevancy, to collaborate, and to have opportunitiesto develop
using solar, then all of ourproblems are solved,” placing the importance on educating not just their immediate social circle,but society at large for a social good. A third opinion of note pointed to the possibility thatcontributing to the available knowledge online would also aid scientists who need to work inother fields and science students such as herself who could not find enough additional resourcesto help her learn the PV solar material at the start of the program.The three participants who valued communicating with scientists and PV engineering audiencesmore expressed that at this point in their career, establishing themselves among professionals andfocusing on their education was a higher priority than communicating with the public
50 students’ with diverse prior experiences. The threecategories of research process sophistication described in this paper will later be used tocharacterize the responses of all returning and direct pathway students in our study and betterunderstand how students’ past education, work, and other experiences relate to their engineeringresearch process. However, the applicability of such a classification scheme would likely extendto evaluating the work of engineering graduate students’ research sophistication or progress overtime more broadly.BackgroundResearch Skills. A major component of doctoral education is preparing students to beindependent researchers. There are a variety of research skills essential for career success inacademia
these challenges highlight the need to better preparetoday’s engineers with the intuition, skills and tools they need to tackle these problems. CharlesVest, 9 former president of National Academy of Engineering, asserts that engineering studentsprepared for professional careers in the year 2020 and beyond, “must be excited by their freshman year; must have an understanding of what engineers actually do; must write and communicate well; must appreciate and draw on the richness of American diversity; must think clearly about ethics and social responsibility; must be adept at product development and high-quality manufacturing; must know how to merge the physical, life, and information sciences when working at
, Northwestern University Trevor is an undergraduate psychology major with a minor in business institutions and a certificate in marketing. Over the course of his Northwestern career he has conducted research for and served as a coauthor on numerous psychology and other social science studies.Dr. Penny L. Hirsch, Northwestern University Penny L. Hirsch, Professor of Instruction and Associate Director of the Cook Family Writing Program at Northwestern University, teaches classes in the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences and the Mc- Cormick School of Engineering and Applied Science. She was Northwestern’s first Charles Deering McCormick University Distinguished Lecturer and played a key role in developing Design Thinking and
public policy, assessing stakeholder needs and desires, resource analysis, and collective impact engagement. Currently, he is working closely with several local and national organizations to research and rally opposition against the transfer of federal public lands to state governance.Dr. Steven J. Burian P.E., University of Utah Dr. Steven J. Burian is an associate professor in the Urban Water Group in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at the University of Utah. Dr. Burian’s career spans more than a decade during which he has worked in design engineering, as a scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory, as a profes- sor at the University of Arkansas and the University of Utah, and as a director of
interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, interdisciplinary pedagogy for pervasive computing design; writing across the curriculum in Statics courses; as well as a CAREER award to explore the use of e-portfolios to promote professional identity and reflective practice. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Student Persistence Through Uncertainty Toward Successful Creative PracticeAbstract: To increase creative practice among students in engineering and other
recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Natascha M Trellinger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Natascha Trellinger is a second year Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Syracuse University where her interest in the
UniversityAbstract:Although there is evidence that most women with long-term careers in STEM will face someform of sexism, there is little research on how to handle such behaviors. Some situations requireintervention by those with authority, some can be confronted directly by individuals, and stillothers should be ignored. To better understand how students and faculty should respond to sexistcomments made by one student to another, we interviewed engineering students, professionals,and faculty, asking them to respond to two different real-life scenarios containing sexistcomments.We found that three-fourths of professionals and over one-third of students had experiencedinappropriate behaviors that could be labeled as sexist. Furthermore, we found major differencesin
over a 19-year teaching career and among the lowest courseratings in the department. The average departmental overall course rating is 4.8. A few studentsrated the course adequate; four students rated the course at a 4 or 5. Students’ expectations werelow; the “personal interest before enrolled” average rating was 2.1 / 6 (median 2.0); the lowestseen in the department. The average amount of time that students reported spending on thecourse (including class) was 7-9 hours per week; that is appropriate to an upper-divisionengineering course that meets 2 hours per week with an expectation of 2 to 3 hours of outsidework per week per credit hour (6 to 8 hours, by that estimate). The median was only 4-6 hours,and this may be why some students did
to a reason for pursuing (or not) engineering thatis related to the self-perceived identify of an engineer; Cost is the price of success (or failure) interms of effort, time, and/or psychological impacts in pursuing engineering in comparison toanother career; Interest is the enjoyment (or lack of) experienced in doing engineering activities;and Utility is the perceived usefulness (or lack of) of becoming an engineer and/or earning anengineering degree (Matusovich et al., 2010). The authors conducted longitudinal semi-structured interviews of 11 participants (5 boys and 6 girls) during their four years ofundergraduate engineering education. They found that all four Eccles’ value categories arepresent; that attainment value plays a prominent
societal challenges; and 4)perform data collection, analysis and presentation in order to answer research questions andshare research results with a professional audience. The course also emphasized critical thinking,multidisciplinary perspectives, leadership and team-based problem solving. To achieve thecourse learning objectives, the course focused on problems associated with an aging sewersystem, generally, and the lack of local sewer infrastructure data, specifically. This course wasexperimental in that it introduced design thinking through an experiential learning project earlyin engineering students’ academic careers. Traditionally, design capstone courses are offeredtoward the end of students’ course of study after core courses and textbook
complete in one academic year. It was understood by the companythat most of the students would be graduating and starting professional careers after thecompletion of their degrees. In the fall semester proposals were drafted and aggressive scheduleswere put together. By the winter break working prototypes of all three systems, mechanical,electrical and software, were demonstrated. It was the hope of the company to be ready tomanufacture at the conclusion of the spring semester. As with most student projects, issuesslowly started to materialize that would impede demonstrating a commercially ready solution inthe time frame desired by the company.By the end of the academic year, a fully functional software system was demonstrated. Theelectrical
RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutioniz- ing Engineering Departments project and a CAREER project, FRAME. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, sci- entists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Chen Qiu M.Sc., University of New Mexico Chen
comes out or begins transitioning between the ages of 18 and 24[14]. This itself is a process with additional social and material support needs which canovershadow the demands of the classroom.Resiliency and social support Resiliency refers to the processes used to overcome challenging situations and adapt tothe demands of life, with particular attention on the unique strategies employed by marginalizedgroups [16, 17]. Transgender and gender nonconforming students are often written about throughdeficit framing which define their lives in terms of their trauma or perceived academic failure[13, 18]. In contrast, resilience is “reflected by achievement in career development, happiness,relationships, and physical well-being in the presence
of Toronto, where he rose to the rank of professor. In 2001, he joined the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering at the University of Alberta where he holds the NSERC industrial research chair in petroleum thermodynamics. During his career he has developed expertise in the phase behavior, physiochemical and transport prop- erties of hydrocarbon mixtures from coal liquids, heavy oils and condensate rich reservoir fluids to pure compounds. This led to the establishment of an NSERC (like NSF in the USA) Industrial Research Chair in 2001, a rare honour at that time. He has held visiting scientist/professor positions at the Technical Uni- versity of Delft (Delft, The Netherlands), the Institut Francais du
Degree in Engineering Managament and a Bachelor’s Degree in Chemical Engineering in 2018. While at Northeastern, he was involved in the Connections Chemistry Review program and first year engineering tutoring for four years. Tyler currently works as a tech transfer engineer in biopharmaceuticals.Dr. Paul A. DiMilla, Northeastern University Paul A. DiMilla is an Affiliate Associate Teaching Professor in Chemistry & Chemical Biology and Chem- ical Engineering at Northeastern University. During his academic career at Carnegie Mellon University, Boston University, and Olin College he has been the recipient of the first Whitaker Young Investigator Award from the BMES, a Searle Scholar Award, and an Early Career
University has several programs learning support such as UCL Arena and UCL: Changemaker that supports teaching and learning and collaborations in these areas. Career tracks are divided into an academic track, an education-focused track Reward and and a research track. University instituted reform to develop a process for recognition of improving and formalizing the recognition and reward of teaching teaching achievement. engineering education research capacity has grown significantly since the Educational introduction of the IEP. Areas of particular research focus include (i) research problem-based and skills-based learning; and (ii
forthe sake of the institution’s reputation, the desire to protect their most prolific and well-knownscientists, and the fear of being sued by the targets of bullying” 31 . Furthermore, the kind of negativerelationship between PhD student and advisor discussed in Narrative 3 can be a major contributingfactor to a students’ decision to either leave the PhD program or to complete the PhD programbut abandon a faculty career 32 . A 2018 Nature editiorial stated “[we] will never know how manypromising scientific careers around the world have been brought to a premature end because youngresearchers felt they could not continue to work under a bullying senior figure” 33 . Another author of this work had a very similar experience in their previous
advanced coursework of engineering students can be predicted by theiracademic performance in first-year courses [9]. In addition, these courses can help studentsidentify areas of engineering that interest them and guide their career choices [10]. Thus, thesignificance of the first-year engineering courses extends beyond mere academic introduction;they are integral in shaping the future academic journeys of aspiring engineers.Understanding how instructors' pedagogical knowledge affects their classroom practices iscrucial. Pedagogical knowledge includes a wide range of pedagogical strategies to effectivelymanage a classroom and engage students [11]. This includes the use of instructional strategiesthat accommodate diverse student needs, the design
because they were more efficient at problem-solving. Additionally, to address bothtechnical and personal disagreements, interviewees said they were comfortable speaking openlyin meetings and after incidents occurred, indicating good psychological safety with teammates.We hope to use the results of this work to develop recommendations and best practices forstudent-organized engineering design project teams to provide a welcoming and effective learningenvironment for all students involved.IntroductionEngineering design teams are common in the industry, so students need to have experientialdesign team experiences to learn and develop critical skills needed for their careers. These skillsgo beyond the technical content in core engineering courses and
potential for improving learningoutcomes for diverse students by helping them connect theoretical concepts with practicalengineering applications [28]. When utilized in introductory level engineering courses, project-based learning has been shown to be beneficial for student performance in subsequentengineering courses [28]. The social component of project-based learning has also beenobserved to be an effective tool in helping students develop and refine soft skills such ascommunication, collaboration, creativity, and critical thinking that will be very important to theirfuture success in a career [3].Assessment MethodsPre- and Post-Participation SurveysPre- and post-participation surveys were developed by the project’s evaluator based
finding himself, coming to terms with his engineering identity. So, I like to tell people that when I went to Germany, I had no idea what I wanted to do as an engineer. Going through my one year in Germany I walked out of there knowing exactly what I want to do. […] the biggest positive I got of going abroad was figuring out what I want to do as a career in my engineering field […]. It was the research what, like, sparked it. JD, originally reserved and not used to advocating for himself, then developed theconfidence to ask his internship supervisor whether he could work on a project related to hisnewly found area of interest: “At Siemens, I asked my boss, if it was possible for me to do somehardware tests
, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including tDr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello is a military veteran, licensed mechanical engineer, and associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Her research examines issues of access, equity, and identity in the formation of engineers and a diverse, transdisciplinary 21st century engineering workforce. Angie received an NSF CAREER award in 2021 for her work with student veterans and service members in engineering.Dr. Ronald W. Welch P.E., The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He
. He earned his PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a focus in Engineering Education. His interests are centered around mentorship, mental health, and retention in STEM students and faculty. Additionally, he helps support the development of new engineering education scholars and researches quality in mixed methods research methodologies.Dr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering education research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering
technologies and environmental changes.Step 4: By having categories, considering the number of respondents per category was beimportant. For instance, all the respondents should not only be from industry – there should bea balance between industry, government, and academia. Based on these numbers, theconsensus building function is equipped to attach confidence levels to the categorymodifications. For example, if the curriculum is for undergraduates with the goal of makingthem prepared for industry and government careers, then perhaps a larger number of industryand government respondents should be emphasized / weighed / required (requested for input).However, if the curriculum is geared towards PhD students, then a larger respondent pool ofacademics
introduces globalization and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [14]. Thegoal of this module is to help students recognize the implications their design decisions mayhave outside of their immediate community and identify ways their careers as designers couldinclude work toward addressing some of the SDGs.The lesson plan for this module first introduces the concept of globalization, including bothpositive aspects like economic growth and cultural exchange and negative aspects likeoverconsumption and exploitation. The UN SDGs are then presented as an international effort toalign countries and major organizations toward positive globalization outcomes. After a briefhistory of the development of the SDGs, students are encouraged to evaluate the
energy and conversion to electricity in high school students in a rural community, remotely implementing the teaching-learning process through STEM-oriented project-based Learning (PBL)? 2) What is the change in attitudes towards STEM careers of high school students in a rural community who remotely implement the teaching-learning process through STEM-oriented Project-Based Learning (PBL)?4.1 Design of the Content ExamTo answer the first question, the project designed an exam of 20 multiple-choice questions following thetopics covered in the Didactic Sequence. To validate the exam, the project followed the ValidationProcess (Coral, 2009) [16]. After developing the first draft, the exam was presented to two
usingtrial and error to fine tune their IM selections over time (Go It Alone). We also found complexPower dynamics were involved. Instructors often teach more than one course over an academicyear or a career, and thus we expected to see multiple strategies mentioned. As noted earlier,there is expected overlap between responses and instructors in the Power and the Peers andColleagues themes. However, we did not see overlap between instructors with responses in thePower or the Go It Alone themes. Perhaps those who employ a Go It Alone strategy for their IMselection also opt to teach courses without a strong Power dynamic at play. Also, one instructor'sresponses are in both the Go It Alone and the Peers and Colleagues themes, as they use a mix ofself