classroomdemonstrations are most effective when coupled with the requirement of having the studentspredict the answer in advance of observing the demonstration(11).Our apparatus for experiments in statics is dubbed the “VectorSmith.” In addition to the threeroles of laboratory experiences described above, we believe that these laboratory experiencesshould provide students an alternative look at a particular problem. With this in mind, the fiveexperiments we developed are classic problems presented in virtually all statics textbooks. Thisallows students with different learning styles a better opportunity to grasp the concept that theproblem is conveying.Yoder et al.(12) proposed the following guidelines for hands-on laboratory experiences forteaching engineering
AC 2007-1425: DEMONSTRATING NEURAL FUNCTION THROUGH BOTHHANDS-ON AND COMPUTER-SIMULATED LABORATORY MODULESJennifer Kang Derwent, Illinois Institute of Technology Page 12.445.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Demonstrating Neural Function through Both Hands-on and Computer Simulated Laboratory ModulesAbstractThe Department of Biomedical Engineering (BME) at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT)focuses on three areas of study: Cell and Tissue Engineering, Neural Engineering and MedicalImaging. Within the Neural Engineering curriculum, students take a core class called “BME 445Quantitative Neural Function”. The major objective of this class
AC 2007-345: MAGNETIC LEVITATION SYSTEMS USING ANALOG ANDDIGITAL PHASE-LEAD CONTROLLERSJianxin Tang, Alfred University Jianxin Tang, Professor of Electrical Engineering, Alfred University, Alfred, NY 14802. Education: • Ph.D. The University of Connecticut, Electrical Engineering, 9/84-9/89; • M.S. The University of Bridgeport, Electrical Engineering, 1/83-5/84; • B.S. Guangxi University (China), Electrical Engineering, 9/72-7/76. Areas of Specialization and Research Interests: • Power system generation scheduling • Digital Signal Processing. • Control and communication systems
. Robert Lee Moore1 about 1932, and since then, it has been applied mostly inMathematics, mainly for proofing theorems2. Even though there are many parallels in thinkingamong engineers and mathematicians, and despite the fact that engineering disciplines employmathematical knowledge and methodologies all the time, Moore’s method unfortunately neverreally found its way into Engineering.But how does this method work? Professor Moore summarized his method in these words: “Thatstudent is taught the best who is told the least.” The method is a “commitment to teaching byletting students discover the power their own minds have.”3 In a "classical lecture", we depriveour students of the chance to advance in any other field outside of mere "knowledge in
Teaching the Introductory Computer Architecture Course with a Systematic View Wei Zhang Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Southern Illinois University Carbondale Carbondale, IL 62902 USA zhang@engr.siu.edu 2 Teaching the Introductory Computer Architecture Course with a Systematic View Wei Zhang Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Southern Illinois
, there are too many so called professionals, who rely blindlyon test data with no or very little understanding of basic principals of engineering. Figure 3: “Dog bone” sample in the tester. Page 12.1166.6Theoretical calculations will sink deeper into the minds when people see the end result. AT308,Inc. delivers exactly what is needed: learning by validation of the theoretical side of the course.There is another way to learn. The Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering in Needham,Massachusetts offers a different approach to engineering education. Guizzo reverses the “theoryfirst, practice later” model and gets students
relating them to common items is helpful in understanding concepts.” – Jim Fox, senior civil engineering student at UCDHSC, Fall 2006. “My favorite is the hamburger helper because it’s easy to relate to and provides a good laugh (sticks in my mind), and the atomic fireball because you are able to experience it. I don't think that I'll forget either one.” – Josh Powell, junior civil engineering student at UCDHSC, Spring 2007. “The hamburger helper analogy helped a lot and was a really good example. Traffic Gridlock is also good. Group of straws is also excellent. Those three examples are stuck in my head and I understand it very well. Last week when my Timber Design professor
Case Study of ABET Assessment Plan and Results Abu S.M. Masud (abu.masud@wichita.edu) Don E. Malzahn (don.malzahn@wichita.edu) Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260-0035 ABSTRACTThe Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering at Wichita State Universityhas put in place a plan for assessment with respect to criteria 2 and 3 of EAC/ABET.This paper will explain our assessment plan, data collection tools used, and share someresults and experience. INTRODUCTIONThe Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering is
important goals of this course, in addition to recognizing thatethical issues pervade engineering – to be open-minded yet critical in our approach to ethicalproblem solving.In addition to the pedagogical value of Star Trek, I like using it because it is fun. Even though asa boy I was fascinated and impressed with the imagery and sets of the original series, today itappears primitive and campy. That combined with the acting style of William Shatner make fora lot of laughs. All of the series include moments of humor and good-natured teasing.Course StructureThe course meets once a week for a 75-minute period. The basic weekly pattern is to view acomplete episode of Star Trek every other week, with the alternating classes for discussions thatbuild upon
Earth Day Teach-In: A Model for Industry, Community, and Education Collaboration Ken Barnard, Aviation Greg Stephens, Arts, Science, Business Raju Dandu, Engineering Technology College of Technology and Aviation Kansas State University at SalinaAbstractEarth Day is a driving force for environmental awareness around the world. It can also be aneffective event for educating the 21st Century Community and the Engineer community becauseengineers and technologists will play a vital role in civic engagement, green economicdevelopment, and global
AC 2007-1207: TEACHING STRUCTURED PROGRAMMING USING LEGOPROGRAMMABLE BRICKSEric Wang, University of Nevada-Reno ERIC L. WANG is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno. Dr. Wang has won numerous awards including the Tibbitts Distinguished Teaching Award, UNR's most prestigious teaching award. In addition to his pedagogical activities, Dr. Wang conducts research on sports equipment, biomechanics, robotics, and intelligent materials.Jeffrey LaCombe, University of Nevada-Reno JEFFREY C. LACOMBE is an Assistant Professor of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering at the University of Nevada, Reno. In addition to his education-oriented research
Learning Assistance Program at NJIT. She is active, and a former Board Member, in the Hispanic Association for Higher Education (HAHE) and has presented at previous ASEE meetings. Page 12.1409.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 AC 2007-378: The Doctoral Pathway, an Institutional Journey of DevelopmentGSD, MIND, WIE, INTDRonald Kane and Clarisa Gonzalez-LenahanThe history of one institution’s transformation from a regional specialized institution to a leadingresearch university can be a model for others in times of limited state resources to supportgraduate education
. Crawley, E. F. The CDIO Syllabus: A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education, MIT CDIO Report #1, 2001. Available at http://www.cdio.org31. Gronlund, N.E. (2000). How to Write and Use Instructional Objectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.32. Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years. New Page 12.1340.15 York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.33. Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N.R., and Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books34. Baxter Magolda, M. B
Learning and Development”3 published in 1984 has become the foundation for the subject andmost, if not all, future work on this subject. David A. Kolb’s ideas have had a dramatic impact on thedesign and development of lifelong learning models. His work can be traced back to that famous dictum Proceedings of the 2007 Middle Atlantic Section Fall Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 2of Confucius around 450 BC: "Tell me, and I will forget. Show me, and I may remember. Involve me,and I will understand."The concept of experiential learning explores the cyclical pattern of all
-the arttechnology knowledge, in comparison with company engineers who may have graduated five toten years before. This new information from classes provides a way of thinking outside the boxand allows fresh minds to suggest new ideas [1].Also, there can be some synergy between the classes, the internship and the research project asshown in Figure 1. First the student gets a strong background in classes. During the graduateinternship, the student gets a deeper background and foundation on the topic. Additionally s/helearns the constraints, limitations and other issues that must be addressed within the industrialenvironment that might be overlooked in academics. Next, the student takes this industrialrelevance and applies it to future classes
the three courses that comprise our ComputerScience Engineering Sequence and then evaluate their learning using a group project. The first course isstrictly individual effort, the second course combines group and individual work, and the sequenceculminates with an exam-less, group project course. Students benefit from opportunities to learn how tosucceed in a group setting over time, while we increasingly adjust the allocation of evaluation points fromindividual to group effort. In our final course, we employ cooperative learning using vertical slicingwhere students select a component of the system whose development they are responsible for throughouteach phase of the engineered solution. This vertical slicing allows us to develop homework
AC 2007-971: A THOROUGH HANDS-ON PROCESS TO IMPLEMENT A RFIDSYSTEMBen Zoghi, Texas A&M University Dr. Ben Zoghi is currently a Professor and Director of RFID/Sensor Lab in the Engineering Technology and Industrial Distribution Department at Texas A&M University. He has served the department as Industrial Distribution Program Coordinator, Executive Director of Thomas and Joan Read Center and Associate Department Head for Research since he joined Texas A&M in 1987. His research activities include RFID/Sensors and engineering leadership development. Dr. Zoghi is a senior member fo IEEE, meber of ASEE, TAP, TBP. He has over 100 educational and research publications.Ryan Beasely, TAMU
dominated by nanotechnology, bioengineering, andother promising but potentially problematic technologies (in his 2006 Liberal Education DivisionDistinguished Lecture “The Unleashed Human Mind: Liberating Education for the 21stCentury”18).We chose the learning outcomes and formal title (“Engineering Professional Development 690:Social and Ethical Impacts of Technology—Literature and Discussion”) with an eye toward ourexperiences with the pilot course, the mission of our department within our College ofEngineering, and the ABET “professional skills” criteria. The five learning outcomes wedesigned for students were • Outcome 1: Articulate connections among engineering, ethics, community, history, social change, and politics by actively
interest in higher education pedagogy. He was Professor of Communications at Kettering University prior to joining the faculty at Michigan Tech. While at Kettering, he received the Distinguished Teaching Award and the Charles L. Tutt, Jr. Innovative Teaching Award. He has published extensively in the area of pedagogical design, innovation, and experimentation. Page 12.1078.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 MOM in Action1. IntroductionThe application of mechanics of materials continues to grow beyond aerospace, civil and mechan-ical engineering where it
AC 2007-1392: UNDERSTANDING GRADUATE SCHOOLStacy Eisenman, University of MarylandGeorge List, North Carolina State University Page 12.1514.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 UNDERSTANDING GRADUATE SCHOOLAbstractGraduate school is a significantly different world from undergraduate study. It is alsodrastically different from the “real world.” One of the main complexities associated withbeing a graduate student is understanding and meeting expectations. These include yourpersonal expectations, expectations of your advisor, other faculty, your department, theschool, other students and future employers. This paper provides a students perspectiveon being in
AC 2007-1495: EFFECTS OF THE TEAM-BASED APPROACH ON INDIVIDUALLEARNINGJason Pitts, Oklahoma State UniversityPatrick Teague, Oklahoma State UniversityAlan Cheville, Oklahoma State UniversityCharles Bunting, Oklahoma State UniversitySohum Sohoni, Oklahoma State University Page 12.588.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Effects of the Team-Based Approach on Individual Learning1.IntroductionThis study is a part of the ES21C project at Oklahoma State University. The goal of ES21C is toprepare OSU electrical engineering students to meet the challenges of engineering in the 21stcentury. The proposal for the ES21C project gives the following summary
AC 2007-413: DIAGNOSING STUDENTS' MISCONCEPTIONS ON SOLUBILITYAND SATURATION FOR UNDERSTANDING OF PHASE DIAGRAMSStephen Krause, Arizona State University Stephen J. Krause is Professor and Associate Director of the School of Materials in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches courses in general materials engineering, polymer science, characterization of materials, and materials selection and design. He conducts research in innovative education in engineering, including a Materials Concept Inventory, and also in adapting design, engineering and technology concepts to K-12 education. He is currently working on an NSF sponsored MSP developing courses for high
AC 2007-611: SIMULATION AS A MEANS TO INFUSE MANUFACTURINGEDUCATION WITH STATISTICS AND DOE – A CASE STUDY USINGINJECTION MOLDINGKurt Rosentrater, USDA-ARS KURT A ROSENTRATER is a Lead Scientist with the United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, in Brookings, SD, where he is spearheading a new initiative to develop value-added uses for residue streams resulting from biofuel manufacturing operations. He is formerly an assistant professor at Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, in the Department of Technology. He received the Faculty of the Year award in 2002 sponsored by the NIU College of Engineering and Engineering Technology.Jerry Visser, South Dakota State
AC 2007-1906: MATERIALS SELECTION EXERCISES BASED ON CURRENTEVENTSMary Vollaro, Western New England College Mary B. Vollaro is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Western New England College in Springfield, Massachusetts. Dr. Vollaro received her Ph.D. at the University of Connecticut and she has held engineering positions in industry in the materials science area. She is currently Chair of the ASEE Materials Division and works closely with longtime ASEE partners, The National Educators Workshop (NEW). Page 12.1038.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007
AC 2007-2085: DEVELOPING EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE IN ANUNDERGRADUATE LAB ? SERVING EDUCATION ON TWO FRONTS ATVRUPLJohn Bell, University of Illinois-Chicago Page 12.494.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Developing Educational Software in an Undergraduate Lab – Serving Education on Two Fronts at VRUPLABSTRACTEducational software can have a profound and widespread positive impact on the world,particularly if it is made freely available and widely distributed. At the same time, providing alaboratory where undergraduate students can work on large complex software projects beyondthe scope of ordinary homework assignments can provide immeasurable
AC 2007-2460: EXPERIENCES AND TEACHING TOOLS IN ALTERNATIVEENERGY EDUCATIONSlobodan Petrovic, Arizona State University Dr. Slobodan Petrovic is an associate professor at the Arizona State University, with teaching and research interests in the areas of alternative energy (fuel cells, hydrogen production and storage, CO2 reduction), MEMS and sensors. Prior to joining ASU Dr. Petrovic held appointments at Clear Edge Power (formerly Quantum Leap Technology) as a Vice President of Engineering; at Neah Power Systems as Director of Systems Integration; and Motorola, Inc. as a Fuel Cell Group Manager and Reliability Manager. Dr. Petrovic has over 20 years of experience in energy systems
AC 2007-368: INDUCING STUDENTS TO CONTEMPLATECONCEPT-ELICITING QUESTIONS AND THE EFFECT ON PROBLEMSOLVING PERFORMANCEPaul Steif, Carnegie Mellon University PAUL S. STEIF Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa Degrees: Sc. B. 1979, Brown University; M.S. 1980, Ph.D. 1982, Harvard University. Research area: engineering mechanics and education.Jamie LoBue, Carnegie Mellon University Undergraduate Student, Mechanical EngineeringAnne Fay, Carnegie Mellon University Director of Assessment, Eberly Center for Teaching Excellence, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA Degrees: B.A. 1983, York University; Ph. D. 1990, University of California
AC 2007-612: TEACHING COURSES WITH TABLET PC: EXPERIENCE ANDSTUDENT FEEDBACKSaroj Biswas, Temple University Saroj Biswas is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Temple University, Philadelphia. He completed his doctoral degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Ottawa, Canada, in 1986. His field of research is control systems, nonlinear and robust control, neural networks, intelligent systems, and intelligent tutoring systems. He is the author or co-author of over 60 articles in refereed journals or conferences. He is a member of IEEE, ASEE, and Sigma Xi
AC 2007-412: INDIVIDUALIZED FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN ONLINEMODULE IMPROVES LEARNING OF GLOMERULAR FILTRATIONSarah Henrickson, Harvard UniversityRumi Chunara, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyIahn Cajigas, HST Division, Harvard and MITHeather Gunter, HST Division, Harvard and MITJoseph Bonventre, HST Division, Harvard and MIT Page 12.883.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Individualized Formative Assessment in Online Module Improves Learning of Glomerular FiltrationABSTRACTWhile capillary filtration is a fundamental physiology topic, students report that this material is difficult tomaster. In addition, overall exam performance
purchased commercially or canbe built at a much lower cost. A key feature of these exercises is the use of low cost, USB baseddata acquisition (DAQ) devices. Many companies are beginning to offer these types of devices,and prices are getting to the point where students may be able to obtain one for about the cost ofa textbook to use throughout their college careers and beyond. Before outlining the suite of exercises, we take a look at the pedagogical framework whichprovides the basis for them. Most undergraduate engineering courses that have laboratorycomponents involve a series of structured exercises that employ preconfigured devices that yieldpredictable results. The students are usually required to follow a particular procedure to run