to completion”. One student did note, though, that the unstructured natureof the project “was sometimes challenging, as five voices clashed and caused a lot of tension -especially in the last few weeks”.In general terms, these evaluations reflect the experience of Chieffo and Griffiths in a study ofover 2,300 students – 93% of students that studied abroad generated unique, qualitativecomments about their program experience, while only 57% of their on-campus did so. In general,the comments of the former group were more introspective and related to personal gains, whilethe latter group commented primarily on classroom learning and logistics [26]. Of the 15students participating in on-campus projects advised by the author during this time
and consistency in the problemposed. The briefs selected referenced a similar artefact, though outlined differing themes. Thecontrol (a) and experimental (b) briefs implemented entailed; Design and make a mirror; (a) for bathroom setting to hold personal grooming items with a marine theme, (b) for a utility setting to include storage for small personal items to reflect favourite pastime.Implementation of TasksThe participants were arranged in groups of between four and seven students. All instructionsand time guidelines were read aloud to ensure no misconceptions or misunderstandingoccurred. All participants commenced the control design based task; phase one. A periodsubsequent to phase one, all participants
Engineering Global Centrism Engineering Global Prep6.0 DiscussionThe results of this study, which furthers initial results reported in a previous conference paper[25], indicate that the NanoJapan students made sizable gains on all of the EGPI subscales, butonly differences on the Engineering Ethics and Humanity subscale were statistically significant. .The difference between groups may reinforce the importance of aspects of the NanoJapanprogram that encourage students to reflect on culture differences between the US and Japan,which they were of course experiencing daily as part of their research assignments. This findingsuggests that international experiences that combine intensive language and culture instruction,hands-on, cutting-edge research
at improving entering students’ college readinessand mathematics placement. The small scale intervention, A Bridge to Calculus, is intended toimprove students’ placement from College Algebra into Calculus 1. The target population forthis effort are students with high school experience in a Calculus course but whose performanceon placement exams does not reflect this experience. At our institution this is a significantnumber of students and the goal of the project is to develop methods to address and acceleratestudents in this category. The course design, to take advantage of the students’ prior experience,emphasizes practice and mastery using a modified emporium course design and the ALEKSsoftware1. This intervention runs as a summer course
over 20 years with an emphasis on mechanical packaging of microwave circuitry.Dr. Diane L. Zemke Diane Zemke is an independent researcher and consultant. She holds a Ph.D. in leadership studies from Gonzaga University. Her research interests include teamwork, small group dynamics, dissent, organiza- tional change, and reflective practice. Dr. Zemke has published in the International Journal of Engineering Education, the Journal of Religious Leadership, and various ASEE conference proceedings. She is the author of ”Being Smart about Congregational Change.” c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 How Students Create Verbal Descriptions of Physical PartsClear and precise
graduates do not experience this uniformity; therefore, theapplication of identity research directly to this population does not accurately reflect theiridentity. This lack of differentiation limits our knowledge of the engineering technologygraduates’ self-identification. Titles that the engineering technology graduate assumes upongraduation divide this population, and confuses our knowledge of career trajectories.This study is an initial probe into the engineering technology graduate’s identity. This early workwill provide insight for future work in this area. In order to obtain information from engineeringtechnology graduates, the study was distributed through the alumni office. It is thought thatgraduates that belong to the alumni association
engineering”, including 20 attitudes (Table 1): “commitment, confidence, considerationof others, curiosity, entrepreneurship, fairness, high expectations, honesty, integrity, intuition,judgment, optimism, persistence, positiveness, respect, self-esteem, sensitivity, thoughtfulness,thoroughness, and tolerance.”2, p. 148 Interestingly, the attitude entrepreneurship is omitted fromthe list in Appendix O of the BOK2, p. 172; this is perhaps indicative of the difficulty in convergingon a single set of appropriate or desirable attitudes. Some of these attitudes are reflective of a“People Mind” as described by Goldberg and Somerville12, such as consideration of others.Despite the seeming certainty of the list of important attitudes that were articulated for
encountered already in their coursework.First, the students were made aware of the multidisciplinary nature of the nanotechnology whichwas reflected in the diverse group of faculty involved with the summer camp. Next, thepresentation discussed books, TV shows and movies where specific reference to nanotechnologywas made. Students were asked why most of the references in popular media were ominous innature and all students correctly reflected that the reason is because ‘nano’ is too small. Thisperception was juxtaposed with scientific and economic aspects of nanotechnology which areoverwhelmingly positive and optimistic.10 The students participated in an activity where theywere presented with various statements and asked to choose whether these
to promote learning and reflection, makingthem a natural pair for standards-based grading.6 While the applications and structure of rubricscan vary greatly across the literature, a rubric in this context includes criteria for rating studentperformance as well as standards for attainment of those criteria. Rubrics of this variety may beholistic, meaning that they include a single rating scale for the entirety of the work, or analytical,meaning that several scales are used to assess different dimensions of the work. Perlman offers avaluable discussion of the thought-process that goes into developing a successful rubric, as wellas the different varieties which may be applied.9In this work, a system of analytical rubrics were applied to
students commented that classroom grades were not aligned with thecompetition vehicle and that they wanted their grades to reflect engineering work and notpaperwork. This sentiment was echoed by faculty advisors who felt that the progress reportdeliverables were largely busywork and did not reflect actual design or fabrication work. Toprequests from students were: Increase individual accountability Focus on engineering over paperwork Add a design and fabrication task to Introduction to Engineering Projects Replace progress reports with technical reports Use scheduled classroom time effectively Provide students with basic timelineFaculty advisors interpreted student responses to mean that underutilization of in-class
Restrains “Working students can participate but will never be in participation leadership positions.” “We don’t have many URM in the college and the Reflecting pool department has less than that.” Environment “The team space is called the ‘closet.’” “They are just not interested” “If they don’t like cars, Student attributes we can’t make them come participate.” “I think there is a little bit of an intimidation factor, 12 guys and 1 girl. I think the
strategic planning and continuous improvementacross colleges, departments, and academic degree programs.BackgroundThe Tennessee Public Agenda focus is on increasing statewide educational attainment byimplementing Tennessee’s Complete College Tennessee Act (CCTA), enacted in 2010.(“Complete College TN Act of 2010”) CCTA also acknowledges limitations on state funding forhigher education. The Agenda reflects the importance of the state’s educational system forleveraging economic development. Specific CCTA provisions include establishing: Higher education funding, in part, based on outcomes that include degree production, research funding, student remediation, transfer and graduation rates, and job placements. Each institution has uniquely
Illinois at Chicago B.S. Purdue University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Continuous Evaluation of Student Class Performance Using Group Based, In-class QuizzesIntroductionTraditional methods of evaluating student performance in the classroom involve assigningweekly homework assignments, semester long projects, conducting examinations (e.g., mid-terms/finals), and holding arbitrary pop quizzes. Amongst these methods homework assignmentsare a traditional indicator of a student’s continuous learning of the subject matter. Traditionally,performance on homework assignments reflects the level of understanding that the student has ofthe material that is covered in the
, functional solution that the students would ultimately work onalready existed (but was not available to them), they still had to go through the inception-phaseexercise of developing requirements for what they would want in a solution. Section 6 goesfurther into these details, which reflect an overall lack of critical thinking.13 In their storyboards,which described how the user would carry out various actions, there were many gaps that wouldhave prevented meaningful use. For example, with no capability to move an airplane off therunway after landing, subsequent landings would be impossible.In an agent-based simulation, the agents are the most important element to model. They aredefined primarily in terms of three aspects: data (what they are
Effective communication for different audiences (scientific versus business) Formats for presentations and pitches Success as an entrepreneur is Oral versus written communication determined in large part to one’s ability to communicate. 14. Leadership Skillset associated with being an Entrepreneurship requires inspiring the inventor/innovator versus CEO team with vision, energy, and insight to Identifying and attracting talent achieve a common goal.Grades are based on attendance and class participation, two reflection papers, and a team projectconsisting of a
group specializes in characterizing, modeling, and integrating materials that demonstrate high levels of biocompatibility, thermal reflectivity, mechanical robustness, and environmental sustainability, such as carbides, sol-gel coatings, high temperature oxides, and sev- eral polymers. Her research is interdisciplinary in nature and fosters collaborations with Chemical and Biomedical, Mechanical, and Environmental Engineering, Physics, Chemistry, Public Health, Medicine, and the Nanotechnology Research and Education Center (NREC).Prof. Venkat R. Bhethanabotla, University of South Florida Venkat Bhethanabotla obtained his BS from Osmania University in Hyderabad, India, and Ph.D. from Penn State in Pennsylvania, USA
the feedback forms and pre-and post-tests of the children and respond to prompts on a reflection sheet.In an effort to make the activity modules freely available to other engineering students, K-12teachers and parents, a website was developed. The activity kit instructions, resources, materiallists and other related resources are posted on this website so that they can be widely accessed bypeople nationwide who would like to engage in meaningful and effective outreach to middleschool students. Additional resources including fun engineering websites for kids, informationabout engineering for parents and teachers and links to websites with additional engineeringactivities are also included on the website. The website is housed on the University
/intercultural experiences contributedmost to the individual’s global preparedness as identified in Study One. The resultantbackground survey instrument consisted of four components: profile characteristics (e.g., gender,age, class standing,), educational background (e.g., university, major, QPA), travel abroad/international experiences (e.g., level of interest in international issues, foreign languageproficiency), and characteristics of the international experiences (e.g., programmatic elements ofexperiences such as duration, amount of reflection, and comfort zone). The background surveyitems also provided independent predictor variables to help explain the results of the outcomeinstruments (EGPI and GPI). Samples (from each of the four partner
teachers and pre-service teachers joinedother professionals in the region in an immersive materials “boot camp” facilitated by ASM priorto the start of their research experience. Field trips, guest speakers and group work that producedK-12 curriculum complemented the teams’ research experience. During the culminatingactivities, the groups presented the STEM curriculum developed, the final laboratory projectresults and provided regular guided reflections regarding their efforts during the six-weekprogram. Local System Change (LSC), Mathematics Teaching Efficacy and Beliefs Instrument(MTEBI) and Science Teaching Efficacy and Beliefs Instrument (STEBI) surveys wereadministered to identify changes in attitudes, beliefs and practices. Results of the
following pairs ofthe learning style model proposed by Felder and Silverman in 198828: Sensing vs Intuitive;Visual vs Verbal; Active vs Reflective; Sequential vs Global. These dimensions in the ILS drawfrom other well-known learning style models such as the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)and the Kolb learning style index27. The ILS has a substantial history of use and has been provento provide consistent and valid results in numerous evaluative studies 27-31. Reliability testsyielded Cronbach alpha results greater than 0.5 and consistent in all the ILS scales; whilePearson’s correlation and factor analysis tests conducted also indicated that the differentdimensions were indeed distinct - with a mild association found between the sequential
already been tasked with designing slabreinforcement for flexure and shrinkage/ temperature, beam reinforcement for positive/negativeflexure and shear, as well as column reinforcement for flexure-axial and shear individually. Yet,the interaction or continuity of this reinforcement to tie the entire structural system together isoften not well understood, but is critical to the performance of the building’s design.The one-way slab model, shown in Figure 8, aims to clarify all of the aforementioned concepts ina way that directly reflects reinforced concrete design practice and is clear to students. Themodel was constructed by the University of Illinois Department of Civil & EnvironmentalEngineering (CEE) Machine Shop using funding from the
from highly ranked schools. The inherent limitations of areputation system notwithstanding, USNWR rankings, like GRE scores and GPA, generallycorrelate positively with graduate school attendance and success in the research. 4 Thus, a degreefrom USNRW Top 20 ranked program remains an insufficient yet valuable characteristic ofincoming graduate students worth consideration.* The metrics described in this review are for recruitment process evaluation only, and have been adapted for the purposes of this paper. Thescores and conversions should not be considered as a reflection on the admission processes or policies of the UT Austin BME department or thegraduate school. The program’s domestic and international admission committees make final
successful performance onwell-structured problems is not a predictor of success on ill-structured problems becausefundamentally different reasoning skills are needed.7 While well-structured problems are oftensolved once an appropriate algorithm has been identified and used, solving ill-structured problemsinvolves skills such as argumentation and reflective design to robustly identify the problem itselfbefore considering potential solutions.9,10 Success in the setting and solving of ill-structuredproblems has been linked to metacognitive strategies,7,9 specific cognitive skills such asanalogical reasoning,11 and epistemological beliefs.12,13 Analogical reasoning is a higher orderthinking process whereby novel problems are interpreted as an amalgam of
communication skills. These conversations led to a better understanding of what studentsneeded to master in each course as they advanced through the curriculum, which then providedinsight into ways the GTAs could help their students achieve these learning goals. The team alsodeveloped a comprehensive lab report guidelines document for use in all three courses. Theguidelines provided information on formatting, composing the type of content expected in eachsection of the report, and creating figures and tables, as well as other technical writing tips. Theteam also created a rubric, mapped to the guidelines, to help bring consistency to grading. Whilejust one set of guidelines applied for all the labs, the rubric could be customized to reflect
byproducts, among other types of outcomes [19, 24]. These use-inspiredframeworks can help support evidence-based decision making, address practice-related issues ofhigh concern, stimulate reflective practice, enhance teaching [26] as well as create newdirections in research and practice [19]. It is “serious, disciplined work that seeks to interpret,draw together, and bring insight to bear on original research” and aims to fit one’s own researchand the research of others into larger patterns [18] (p. 19).In this study, the scholarship of integration aims to create a framework that illustrates themindset, processes, and behaviors of the entrepreneur for uses beyond business-centric contexts,and in particular for design and problem-solving purposes
The principal joined the classes during the Cook-off event. He was impressed that allstudents were working together and supported each other during the entire event. He was excitedthat students were able to apply their content knowledge of macromolecules to design anappropriate snack. He liked that students were motivated by an authentic audience- the guestchef. Finally, he noted that student choice was an important part of this project. The event didhave design constraints, but the students were allowed to investigate and choose their own recipewithin the constraints which contributed to student engagement and student learning.Student Reflection - Effective group work During the unit, students were asked to self reflect and report in
appreciation ofthe societal relevance of this parameter. Student reflections reveal that the exercise deepenedtheir understanding of the nontechnical issues both in the design and in life in general.IntroductionEfficiency is a broad topic, which students analyze throughout an undergraduate engineeringeducation. In the context of engineering, more efficient is always better, and many students willenter the workforce to play a role in designing a more efficient device or process. How does amore efficient machine affect humankind, specifically the thermal efficiency of a vapor powercycle? One would hope that students of any discipline would be able to articulate how reducingthe combustion of fossil fuels would impact society, yet with the current design
memory.” This question was left open-ended so that students could respond with individual values they ascribed to their experiences.The remaining six questions on the questionnaire provided further details for three selected casestudy narratives illuminating the students’ holistic perspective on their program experience.A distinguishing feature of the program was the value-added activities offered with the purposeof creating a social learning community involving interns, industry professionals, faculty, andsupport staff. Value-added program activities included Socials, Distinguished Speaker Series,and an annual Symposium. These activities reflected the integration of varied communities ofpractice (in this case, the business world and the
helped them to create model materials for an infrastructure course and to acquire toolsand materials to teach their courses (80%). Perhaps most importantly, the majority felt that theworkshop helped them to build relationships with others interested in infrastructure education.Reflecting on the CIT-E Community of PracticeThe CIT-E Community of Practice is evolving over time. Early work revolved around coalescingaround ideas and generating materials and is moving toward broader dissemination. CIT-E CoPmembers are participating at varying levels of effort and involvement. Those in the midst ofteaching an infrastructure course or preparing to teach the course are most engaged in the workof the community. In reflecting on their participation
backgrounds.This increased demand is reflected in the proposed revision to the ABET teamwork guideline inCriterion 3, now labeled number 7: one outcome of an engineering education should be thatstudents have gained the ability to function on teams, but also that these teams should “establishgoals, plan tasks, meet deadlines, and analyze risk and uncertainty.” In previous work at theNYU Tandon School of Engineering (previously known as Polytechnic University) in Brooklyn,New York, it was found that many students thought that they had experience working on teams,but it was suspected that many of those team experiences were working on a projectsimultaneously. Engineering programs will have to do more to demonstrate their effort forgenuine teamwork outcomes