2006-1080: DEVELOPMENT OF EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS FOR ABIOENGINEERING FUNDAMENTALS COURSEAnn Saterbak, Rice University Ann Saterbak is Director of Laboratory Instruction and Lecturer in the Bioengineering Department at Rice University. She received her B.A. in Chemical Engineering and Biochemistry from Rice University in 1990 and her Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign in 1995. She conducted research and provided technical support within Shell Development Company from 1995 to 1999.Ka-yiu San, Rice University Dr. San is a professor in the Departments of Bioengineering and Chemical Engineering at Rice University. Dr. San received his B.S
David A. Willis is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Southern Methodist University. He received the B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from North Carolina State University (1995) and M.S. (1997) and Ph.D. (2001) degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Willis actively performs research in laser processing and thermal sciences. He developed the Laser Micromachining Laboratory at SMU, where he and his research team study thermal transport during laser-material interactions and laser micro-processing. His recent works have been published in the highly visible journals Physics of Fluids, the International Journal of Heat
Steven Beyerlein is professor Mechanical Engineering at the University of Idaho, where he coordinates the capstone design program and regularly participates in ongoing program assessment activities. For these efforts he won the UI Outstanding Teaching Award in 2001. Over the last three years he has assisted Dr. Odom in creating the Mindworks laboratory discussed in this paper. Currently he is collaborating on an NSF grant with other members of the Transferable Design Engineering Education (TIDEE) consortium to develop valid and reliable instruments for measuring student performance in design.Russ Porter, University of Idaho Russ Porter is the manager of the Mechanical Engineering Machine
EducationInfusing engineering-related concepts into K-12 level curriculum is a rather new initiative forpublic school teachers in the United States, especially those who teach technology education.Maurice Thomas, in a paper presented at the Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher EducationConference, stated that “Technology education has the opportunity to become a partner withengineering and benefit from their image, support, and political power. Many argue that we[technology education] would gain a great deal and lose little because engineering content fitscomfortably with technology education objectives and content.”1 Many technology teachers,however, wonder if this new initiative is viable for the future of the technology educationprofession, or that
2006-1229: UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH ON APPROPRIATE ANDSUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGYAngela Bielefeldt, University of Colorado-Boulder Dr. Bielefeldt is an Associate Professor and a licensed P.E. in the State of Colorado. She teaches Civil and Environmental Engineering courses for freshman, seniors, and graduate students on topics including design, hazardous waste management, solid waste management, and bioremediation. She is a co-faculty advisor for the Engineers Without Borders student chapter at the University of Colorado at Boulder (CU) and is working with other faculty at CU to start a new emphasis in Engineering for Developing Communities at both the graduate and undergraduate levels
2006-2338: INTEGRATING ENTERPRISE DECISION-MAKING MODULESSharon Johnson, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Sharon A. Johnson is Director of the Industrial Engineering Program and an associate professor of operations and industrial engineering in the Department of Management at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. She teaches courses in process management, facility layout and design, and production planning and control. Dr. Johnson received her Ph.D. from Cornell University in Operations Research and Industrial Engineering in 1989. Dr. Johnson’s research interests include lean manufacturing and operations design, process modeling, and reverse logistics. With co-investigators Arthur
new course at Purdue is based on fulfilling the needs for students inthe new Multidisciplinary Engineering (MDE) located in the new Purdue School of EngineeringEducation (ENE), which was founded in 2004. The ENE program is Purdue's answer to a needto better understand the learning and teaching of engineering.1 The MDE program is intended tobuild upon the success of the Purdue Interdisciplinary Engineering (IDE) program that hasenabled students to earn a degree at the interface between different engineering disciplines orengineering and other disciplines by providing a common multidisciplinary foundation for Page 11.993.3students who will then
and demonstrate class materials effectively in distant learning mode and to enableindependent learning by students. Various teaching materials and techniques are used.2.1 Classification of E-Learning Readiness2.1.1 Classification of E-Learning Readiness by Chulalongkorn UniversityTo facilitate the transition to a fully functional e-learning program, a gradual transition approachis adopted. In this approach, instructors gradually modify the courses currently offered (or newcourses) from conventional, in-class, teaching to e-learning based classes. The classification ofe-learning readiness of courses by Chulalongkorn University is as follows1: 1. knowledge database, 2. e-learning enhanced course, 3. e-learning hybrid course, and 4
circuits and communications.ROBERT A. STRANGEWAYDr. Strangeway is Professor in the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department at Milwaukee Schoolof Engineering (MSOE). He is also currently performing research on millimeter-wave components and systems atthe Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI. He earned his Ph.D. degree (EE) from Marquette University in1996. He teaches courses in circuits, signals, electromagnetic fields, and RF/microwaves.OWE G. PETERSENDr. Petersen is Department Chair and Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the MilwaukeeSchool of Engineering (MSOE). He is a former Member of Technical Staff at AT&T Bell Laboratories and receivedhis Ph.D. degree from the University of Pennsylvania in
skills.Course Design and GoalsOlin’s introductory materials science is a project-based course that combines new pedagogicalpractices with modern laboratory facilities. The introductory materials science course employs aproject-based approach and emphasizes hands-on experimentation. The course’s strong linkagesto everyday stuff – products such as sporting goods, tools, and toys – as well as cutting edgematerials and processes are highly appealing to Olin’s undergraduate engineering students.The course is designed to provide significant opportunities for student self-direction.Several key elements of the course give students practice in controlling their own learningprocess. The course features open-ended projects with self-designed experiments, self
encouragingbonds between Universities and Industry: • Traditional funding for education from the government has decreased, or at best has fluctuated, over the past few years. Because of this, universities are looking for alternative ways to maintain research and development programs, laboratories, and even faculty so that they might attract the best and brightest students and retain the students that they currently have. Also, ways to stretch current budgets without diminishing the quality of the education must be explored. • Industry realizes that the universities are essential for training the workforce that they will someday employ. It is therefore essential that the education that they receive be
. This manuscript describes the instructional approach used to teach this project-based capstone engineering design course. Detailed information regarding the activities conducted in MET 210W is provided. Finally, the assessment techniques used in this course are described.IntroductionThe engineering education community has shown increasing interest in project-basedlearning approaches. The benefits of project-based learning include enhanced studentparticipation in the learning process, enhanced communication skills, addressing of awider set of learning styles, and the promotion of critical thinking.1 The authors feel thatthe use of engineering design and analysis projects provide students with a wider contextto the material
ProjectsSeveral engineering service-learning projects have been accomplished at Cal Poly Pomona.Every one of them requires a common engineering sense built on the fundamental subjects andsofter skills developed in general education classes as well as engineering and science classes,particularly the team-oriented laboratory classes. A brief summary of some of the projects aregiven below:Robot FIRSTA group of engineering students teamed up to support Robotics Alliance of West Covina, a localrobotics community for teaching and assisting local high school students of West Covina HighSchool in designing and constructing a robot for the FIRST Robotics competition. FIRST standsfor “For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology” and is an initiative
courses teaching wireless data acquisition.References1. E. Cheever, L. Molter, B. Maxwell, “A Remote Wireless Sensing and Control Laboratory,” CD- ROM Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 3432, June 22-25, 2003 Nashville, Tennessee.2. J. Gumaer, “Teaching Data Acquisition Using Laptop Computers,” CD-ROM Proceedings of the 2004 ASEE Annual Conference, Session1426, June 20-23, 2004, Salt Lake City, Utah.3. M. Hoffmann, “Improving Data Acquisition and Reduction in a First-Year Student Laboratory Experiment,” CD-ROM Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference, Session 3559, June 12- 15, 2005, Portland, Oregon.4. A. See, “Utilizing LabVIEW for Data Acquisition and Analysis for a 13 Weeks
expensive and unaffordable for many engineering and engineering technologyprograms. Maskless writing techniques, including electron-beam direct writing3,4, ion-beamdirect writing5, X-ray lithography6,7, and laser direct writing8,9, are alternate polymer waveguidefabrication approaches. Due to their high operation cost, first three maskless technologies are notsuitable for teaching purpose. This paper presents a simple and inexpensive polymer opticalwaveguide fabrication approach, i.e. Laser Direct Writing (LDW), developed for our ELET 5320(Introduction to Telecommunications) course. LDW waveguides will be produced in a singlecomputer controlled step. This process eliminates all the complex steps associated with thedefinition of structures using
classoffered twice per week for 3 hours. It was a combined lecture and “hands-on” experience for thestudents allowing access to classroom, field and/or laboratory facilities as necessary. Initialenrollment was 14 students. Biology and Chemistry Applications for Engineers presented students withfundamental biology and chemistry concepts in the context of engineering and scienceapplications. Based on the expertise of the two faculty teaching the course (achemical/environmental engineer and a biologist and wetland ecologist), the class focused on thestudy of a freshwater aquatic microcosm. Based on the expertise of the faculty, this courseoffering was focused in civil/environmental engineering. Skills developed in the class areappropriate for the
Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86, No. 1, 1997, pp. 17-28.3. Davis, William J., and Philip D. Strope, “Enhancing Student Learning and Community Service Through Senior Engineering Projects,” Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education – Southeast Section, 2000.4. Craft, Lucille, “Crafting a New Curriculum,” ASEE Prism, Jan, 2005, pp. 30-34.5. Miller, Gregory and Stephen Cooper, “Something Old, Something New: Integrating Engineering Practice into the Teaching of Engineering Mechanics,” Journal of Engineering Education, Apr, 1995, pp. 105-115.6. Shapira, Aviad, “Bringing the Site into the Classroom: A Construction Engineering Laboratory,” Journal of
2006-1475: ENGINEERING STUDENTS FOR THE 21ST CENTURYCharles Bunting, Oklahoma State University Charles Bunting received his Ph.D. from Virginia Tech in 1994. His interests are in Electromagnetic characterization and application of reverberation chambers, computational electromagnetics, and analysis of optical and microwave structures using numerical methods. Currently he teaches at both the undergraduate and graduate level, developing hands-on approaches to teaching electromagnetics.Alan Cheville, Oklahoma State University Alan Cheville is an associate professor of electrical engineering at Oklahoma State University. Starting out along the traditional tenure path as a researcher in THz
. and Ph. D. in Industrial Engineering and Management from Oklahoma State University. Page 11.1344.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Tools for Authentic Assessment Used in the Active Learning in the Virtual Enterprise System (ALIVE)1. IntroductionThe Active Learning In the Virtual Enterprise (ALIVE) system is an NSF CCLI sponsored effortto teach systems thinking, information technology, and business skills while integratingcurriculum and disciplines. The Virtual Enterprise (VE) is a full scale manufacturing supplychain, integrated using information technology, and producing an actual product
2006-488: GIRLS ARE IT--A WORKSHOP FOR RECRUITING GIRLS INTOINFORMATION TECHNOLOGYAnn Beheler, Collin County Community College Ann Beheler is Dean/Executive Director of the Engineering and Emerging Technology Division of Collin County Community College and is a Ph.D. student at Walden University. She is responsible for continuing education and credit engineering and technology programs on all campuses as well as Distance Education and the Teaching and Learning Center for the district. Additionally, she manages a $2.46 million National Science Foundation grant for a Regional Center in Convergence Technology that focuses on furthering careers in the emerging career area of convergence
2006-622: INTEGRATING COURSES THROUGH DESIGN PROJECTS IN A HIGHSCHOOL ENGINEERING SUMMER PROGRAMAmit Nimunkar, University of Wisconsin-Madison AMIT J. NIMUNKAR is currently a doctoral student at the Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison. He is also a teaching assistant at the Department of Chemistry and worked as a chemistry instructor and curriculum coordinator for the Engineering Summer Program in the College of Engineering. He is pursuing the Delta Certificate in Teaching and Learning.Sandra Courter, University of Wisconsin-Madison SANDRA SHAW COURTER teaches technical communication courses in the College of Engineering. As director of the Engineering
2006-2654: EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING FOR INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERINGCURRICULUMSandra Furterer, University of Central Florida Sandra L. Furterer, Ph.D. is the Assistant Department Chair in the Industrial Engineering and Management Systems department in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida. Dr. Furterer’s research and teaching interests are change management related to application of Lean Enterprise and Six Sigma, as well as engineering education.Jessica Jenness, University of Central Florida Jessica Jenness is an IEMS Masters student in Quality Engineering at the University of Central Florida. She has a Bachelor’s of Science in Statistics from UCF
makesit accessible to students at any time, b) it is interactive much like the way a student interacts witha human tutor, c) it is intelligent in the sense that it mimics the teaching style of a human tutor,and d) it is adaptable by any instructor. The course material is organized as a collection oflogical interrelated topics with examples, and exercise problems. The tutoring system maintainsa database for every interaction that the student makes with the system. As the studentprogresses through a course, the system records every move that the student makes, such as, thenumber of attempts that the student makes in solving a particular problem, whether the student isable to solve a problem, etc., and suggests prerequisites as the student stumbles
the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1999, and in 2004 she was awarded the ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award in recognition of distinguished accomplishments in engineering education.Larry Leifer, Stanford University Larry J. Leifer has been a member of the Stanford School of Engineering faculty since 1976. Professor Leifer teaches a year long master’s sequence in “Team-Based Product Innovation with Corporate Partners,” the “Design Theory and Methodology Forum,” and a freshman seminar, “Designing the Human Experience: Design Thinking in Theory and Practice.” From 1997-2001 he served as founding director of the Stanford Learning Laboratory, an ongoing university
teaching and research experience both in the United States and abroad. He has published more than 50 journal and conference papers, and has co-authored two books and invited chapters published by Kluwer Academic Publishers and Springer.Glen Archer, Michigan Technological University is with the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan Technological University. He received his Masters degree from Texas Tech University in 1986. He has been the instructor of an EE service course and its associated laboratories since Fall 2001, and has 12 years of teaching experience. Page
of offering meaningful laboratory experiences viathis mode of instruction. In spite of these misgivings, many studies have compared face-to-faceinstruction to distance learning instruction and found no significant differences2,3.This study compares software platforms (WebCT vs. WebBoard/other types e-communications),assesses the efficacy of TLT (Teaching, Learning, Technology) training and teaching technologyformats (multimedia only vs. text based only vs. a mixed format of multi-media and text) andtheir impact on learning outcomes (student performance and satisfaction with the course and theinstructor) at a large public research university with a reputation as a pioneer and leader ininformation technology and distance learning.Student
tocontemporary problems and technology solutions than strictly didactic instruction orcontrived laboratory problem approaches. Not surprising, students’ motivation increasesin these settings and their confidence in problem definition, option development andsolution grows. As with active learning approaches, the instructor role changes in clinicand project courses from one of talking head to facilitator, guide and resource [2,6]. Thestructure of an engineering clinic based ECE program is one that requires students tooperate at higher orders of abstraction earlier in their education while still requiring aconcrete “hands-on, minds-on” engineering solution to the real world problem at hand.These transformative changes are discussed as desirable in most of
2006-796: CAN ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGYPROGRAMS RESIDE WITHIN THE SAME DEPARTMENT?Tim Brower, Oregon Institute of Technology TIM L. BROWER is an associate professor and department chair in the Department of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering and Technology at Oregon Institute of Technology. He received his BS in General Engineering at Idaho State University, MS in Mechanical Engineering from Montana State University and PhD in Civil Engineering from Colorado State University. Before teaching at OIT seven years ago, he worked as an aerospace engineer with the Lockheed Martin Corporation in Denver, Colorado. Dr. Brower is the Associate Director of Oregon Space Grant and
Open-Ended Design Project as Introduction to Design for Civil Engineering Freshmen. Bert Davy, Indranil Goswami, Jiang Li, Gbekeloluwa Oguntimein, Charles Oluokun, Arcadio Sincero. Department of Civil Engineering, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD 21251.AbstractA freshman design course - CEGR 105 Introduction to Civil Engineering - was designed anddelivered as part of the effort for ‘early introduction of design into the engineering curriculum’.The course is a second semester orientation course that follows a broader first semester coursecalled ORIE 104 Orientation to Engineering.With a team-teaching
Metallurgical Engineering from Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Before joining FGCU, Dr. Egiebor was Professor and U.S. Department of Energy Chair of Excellence in Environmental Engineering at Tuskegee University, where he was the coordinator of the environmental engineering undergraduate program between 1996 and 2005. Dr. Egiebor has received several national and international awards for teaching and research accomplishments in environmental engineering, including the German Alexander von Humboldt Senior Fellowship Award in 1994 and the U.S. Department of Energy Award for teaching and research in 2003.James Sweeney, Arizona State University JAMES D. SWEENEY has been hired by