. 3. I can apply the engineering design process to solve real-world problems. 4. I understand the role of engineering in society. 5. I believe that engineering contributes to everyday life. 6. The field of engineering offers solutions to important problems. 7. Engineers play a significant role in technological innovation. 8. Engineering is a field that requires creativity and problem-solving. 9. The work of engineers impacts environmental sustainability. 10. Creativity in engineering is fundamental. 11. Engineers must work collaboratively to be successful. 12. Ethical considerations are important in engineering. 13. I am aware of the broad range of careers available in engineering. Students are
Management at Regis University, a B.S. in Electrical Engineer- ing and Computer Science at the University of California at Berkeley; has 25 years of software/hardware industry experience and 21 patents; and has volunteered extensively in developing countries.Mrs. Tanya D. Ennis, University of Colorado, Boulder TANYA D. ENNIS is the current Engineering GoldShirt Program Director at the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. She received her M.S. in Computer Engineering from the University of Southern California in Los Angeles and her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Southern University in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Her career in the telecommunications industry included positions in
. The cohort also represented 7of the 10 engineering departments in our College of Engineering.Academic SuccessDuring the pre-interview, all participants emphasized the importance of equipping students withthe skills needed to succeed academically and professionally. Common strategies that they werealready utilizing in their teaching (as indicated in their pre-interviews) included making coursematerials accessible, using flexible assessment methods, and integrating real-world applicationsinto the curriculum. While all participants aimed to support student success, their specificmethods varied. For example, Diana focused on teaching students relationship-building and gritto achieve their professional career goals, while Natasha emphasized
Secondary Mathematics Teaching Certification in 2008 and an MS in Mechanical Engineering in 2018. Ms. Perkins is a former Assistant Engineering Educator in the Engineering Technology Department of Wichita State University. She has also taught Secondary Mathematics courses in both public and private school settings. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 I Have to Get Back in the Classroom: A Graduate Student's Journey Navigating Dual Academic Identities.IntroductionMany who endeavor to teach engineering in higher education pursue doctoral degrees to securethe minimum credentials required for their desired career. During their doctoral studies, somefind they have to set
Paper ID #46556Knitting the knitters: Building and sustaining leadership teams for equity-orientedinstitutional changeSandra Laursen, University of Colorado Boulder Sandra Laursen is senior research associate and director of Ethnography & Evaluation Research (E&ER), where she leads research and evaluation studies focusing on education and career paths in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. She has studied ADVANCE projects for 25 years as an evaluator and researcher, and has published articles, books and online resources on strategies for institutional change to advance equity and
from Carnegie Mellon University. He received US National Science Foundation CAREER Award, US Air Force Office of Sponsored Research’s Summer Faculty Fellowship, and Google’s ASPIRE Research award in security and privacy, inter alia. He is an expert in the areas of cybersecurity and privacy. He has hundreds of publications in the most reputable venues as well as numerous patents. His research has been funded by numerous government agencies and industry. He has chaired/served on the of top-tier security conferences, e.g., NDSS, USENIX, ACM CCS, IEEE SP, and serving as the deputy editor in-chief of IEEE TIFS and associate editor of Elsevier COMNET journals. More information can be obtained from http://nweb.eng.fiu.edu
said, but why aren’t you saying it?’” – MayaMaya was frustrated by this experience, but also expected that in her future career she mighthave similar experiences, because there was a good chance that she might find herself as the onlyBlack person at a design firm. She was not comfortable with being treated differently for beingBlack: “It’s a little uncomfortable because I feel like a quota sometimes. I’m getting certain things because I’m Black and that they want me to feel included, but do I actually deserve them? Is there someone else that deserves them more than I do? I’m a hard worker, so I want to get things that I know that I deserve, not something just because of my skin tone, which was a little
accessibility, sustainability, and the fair distribution of resources,which are often overlooked in traditional engineering programs [6], [7], [8]. This criticalengagement is important for promoting more inclusive and socially responsible engineeringpractices. Studies have shown that when students are exposed to social justice frameworks, theyare better equipped to develop solutions that address the needs of all members of society,particularly marginalized communities [5], [6]. Thus, integrating social justice into engineeringeducation enhances technical competence of students and also prepares them to be agents ofpositive social change in their professional careers.1.4 Purpose of the StudyThis study seeks to explore how gender influences engineering
broaderapplicability of the intervention [38]. Additionally, longitudinal studies tracking the long-termeffects of improved programming self-efficacy on academic and career success would providevaluable insights into the lasting impact of such interventions on students in programming andengineering fields [39].ConclusionThis study demonstrated that the WebTA code critiquing tool significantly improvedprogramming self-efficacy among first-year engineering students, with particularly notable gainsfor female students. These findings underscore the effectiveness of targeted educationalinterventions in boosting self-efficacy, which is essential for success in programming. Tools likeWebTA, which provide immediate feedback, can be instrumental in addressing
communication. She has implemented two Virtual Exchanges and collaborates with multiple organizations across Latin America to foster international relationships that broaden public engagement with science. Her work in these arenas has been recognized with the AAAS Early Career Award for Public Engagement with Science and a NSF Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award.Daniel Suarez, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Building Global Competencies in Biomedical Engineering Education through Virtual ExchangeABSTRACT Our world’s most pressing biomedical challenges cross national boundaries and demandinternational
Multicultural Engineering Program and Director of the Clark Scholars Program. In this role, Dr. Griggs drives initiatives to improve the recruitment and retention of historically underrepresented groups pursuing degrees in engineering and strives to foster a welcoming environment that celebrates culture and inclusion. She is the advisor for the National Society of Black Engineers and co-advisor for the Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers, and the Multicultural Engineering Graduate Association. Her passion lies in mentoring through meaningful career discussions and helping students gain confidence as well as succeed in their chosen degree fields.Dixon Zor, Pennsylvania State UniversityChristopher L Dancy, The Pennsylvania
, honesty, integrity, kindness, courage,forbearance, and respect. Here we will summarize two of the stories. Figure 1 illustrates bothstories.2.2.1 Story 1: Lu Ban and Ya ZiOne of the virtue-of-the-week stories was about Lu Ban and his son Ya Zi 24,25 . This storyexemplified the virtues of diligence of perseverance. Lu Ban (507 – 440 B.C.E.) is a reveredengineer, architect, and a master of carpentry and masonry in ancient China.Lu Ban’s son, Ya Zi, was not sure about his dream job and future career. First, he told his fatherLu Ban that he would like to become a farmer. Lu Ban was delighted to know it and encouragedYa Zi to go to another place and learn the skills of farming from experienced farmers. One yearlater, Ya Zi returned home. He told
careers inengineering.Discussion In this section, we discuss the major observations from the literature review and their implicationson future directions for engineering education researchers and engineering design educators. We alsoposit the use of digital twins in the capstone and cornerstone projects in engineering design. Forengineering education researchers, future work should focus on evaluating the effectiveness of digitaltwins in improving learning outcomes, particularly in enhancing students' problem-solving abilities,design thinking, and technical skills. From the literature review, we identified that empirical studies areneeded to assess how digital twins influence student engagement, retention, and knowledge transfer toreal
Paper ID #46560BOARD # 360: EDU Core—Engineering Systems Change for Equity: AFocus on Change ProcessesSandra Laursen, University of Colorado Boulder Sandra Laursen is senior research associate and director of Ethnography & Evaluation Research (E&ER), where she leads research and evaluation studies focusing on education and career paths in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. She has studied ADVANCE projects for 25 years as an evaluator and researcher, and has published articles, books and online resources on strategies for institutional change to advance equity and inclusion for faculty
engineering.Keywords: preliminary examination, doctoral education, mechanical engineering1 IntroductionDoctoral programs in mechanical engineering aim to develop advanced technical expertise andresearch skills, preparing graduates for careers in academia, industry, and research organizations.These programs focus on both the mastery of core engineering principles and the development ofindependent research capabilities. Students are expected to engage in original research thatcontributes to the advancement of the field, while also demonstrating comprehensive knowledgein one or more fundamental areas of mechanical engineering, such as thermodynamics, solidmechanics, fluid dynamics, control systems, and design.During a doctoral program, students undergo a
Paper ID #47171Navigating Deficit Narratives: Marginalized Student Experiences in HumanitarianEngineering Graduate ProgramsMs. Emma Sophie Stine, University of Colorado Boulder Emma Stine recently finished a Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado, Boulder, where she is researching student experiences before, during, and after attending a graduate program in humanitarian engineering, focusing on how these experiences influence career goals and outcome expectations. She is interested in how these goals align with social justice movements, including if and how students and practitioners are addressing global
[10]. Another possibleexplanation for this disparity could be that Hispanics are less likely to have a science orengineering background that would facilitate their STEM employment [10], a supposition theperformance gaps noted above appear to support. The National Science and Technology Councilrecently identified STEM education goals. They are to “increase diversity, equity, and inclusionin STEM”, and “prepare the STEM workforce for the future” for the U.S. to be the global leaderin STEM literacy, innovation, and employment [11]. To achieve sustainable growth in the STEMworkforce, it is imperative to train educational professionals in a way that would enable them tomotivate their students from all backgrounds to pursue careers in STEM
reform and interventions. While faculty-studentinteraction powerfully fosters student engagement [6], [31] and belonging [32], and increasesfaculty satisfaction [33], individual perceptions of responsibility for creating equitable courseenvironments vary individually, as does competence with the necessary equity-focused skills togenerate such environments. Notably, engineering faculty of color are often motivated to useinclusivity best practices due to past experiences of discrimination in STEM classrooms [34] - afactor that is not universal among faculty.Even faculty who feel it is their responsibility to adopt equity practices may refrain from doingso due to potential interpersonal and career impacts. For example, engineering faculty
(with permission) to see patterns in how neurodivergent students engage (e.g., do they pausevideos more often, access materials at different times, etc.). Such data can triangulate self-reported experienceswith behavioral evidence. Long-term outcomes and career trajectories: It is also essential to explore the long-term impact of onlinelearning on neurodivergent students’ academic trajectories and career readiness. For example, did the challengesof online learning lead to any shifts in major (did some leave STEM fields or slow down their course load)?Conversely, did any find the online format beneficial enough that they excelled
supports groups, like first-generation students. These students are often self-driven to seek out faculty and mentor support[19], [22]. It is individuals like faculty and mentors who understand the academic landscape andoffer the first line of information. Frantellizzi [23] also found that first-generation femaledoctoral students lacked career counseling, and more was needed within degree programs.Providing students with access to additional tutoring and mentoring can help reduce thechallenges with transitioning into graduate school [7], [19], such as adjusting to the coursework-research balance [21]. With research being a core focus, the relationship between students andtheir research advisors is critical to their persistence in their program and
by faculty and research staff.Two primary categories emerge in discussions about the admission process: access toinformation and the evaluation of the scoring system.Access to Information: A study on Hispanic/Latinx undergraduate student experiences with thegraduate school application process found that access to information through research mentorsand peers significantly aided students in navigating the application process [10]. This findingwas found to be similar pertaining to women of color here mentors and career counselors canprovide additional support in applying to graduate programs [11]. Additionally, a volunteergroup, Científico Latino - Graduate Student Mentorship Initiative (CL-GSMI), which aims toprovide resources on the graduate
) frameworks to conduct research related to postsecondary education/learning, job transitions, remote work, and work-life integration with a focus on helping women and marginalized groups manage and develop thriving and sustainable careers. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Two Years’ Comparison from Industries of the Future Research Experience for Preservice Teacher Summer Program AbstractThis paper reports two years’ experience from our implementation of the NSF project titled“Industries of the Future Research Experience for Preservice Teachers in STEM Settings.” Thegoal of the project is to host 10 high school preservice teachers each
to education, sense of community, retention, college transitions, living-learning communities, career readiness, mentoring and persistence to graduation for students in STEM programs.Rachid Ait Maalem Lahcen, University of Central Florida ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Accelerating Student Success in Mathematics through Personalized Adaptive LearningAbstractMath Launch is a program designed to help incoming first-year students prepare for calculus 1and set them up for success in their chosen STEM major. With a focus on expanding students’knowledge and capabilities in algebra, trigonometry and precalculus, Math Launch helpsstudents become calculus ready in
students to chooseengineering as a career. With an emphasis on smart and connected cities, the SCR2 programprovides summer research experiences (eight weeks for students and six weeks for teachers).This paper presents our learnings and insights of the program for the past four years withevaluation findings. There have been 116 students and 44 teachers who have successfullyparticipated. The research program was conducted on campus in 2019, but due to COVID-19, theprogram was conducted online in 2020. In 2021 and 2022, the program was redesigned to behybrid, and six host sites participated. Despite the changes in the program, students' prowess wasenhanced by their teamwork and engagement in the projects. The post-program survey raisedconcerns about
freshman, so I still went to career showcase even though no one’s going to hire a freshman, but I still show up. But I got to see a lot of people who kind of looked like me, who had similar experiences, and I got to talk to them which was kind of cool. So, it made me feel like, okay, this is great. This is totally feasible. I’m here, people have similar struggles, so I can definitely just ask them for help and move forward to the next step. Then post COVID, or while in COVID I was like, okay, so what happens now. So, you just kind of take it day by day while in COVID. But then post COVID, I think it was hard, trying to integrate back into society, even though I’m an extrovert, I was already comfortable
that utilize interdisciplinary approaches toward a better understanding of stem cell fate in the context of regenerative biomedical therapies. He is committed to the integration of research and education and has developed courses and programs that relate to entrepreneurship, service learning, and community engagement. He is an elected Fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering (AIMBE), an elected Fellow of BMES, and Past-President of the Institute of Biological Engineering (IBE). Awards and Honors include NSF-CAREER, Qimonda Professorship, Billingsley Professorship, IBE Presidential Citation for Distinguished Service, and University of Arkansas Honors College Distinguished
Paper ID #39250Unexpected Accomplices: Effective Mentoring between a Black and WhiteWoman Despite Historical Issues of Privilege, Power, and PositionalityDr. Meagan Eleanor Ita, Arvinas Dr. Meagan Ita is a Research Scientist at Arvinas working to develop disease modifying therapies for neu- rodegenerative diseases. Her career passion is to develop novel biotechnologies and therapeutics to better understand human physiology with the goal of equitably extending healthspan, ideally at the intersection of healthcare and STEM education. Meagan has experience as a Postdoctoral Scholar in Engineering Education from The Ohio State
students. Itwill then be taught in Spring 2024 to the remaining ~400 engineering juniors. Feedback will begathered after the pilot and again after the full-scale instruction in order to tweak any issues thatmay remain. In addition to the two goals set out by the faculty at large of having the seniors passthe Engineering Economics portion of their FE and having more cohesive project managementwithin their Capstone teams, it is also the goal of the instructors of the course to have studentsappreciate the lessons of both and see the value in understanding that finances and teamcohesivity are critical factors in the success of engineering projects in their future careers.
M.S. in Applied Behavioral Science from Johns Hopkins and a B.S. in Computer Science from Old Dominion University. Prior to coming to the College of Engineering in 2000, Dr. Scales was the Director of Instructional and Research Computing at North Carolina A&T where she led a university team to successfully launch their first virtual campus. She began her career working as a computer analyst for the National Security Agency. In 2018, Dr. Scales was appointed by Governor Terry McAuliffe to the Southern Regional Education Board for a second term. This board works with 16 member states to improve public education, from prekindergarten through post-secondary education. American
. Homero’s goal is to develop engineering education practices that value the capital that tra- ditionally marginalized students bring into the field and to train graduate students and faculty members with the tool to promote effective and inclusive learning environments and mentorship practices. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI), the Program Chair for the