background of learning design process in CE200 Project — Civil Engineering Drawing fora Villa of 400 m2. The students worked in groups. Each group contained maximum threestudents.Scope a) Draw plans, elevations, cross-sections, materials schedule, etc. b) Draw required structural plans, sections, and details.Data Collection Process Students are asked to visit existing construction site of such plot area, and gather data to: a) Find Free space required to be left around the building by the local Municipal Authority. b) Find the reasons, why such spaces have to be left for. c) Find, dimension of each room, and justify them. d) Find size of doors, windows, stairs, beams, columns, slab, etc.Design Development Process a) Use the above data to come up
- Give students practice preparing a courseObjectives:By the end of this course each student should be able to, among others: - Understand their learning style - Describe Myers-Briggs Type Indicators and Soloman’s Learning Styles - Describe and compare Piaget’s and Perry’s theories of cognitive development - Describe and compare Kolb’s learning cycle and Maslow’s theory of needs - Classify course activities using Bloom’s Taxonomy - Adapt their teaching style to various types of learners - Be a better listener and adviser - Prepare a plan for personal development as a faculty member and a professional Table 2- Course topics Introduction - Introduction, learning styles
2Project Planning, Curriculum Integration, Fund Raising and Team Support, VehicleTesting and Driver Training, and Logistics were also discussed in the proposal. Iexplained how we plan to meet all of the specifications listed in the Sunrayce ‘97Regulations.3 Proposals submitted by different universities were evaluated and scored bySunrayce officials. We were selected as one of the top 30 teams to receive an award of$2000. Currently, 60 teams have registered to compete in Sunrayce 97. The list includesMIT, Yale, Texas A&M, Stanford, University of Michigan, and several universities fromCanada. We are building our second solar car, the Solaraider II. Many undergraduatestudents, the Engineering Technology and Industrial Studies Chair, the Dean of
lessons are helping to shape plans for future development and assessment arediscussed.The National Landscape of High School EngineeringUntil just a few years ago, there were very few high schools that had any sort of engineeringcurriculum other than a small selection of graphics courses such as drafting and computer aideddrafting. As of late, there has been a push to get more engineering content into high schoolcurriculums. Today several state education standards address engineering to some degree, butthere is considerable variation among those state standards, and the national effort to introducesuch standards is still in its infancy. Indeed, the National Academy of Engineering is currentlyconducting a study (due out in March 2010) on K-12
AC 2010-1942: A FUNCTIONAL K-12 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FORTEACHING TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACYSteve Macho, Buffalo State College Steve Macho completed a BS at St Cloud State University, and M.A. & Ed.D. in Technology Education at West Virginia University. Steve is a Minnesota farm boy who has been involved in technology his entire life. He worked at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico Highlands University, and is currently an Assistant Professor of Technology Education for at Buffalo State College. He became a member of the Oxford Roundtable in 2008 and plans to present another paper there in 2010
AC 2010-2063: A FUNCTIONAL K-12 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FORTEACHING TECHNOLOGICAL LITERACYSteve Macho, Buffalo State College Steve Macho completed a BS at St Cloud State University, and M.A. & Ed.D. in Technology Education at West Virginia University. Steve is a Minnesota farm boy who has been involved in technology his entire life. He worked at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico Highlands University, and is currently an Assistant Professor of Technology Education for at Buffalo State College. He became a member of the Oxford Roundtable in 2008 and plans to present another paper there in 2010
and established system of training,not focused on current scientific and technological requirements of the industry [2]. Lack of staff holding competencies in the field of technology of production, processing,transportation, which will be able to rapid response to market conditions and rapidly changingeconomical situation, assess the conditions and consequences of their organizational andmanagement solutions, project management in the field of high technologies, marketingresearches, develop business plans of production and realization of products is one of themost urgent problems of modern high-tech industries in innovatively developing enterprisesof petrochemical complex. An effective way to solve this problem is implementation of
) programhave started to develop cohorts of students and faculty who travel to international conferencesand report on their experiences. Cohort travel models are not unique in undergraduate circles;however, for our group of participants, the model serves as a pathway to broaden theparticipation of STEM-trained women and minorities in international engagement. The modelincludes immersing the cohort into a culture through participation in an internationalconference, presentations at a host university to develop collaborations with faculty andstudents, scientific excursions, discussion sessions addressing research questions, and plans forbuilding on the short-term experience. This model started in 2012 with a graduate studentpresentation at the Latin and
the engineering profile is stable. Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering EducationEngineering Profile DevelopmentThe development of a profile for a top quality engineer began in late 2002 with leadership fromfaculty associated with the NSF-sponsored “Transferable Integrated Design EngineeringEducation” (TIDEE) project14. The engineer profile was planned to reflect attributes desired atthe time of graduation or during the first five years following graduation with a baccalaureatedegree in engineering. Performance during this 5-year window was judged important for aprofile because it is indicative of both
COOPERATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES AND CORPORATIONS Rusk Masih The University of Connecticut, Avery Point Campus, Groton Email r_masih@yahoo.comAbstract This paper treats the role that can be played by both the universities and the industrytogether in shaping continuous engineering education, nationally and internationally. Itrecommends forming a joint committee from the industry and academia to define the plan toenhance the cooperation between the universities and corporations, and the execution of suchplan. It also treats the interest of each
number of cross-functionalactivities. Effective and efficient communication skills and team dynamics are essential. Theywill work on one product, separating the engineering challenge into modules of various tasks indesign, manufacturing, facilities planning and business functions, each task managed by a sub-team. A case study will be presented. As a result, students not only synthesize what they havelearned but also apply what they have gained: teamwork experience, collaborative finesse,ability to comprehend the global picture of engineering, the urgency to be innovative, and thedrive to become effective leaders. The university gains a better reputation and strengthenedbonds among departments.IntroductionToday’s work environment demands that
joined together toendorse a Sustainability Greenhouse Gas Action Plan for New Jersey. In signing this“sustainability covenant,” Rowan University has pledged to reduce its greenhouse gasemissions to 3.5% below 1990 levels by 2005. We have used this agreement as the basisfor a novel collaboration between the New Jersey Higher Education Partnership forSustainability (NJHEPS) and the College of Engineering at Rowan University.We have developed a course project in which sophomore students from all engineeringdisciplines calculate CO2 emissions for the university and propose methods for furtherreducing our greenhouse gas emissions. This project has been developed for SophomoreClinic II, the 4th course in an innovative eight semester multidisciplinary
educators, studentsages 10-18, and the general public to enhance their understanding of the principles ofelectrical and information sciences and technologies within a historical context. Itexplores the global social impact of technology and demonstrates the relevance ofengineering and engineers to society.IEEE is planning a future two-day conference titled: LEADERSHIP FORTECHNOLOGICAL LITERACY: Collaborations in Science, Mathematics,Engineering, and Technology Education (SMET). The central themes of theconference are leadership, technological literacy, and collaborations among mathematics,science, and technology educators.The primary attendees at the conference will be pre-college educators from all over theworld. However, engineers, scientists and
Session 2455 If I’m going to work in industry, why join ASEE??? Carol Mullenax Tulane UniversityAbstract:One challenge to sustaining ASEE student chapters is finding enough interested parties toparticipate. There are many thoughts on how to increase potential membership, including cateringto undergraduate and graduate students planning to pursue industry positions. This paper serves asa sort of business case for students not specifically planning an academic career to participate inASEE and become better educators. Based on nine years of industry
laboratory every day (and night) for theproject work. Two teams share a workplace, which is equipped with PC (MS Windows98),oscilloscope, power supply and DSP emulator. Each team receives a mobile robot, rechargeablebatteries, battery charger, tools, manuals and a locker for keeping the equipment. The cost ofcomponents per team is limited to $50. Each team makes purchases of their own to the electroniccomponent distributor. During the first two weeks, the students begin by writing a specificationrequirements, which describes what to do in the project. They also draw up a project plan whereall resources are allotted. This plan describes the project organization, distribution of work,estimation of costs, phase and time schedule and document
course expectations as a team andindividual. The course timeline also begins the course discussion on project planning andtracking. The first semester focuses on team formation and project planning, while the secondfocuses on project execution. At the beginning of each semester, the students are assignedseveral LinkedIn Learning modules to complete as self-paced learning. The first week of classfocuses on team formation, and projects are assigned by the end of the third week of the firstsemester.The large class is broken down into 4 team cohorts by the 4th week of the first semester, whichbecomes the class meeting unit outside of presentations at the end of each semester. At eachcohort meeting, the teams discuss their project and current status
largest ethnic group by then. Nevertheless, low enrollment of Hispanics in STEM disciplinesand lack of professionals in STEM-specific careers is a major concern to many.As a major Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI) in southern Texas, Texas A&M InternationalUniversity (TAMIU) has been engaged in providing quality education in STEM disciplines toHispanic and other minority communities. The STEM-Minority Outreach and RetentionEnhancement (STEM-MORE) project, funded by the US Department of Education, is part ofsuch effort, which was established in 2011 with activities planned for the following three years.Several project components including MORE-Education and Enrichment Program (MORE-EEP), MORE-Transfer and Retention Program (MORE-TRP), MORE
used in theteacher training. These trial-runs help teachers to make iterative improvements in their planned activities. In additionto student responses, the middle school teachers were able to work on aspects of delivery (pedagogy and methods) in areal-time environment, under the mentoring of master teachers from the G/T programs. Page 24.1326.2 Grade Level: 6 – 8 Authors: The PRISM Team, Pat Carlson, Matt Davidson, Bob Jackson, Erin Phelps, and Ryan Smith Author Contact Information: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, carlsonp@rose-hulman.edu Indiana State Academic Standards: (1) Use models to enrich understanding of
project.I liked designing our own impeller / wind 77.5% 80.1% 93.8%turbine blades / artificial leg.I would like to see more interactive designprojects in the first-year engineering courses 96.0% 81.4% 86.6%that combine physical testing, modeling, anddesign. Page 23.953.3The original plan was, once the projects were developed, to post them on Engineering Pathway(part of the National Science Digital Library) 4 and MERLOT 5 Both of these online
Carolina at Charlotte. Before joining academia, Dr. Ozelkan worked for i2 Technologies, a leading supply chain software vendor and for Tefen USA, a systems design and industrial engineering consulting firm. Dr. Ozelkan holds a Ph.D. degree in Systems and Industrial Engineering from the University of Arizona. He teaches courses on supply chain management, lean systems, decision analysis, designed experimentation, and systems design and optimization. His current research interests include on the education side, development of simulations and cases for active learning, and on the mod- eling side, supply chains and logistics management, and production systems planning and optimization, and applications in different
program – the support of collegemanagement (dean, associate dean, etc.) and faculty is key to the success of a such a program.As you determine the best way to justify and start up an undergraduate research program, takethis into account, as it may influence your justification plan and could heavily influence whetherthe plan is viable at your institution.Financial Support of an Undergraduate Research ProgramThe financial support of any co-curricular program is very important, and as universityemployees we have an obligation to fund the programs that will best benefit our students. TheSURE Program is currently supported by a combination of funding from the Suzanne and WalterScott Foundation and the CSU Provost; the program was initially supported
analysis is planned, including analyzing the impact of the block model for specificgroups such as first-generation learners. More detailed focus group analysis is planned, includinga follow-up focus group 4-months after the block model pilot. This pilot will continue into the2024-2025 academic year, allowing for additional data collection.AcknowledgmentThe authors acknowledge financial support from the York University Academic Innovation Fundand are gracious for ongoing support from the Lassonde Educational Innovation Studio. Data werecollected under York University’s research certificate e2023-264.References[1] J. Harris, P. Molicard-Chartier, and M. Jadidi, “Redesigning the common engineering first- year (Part 1): Designing for 21st
to improve the engineering education experience for future generations of engineers. As a McNair Scholar, Shaylin worked on chemical engineering projects creating thermal barriers for food packaging and studying soil remediation. Additionally, she completed an REU project in healthcare engineering at the University of Wisconsin- Madison. She earned a master’s degree in industrial and systems Engineering with a Management Systems Concentration in December 2022. Shaylin recently completed her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Mississippi State University, using Self Determination Theory to analyze freshmen and continuing Summer Bridge students’ experiences and senior engineering students’ graduation plans. She
included: • Moving away from prescriptive, task-based assignments, to allow students to take ownership over their project’s direction and schedule, and moving towards a student-led focus on project planning and management; • Emphasizing user-centered research and market research so students can gain a robust understanding of stakeholders to ensure they are creating a solution that fulfills a need and is what people will want; • Emphasizing divergent inquiry to push students to fully explore problems and constraints, to lead to the creation of thoughtful concepts that are novel and innovative; • Emphasizing the importance of visual communication and storytelling when presenting their work, which
“Proceedings of the 2005 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education” 2theoretical specific gravity of asphalt mixtures. In the summer of 2005 a group of studentsshown in Figure 1, plan to evaluate a new non-destructive testing device used for determiningconcrete compressive strength. This research is state-of-the art and introduces students to thenumerous steps involved in research programs. Students are required to develop outlines for thetesting program, design and create material to be tested, and present their findings through apaper and presentation. Figure 1:Students
. Others suggested a tour of some type of engineering facility.EGR 110 in the FutureEGR 110 will again be offered at MSU in the 2009 fall semester. Plans are to put some of thestudy habits and campus resources back into the course since students will no longer be takingboth EGR 110 and IDS 110. We will continue to use practicing engineers as guest lecturers. Wealso plan to add some simple laboratory exercises and/or demonstrations to the course.In addition, the administration at Missouri S&T has invited students in the cooperativeengineering program, to take a one day trip to the Missouri S&T campus in Rolla to see some of Proceedings of the 2009 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education
Experience in Building STEM PipelinesAbstract In 2007, University of Louisville School of Engineering charged the newly formed Department ofEngineering Fundamentals to develop a K-12 outreach program. The program’s goal is to increase thenumber of students interested in and capable of studying STEM fields in college. To organize, guide,and focus department outreach efforts, the department developed and implemented a plan to createSTEM pipelines in the Jefferson County Public Schools. The pipelines are currently comprised ofselected elementary and middle schools that send students to the engineering magnet high schools. Theelementary program uses the Boston Museum of Science’s (BMOS) curriculum, “Engineering isElementary®” (EiE), and the
deliveredto school districts by engineering students and faculty. Engineering students develop andpilot the activities, lesson plans, and handouts. The program, has already reached out tonumerous schools in the Southern New Jersey region with successful outcomes. Schoolshave limited money for educational field trips these days. Engineers on Wheels brings the‘field trip’ to the students and also helps students learn about a possible career field.Introduction:Science and engineering has been the base of the American economic growth forgenerations. We were leaders in the industrial revolution and we initiated the internetage. Today, these fields continue to have great potential for growing our economy andemploying more Americans. Between 1983 and 2004
personal problems, not academic problem. For this reasonall those involved need to understand the policies and procedures that affect students'financial aid as well as have a clear understanding of how to effectively advise thosestudents in financial need.The career development center on campus needs to go beyond their traditional role aswell. They need to help students understand how their chosen study plan will learn aninteresting career that pays well. If they understand their career options/goals then theywill have a better focus on their classes. Career services should also organize shortseminars to help students better make the connection between their academic planningand their career goals.Another way to help make that connection is by
9% III. MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS 4% IV. MATERIALS, METHODS, AND PLAN READING 10% V. BIDDING AND ESTIMATING 17% VI. BUDGETING, COSTS, AND COST CONTROL 10.5% VII. PLANNING, SCHEDULING, AND CONTROL 16.5% VIII. CONSTRUCTION SAFETY 7% IX. SURVEYING AND PROJECT LAYOUT 2% X. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION 18.5% At the author’s university the AC exam has been used as an assessment tool for nearly 10 years. Theperception was that an established standard exam would bring benefits to