Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Homero Gregorio Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

traditionallecture because students reflect about what they are doing after engaging in several learningactivities introduced in the classroom [1, 14, 16, 23-25]. In contrast, students in traditionallecture pedagogies receive information from the lecturer and their participation andengagement is minimal. As Smith, Sheppard [26] express: “students learn more whenintensely involved in educational process and are encouraged to apply their knowledge inmany situations” (p.87). According to Bonwell and Eison [22], the amount of informationretained by students declines considerably after ten minutes of listening, so traditionalinstructional strategies may not be effective, specially in engineering education. Also, thereflection promoted in active learning has been

Conference Session

Graduate Ethics Education & Professional Codes

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Craig Hanks, Texas State University, San Marcos; Dominick Esperanza Fazarro, The University of Texas at Tyler; Jitendra S. Tate, Texas State University, San Marcos; Walt Trybula, Texas State University & Trybula Foundation, Inc.; Robert J.C. McLean, Texas State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

-institutional.Our project starts with the notion that ethical and social responsibility (and here we includesafety, health, and environmental considerations, among others) is an integral part of the practiceof engineers and technologists. Shaping engineering education with this idea in mind is attentiveto the role of identity in what people do,30 and can serve to provide intellectual, conceptual, andnarrative resources to assist professionals as they navigate their work world. Engineering,similar to other professions, has a language,18 and that language frames how practitioners thinkof themselves and their work.27 As Korte notes in a 2013 study, “the developing professionalidentities of new engineers are reflected in the narratives they construct regarding

Conference Session

Trends in Engineering Education 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kathy Schmidt Jackson, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Linda C. Schmidt, University of Maryland, College Park; Gül E. Okudan Kremer, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Peifeng Yin

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

studies in learning, thinking, and reaction time2. Below, we summarize some ofthe relevant works on cognition relating to our research based on the extended summary ofcognition, value and decision-making research by Sprehn18.Earlier studies on cognition began in 1940s, where laboratory studies aimed at identifying groupsof people with significant differences in their cognitive processes. Some of the predominanttheories of this epoch are: 1) Perceptual versus Conceptual Groupers3, 2) Sharpeners andLevelers4, 3) Field Dependency/Independency5, and 4) Impulsive versus Reflective Thinkers6,7.We refer the readers to Kozhevnikov8 for an in depth review in this area. One salient criticism ofthese early theories, as voiced by Walker9, Kogan and Saarni10

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Research Technical Session 7

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Wendy C. Newstetter, Georgia Institute of Technology; Eden Fisher, Carnegie Mellon University; Paula Gangopadhyay, The Henry Ford (museums); James Edwin Cawthorne Jr., Purdue University, West Lafayette; Sridhar S. Condoor, Parks College of Engineering, Aviation and Technology, Saint Louis University; Edward J. Coyle, Georgia Institute of Technology; Donald Wroblewski P.E., University of California, Berkeley; Cornelia Huellstrunk, Princeton University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

/entrepreneur engineer characteristics important to each stage of the innovation process. 2. The characteristics or strengths of an engineer in one stage of the innovation process are not necessarily the same characteristics required in a different stage of the innovation process (Caldicott, 2013; Griffin, Price, & Vojak, 2012). This finding has implications for hiring, job placement/selection, team management, professional development and self-assessment of engineering professionals and their education and life-long learning.ConclusionsInsights into the critical characteristics of an innovative engineer will aid student and practicingengineers as well as engineering faculty in self-reflection, instruction and team

Conference Session

Innovative Use of Technology and the Internet in Engineering Education

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul S. Steif, Carnegie Mellon University; Luoting Fu; Levent Burak Kara, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

feedback onseparate subtasks, then we might indeed observe improvement in their ability to execute thedifferent subtasks.Thus, our goal is to sensibly designate the different subtasks or distinct skills that must bemastered to ultimately solve such problems. Of course, we also want the clarity of being able tocharacterize each attempt to use a skill as unambiguously correct or correct. We hope thefrequency at which those attempts are correct increases with practice. How then should wedivide up the overall task? Critical to that division is its granularity – how small are the actionsthat are deemed to reflect individual skills and how many different skills are recognized amongthe different actions of the same general type.To illustrate issues of

Conference Session

New Teaching Pedagogies: Methods and Assessments

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey F. Rhoads, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Eric Nauman, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Beth M. Holloway, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Charles Morton Krousgrill, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics

complex engineering problems.Apart from the core components highlighted above, there is also considerable ongoingexperimentation within the PMFC with other pedagogy-driven instructional elements. Theseinclude:  Using the Index of Learning Styles (ILS)4-6 to categorize learning style preferences and tailor information delivery. The ILS is a relatively simple measure of how students prefer to receive information. The survey divides learning style preferences into four domains with opposing descriptors, visual-verbal, active-reflective, sensory-intuitive, and sequential-global. Using these domains, it has been established that students tend to prefer visual, active, and sensory modes, despite the fact

Conference Session

Construction Contracts, Law and Ethics

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John David Cioara, Arizona State University; Dean Takeo Kashiwagi, Arizona State University; Sylvia Romero, Arizona State University; Kenneth Timothy Sullivan, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Construction

estimating, project management, and client coordination.The goal is to change the students’ role from a traditional reactionary model who listens tolectures and takes notes, to a subject matter expert. This new style of teaching has the studentstake the curriculum, research it, interface with the industry, utilize legal expertise, problem solvethe material and then teach the results to their peers. The new student transition increasedparticipation of other students and in their understanding of the topics being learned. Page 24.1248.5 Class FormatThe new class format reflected the students’ transformation

Conference Session

K-12 and Pre-college Engineering: Educational Policy and Research

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robin Clark P.E., Aston University; Jane Andrews, Aston University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

. It should be noted however, that at eachcompetition, the somewhat chaotic nature of the event, in which between 50 and 250 children,their siblings, class mates, parents and teachers were present within a single school facilitymeant that the observations did not provide any useful data other than a reflective narrativeaccount written by the researchers in which a number of relevant factors were recorded.The case-study ‘organisational’ fieldwork conducted in 2013 commenced with a documentanalysis of various internal documents, looking at coverage in terms of provision as well asexamining the initiative itself (in terms of tools used). Six in-depth semi-structured interviewswere then conducted with six members of staff responsible for

Conference Session

Innovative Assessment Techniques in Civil Engineering Courses

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel, The Military College of South Carolina; Joshua Pelkey, AirWatch; Caroline R. Noyes, Georgia Institute of Technology; Michael Owen Rodgers, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

knowledge structure, although they are usually very objective30.As a result, objective tests may be unsuitable for assessing sustainability knowledge because theydo not allow students to reflect on the inherently broad content and interrelated structure ofsustainability. Open-ended assessment methods, such as essays and presentations, are usualalternatives to objective tests that disclose more about knowledge structure, but are oftenaccompanied by subjective scoring rubrics that are difficult to apply30. In addition, studentinability to produce acceptable artifacts (e.g. reports or posters) may be mistaken for lack ofknowledge in the domain30. Consequently, traditional open-ended assessments may beunfeasible for broad and accurate sustainability

Collection

2014 ERC

Authors

Linda Horton

,, and Hubs – Representative research highlights from the BES divisions, EFRCs, and Hubs BES Core Research Activities (CRAs) – Updated to reflect current portfolio descriptions accomplishments descriptions, accomplishments, and challenges http://science energy gov/bes/research/ http://science.energy.gov/bes/research/ 3 FY 2015 BES Budget RequestResearch programs FY 2015 Request:  Energy Innovation Hubs & Energy Frontier SBIR/STTR, $ 1,806.5M Research Centers are funded at FY 2014 SUF

Conference Session

Impact of Community Engagement on Students

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hoda Baytiyeh, American University of Beirut (Beirut); Mohamad K. Naja

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

students. The survey invites students to voluntary participate while ensuring themof complete anonymity. The survey was randomly distributed and data collection ended whenreaching 25% of the targeted population 17.The survey was based on the volunteer functions inventory 18 and included three sections: thefirst section gathered demographic information about participants, the second sectioninvestigated students’ awareness of earthquake disaster and their willingness to join anearthquake volunteering program, and the third section asked participants to rate 19 items on ascale of 5 that reflect their attitudes and subjective norm toward volunteering in an earthquakerisk reduction program based on the theoretical framework (TRA). Items were designed

Conference Session

Nuclear and Radiological Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nestor J. Echeverria, U.S. Military Academy; Kenneth Scott Allen P.E., U.S. Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Nuclear and Radiological

Cross-disciplinary (18) Non-MSE only (6) 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 Figure 2: Breakdown of survey respondents’ results to the question, “To what extent did you learn something as a result of this project?” 1=I did not learn anything, 2=I learned very little, 3=I learned somewhat, 4=I learned very much. Page 24.8.7The quality of work from each of the 17 design teams, as reflected in their assigned grades, isgiven in figure 3. Once again, the results show that the quality of work improved as a functionof the percentage of

Conference Session

Pedagogical Approaches in Construction Education

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Suat Gunhan, University of Texas, San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Construction

members’experience and capabilities but also their people skills are evaluated by owners. Team members’body language reflects both their respective role (superintendent, project manager, projectengineer, project executive, etc.) and their personality.Teaching MethodologyThe project delivery methods are first covered in a traditional lecture. In addition to theoreticalknowledge, students are also introduced to the Top Companies’ Lists of Design-Build,Construction Management at Risk, and Construction Management for Fee type of deliverymethods published by the Engineering News Record (ENR) Magazine8, 9. It becomes easier todeliver the content when actual data is incorporated from the industry because students are moreinterested with theoretical content when it

Conference Session

Teaching Communication I

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brad Jerald Henderson, University of California, Davis

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

which the student design team’s memo presents design deliverables that are viable, elegant, and robust. Submitted work should be technically correct, yet also reflect a degree of down-selection and optimization that results from quantitative design tradeoffs (e.g., square versus round sections, hollow versus solid, best material selection, weight minimization). Velocity: A measure of the memo's communication efficiency and effectiveness at the paragraph- level. An efficient and effective writing style allows the reader to decode a document's message smoothly and at a speed in sync with the reader's ability to uptake information. On the contrary, poorly written streams of English

Conference Session

Methodological & Theoretical Contributions to Engineering Education 3

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University; Elizabeth G. Creamer, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

the language used in each article to explain therationale for using mixed methods are included in the table, along with the category name. Only2 of the 16 articles contained no statement that could be identified to reflect a rationale foremploying mixed methods. Page 24.68.8 Table 1: Articles Using Qualitative and Quantitative Methods and Mixing PaperJournal Paper Title Year Why Collect Qual and Quant Data? Category

Conference Session

Engineering Physics & Physics Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bala Maheswaran, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics & Physics

2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 Group 1 Group 2 Group 3Figure 6 reflects the students’ view regarding the important question of this study and surveywhether “the mastering physics helps you to master the engineering physics concepts thecourse”. The majority of the students, about 75% felt that mastering physics helps them to learnengineering physics 2 concepts. Page 24.79.6 6 Figure 6 100 80 60 40 20 0 Yes NoConclusionMastering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kimberly Warren, University of North Carolina, Charlotte; Chuang Wang, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

taughtbasic science in a more coherent way. The existence of various learning styles has also been well documented and multipleclassification systems have been developed. For example, the Felder-Silverman model12separates learning styles into four dichotomous categories: student learning can be 1) sensory orintuitive, 2) visual or verbal, 3) active or reflective, and 4) sequential or global. Parallel to thisstudent learning model, corresponding teaching styles are either 1) concrete or abstract, 2) visualor verbal, 3) active or passive, and 4) sequential or global. Evidence suggests that the currentstudent population has a diverse learning style. Therefore, the typical teaching approach(utilizing the abstract, verbal, passive, and sequential

Conference Session

Construction Materials and Technologies

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jing Du, University of Texas at San Antonio; Suat Gunhan, University of Texas, San Antonio

Tagged Divisions

Construction

measuring criteria are shown in the following table: Potential Outlier Studentized ti Cook’s Di DFFITSi DFBETASk>1 Y22 -3.436 0.194 -1.593 1.160 (k=3)By examining measures of influence, it is concluded that removing this outlier from the samplewill not significantly affect the fitted regression; however, it will change the coefficient of  3much. So it must be carefully discussed whether current model should be fixed or improvedfurther.Model 3: The final modelAfter the outlier is removed from the sample, the P-value of hypothesis test H 0 :  3  0 increasedfrom 0.0742 to 0.2451, which exactly reflects the meaning of DFBETAS . This has

Conference Session

Systems Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S. Gary Teng, University of North Carolina, Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Systems Engineering

. China EMS manufacturing facility case 7. US-China joint manufacturing facility case 8. Axle assembly line improvement case Page 24.472.3Using these cases to discuss systems engineering process and systems thinking as well as theirimplementations, the instructor provides some discussion points that reflect the issues of systemsthinking and the achievement of systems objectives. For example, one discussion is on the initialimplementation of lean approach to outsource various processes to multiple suppliers located atdifferent countries for Boeing 787 Dreamliner’s design and production activities. Some of theissues discussed include how

Conference Session

Potpourri

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melodie A. Selby PE, Walla Walla University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

” and “Homework questions on the Avengers made the homeworksomething cool to research of [sic] figure out rather than just get through and done with.”The students also submitted reflections on the class as part of their final. In 2013, the studentswere unanimously positive about the class. Their comments included statements like “All myfriends in other classes are jealous” and “It helped me see that engineering doesn’t have to beseparate from my real life.” Their level of enthusiasm for the class was certainly higher thanstudents in previous years. For the first time since I have taught the class, people who were notin the class have come to me, sometimes months later, to talk about the ideas we discussed in theclass. The students have been

Conference Session

Industry Collaboration in Construction Education

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa M. Holliday, University of Oklahoma; Matthew Reyes, University of Oklahoma; Kenneth F. Robson, University of Oklahoma

Tagged Divisions

Construction

experience due to the PhD requirements.The attainment of a PhD has grown as a requirement as research and external funding for hasbecome more important. The essential aspect of industry experience is a result of the appliedscience nature of construction management education. 6 The importance is reflected not only injob postings but also in accrediting body requirements. Both the Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology (ABET) and the American Council for Construction Education(ACCE) note that faculty in construction engineering and construction engineering programsshould have relevant professional experience. 1, 2 In fact, ABET considers this one of the ways inwhich faculty demonstrate their competence. 1This current demand on faculty for

Conference Session

FPD 10: Teamwork

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oguz Hanoglu, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Aladar Horvath, Ivy Tech Community College; Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

video-recordings. The conversationsin these frames were compared to the related part of their documented works to see how theyconveyed their ideas. Portions of the video-recordings which were found to be related to theresearch question of this study were transcribed and used to triangulate findings from the writtendocuments and interviews.Interviews were transcribed and relevant pieces about how they respond to TA feedback wereselected. These pieces provided insights to students’ individual reflection on their teamwork.Results of Team A and Team B were constantly compared with each other to identify thesimilarities and differences in the ways they respond to TA feedback and conveyed their ideas intheir documented works.IV. ResultsSubmitted

Conference Session

Professional Development and Advising for Graduate Students

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farshid Marbouti, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Cyndi D. Lynch, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

0.55 2.98 1.27 Personal qualities Integrity 3.55 0.63 2.86 1.09 Self-confidence 3.43 0.66 2.61 1.08 Self-reflection 3.30 0.70 2.61 1.10 Responsibility 3.50 0.66 2.59 0.95 Preparation and 3.30 0.59 2.82 1.04 Self management prioritization Commitment to research 3.18 0.58

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Paul D. Mathis, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Page 24.259.5 References1 Genco, N., Holtta-Otto, K., & Seepersad, C. C. (2010). An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of engineering students. Proceedings of the 2010 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.2 Atman, C. J., Sheppard, S. D., Turns, J., Adams, R. S., Fleming, L. N., Stevens, R., et al. (2010). Enabling engineering student success: The final report for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering

Conference Session

New Course Development Concepts in ET II

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aaron Alexander, Oklahoma State University; Kenneth Belanus, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

placing a pieceof reflective tape on the orbiting mass (internal to the sander) and using an optical tachometer tomeasure the revolutions. Figure 5: Mounting of the Orbital Sander Vibration Source Page 24.317.5The accelerometer can be mounted in several different manners. The easiest is a simple drill andtap in the side of the wooden tier. This is sufficient for a short time, but the threads willeventually strip and a new fastening hole must be created. If a longer lasting mount is desired, itis possible to use a small nut to hold the accelerometer (Figure 6). In order to install the nut,drill a shallow hole in the side of the

Conference Session

The Philosophy of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

Minnesota Office of HigherEducation [3]. The third intention is to argue that reconciliation between the two literacies is more easilyaccomplished if new curriculum structures can be embraced. While it is understood that particular notions ofcurriculum structure are deeply embedded in a culture, it is argued that this embededness prevents a culturefrom reflecting on how it should respond to the explosion in knowledge that has occurred in the last century.This requires thinking outside the box about alternative curriculum structures.A model curriculum for a college engineering and technological literacy program is described. Its framework isderived from elements of an experimental program in technology education designed for the transition year

Conference Session

Capstone Courses and Project Based-Learning

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John-David S. Yoder, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

completethe objectives without an unreasonable amount of time so that it does not adversely affecttheir other courses. Proper testing facilities should be available to students throughout theproject so that they can learn to operate them, measure attachment points, etc. Materialsand shop facilities must also be made available if prototypes will be required. Andcertainly the projects must be carefully aligned with the desired outcomes.Third, many students struggle to accurately assess the causes for the difference betweentheir theoretical results and what they find during testing. Taking time in class to reflect onthe possible causes is important. For example, we have found that often the students dothe analysis correctly, but fail to take into

Conference Session

NSF Grantees’ Poster Session

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeremy John Vaillant, University of Massachusetts Lowell; Christopher Hansen, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Jonathan D. Stolk, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Stephen Johnston, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; Sammy G. Shina, University of Massachusetts, Lowell; David Joe Willis, University of Massachusetts, Lowell

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Tagged Divisions

Division Experimentation & Lab-Oriented Studies

project? 2) How do student motivation and goal orientations change throughout their interaction with the curriculum changes? 3) How does students’ self-efficacy for design learning, specifically their comfort with “messy” open-ended engineering design problems and use of higher-level cognitive strategies change as they experience and reflect on errors or failure during prototyping and design activities?The quantitative project evaluation will consist of three previously developed and validated in-struments, the Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS26), the Motivated Strategies for LearningQuestionnaire (MSLQ27), Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI28) and the Learning Inven-tory29, while qualitative data will be

Conference Session

An Examination of Methods to Enhance Transfer Student Enrollment, Retenion, Persistence, and Outcomes

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shen Liu, West Kentucky Community and Technical College

Tagged Divisions

Two Year College Division

results during the conference presentation.ConclusionThe encouraging survey results have reflected a strong agreement with the main goals ofincorporation of the PBL into traditional lecture-based courses. Projects have served as bridgesto connect classroom learning and real-life applications. The implementation of hand-on projectshave made the learning of science and engineering principles more enjoyable. Through project-based learning, students are not only more confident with their understandings of the materialspresented in a course, but they are also better prepared for the upper-level engineering design andlaboratory courses.References 1. Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991

Conference Session

Computer Programming and Simulation

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David M. Whittinghill, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David B. Nelson, Purdue University; K. Andrew R. Richards, Purdue University; Charles A. Calahan

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

enrolled in the course if it were notrequired of them. At the conclusion of the course, students were asked to reflect on thecontribution of the course to their enjoyment of programming. We used this data tocreate a pre and post-score, where like/dislike of programming was measured in thebeginning and end of the course.We used this data to test four research questions about attitudes toward programming: 1) Can an inclusive, supportive environment that is catered to the non-programmer lead to improved attitudes about programming? 2) Can students with low-positive feelings (LP) increase their confidence in programming? 3) Does prior experience with programming influence the degree of attitudinal change? 4) Do specific