Paper ID #45761A Gender-based Comparative Analysis of Motivations and Challenges in ConstructionEducationDr. Saeed Rokooei, Mississippi State University Saeed Rokooei is an associate professor in the Department of Building Construction Science at Mississippi State University. Dr. Rokooei’s primary research interests include community resilience, engineering education, simulation and serious games, project management methodologies, data analytics, creativity and innovation, and emerging technologies.Mr. George D Ford P.E., Mississippi State University Dr. George Ford P.E. is the Director of Mississippi Stateˆa C™s Building
, I’m not sure, no but itprobably helps, or not at all. The collective results of this study point to the benefit ofconvergence of nursing and engineering to solve pressing societal challenges of theAnthropocene.MethodsInstitutional context. Located in Rolla, Missouri, the Missouri University of Science andTechnology was founded in 1870 as the Missouri School of Mines. In 2023, a total of more than7,000 students (approximately 1,500 graduate and 5,500 undergraduate) are enrolled inapproximately 100 degree programs. Currently characterized as a Carnegie R2, a doctoraluniversity with high research activity, S&T is home to three colleges. Within the College ofEngineering and Computing, the Department of Civil, Architectural, and
& Make: Annual Global Report,” Autodesk, https://www.autodesk.com/hk/insights/research/state-of-design-and-make (Accessed August 13, 2024).[2] B. Caldwell and G. M. Mocko, “Product Data Management in Undergraduate Education,” Volume 3: 28th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Parts A and B, pp. 433–441, Jan. 2008. doi:10.1115/detc2008-50015.[3] R. O. Buchal, “The Use of Product Data Management (PDM) Software to Support Student Design Projects,” Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), Aug. 2011. doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3862[4] K. Del Re, S. Yun, E. Kozikowski, T. Fuerst, and J. Camba, “Integrating a Product Life- Cycle Management System into a
challengingworking conditions, many Disabled Workers contribute to the sector yet struggle to participatefully in all work areas. Besides the ethical imperative for justice and inclusivity, the growinglabor shortage is an additional spur to better solutions that can both retain and encourage morediversity in the workforce and better educational programs that address inclusive methods in thebuilding process. This paper reports on a review of existing accessibility practices and conditionson four worksites within the UK. The results from this investigation are informing the inclusionof health and safety (H&S) as well as diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) topics within a newBSc Construction Management degree being launched in September 2025 at the New
with the courses students are currently enrolledin at the time of the study, such as the types of courses they are taking and the available resourcesas part of the courses. Hilliger et al.’s [32] grounded theory model of what makes coursesdemanding to students provides a suite of contextual and external variables that could impactperceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, such as content complexity, faculty support,workload, and student interests. This work fits into a larger project on how students usemetacognitive strategies with these external resources, especially large language model-basedtechnology like ChatGPT, so metacognitive strategies will be explored as a potential moderatingvariable for the intentions to use and elements of
. Prichard, "Sleep Patterns and Predictors of Disturbed Sleep in a Large Population of College Students," Journal of Adolescent Health, pp. 124-132, 2009.[2] S. P. Becker, M. A. Jarrett, A. M. Luebbe, A. A. Garner, G. L. Burns and M. J. Kofler, "Sleep in a large, multi-university sample of college students: sleep problem prevalence, sex differences, and mental health correlates," Elsevier, pp. 174-181, 2018.[3] L.-L. Tsai and S.-P. Li, "Sleep patterns in college students: Gender and grade differences," Journal of Psychosomatic Research, pp. 231-237, 2004.[4] S. H. Cheng, C.-C. Shih, I. H. Lee, Y.-W. Hou, K. C. Chen, K.-T. Chen, Y. K. Yang and Y. C. Yang, "A study on the sleep quality of incoming university students," Psychiatry
] M. Ridgway et al., “Equality, diversity, and inclusivity in engineering, 2013 to 2022: a review,” Royal Academy of Engineering, Nottingham Trent University, 2023. doi: 10.17631/RD-2024-0002-DREP.[2] S. Appelhans et al., “From ‘leaky pipelines’ to ‘Diversity of thought’: What does diversity mean in engineering education?,” in 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Charged Up for the Next 125 Years, ASEE 2019, June 15, 2019 - June 19, 2019, in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. Tampa, FL, United states: American Society for Engineering Education, 2019.[3] D. E. Chubin, G. S. May, and E. L. Babco, “Diversifying the Engineering Workforce,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 73–86
seek help or treatment (Jensen & Cross,2019; Lipson et al., 2019).To combat this crisis and encourage a help-seeking mindset in engineering students, someresearch has begun to implement mental health-focused interventions designed to shift themindset and encourage persistence in engineering programs [18]. In Tait et al. (2024)'s review ofwell-being interventions, they found that the most common type of intervention was educational,in which a curriculum is updated to feature considerations for mental health awareness. Someinterventions have included reflections surrounding mental health [19], in-class discussion [20],watching videos or consuming media [21], or designing products that promote mental health[22]. These interventions often led
decision-making in engineering education.AcknowledgmentsThis study was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under grants DUE-2152282,DUE-2111510, and DUE-2111386. Any opinions, findings, or recommendations expressed inthis study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. The authors would like to thank the undergraduate students who helpedwith the data collection for this study.References[1] M. Fuller, & R. Moore, An Analysis of Jane Jacobs's The Death and Life of Great AmericanCities. Macat Library, 2017.[2] J. Speck,. Walkable city: How downtown can save America, one step at a time. Macmillan,2013.[3] M. Tobin, S. Hajna, K. Orychock, N. Ross, M. DeVries, P. J. Villeneuve
Nuclear Power: Environmental Considerations Power Grid Vulnerabilities Hydraulic Fracturing Facial Recognition Water Projects in Developing CountriesWhile reading the scenario the students are given a series of questions to guide the discussion.These discussion prompts direct the students to identify the important problem/s and to discussstakeholders, impacts, unknowns, and possible solutions. The EPSA discussion prompts areshown in Table 3Table 3. EPSA Discussion PromptsImagine that you are a team of engineers working together for a company or organization onthe problem/s raised in the scenario. 1. Identify the primary and secondary problems raised in the scenario. 2. Discuss what your team
analyze data. Finally, our interpretation ofthe conceptual nature and contexts for the items we reviewed is based on our ownunderstandings, experiences, and assumptions. We do not know the intentions of the authors ofthose concept inventories beyond what was present in their prior publications. It is possible thatour own misunderstandings or misconceptions could have influenced these results.AcknowledgmentsMany thanks to Dr. Eric Davishahl, Dr. Scott Danielson, Dr. Christopher Papadopoulos, and Dr.Paul Steif for their responses and support of this project. Many more regards and appreciationalso go out to all the other professors who helped provide their concept inventories for initialreview.References[1] A. Madsen, S. B. McKagan, and E. C. Sayre
STEM.Although the framework was originally designed to better understand how interruption impactsBlack women in STEM, we believe it can be applied in other contexts. The framework has gonethrough many iterations, and we continue to adjust it, as needed, to ensure its applicability to arange of audiences. We hope that as we continue to refine it, practitioners and researchers willseek ways to apply the framework to their specific population and context of focus.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation underGrant Nos. 2140890, 2140891, 2140892. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of
PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses –Search) is a reporting guideline designed to enhance the transparency, comprehensiveness, andreproducibility of search strategies in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. As an extension tothe broader PRISMA Statement, PRISMA-S focuses specifically on the search component, whichis crucial for identifying all relevant studies. The guideline includes twelve checklist items,covering essential aspects such as specifying the databases and platforms used, providing fullsearch strategies with detailed syntax, and reporting any limits or restrictions applied. It alsoemphasizes transparency in documenting supplementary search methods, such as manualsearching or citation chasing
qualitativedata collection and analysis, such as interviews, which could have provided a deeperunderstanding of how and why students develop these mindsets over time.References[1] C. J. Atman, R. S. Adams, M. E. Cardella, J. Turns, S. Mosborg, and J. Saleem, "Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 359-379, 2007, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2007.tb00945.x.[2] P. Biney, Assessing Abet Outcomes Using Capstone Design Courses. 2007, pp. 12.261.1- 12.261.20.[3] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, "Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning," (in English), J. Eng. Educ., Review vol. 94, no. 1
College Students with Disabilities in STEM,” JPED, vol. 24, no. 4, pp.375–388.[7] E. A. Cech, “Engineering’s Systemic Marginalization and Devaluation of Students andProfessionals With Disabilities,” in Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Annual Conference VirtualMeeting: American Society of Engineering Educators, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Jan. 11, 2025.[Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/engineering-s-systemic-marginalization-and-devaluation-of-students-and-professionals-with-disabilities.pdf.[8] C. Funk, “Black Americans’ Views of and Engagement with Science,” Pew Research Center,Apr. 2022.[9] C. Funk and M. H. Lopez, “Hispanic American’s Trust in and Engagement with Science,”Jun. 2022. Accessed: Jan. 11, 2025.[10] J. C. Richard, S. Y. Yoon, M. C
indicated "strong agreement" or "always or almost always true of me." The first twosections were adopted from [5]’s survey, while the other survey sections were adopted from[20]'s survey. These scales allowed respondents to share distinct perceptions and experiencesrelated to the development of their pedagogical and entrepreneurial mindsets attributed to thecourse.Analysis ProcedureIn this study, the analysis focuses on evaluating the KEEN Entrepreneurial Mindset trackcompared to the general pedagogical and leadership development from the GTA course. Thesurvey was utilized, with each section corresponding to crucial topics within the course andKEEN tracks. The two surveys used in this study are valid and reliable [5], [20]. The impact ofthe KEEN
. Society for the Teaching of Psychology. Available: https://teachpsych.org/ebooks/itow. [Accessed November 3, 2023].[5] A. Okrent and A. Burke, “The STEM Labor Force of Today: Scientists, Engineers, and Skilled Technical Workers,” Science and Engineering Indicators, National Science Foundation | National Science Board National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES) | Alexandria, VA., 2021. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221. [Accessed November 3, 2023].[6] S. Rotermund and Burke, A. “Elementary and Secondary STEM Education, Science and Engineering Indicators,” National Science Foundation | National Science Board National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NCSES
the IEEE, 105(9), 1836-1847. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2017.2714564Allen, A. (2017). Power/Knowledge/Resistance. Foucault and epistemic injustice. In The Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice (pp. 187–196). Routledge.Anderson, E. (2012). Epistemic justice as a virtue of social institutions. Social Epistemology, 26(2), 163- 173. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.652211Baquero-Sierra, M. J. A., Vargas-Ordóñez, C. E., McDermott, J. E., & McBride, S. M. (2023, June). Understanding international graduate engineering students’ well-being: What do they need to thrive? (Work in Progress). Paper presented at the 2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Baltimore, Maryland. https://doi.org
. [2] O. C. Jenkins, J. Grizzle, E. Atkins, L. Stirling, E. Rouse, M. Guzdial, D. Provost, K. Mann, and J. Millunchick, “The Michigan Robotics undergraduate curriculum: Defining the discipline of robotics for equity and excellence,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06905, 2023. [3] T. Balch, J. Summet, D. Blank, D. Kumar, M. Guzdial, K. O’hara, D. Walker, M. Sweat, G. Gupta, S. Tansley, et al., “Designing personal robots for education: Hardware, software, and curriculum,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 5–9, 2008. [4] I. M. Souza, W. L. Andrade, L. M. Sampaio, and A. L. S. O. Araujo, “A systematic review on the use of LEGO® robotics in education,” in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–9, IEEE, 2018
Paper ID #49232A complex systems approach to studying the outcomes of initiatives supportingwomen engineering faculty.Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Dr. Matilde S´anchez-Pe˜na is an assistant professor of Engineering Education at the University at Buffalo – SUNY where she leads the Diversity Assessment Research in Engineering to Catalyze the Advancement of Respect and Equity (DAREtoCARE) Lab. Her research focuses on developing cultures of care and well-being in engineering education spaces, assessing gains in institutional efforts to advance equity and inclusion, and
studies could also address the impacts of team dynamics such assize, communication and leadership on the application of requirements tools and evolution [18],[19]. These studies would enable further assessment of the impact of QFD on requirementsevolution in capstone product design.References[1] D. G. Ullman, The Mechanical Design Process, 6th ed. Independence, Oregon: David G. Ullman, 2018.[2] G. Pahl and W. Beitz, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 2nd ed. London: Springer, 1995.[3] B. Morkos, S. Joshi, and J. D. Summers, “Investigating the impact of requirements elicitation and evolution on course performance in a pre-capstone design course,” Journal of Engineering Design, vol. 30, no. 4–5, pp. 155–179
. Pallitt and K. Wolff, "Learning to teach STEM disciplines in higher education: A critical review of the literature," Teaching in Higher Education, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 930-947, 2019.[2] D. Varas, M. Santana, M. Nussbaum, S. Claro and P. Imbarack, "Teachers’ strategies and challenges in teaching 21st century skills: Little common understanding," Thinking Skills and Creativity, vol. 48, p. 101289, 2023.[3] H. Jang, "Identifying 21st century STEM competencies using workplace data," Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 284-301, 2016.[4] D. Tan, "The Significance of Integrating Engineering Design-Based Instruction in STEM Education," Science Insights Education Frontiers, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 3827-3829, 2024
The reassessment of students' academic trajectories observed during the study153 suggests a need for CURE programs to go beyond research immersion. Integrating154 career exploration initiatives that link research experiences to a variety of STEM155 career paths could provide students with a clearer vision of their future opportunities.156 Tailored mentoring and exposure to diverse professional avenues would also help157 address the unique challenges URM students face in navigating STEM fields,158 fostering both confidence and persistence.159 Acknowledgements160 We acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation (NSF HBCU-161 UP Implementation Project #2306341; NSF S-STEM #2029907). The opinions,162 findings
students with information about pursuing graduate education and careers intransportation-related fields. The relationships that students build with their faculty mentors,graduate student mentors, and peers foster a supportive community that promotes lifelonglearning.AcknowledgmentsThis project is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number 2150204. Anyopinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those ofthe authors/PIs and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] S. Maharjan, F. Janatabadi, and A. Ermagun. “ Spatial inequity of transit and automobileaccess gap across America for underserved populations,” Transportation Review Board, vol.2678
utilization.Collection and analysis of results from the current and upcoming semesters are expected toprovide insight into how students approach these large projects and how changes over the courseof scaffolding assignments, instruction from learning modules, and reflections influences studenttime management and productivity as the class progresses. A portion of the structure of this studydoes depend upon self-reported data from students as a part of their reflection and could providevariability upon student engagement and honesty in reporting.References[1] S. Puntambekar and R. Hubscher, “Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex LearningEnvironment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed?,” Educational Psychologist,vol. 40, no. 1. Informa UK Limited
, engaging teachers as designers can increase the frequency and effectivenessof teachers implementing technology activities (Cviko et al., 2014).Activity theory also provides a framework for our exploration of teachers’ curriculardecisions.(Engeström, 1987) Activity theory is based on the idea that human actions occur withinsystems that are mediated by material and conceptual tools and shaped by rules, communities,and cultural practices related to the division of labor. Each activity system consists of sixelements. The first two elements are the human subject(s) and their goal, which is called theobject. The other four elements influence how the subject achieves the object. They are tools,division of labor, community, and rules. The six elements
in 2021 and is currently in Year 3. The researchers have completed thedata analyses of Phase 1 and the open-ended coding of CI item contexts in Phase 2. Currently,data collection for the semi-structured and think-aloud interviews are ongoing (eight interviewsfrom a higher education institution collected). Tables 2 and 3 provide an overview of our Phase 1findings using data collected by instructors across multiple U.S. higher education institutions. InPhase 1, we computed item discrimination and difficulty for CI items for two commonly usedengineering CI—Dynamics Concept Inventory [DCI; 7] and Thermal and Transport ScienceConcept Inventory [TTCI; 8]. To determine whether an item is acceptable or unacceptable, weused Jorion et al.’s CI item
.21271.[2] E. Forman, “The Practice Turn in Learning Theory and Science Education,” in Constructivist Education in an Age of Accountability, 2018, pp. 97–111. doi: 10.1007/978- 3-319-66050-9_5.[3] C. C. M. Mody, “Scientific Practice and Science Education,” Sci. Educ., vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 1026–1032, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21190.[4] D. Jonassen, J. Strobel, and C. B. Lee, “Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 139–151, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00885.x.[5] S. Wörner, J. Kuhn, and K. Scheiter, “The Best of Two Worlds: A Systematic Review on Combining Real and Virtual Experiments in Science Education,” Rev. Educ. Res., vol
necessarilyrepresent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.References[1] M. Kotche, A. E. Felder, K. Wilkens, and S. Stirling, “Perspectives on BioengineeringClinical Immersion: History, Innovation, and Impact,” Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 48, no. 9, pp.2301–2309, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02508-x.[2] S. Miller and S. Higbee, “Work in Progress: A Clinical Immersion Program to TrainBiomedical Engineers to Identify Unmet Health Needs in Urban Clinics,” presented at the 2022ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Aug. 2022. Accessed: Nov. 01, 2022. [Online].Available: https://peer.asee.org/work-in-progress-a-clinical-immersion-program-to-train-biomedical-engineers-to-identify-unmet-health-needs-in-urban-clinics[3] J. Mezirow, “On
: Intervention group (2) is currently ongoing (8th graders taking Algebra), and intervention (3)will start a few months after (8th graders taking pre-Algebra). The data from these twointerventions will be analyzed for trends and correlations to inform how and when theseinterventions are the most appropriate. The author hopes this work is a precursor to studying how STEM interventions affect thecommunities where they are applied and would help personalize the project types and the levelof content needed to maximize interest in STEM. Bibliography:[1] U. B. o. L. Statistics, “Occupational Outlook Handbook,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/civil-engineers.htm#tab-6[2] S. Acharya, Civil Engineering