Ebony O. McGee is an Assistant Professor of Diversity and Urban Schooling at Vanderbilt University’s Peabody College and a member of Scientific Careers Research and Development Group at Northwestern University. She received her Ph.D. in Mathematics Education from the University of Illinois at Chicago; and she was a National Academy of Education/Spencer Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow and a National Science Foundation Postdoctoral Fellow. As a former electrical engineer, she is concerned with sci- ence, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning and participation among historically marginalized students of color. Her research focuses on the role of racialized experiences and biases in STEM educational and
graduation rates [5].Thus, promoting an environment where students can cultivate a sense of belonging is vital topromoting student success and retention of students at-risk of attrition [7]. Connections with aslittle as one other individual in the institution might influence their decision to persist in college[7].Summer Bridge Programs Traditionally, summer bridge programs are interventions implemented to supportincoming first-year undergraduate students as they transition from high school to a post-secondary institution to increase retention and academic success of these students [8].Conventionally, summer bridge programs are a multi-week experience during the summer beforea student’s first semester at a four-year university. During the
to Foster Sustainable, Equitable, and Resilient Infrastructure ConceptsAbstractThis study aims to position active learning as a potential approach for teaching equitableresilience of infrastructure projects through online courses within construction curricula.Exposure to active learning methods can significantly enhance the problem-solving abilities ofconstruction management (CM) students, preparing them for complex technical challenges intheir future careers. Additionally, such interactive teaching strategies can help students retaininformation about advanced and practical concepts. However, in online learning environments,keeping students engaged poses a unique challenge. Unlike in-person classes
, course content, and teaching methods and the impact of those interactions onteaching and learning. Each of these factors impacts different levels of interaction in theclassroom. For example, dynamic interactions occur between both faculty members and students,as well as students with their peers in the classroom. The model posits that a deeper awareness ofthese variable and critical interaction patterns is valuable for the shaping of students’ uniquelearning experiences. Further, it serves to foster the importance of being aware of students’ andone’s own unique background, experiences, and social identities and how this influences theteaching decisions that faculty make, as well as how the classroom experience is received bystudents. Applying
-of-class is to offer students theopportunity to self-identify through their names or pronouns. This helps set up a classroomenvironment where students feel more comfortable and welcome. One faculty member at RowanUniversity learns more about her students’ personal identities by using a poem activity to learnmore about the students, including their family background and important holidays. The facultymember also shares her background as an ice breaker activity.Introductory Engineering CourseThere are more course-oriented ways to incorporate diversity. Within a student’s undergraduatecareer, certain courses can explore engineering in the broader context. At Midsized NortheasternUniversity, the introductory engineering course was redesigned to
ranging from academics, NSF PIs, in- dustry leaders, entrepreneurs, and professionals to students or high-schoolers starting out with Computer Sciences, helping them strategize and broaden participation, as well as explore, understand, and apply emerging technologies. Sreyoshi is committed to broadening participation among underrepresented mi- norities in engineering and serves as a Senator at the Society of Women Engineers. She is also part of the Advisory Board at the College of Engineering at Virginia Tech and serves as an Advisor to the leadership at Sisters in STEM. Sreyoshi frequently collaborates on several National Science Foundation projects in the engineering education realm, researching engineering career
Clemson University. Her research interests focus on social factors affecting the recruitment, retention, and career development of underrepresented students in engineering. Dr. Martin is a 2009 NSF CAREER awardee for her research entitled, ”Influence of Social Capital on Under-Represented Engineering Students Academic and Career Decisions.” She held an American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) Science and Technology Policy Fellowship in 2012-2013, with a placement at the National Science Foundation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Cross-Disciplinary Teamwork During an Undergraduate Student Project: Results To DateAbstractThis
were evaluated through surveys at the start, mid-pointand end of the program by an external program evaluator. Through these numerous surveys wedocumented student self-assessment of their change in knowledge and skills. After a year in theprogram most students (usually seven out of eight or eight out of eight) reported the programinfluenced their career area and their level of confidence pursuing a career area. Students as acohort dramatically increased their confidence in how to prepare an academic poster, participatein a professional meeting, plan a controlled experiment, engage in an effective mentoringrelationship, find an internship that matched their interests and explore graduate degrees thatinterest them. At the start of the program
leadership and policy decision makers. NRT trainees and faculty visited with keylegislators and policy-making groups about water governance/water policy in Kansas. In spring2020, 2021, 2022, and 2023 NRT trainees met with legislatures and policy-making groups aboutwater governance and policy in Kansas. NRT trainees were prepared to this activity during NRTSeminar where they had an overview of the state legislature and received tips on how tocommunicate with the legislators.To explore different career pathways and to create a professional community, the NRTleadership team established a team-based faculty and peer mentoring to provide vocationalcounseling and career planning for NRT trainee to pursue industry, government, and academiapositions and
community facing engineering student-lead projects, and produced more than 200,000 community service hours. Butler brings faculty and industry partners together to mentor and support these student projects as students gain real-world experiences the necessary skills for future careers. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 STEM Energy Education in California San Joaquin ValleyBackgroundThere are significant educational equity gaps that exist in STEM fields for underrepresentedminority (URM) students who live in the San Joaquin Valley. URM students are defined as non-white and non-Asian, though it is recognized that there are subpopulations of URM
Psychology, vol. 29, pp. 66-75, 1982.[7] H. Tsai, “Development of an inventory of problem-solving abilities of tertiary students majoring in engineering technology,” World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 268 – 272, 2010.[8] P.P Heppner, T. E. Witty, and W. A. Dixon, “Problem-solving appraisal and human adjustment: A review of 20 years of research using the problem solving inventory,” Counseling Psychologist, vol. 32, pp. 344-428, 2004.[9] Y.P. Huang, and L. Y. Flores, “Exploring the validity of the Problem-Solving Inventory with Mexican American high-school students,” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 431-441, 2011.[10] N. Kourmousi, V. Xythali, M. Theologitou, and V. Koutras
Paper ID #22321Reflections on a new community partnership: How does an engineering sum-mer camp evolve to meet the needs of an increasingly diverse student popula-tion? (WIP)Emily E. Liptow, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Emily Liptow currently works at a tech startup accelerator in Cleveland OH where she manages a cowork- ing space and promotes community and diversity in the city’s entrepreneurship ecosystem. She served as an AmeriCorps VISTA member at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo where she was involved with a variety of diversity and inclusion efforts in the College of
students in their own learning environment. (5) Challenge students to construct knowledge from their experiences.During sophomore year, engineering students take Technical Writing and Communicationswhere they are introduced to the fundamental principles of technical writing and use a project-based learning model.Taking the aforementioned points into consideration, the technical writing instructor andengineering faculty tried a new approach to add realism to the technical writing course content.The course recently implemented a team exercise with iFixit [13] where student teams of fourhad to troubleshoot an unserviceable item (laptop, kitchen appliance, smart phone, etc.) andrepair it. As part of the project, teams documented their written
-disciplinary research initiatives among students and faculty. Reframingthe seminar as a research group meeting will allow the faculty members to focus more onproviding opportunities to grow as a researcher and develop professionally. For example, facultymembers have explored hosting a session to discuss how to become an interdisciplinary scholar,and students are now regularly bringing work (grant proposals, abstracts, talks) to share with oneanother for feedback – and consequently deepening their awareness of one another’s fields. Byexplicitly discussing with students how to think interdisciplinarily and how to conduct researchacross disciplines, students will be more likely to develop a functional understanding of theinterdisciplinary space.We
teaching practices.Dr. Emily Anna Dare, Florida International University Dr. Emily Dare is an Assistant Professor of Science Education at Florida International University. Pre- viously, she taught at Michigan Technological University from 2015-2018, where she is still an affiliated faculty member in the Department of Cognitive and Learning Sciences. Dr. Dare’s research interests are focused on K-12 STEM education. In particular, she is interested in supporting science teachers’ reform- based instruction while simultaneously understanding their beliefs. As science classrooms shift to more integrated STEM approaches, this is especially critical. Additionally, Dr. Dare has a passion for working with K-12 students to
could be a positive aspect, sometimes these experiencesparalleled the negative department environment. Such work environments can have lastingrepercussions for women personally and professionally and negatively impact their experienceswith the promotion and tenure process. Recommendations for institutions, EE departments,department chairs, faculty members and future research are offered to help promote a supportiveculture for women EE faculty members applicable to other STEM environments.IntroductionWomen faculty members have an important place in universities in the United States as an elitegroup of highly educated professionals. However, women faculty members are underrepresentedin all professorial ranks of the Science, Technology
personal computers or computers withstrong local computing power, who can now utilize any computer with internet access, such assystems at the public library, and be able to access their work or create their own projects.Giving students access to these tools and encouraging their use can promote confidence in theirskills through exploration of their features and industry relevant tools and applications that arehosted on the site.The AI section was taught completely in-person without members of the EQuIPD grant present,apart from one instructor attending the final section time virtually to watch and assist withpresentations of the chatbots. For this section, the camp organizers hired their own instructor,while curriculum was provided by the EQuIPD
academic andindustry background and was focused on engineering education for graduate and systemsengineering programs, to lead the expansion of the academic programs and develop new courses.The PIR faculty member developed and taught the first new course, Introduction to SystemsEngineering that teaches Systems Engineering principles, practices, and methods according toISO 15288 [3] and the INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook [4]. The faculty member thendeveloped and taught a second new course in model-based systems engineering (MBSE), whichintroduced students to systems modeling using descriptive modeling languages like the systemsmodeling language (SysML) and MBSE methods like the object-oriented systems engineeringmethod (OOSEM), and advanced
aspects of our lives. As a result, graduates need to be able to recognize andcommunicate such changes, as well as understand their own gaps in knowledge and skills to beable to address such changes in the future. Even though the faculty participants stated that they believe their students are well-prepared for a career in terms of domain-specific knowledge and skills, student preparation interms of soft-skills may not be sufficient, since it is often only inconsistently addressed on acourse-by-course level. As such, our results suggest the following two measures to furtherimprove computing programs. First, soft skills should be part of formal education to support not only collaborativeefforts, but also an ability to address ill
classroom management problems and students with abewildering assortment of academic and personal problems, doing what it takes to learn aboutand integrate into the campus culture, and finding the time to do all that and still have a personallife (Adam et al. 2008, Felder et al. 2012; Kember and Kwan 2000). It becomes more challengingto get established when the department or the college does not have the adequate resources tosupport the new faculty, and lacks a formal faculty development and mentoring program oncampus. There are some tricks of the trade—what I have learned from the literature and from mypersonal experience that will be shared in this article so that new E and ET faculty become moresuccessful in their careers. Some of the key issues
team Building, sustaining and factors that influence dynamics and performance, and have aJunior leading effective teams decision-making tied to better understanding of their role in an and establishing personality, and identify effective team. Furthermore, integration at performance goals the importance of both this level provides an early intervention to team and individual help prepare students before their senior performance to achieve design projects, which are also team-based. overall team objectives
academic and/or social support for students from groups racially/ethnicallyminoritized in higher education (both STEM and non-STEM). These include ethnic/culturalcenters, instructional centers, programs supporting undergraduate research, and other academicsupport programs for minoritized students university-wide. Community 2 comprises advisingoffices for STEM disciplines outside the College of Engineering, student organizations forminoritized students in non-engineering STEM disciplines, and some general undergraduateacademic support/tutoring programs. The three organizations in Community 2 that are mostcentral/tightly connected to the larger network are an office serving graduate students fromminoritized groups, a tutoring center serving the
them, especially URMs, arebeing negatively impacted, personal and professionally [4], [5]. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the research that is being conducted on URMs’experiences during COVID-19, particularly as it pertains to engineering. Using the online data andanalysis platform SenseMaker, participants were asked to share a story in response to the followingprompt: Imagine you are chatting with a friend or family member about the evolving COVID-19crisis. Tell them about something you have experienced recently as an engineering student. In asimilar study, at the University of Georgia, students expressed there was a lack of empathy frominstructors during the shift to virtual instruction [6], [7]. Our overarching
embedded within engineeringdepartments [9]. By using the expertise of graduate student and postdoctoral peer coacheswithin a given discipline, the Communication Lab provides a scalable, content-aware solutionwith the benefits of just-in-time, one-on-one [10], and peer [11] training. When we firstintroduced this model, we offered easy-to-record metrics for the Communication Lab’seffectiveness (such as usage statistics and student and faculty opinion surveys), as arecommonly used to assess writing centers [12], [13]. Here we present a formal quantitative study of the effectiveness of Communication Labcoaching. We designed a pre-post test study for two related tasks: personal statements forapplications to graduate school and graduate
, finding solutions and making5 Since the Maternal Wall bias is focused on gender based bias, we would not elaborate on the regressioncoefficients of the race variables. Model 5 does show Latino/Latina reported lower level agreement with thestatement. We do not have enough data in this study to offer an explanation to this result.improvements are what researchers and practitioners should focus on next. Various attemptshave been made or are in the making. For instance, a group of graduate students and faculty atthe Purdue University Engineering Education program published a report with proposedsolutions to improve African-American women’s presence in engineering (Fletcher et al 2016).The Center for WorkLife law at U. C. Hastings are working on
improve student engagementvia topic exploration. The goal of the partial classroom flipping was to engage students in activeproblem-solving. In addition, the design memo structure provided an opportunity to reflect onthe potential “pitfalls” if another faculty member were to implement the strategy. These were notnecessarily problems that the GL encountered, but guidelines to address potential problems. Forexample, the GL who implemented the mini-collaborative project suggested that the strategyshould be implemented in a class where a culture of collaboration has already been introduced.The GL who implemented the partially flipped classroom indicated that to avoid pitfalls facultyshould provide short problems that included all of the data tables
, and a graduate degree in Educational Leadership from the University of San Francisco. She is committed to creating equitable and accessible public institutions of higher education, including inclusive environments for underrepresented students in STEM.Dr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Amelink is Associate Vice Provost for Learning Systems Innovation at Virginia Tech. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of Engineering Education and Educational Leadership and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Pandemic Pivots: The Successful
program improvement.Kristian Basaraba, University of Alberta Kristian Basaraba is currently an Instructional Coach for the SPARK-ENG (Scholarship of Pedagogy and Research Knowledge - Engineering) Program at the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Alberta. Throughout his 20+ years of teaching he has taught all levels of high school science in both a traditional and outreach setting. He earned his Master’s of Science in Science Education from Montana State University where he explored the role that computer simulations have on students’ conceptual understanding of classical physics. Kristian is very active in the professional development community and loves to share ideas and methodology for what happens in his
Wyoming in 1992, 1994, and 1998, respectively. During his Ph.D. studies, he also obtained a graduate minor in statistics. He is currently an Associate Professor and Undergraduate Coordinator with the Electrical and Computer Engineering department at North Dakota State University, where he teaches courses and conducts research in signal processing. Since its inception in 2008, Dr. Green has been an active member of the NDSU Advance FORWARD Advocates, a group of male faculty dedicated to effecting departmental and institutional change in support of gender equality. As part of this group, he regularly trains men, at NDSU and other institutions, to better serve as gender equity allies. Dr. Green is the author of a
inhigher education highlights the critical need for change agents—individuals within academia andoutside of it willing to enact a transformation in STEM education at the curricular, institutional,and national levels. A core piece of ensuring a change in educational systems is the ability of theseagents to exercise their agency (i.e., free will or choice to act). However, the dominant norms inhigher education can limit opportunities for students, faculty members, or higher educationadministrators to enact their agency [3], [4]. A deeper understanding of how agency is defined andused in this context for research and policy changes can provide useful ways of catalyzing changein engineering education.Agency is an emerging theory within engineering