Optimizing Student-Faculty Rapport for the Engineering Classrooms: Dimensioning the Behaviors that Matter

Fethiye Ozis; Kyle Nathan Winfree

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Location: Virtual On line
Publication Date: June 22, 2020
Start Date: June 22, 2020
End Date: June 26, 2021
Conference Session: Faculty Development Research
Tagged Division: Faculty Development Division
Tagged Topic: Diversity
Page Count: 15
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--35016
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/35016
Download Count: 313

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Fethiye Ozis P.E. Northern Arizona University

visit author page

Dr. Fethiye “Faith” Ozis is a lecturer in the civil and environmental engineering department at Northern Arizona University. Dr. Ozis holds a B.S. in environmental engineering from the Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey and a Ph.D. from the University of Southern California, Los Angeles. She is a licensed Professional Engineer, Environmental, in Arizona.

Dr. Ozis is an ExCEEd fellow, and enjoys every dimension of being an engineering educator, including conducting research related to classroom and innovative pedagogical strategies. Her own intersectionality led to her passion in promoting and researching pathways into Engineering especially for underrepresented minority groups.

visit author page

biography

Kyle Nathan Winfree Northern Arizona University

visit author page

Dr. Winfree is the Associate Director of the School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems as Northern Arizona University. His research focuses on wearable technologies as applied to health assessment and rehabilitation. He teaches in both Electrical Engineering and Informatics.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

This research paper describes the findings from an exploratory study. Student retention, from program initiation through commencement, in engineering disciplines is recognized as a challenge by higher learning institutions across the US. Numerous studies have identified that professors who can establish strong and positive rapport with their students have an immediate and positive impact on students’ learning, engagement, motivation and academic success, resulting in a positive long-term influence on retention. Previous work has defined fifteen specific faculty behaviors that establish positive rapport between students and professors in other disciplines. However, these past studies may not be generalized for engineering and fall short of identifying the differences across student academic maturity and demographics. Given the potential for strong impact on engineering students’ experiences, and faculty resource limitations, we sought to elucidate if some behaviors have a higher potential for impact than others, and if so, which faculty behaviors may best contribute to building faculty-student rapport. With these insights, engineering faculty can be trained to selectively focus on those which are expected to have the greatest return on investment. To support the primary aim, students from multiple disciplines in an engineering college were surveyed and asked to rank their perceptions of faculty behaviors that best establish rapport with engineering students. The survey asked students to self identify their gender and ethnicity. This was used to identify how these factors may influence ranking of rapport supportive behaviors. Additionally, this survey asked students both their academic program (the discipline within engineering) and their degree progression, in order to identify how these factors impact such rankings. Based on findings in the literature, and given the scope of this project, the authors anticipate that the most effective way to broaden students’ retention in engineering education is through establishing rapport between engineering professors and their students. Using the results of this study, we can design interventions aimed at faculty member’s ability to establish positive rapport, which in turn creates a respectful environment, and removes the barriers to cultivation of diverse student retention in engineering disciplines. Preferred presentation method for this work is round table discussion.

Citation
Format

Ozis, F., & Winfree, K. N. (2020, June), Optimizing Student-Faculty Rapport for the Engineering Classrooms: Dimensioning the Behaviors that Matter Paper presented at 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual On line . 10.18260/1-2--35016

TY - CPAPER
AB - This research paper describes the findings from an exploratory study. Student retention, from program initiation through commencement, in engineering disciplines is recognized as a challenge by higher learning institutions across the US. Numerous studies have identified that professors who can establish strong and positive rapport with their students have an immediate and positive impact on students’ learning, engagement, motivation and academic success, resulting in a positive long-term influence on retention. Previous work has defined fifteen specific faculty behaviors that establish positive rapport between students and professors in other disciplines. However, these past studies may not be generalized for engineering and fall short of identifying the differences across student academic maturity and demographics. Given the potential for strong impact on engineering students’ experiences, and faculty resource limitations, we sought to elucidate if some behaviors have a higher potential for impact than others, and if so, which faculty behaviors may best contribute to building faculty-student rapport. With these insights, engineering faculty can be trained to selectively focus on those which are expected to have the greatest return on investment.
To support the primary aim, students from multiple disciplines in an engineering college were surveyed and asked to rank their perceptions of faculty behaviors that best establish rapport with engineering students. The survey asked students to self identify their gender and ethnicity. This was used to identify how these factors may influence ranking of rapport supportive behaviors. Additionally, this survey asked students both their academic program (the discipline within engineering) and their degree progression, in order to identify how these factors impact such rankings.
Based on findings in the literature, and given the scope of this project, the authors anticipate that the most effective way to broaden students’ retention in engineering education is through establishing rapport between engineering professors and their students. Using the results of this study, we can design interventions aimed at faculty member’s ability to establish positive rapport, which in turn creates a respectful environment, and removes the barriers to cultivation of diverse student retention in engineering disciplines. Preferred presentation method for this work is round table discussion.
AU - Fethiye Ozis P.E.
AU - Kyle Nathan Winfree
CY - Virtual On line
DA - 2020/06/22
PB - ASEE Conferences
TI - Optimizing Student-Faculty Rapport for the Engineering Classrooms: Dimensioning the Behaviors that Matter
UR - https://peer.asee.org/35016
DO - 10.18260/1-2--35016
ER -