backscatteredlight are very important in a detection system.2. Theory of reflectance optical detection systemThe physical requirement necessary for an optical system in order to detect multiple numbers ofchromopores is to have light sources of specific wavelength with different absoptivity pattern.The light attenuation between the source and the detector can be written as follows: ⎛I ⎞ − log10 ⎜ out ⎟ = ODλ ⎜I ⎟ (1) ⎝ in ⎠where I in is the incident light, I out is the detected light, and ODλ is the optical density forwavelength λ . Optical density is a function of absorption ( Aλ ) and scattering ( S λ
, IV. MANUFACTURING SMART TABLEthe students may have a varied background educationlevel; and hence all students may not be at par as for as Since in 2008, SMART technology has been a rapidlytheir educational knowledge is concerned about the topic growing segment, with its application used in the variousbeing discussed. Likewise, there could be many other organizations. The cost of the product remains a keypossible reasons as well. In such a situation, it becomes issue in this regard, maintaining the problem ofnecessary that the instructor is informed about such a affordability for schools and colleges [5]. One aspect ofcondition being present in the class so that s/he me make the study will be that an affordable
operations, task allocation, obstacle The swarm-bot research project [6], deals with designavoidance, and object transportation. and implementation of swarm robots (s-bots) with self Keywords—Heterogeneous Robot Swarm; Hardware organizing and self assembling capabilities, but each S-botArchitecture; Reconfigurable Robot Swarm. is physically identical (homogeneous) and uses same kind of sensors, actuators, microcontroller. S-bot can connect I. INTRODUCTION with other
1members from Norwich University who were not part of the presents a summary of sample scenarios. After reading theproject team were introduced to the EPSA method. These scenario, the students are then asked to determine the mostfaculty members have independently started to utilize aspects important problem/s and to discuss stakeholders, impacts,of the EPSA method in their courses. This paper describes unknowns, and possible solutions. An example EPSA scenariohow the EPSA scenarios and EPSA rubric are being used in is presented in Appendix Athe “Ethics” section of a senior level “Professional Issues”course for engineering students. The EPSA Rubric
shows three contexts that influence engineering instructors offundamental engineering courses (FECs) in using tests in their courses: 1) autonomy, 2) coursecontext, and 3) inertia. These contexts are largely consistent with the literature, but also revealsome research gaps that the engineering education community should think about addressing toimprove our education processes. In addition, the community can use our findings to raisequestions about test usage, introducing intentionality with test usage in engineering classrooms.ReferencesAbadi, M. G., Hurwitz, D. S., & Brown, S. (2017). Influence of context on item-specific self- efficacy and competence of engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 33(4
Notes in Computer Science, no. 12225. Springer, 2020, pp. 3–14. [4] L. D’Antoni, D. Kini, R. Alur, S. Gulwani, M. Viswanathan, and B. Hartmann, “How can automatic feedback help students construct automata?” ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 9:1–9:24, 2015. [5] E. L. Deci, H. Eghrari, B. C. Patrick, and D. R. Leone, “Facilitating internalization: The self determination theory perspective,” Journal of Personality, vol. 62, pp. 119–142, 1994. [6] E. L. Deci and R. Ryan, “Self-determination theory,” in Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, and E. T. Higgins, Eds. Sage Publications Ltd., 2012, vol. 1, ch. 20, pp. 416–436. [7] Y. Du, A. Luxton-Reilly, and P. Denny, “A
work is consideredrigorous engineering research? What work is considered to have the most value? What is valuedby the dominant cultural and political voices? This work-in-progress paper provides currentfindings as a brief narrative exploration of literature on engineering research culture, and theparadigm(s) that lead engineering research work that was guided by the following question: whatare the research and cultural paradigms that guide engineering research?As this question is ambiguous and broad, I would like to explicitly note that this paper does notreport on preliminary findings from the first stages of a scoping literature review, but it is anarrative literature review to lay a foundation for further exploration. This paper serves as
material, activities, and community.However, other studies have defined it within the context of the learning environment, whereengagement is referred to as students’ interactions or involvement in tasks related to the specificlearning environment-based tasks [6]. For example, O’Brien and colleagues [7] definedengagement in the context of a technology-mediated environment (settings in which computer-based applications and simulations are used to support participants’ involvement). Theysuggested engagement as interaction with the technology application(s) and systems in ameaningful way, within a context that may not necessarily be educational in nature. The vitalcaveat in both definitions was associated with one common principle: “meaningful
students make sense of their engineering identityin the context of their experiences in an REU summer internship program? (2) Whatacademic and non-academic factors influence their engineering identity development?Milem et al.’s campus racial climate framework informs our study. This case study approachaligns with our conceptual framework as it allowed us to situate participants experiences andperceptions in their university context. Our study findings reveal students’ participation inthe REU summer internship program positively affected their engineering identitydevelopment as students developed increased confidence in their ability to conduct researchand pursue a career in engineering. Additionally, students’ interactions with mentors,faculty
Braun and Clarke (2006)’s six-phase method for thematicanalysis, which encompassed, familiarizing yourself with data, generating initial codes,searching for themes, reviewing, defining, and naming the themes, and creating the report.While the method is presented as being linear, we took an iterative and reflective process thatinvolved a constant moving back and forth between phases. Finally, video recordings andobservation notes that captured all the moments of target participants’ conversations andinteractions that could hold meaning of CT were reviewed. Those transcriptions of thesemoments underwent a similar process of thematic analysis by both the first and second authorand were shared with the third author.This study was strengthened by
from a variety of sources such as faculty members, counseling centers, andindustry professionals could be beneficial. Furthermore, to create a curriculum that has asignificant impact with measurable outcomes on a particular subject, it is essential to determinethe most appropriate delivery method for the target audience.References[1] American College Health Association (ACHA), “NCHA- II_Fall_2017_Reference_Group_Executive_Summary.pdf.” Accessed: Nov. 13, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.acha.org/documents/ncha/NCHA[2] Lipson, S. K., Zhou, S., Abelson, S., Heinze, J., Jirsa, M., Morigney, J., ... & Eisenberg, D., “Trends in college student mental health and help-seeking by race/ethnicity: Findings from the national healthy
University (PSU) in 2010 and 2012, respectively. Dr. Ashour was the inaugural re- cipient of William and Wendy Korb Early Career Professorship in Industrial Engineering in 2016. Dr. Ashour’s research areas include data-driven decision-making, modeling and simulation, data analytics, immersive technologies, and process improvement. He contributed to research directed to improve design and engineering education.Dr. Daniel Knight, University of Colorado, Boulder Daniel W. Knight is the Program Assessment and Research Associate at Design Center (DC) Colorado in CUˆa C™s Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering and Applied Science. He holds a B.A. in psychology from Louisiana State Universit
, we seek to apply and validate an assessment strategy to categorizestudents’ ways of experiencing human-centered design. We directly build on Zoltowski et al.’s[2] findings which suggest that engineering students experience human-centered design in sevencategorically discrete ways. Guided by this prior study, we seek to address the research question,“To what extent can we use post-course open-ended written reflection data to identifyengineering students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design?” The use of reflection datato categorize students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design is unique from othermethods that have extended Zoltowski et al.’s work but may offer a more accessible assessmentmodality for design instructors. Thus, we
student motivation. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 84, 261-271.Amundsen, C., & Wilson, M. (2012). Are we asking the right questions? A conceptual review of theeducational development literature in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 82(1), 90–126.doi: 10.3102/0034654312438409Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research onmetacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 87-95.Baard, S. K., Rench, T. A., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integrationand review. Journal of Management, 40(1), 48-99.Baker, L. (1979). Comprehension monitoring: Identifying and coping with text confusions. Journal ofReading
two groups representing high and low levels of leadership, these groups weresignificantly different at the p Group: Medium + Large Organization *; b Group: Founder > Group: Medium + LargeOrganization **; c Group: Founder > Group: Small Organization *Perhaps unsurprising is the finding that the for-profit founders reported significantly greaterInnovative Behaviors than either those working in Small (p Group 4 **b Group 1 > Group 5 ***Overall, we begin to see a few trends emerge. For Group 1, where the work of R&D and Designare combined, greater confidence in engineering tasks (ETSE) is exhibited, relative to all theother groups, except Group 2 where the focus is just on R&D). Based on [12], we had expectedthat Group 2’s focus
institutional processes – including tenure and promotion –through the lenses of diversity, equity, and inclusion.References[1] S. Bird, J. S. Litt and Y. Wang, "Creative Status of Women Reports: Institutional Housekeeping as 'Women’s work'," NWSA Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 194-206, 2004.[2] D. Britton and L. Logan, "Gendered Organizations: Progress and Prospects," Sociological Compass 2, pp. 107-121, 2008.[3] M. L. Daut, "Becoming Full Professor While Black," The Chronicle of Higher Education, 28 July 2019.[4] C. Flaherty, "Babar in the Room," Inside Higher Ed, 2020.[5] C. Flaherty, "Relying on Women, Not Rewarding Them," Inside Higher Ed, 12 April 2017.[6] C. M. Guarino and V. M. Borden, "Faculty Service Loads and Gender: Are Women
. M., Eisenberg, D., Perry, G. S., Dube, S. R., Kroenke, K., & Dhingra, S. S. (2012). Therelationships of level of positive mental health with current mental disorders in predicting suicidal behavior andacademic impairment in college students. Journal of American College Health, 60(2), 126-133.doi:10.1080/07448481.2011.6083934. Renshaw, T. L., Eklund, K. R., Bolognino, S. J., & Adodo, I. (2016). Bidimensional emotional health incollege students: A comparison of categorical and continuous analytic approaches. Journal of Psychopathology &Behavioral Assessment, 38(4), 681-694. doi:10.1007/s10862-016-9558-65. Lotkowski, V. A., Robbins, S. B., & Noeth, R. J. (2004). The role of academic and non-academic factors
recognition, machine learning, and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Scholarship Program Initiative via Recruitment, Innovation, and Transformation (SPIRIT): S-STEM Program Initiatives and Early ResultsThis paper describes the structure, project initiatives, and early results of the NSF S-STEMfunded SPIRIT: Scholarship Program Initiative via Recruitment, Innovation, and Transformationprogram at Western Carolina University (WCU). SPIRIT is a scholarship program focused onbuilding an interdisciplinary engineering learning community involved in extensive peer andfaculty mentoring, vertically-integrated Project Based Learning (PBL), and
used to minimizecomputational time and encourage solution convergence. Due to the complicatedgeometry, an unstructured mesh was used in the bifurcation region including the carotidsinus. Figure 6 shows the meshed model geometry for a healthy artery with no stenosisand an artery suffering stenosis of 80% NASCET. Figure 6. Meshed bifurcation models for a carotid with no stenosis and a carotid simulating 80% stenosis according to NASCET.Flow ConditionsThe blood flow is assumed to be incompressible and Newtonian with properties fordynamic viscosity of 0.0035 Pa*s and a mass density of 1060 (kg/m3) 4. The blood flowis pulsatile in nature and is modeled using a transient flow scheme. Although
no two students arelikely to receive the exact same problem decreases the odds of cheating or copying answers fromother students, both of which are widespread issues when assigning problems from the textbook.There are online homework systems, such as WebAssign, which are tailored to individualtextbooks, but they typically utilize the same homework problems as in the textbook andeqpugswgpvn{"fqpÓv"thwart cheating or the problems associated with easy access to completesolutions manuals.One aspect of teaching that WeBWorK can change radically is the meaning of Ðoffice hoursÑ.WeBWorK allows students to e-mail their instructor and/or other designated person(s) frominside a particular problem in their WeBWorK assignment. The instructor (and/or
worked to create but had fun at the same time: “Playing with Legos (is my favorite 15part), because I get to create things. I love creating things.” This seventh grade participantrecognized the need to use their brain to be innovative: “I feel like not just to be smart, but to behealthy, to be strong [sic]. It isn’t all about the brains. Most of it’s the brains, otherwise who’dcome up with NASA and stuff like that.” An eighth grade participant reported, “I was already thinking about it (a STEM career) butI think it made me for sure that I want to be an engineer later on [sic].” The participant enjoyedthe rocket launch experiment, as (s)he reports, “I think it was just really fun to
displays “Welcome to Java”p u b l i c c l a s s Welcome { p u b l i c s t a t i c v o i d main ( S t r i n g [ ] a r g s ) { System . o u t . p r i n t l n ( ” Welcome t o J a v a ! ” ) ; }}After applying the above transforms in program 5 and shuffling the valid and invalid line ofcodes, we get the following Parsons puzzle. System . o u t . p r i n t l n ( ” Welcome t o J a v a ! ” ) } }p u b l i c C l a s s Welcome { p u b l i c s t a t i c v o i d main ( S t r i n g [ ] a r g s ) {p u b l i c c l a s s Welcome { System . o u t . p r i n t l n ( ” Welcome t o J a v a ! ” ) ;p u b l i c s t a t i c c h a r main ( S t r i n g [ ] a r g s ) {Similarly, P P2 is mapped into a different Parsons puzzle, using the same mapping process
each other out. The final speed of the rocket is found by dividing the total momentum forthe exhaust or the opposite rocket momentum by the mass of the rocket. This simple explanationignores gravity and air resistance. In this project, many model rockets were launched, and thestudents clearly observed that expelled gases push against something (the launch pad) only duringthe brief ignition and lift-off moment. In Figure 12, model rocket ZE-1’s flight trajectory showsthe rocket thrusting without having to push against anything for up to 53 meters.Energy Source for Propulsion for Model Rocket Engines The The Chemical Side Physical
wood pellet,s willprovide the necessary data to determine what additional testing or criterion the commercialcooking appliances should undergo or potential changes or exceptions to NFPA 96 and theexhaust hood requirements for solid fuel cooking.Standards and regulations requirements NFPA 96 sets the minimum preventative and operative requirements to design, install,operate, inspect, and maintain all public and private cooking operations. The purpose of NFPA96 is to reduce the potential fire hazards of cooking operations regardless of the type of cookingequipment used. NFPA 96 outlines the minimum fire safety requirements for all devices andcomponents that are involved in capturing, containing, and controlling grease-laden cookingvapors
, J. M. Caputo, E. A. Ford, R. Fu, S. A. Leibowitz, T. Liu,…C. Wu, “Investigating workplace communication behaviors,” Journal of Business Communication, vol. 50, pp. 152-169, 2013[5] J. R. Meredith, S. M. Shafer, and S. J. Mantel, Project Management: A Strategic Managerial Approach, 10th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2018.CONFLICT NEGOTIATION TRAINING[6] ABET. (2020, Jan ). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. [online] Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/[7] A. L. Mello, and L. A. Delise, “Cognitive diversity to team outcomes: The roles of cohesion and conflict management,” Small Group Research, vol. 46, pp. 204-226, 2015.[8] J
: Building Value and Cost Leadership, Free Press, New York, NY, 1997.2. Sanderson, S. W. and Uzumeri, M., Managing Product Families, Irwin, Chicago, IL, 1997.3. Bremmer, R., "Cutting-Edge Platforms," Financial Times Automotive World, June 1999, pp. 30-38.4. Simpson, T. W., "Product Platform Design and Customization: Status and Promise," Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2004, pp. 3-20.5. Shooter, S. B., Simpson, T. W., Kumara, S. R. T., Stone, R. B. and Terpenny, J. P., "Toward an Information Management Infrastructure for Product Family Planning and Platform Customization," ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences - Design Automation Conference (Chen, W
Expectations for the Masters-Level Structural Engineering Graduate Preparedness using the Delphi MethodIntroduction Structural engineering educational programs in the U.S. are facing great challenges incorrelating their programs and goals with the needs of their graduates and the structuralengineering profession in today‟s constantly changing global environment. The ASCE Raise theBar initiative within civil engineering, its call for education beyond the undergraduate level forfuture entry into civil engineering practice, and ongoing and upcoming changes in professionalregistration emphasizes the need for structural engineering at the graduate level to be carefullyplanned. The educational content
Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Educationindustry practice. During its 100-year development, the concept has grown to become an underpinning ofexperiential learning programs worldwide.Accountability concerns have created a focus on practical learning outcomes deemed important by industry. TheAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) 2000 Criteria, developed in the late 1990’s, stronglyemphasize an understanding of market needs. Measurement, feedback and continuous improvement form cornerstones of the ABET 2000 philosophy. The thinking behind the criteria is largely based on the logistic conceptsdeveloped by Dr. E. Deming that revolutionized the
(s) in ever greater detail.In our later discussion of student reaction to this course, we will also note that students wereengaged by our devoting a significant portion of the course to a series of case studies. Thisapproach, too, bears something of the “cost” of substituting meaningful discussions of bothtechnical and social aspects of events such as the 1981 collapse of the Kansas City HyattRegency Hotel and the construction of the Three Gorges Dam in central China for further“depth” in the analysis of one-dimensional bars or of the hydrostatics of dams. It seemed to usthat such case studies would offer conceptual reinforcement, real-world application, and anextension and expansion of course material whose benefits far outweighed this cost
computer assisted teaching methodologies have been developed.All these are important for successful teaching and restructuring of the integrative electricmachine/energy conversion course. Table 1. Restructured Electric Drives Course Modules and Lab Sessions Lectur es No. Topics (39 hour s) 1 Introduction to Energy Conversion/Electric Drive Systems 1 2 Understanding Mechanical System Requirements 2 3 Review of Basic Electric and Three Phase Circuits 3 4