rates of precalculus students.To accomplish these goals, we offered varying support mechanisms throughout the summer andfirst year of the student’s college career. The program design was student-centered and reflectedthe rigors of engineering. The program design comprised these major components: 1. The director communicated early with the students who did not place into Calculus 1, which included an invitation to participate in the BEST Program. 2. The director met with students at summer advising and registration to talk about the BEST Program and answered any questions they had about their placement. 3. Students were encouraged to participate in an online asynchronous mathematics review over the summer. 4. Students were
graduating from Canadian graduate engineering programs changed over the period 2000-2019 at the national and institutional levels? 2. Do participants perceive GEPs as having “chilly” environments and, if so, how does “chilliness” manifest within Canadian GEPs?LiteratureWhile we know that the number of women employed in STEM within Canada is increasing, theyare less likely to work in STEM fields than men, tend to be overrepresented at lower levels,make lower salaries, and do not have as many opportunities for promotions in STEM careers asmen [6]. Women working in Canadian engineering schools face similar challenges. Womenrepresented less than 17% of engineering faculty in 2019 [10] compared to 41% of all faculty ata national level [10
interested in engineering who started in Precalculus ended up majoring in engineering),and the majority (68%) of those who placed into Single Variable Calculus also left engineering.While retention increases to 56% and 59%, respectively, for students who placed intoMultivariable and Vector Calculus, there are still many students leaving at this point. Dartmouthengaged in an extensive self-study in 2022 to better understand how aspects of the STEMecosystem attract, retain, or deter students from historically underserved groups from pursuingSTEM courses, majors, and career paths in these fields. The following main issues related toDartmouth STEM courses were identified (Char and Jewiss, 2022): ● Courses are too theoretical, with little context or
Susannah C. Davis is a research assistant professor at the University of New Mexico. She holds a Ph.D. and M.Ed. from the University of Washington and a B.A. from Smith College. Her research explores how postsecondary institutions, their faculty, and theiDr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a Professor in Organization, Information & Learning Sciences and in Chemical & Biological Engineering at the University of New Mexico. Dr. Svihla received the National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Scholarship and the NSF CAREER Award, which President Biden also recognized with a PECASE. Their scholarship has been recognized for its contributions to diversity, equity, and inclusion
practices enhance student autonomy or self-efficacy [4]. Linked to inclusion,autonomy improves learning outcomes, and motivation, in diverse student populations [5].Furthermore, autonomy, particularly as related to learner choice within a learning assessment,allows for inclusion of diverse backgrounds and skill levels [6]. Sereti & Giossos [7] defineautonomy as the learner’s ability and skill to decide what and how to learn a given topic.Layering choice (the “what”) within a unique educational assessment can open new pathways forstudents to “fit in” to a given career path. And providing students with opportunities to seethemselves as part of the field of study can increase overall belonging, motivation, andachievement [8] [9].With the
with first year and at-risk students.Dr. Susan L. Thackeray, Utah Valley University Dr. Susan L. Thackeray is an Associate Professor and Department Chair at the Scott M Smith College of Engineering and Technology at Utah Valley University. She has over twenty-five years of demonstrated administrative leadership in industry and education that includes international and domestic higher edu- cation instructional design, distance learning development, usability testing, workforce development, and team organization/training. Dr. Thackeray is noted for her expertise in career pathways to align with the workforce and has received multiple awards for STEM education innovation. Susan holds a Bachelor of Science in
management self-efficacy (perceived confidence in the ability to engage, plan, andmeet deadlines regarding academic activities; Beta= 0. 38), self-efficacy in training regulation(perceived confidence in the ability to set goals, make choices, plan, and self-regulate theiractions in the training and career development process; Beta = -0.31), self-efficacy in proactiveactions (perceived confidence in the ability to take advantage of training opportunities, updateknowledge, and promote institutional improvements; Beta = -0.23), and finally, age (Beta = -0.09). The negative value of this last coefficient in the model indicates that the oldest enteringstudent had a lower average academic performance. There is no multicollinearity and no
theanalysis, and comparisons will be made to determine which yields stronger predictive power.Engineering identity is a type of role identity that students develop as they study and practicetheir engineering disciplines (Godwin 2016). Several studies have examined how EI isdeveloped. Kajfez et al. (2019) investigated how the structural components of a first-yearexperience influenced EI for students from various engineering pathways, such as transferstudents and regional campus students. Their initial survey, which included 300 completedresponses, showed that “students enrolled in direct matriculation first-year-engineering coursesmay initially exhibit higher levels of confidence in EI,” with EI proxied by their career choice.Choe et al. (2019
society. She is particularly interested in developing and implementing interventions to improve mental health related help seeking in undergraduate engineering students. Sarah graduated with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from Rowan University and a Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Massachusetts. She began her academic career as teaching faculty in Chemical Engineering at the University of Kentucky. As an educator, Sarah works to integrate non-cognitive skills such as creativity, social and emotional intelligence, and communication into her courses. Her experience as a teaching faculty member led her to the development of her research in student mental health, resulting in her transition from
Bridge are to develop, implement, and assess on-ramp strategies for highschool students into engineering pathways at CCs; decrease remediation; increase engineeringenrollment; and increase retention and belonging to the engineering profession.The Contextualized Bridge strategies include:▪ addressing low self-efficacy in the profession due to gaps in math or science skills▪ developing professional identity by creating a cohort system and promoting socialization activities▪ alleviating financial barriers by providing a stipend▪ strengthening connections to Wright College and the profession▪ building awareness of engineering fields and career opportunities.EnrollmentThe Contextualized Bridge methodology, initially targeting only high
., Proctor, D., and Plough, A. (2017). What is health equity? and what difference does a definition make?Buse, K., Bilimoria, D., and Perelli, S. (2013). Why they stay: Women persisting in us engineering careers. Career Development International.Center for Instructional Excellence (2023). Global Learning. Accessed on February 11, 2023.Cho, J. Y. and Lee, E.-H. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. Qualitative Report, 19(32).Farrell, S., Godwin, A., and Riley, D. M. (2021). A sociocultural learning framework for inclusive pedagogy in engineering. Chemical Engineering Education, 55(4):192–204.Fong, H. and Harris, E. (2015). Technology, innovation and health equity.Friedman
groups and stuff. And I was like, Oh, I didn't even know there was,• Tracking students if they are staying in their major after completion of degree and then revise thespecific degree program based on their suggestions.• Students recommended detailed talk on cultural appropriation and gender inequity. One studentsaid, “because women honestly do not understand what they are protected under”.• Our participants conveyed an immediate need to hire more black administrators and to invite morewomen of color at the career fair. For example, Dianna [in person, Computer System Engineering,expected graduation SP 2020] suggested, I would take the initiative to hire Black women engineers, that's first. I would also change the
last several decades, there are an increasing number of programs designed toengage preschool-age children and their families in engineering design [1], [2]. Creating learningopportunities for children at an early age is critical for supporting long-term engineering-relatedinterest development and career pathways [3], [4]. Out-of-school, family-based engineeringexperiences can be powerful catalysts supporting young children’s engagement with engineeringdesign practices and the development of engineering-related interests and identities [5]–[8].These experiences can also have an important influence on parents, including their motivation tocreate new engineering-related learning opportunities for their children and the ways theysupport children’s
multiracialstudents to feel like they may not fit in with one racial identity, it is unknown whether multiracialstudents are fully immersed with their other racial identity(ies). Therefore, it is important tounderstand how multiracial student identity is formed, shaped, and enacted by various actorsthroughout a student’s engineering career. If faculty and administrators are unable to supportstudents holistically, including their identity development, they may be disservicing the studentsmeant to be served.Research on minority serving institutions and racial organizations have highlighted the benefitsfor providing resources to underserved students in engineering [36], [37], [38], [39]. Students ofmixed-race backgrounds may face difficulty in finding
regarding college life and their realization of their own academic and socialunpreparedness. They critically reflected on their perspectives about themselves and others. Inthis process, they became more aware of themselves and accepting and inclusive of others. Eventhough most of them considered the overall experience difficult and challenging, especiallyacademically, it is interesting to note that most of them recorded optimistic and enthusiasticstatements about their college and career journey.Apart from open-ended questions, the learning activity survey also comprised mostly positivelyinclined responses. This proves that students encountered enough transformative learningexperiences during the program. However, the study did not collect
attention and supportfrom their peers. Peer mentorship can also promote design leadership among senior students withstudent-led projects, encourage collaboration and teamwork, provide mentorship and guidance,and offer opportunities for students to present their work and receive feedback. This can helpsenior students develop the confidence, skills, and knowledge they need to become influentialdesign leaders. Design leadership [5] is crucial for preparing students for their future careers. Inthe professional world, designers are expected to take leadership roles on projects and workcollaboratively with clients, stakeholders, and team members. By developing leadership skills inSchool, students are better equipped to succeed in their careers and make
learned from year 1Abstract—An abundance of literature demonstrates that women’s and minorities’ sense ofbelonging, or lack thereof, influences their academic performance and persistence in STEMeducation and careers. To address this problem, we developed and piloted a holistic, socio-culturally responsive peer-mentoring program—with funding from the National ScienceFoundation—that provided a multidimensional (i.e., academic, institutional, and social) supportsystem for first-year engineering students, particularly Hispanic/LatinX/XicanX studentsinclusive of their intersectionalities (HLX+). The purpose of this pilot program, Promoviendo elÉxito Estudiantil a través de un Sistema de Apoyo (PromESA), is to increase HLX+ students’sense of belonging
course, the more disciplinaryknowledge and concepts the student is assumed to have mastered. But while faculty use grades toprovide feedback to students regarding knowledge accumulation within a curriculum, they alsohold implications for the ways students experience school. For example, grades influence thenumber of scholarships and types of financial assistance offered to students, with higher gradesyielding more financial support. They are used to determine eligibility for entrance into certainacademic and sports programs, and in some instances, can qualify or disqualify students fromcertain co-op, internship, and other career development opportunities.However, approaches, philosophies, and policies toward grading can vary drastically
. His career experiences include industrial consulting and managing an outreach center. His research interests include Distance education qual ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: An Analysis of the Existence of Metrics for University/Industry CollaborationIntroduction:Partnerships between universities and commercial enterprises have become relatively commonand take a variety of forms. From traditional research projects at universities that yield data andknowledge businesses and industries can then use to improve processes and practice, to morespecific training and development programs that focus on building particular skills for
students discussed challenges in theirprograms. Undergraduate prioritization of internships and securing employment post-graduationhas encouraged the library to collaborate more closely with campus Career Services to provideprogramming targeting resume builders and research practices outside the academy. Graduatestudents’ experience as teaching assistants was associated with a great deal of anxiety – both dueto lack of confidence with course content, as well as time management concerns. Instructors relyheavily on teaching assistant’s availability, and many teaching assistants are not discouragedfrom working more than their contracted hours. These reports indicate a substantial gap insupport for first year graduate students in SoE. We
regular meetings withcounselors [3], and opportunities to engage with high impact practices, such as undergraduateresearch [3]. In addition, it has been shown that offering introductory engineering courses at the2-year institution helped students effectively navigate the path to transfer when such coursesincluded a survey of engineering careers as well as information about transfer planning and degree[3]. Additionally, faculty guidance on major-specific educational planning and transfer destinationselection was critically important to transfer success [3], as well as outreach and recruitmentactivities in which faculties from 4-year institutions visit the community college to present themajor and their scholarly interests [2]. The existing
. Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research on ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Dr. Rebecca Brent, Education Designs, Inc Rebecca Brent is President of Education Designs, Inc., a consulting firm located in Chapel Hill, N.C. She is a certified program evaluator and a faculty development consultant. Brent received her B.A. from Millsaps College in
M.Eng. degree in Industrial Engineering/Human Factors and Ergonomics and a Ph.D. degree in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from The Pennsylvania State University (PSU) in 2010 and 2012, respectively. Dr. Ashour was the inaugural re- cipient of William and Wendy Korb Early Career Professorship in Industrial Engineering in 2016. Dr. Ashour’s research areas include data-driven decision-making, modeling and simulation, data analytics, immersive technologies, and process improvement. He contributed to research directed to improve design and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Comparison of an Integrated Nonlinear Storytelling and Simulation
potential variability incomponent and material sources. This provided a chance to discuss with students how suchsetbacks should be handled, as they are bound to occur at some points in their careers. Anotherlearning point was that reliable 3D printing is not assured or automatic, and there are parametersassociated with it that must be determined, sometimes by trial and error. For example, using PLAat 20 percent infill often led to parts that did not perform well; however, 60 percent infillprovided much better performance. A more detailed analysis of the written comments that mayinclude coding is planned but has not been executed.Faculty Reflection and EvaluationA primary goal for this class is to prepare students for their senior design class
engineering programs and professionals in theengineering workforce do not accurately represent the general population. For example, despitemaking up 50 percent of the population, women represented only 24 percent of engineeringbachelor’s degrees conferred in 2021 [1]. Furthermore, although 12.1 percent of the USpopulation is Black only 4.7 percent of engineering bachelor’s degrees conferred were to Blackstudents. Research suggests that earlier exposure in K-12 programs to STEM active learningexperiences encourages greater participation in STEM amongst women and UnderrepresentedMinority (URM) students [2], [3]. As such, it is vital that K-12 districts introduce students to andinterest students in STEM fields and careers. An effective strategy
. She directs the Research, Academics and Mentoring Pathways (RAMP) to Success program that aims to estab- lish successful pathways to graduate school and interdisciplinary careers for new engineering undergrad- uates. Dr. Chandra’s research interests include design of data-driven stochastic models for applications in acoustics, communication networks and predictive analytics in education, model-based systems engi- neering and communications network traffic and performance modeling. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Setting the Stage for Co-Creation: Using Workshops to ScaffoldInterdisciplinary Research, Collaboration, and Community BuildingSetting the Stage for Co-Creation
intervention in entrepreneurial thinking increase the originality and quality of projects in an open-ideation forum (e.g. ENGR 350)? Instructors for the ENGR 350 course will be interviewed to assess differentiation of FLiTE-influenced projects versus those of the general student population. 3. Does the FLiTE program promote diversity in the regional technology-entrepreneurial workforce, particularly among native Appalachian students, who are typically underrepresented in STEM fields? FLiTE scholars will be interviewed over the course of the program to assess their perceptions of the program’s influence on their degree satisfaction and career path. Where possible, FLiTE program participants will be tracked post
Seattle, WA. Dr. Jarrett combines her practical experience and love of teaching to create welcoming classroom environments tailored to preparing stu- dents for their future careers and inspiring them to be lifelong learners. She is passionate about making engineering education and the engineering industry more innovative and more inclusive. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Creating Inclusive Classrooms: Work Developed during the ASEE Year of Impact on Racial Equity (YIRE)BackgroundThe ASEE Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI) specified 2021–2022 as theYear of Impact on Racial Equity (YIRE). The inspiration and objectives for this work has
LAunchPad Summer program [10], and the FYrE@ECST [11]. TheLAunchPad Summer Program is a two-week summer program where female high school juniorsand seniors experience a gender-inclusive learning environment, with scaffolded instruction,hands-on activities to reinforce the learning, and exposure to female role models. A studyrevealed that after participating in the LAunchPad, the student's interest in pursuing anengineering or computer science career increased by 29% [12]. The FYrE@ECST is a first-yearexperience program in the ECST where first-year students receive holistic academic support andgo through a pathway to complete their Math and Science requirements during their first year. Astudy reveals that the FYrE@ECST intervention students
, new insights, and field recommendations. Weground our analysis in our individual and collective positionalities as well as the careful selectionof a guiding theoretical framework. We explore the use of a collaborative autoethnographyapproach and qualitative coding of the panel transcript as effective methods for analyzing paneldiscussions and capturing the information and ideas presented in peer-reviewed publications.We find the method presented especially impactful for topics related to broadening participationin engineering. Marginalized groups are still vastly underrepresented, and their perspectivesremain unvalidated within engineering and engineering education spaces. This paper is based ona panel of six early career women engineers in