2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference Engineering Ethics as an Expert Guided and Socially Situated Activity Magdalena G. Grohman, Eun Ah Lee, Nicholas Gans, Marco Tacca, and Matthew J. Brown The University of Texas at DallasKeywordsEngineering, Ethics, Expert, Situated Cognition, Activity, Social Responsibility Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference Organized by The University of Texas at Dallas Copyright © 2017, American Society for Engineering Education 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual
AC 2007-2925: CREATIVITY AND NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: BRINGINGENTREPRENEURSHIP INTO ENGINEERING DESIGN CLASSESLarry Richards, University of Virginia Page 12.422.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Creativity and New Product Development: Bringing Entrepreneurship into Engineering Design ClassesAbstractWe have taught a course on Creativity and New Product Development since 1995. It isunique in its attention to all aspects of the product development process, including thepersonal and interpersonal issues in product development, as well as the technical ones.Our focus is not just on studying product development, but on actually DOING it
” solving everyday problems in a systematic method. Certainlythese can be valuable experiences for children. However, they don’t allow the child to explore indepth or make connections between math and science concepts which are an integral part of anengineer’s view of the world.A third approach, the “Drive into Engineering” model, puts the teachers and the students in themiddle of the engineering activity. The teachers have created the moment and then both groupsare immersed in it. For Douglas L. Jamerson Elementary School this represents a “hands-on,minds-on” approach that fosters the development of methods and activities aimed at theintegration of mathematics and science concepts we are expected to teach imbedded inengineering concepts and
cognitive building. Today, the graduates from manywell-known undergraduate engineering and technology programs are trained to concentrate onmachines rather than the human user’s well-being. Thus, one critical component in our teachingof ergonomics is to always bring students to the user, as other courses they have had in the pastmainly emphasize the issues of product functionality and product manufacturability. Theconsequences of missing the human element in engineering and technology education could bethe creation of mad scientists or evil engineers instead of a human-being with a balanced worldview and the ability to respect life.With the human-first idea in mind, the subjects covered in this module included both physical andcognitive ergonomics
2006-1297: DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE, SUSTAINABLE, MUTUALLYBENEFICIAL INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIONS IN ENGINEERING ANDTECHNOLOGYMichael Dyrenfurth, Purdue University Dr. Michael Dyrenfurth is responsible for International Programs involving the College of Technology at Purdue University.Michael Murphy, Dublin Institute of Technology Page 11.438.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Developing Effective, Sustainable, Mutually Beneficial International Collaborations in Engineering and TechnologyThis paper shares the experience and effective practices involved in building a systematic set
the girls feel theyare good at math and science. The most negative responses were in the writing and details.The positive responses in problem solving and group interactions will be highlighted in thehands-on activity and as an important and positive trait of engineers. As the details of theactivity are outlined in this paper, it is important to keep in mind the broad objectives and theprofile of our participants.Table 1. Profile of the participants: Sample from year 1 of our partnershipSurvey Reference: “Three Cheers to Engineers”, by Patricia J. Paddock QUESTIONS YES NO Do you consider yourself an inventor? 36 8 Do
AC 2007-350: THE USE OF ELLUMINATE DISTANCE-LEARNING SOFTWAREIN ENGINEERING EDUCATIONJohn Crofton, Murray State University Dr. Crofton earned his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Physics and his B.E.E. in Electrical Engineering from Auburn University. Before coming to Murray State University in 1994, Dr. Crofton was a Senior Engineer at the Westinghouse Science and Technology Center in Pittsburgh. Dr. Crofton’s research work has focused on ohmic and Schottky contacts to compound semiconductors such as SiC and GaN. Additionally, Dr. Crofton is interested in applications of solid state UV sources for water purification.James Rogers, Murray State University Jamie Rogers is an assistant professor in the
23.603.8fundamentals courses taken by all engineering freshmen, departmental courses, or mathematicscourses. To help make this determination, a similar survey is being developed and will soon beadministered to faculty of introductory mathematics courses at Ohio State. Exploring anymismatches in the perceptions and beliefs of the two groups of faculty is key to developing aneffective intervention.1 Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. ,ed, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School(National Academy of Science, 1999).2 Bassok, M. & Holyoak, K. J., “Interdomain Transfer Between Isomorphic Topics in Algebra and Physics,” Journalof Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15, 1, 153-166 (1989).3 Bassok, M., “Transfer
the computer engineering knowledge iswidely used in our everyday lives, most middle school and high school students still don’t knowabout it. If no one from university level introduces the program and fills in the gap, there is noway for the next generation youngsters to choose CPEG as their majors. Nowadays moststudents already have a dominated program in their mind before they become high school seniors.From university recruit point of view, STEM programs must find ways to attract them at an earlystage.In summary, this collaborated weather balloon project not only breaks the technical barriers formiddle school teachers, but also provides university professors a unique opportunity to teach themiddle school students what is Computer
post-teaching survey, asked participants toanswer on a Likert scale with regard to level of agreement (e.g., strongly agree, stronglydisagree) or frequency (e.g., sometimes, never). For example, teachers were asked to expresstheir level of agreement regarding the statement, “I see myself as developing competence in asubject (engineering) for which (prior to the project) I was not trained.” They were asked toshare the frequency with which they “… communicate with other teachers (including co-teachers) about aspects of the unit.” Five questions on the pre-teaching survey were open-response questions. One suchquestion was: “What kinds of words come to mind when you think of the engineeringprofession? (Please include a "brainstormed" list
addition, the framework will suggest membership requirements forparticipating institutions, keeping in mind the benefit of the program’s flexibility ofadapting to many different types of institutions. The funds will be used to define astructure in which the quality of the Engineering Ambassador program remains high, andoffer the essential support system for participating institutions and new schools who wantto start a similar program. Part of the success of the founding partner schools can beattributed the collaboration between the Engineering Ambassador advisors and thesupport system that ensued. The network will allow the same benefit to participatinginstitutions in sharing materials, offering invaluable networking opportunities, andproviding
to a classroomof students. Engineering concept integration then becomes somewhat of a communicationprocess for the fellow, not simply presenting it but ensuring an understanding and leading theteacher in instruction methods and ideas. In the professional world, delegating responsibilitiesand training employees is an essential management tool, thus the training similar to this receivedby the fellow better prepares him/her for work in industry. A management mind set is furtherexperienced with project based learning, either individually or in small groups. In this case, thefellow becomes the managing body of the entire class, responsible for monitoring their progress,helping them overcome hurdles without doing the work for them, and making
The Use of Active Learning in Design of Engineering Experiments Gerardine G. Botte Ohio University 183 Stocker Center Athens, OH 45701 This paper discusses the issues and experiences in developing an active learningatmosphere during a Design of Engineering Experiments course. The course coveredthree main topics: introduction to statistics, design of experiments, and statistical processcontrol. Twelve undergraduate students at the sophomore and junior levels participated inthe course. The course was taught at the University of Minnesota Duluth. A highlymotivated classroom environment
and the West Point CivilEngineering Program. The battlefield is the mind of the potential civil engineering student. Ourstrategy to reverse this trend and shape this arena is based on marketing. Our marketingobjectives are to create an interest in engineering and to develop a positive department reputationwithin the student body. This paper addresses outreach practices employed by the CivilEngineering Division at West Point to increase enrollments from the high school student to thefaculty role model.IntroductionIn order to judiciously combat the recent decrease in civil engineers majors, we first had to answerthe question “Exactly what attracts students to civil engineering in the first place?” Toaccomplish this, we conducted a short survey
some skills such as showed bellow: Basic Sciences + Basic Sciences of Engineering plus: • Aptitude to conduct and implement projects • Responsibilities for actions and results • Creativity and innovation potential • Mastering technologies’ evolution • Positive attitudes and behaviors • The willing to learn all life long • International experience • Entrepreneurship mind • Respect to diversity • Communication skills • To work in teams • Strong ethics.These capabilities can be instigated in the students by means of: • new education proposals, • exchanging programs, • international experiences, • double diplomas, • internships, • Scientific and technological initiation
understand thecomplexity of the futuristic problems and the mechanism to solve them. Furthermore, the highlyengaging challenge that a systems engineering approach offers the novice by asking a student toimagine an outcome and apply all their creativity and fancy to the solution becomes an enticingand limitless project to a young mind. Once the student has envisioned their model, then the nutsand bolts of engineering are introduced to show how it might be realized. Hence- a perfectinstructional hook. The engineering content for ICE-HS Framework is inspired by systemsengineering discipline.The ICE-HS Framework is designed with the adaptation of a logical instructional model that isbased on the professional standard for instructional delivery
them was quite positive.1. IntroductionEstablished in 1994, the College of Engineering at Rowan University is known for itshallmark of hands-on education from its first day. The unique Engineering Clinic series leadsthe way of hands-on minds-on education, while many traditionally theoretical courses alsointroduced various projects to bring more hands-on flavor. Following this tradition, manynew courses were also proposed and introduced with heavy emphasis on projects and hands-on experience. In the spring 2004, the department of Mechanical Engineering of RowanUniversity developed a new breed of senior course, which is currently named “EmergingTopic – Designing and Building a Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV)”. It is a project-basedcourse where
to the ongoing departmental undergraduate projects and contests such as the moon buggyand solar bike supervised by another ETIS faculty member. Page 10.1204.2 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education”Application of the Engineering Design Process Many of our students who take Engineering Fundamentals will not have any backgroundin college algebra, trigonometry or physics because there are no prerequisites for this course.This fact was always kept in mind while preparing projects or tests
AC 2010-53: TOWARDS DEVELOPING AN ONTOLOGY FOR K-12ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY EDUCATIONM. David Burghardt, Hofstra UniversityMichael Hacker, Hofstra University Co-director, Center for Technological LiteracyMarc Devries, University of Technology, DelftAmmeret Rossouw, University of Technology, Delft Page 15.1270.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Toward Developing an Ontology for K-12 Engineering Technology EducationAbstractHofstra University’s Center for Technological Literacy and the University of Technology, Delft,conducted an international research study in the summer of 2009 to identify the most
AC 2010-1634: CONFLICT BEHAVIOR AND ITS INFLUENCE ONENGINEERING DESIGN TEAMSXaver Neumeyer, Northwestern UniversityAnn McKenna, Northwestern University Ann F. McKenna is the Director of Education Improvement in the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University. She also holds a joint appointment as a Professor in the School of Education and Social Policy as well as a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and is the co-Director of the Northwestern Center for Engineering Education Research (NCEER). She received her BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Drexel University and Ph.D. in Science and Mathematics Education from the University of
and scenarios for them to be able to experience theirown creativity and unique talents. Hands-on collaborative discovery environments are myspecialty. Engineering used to include labs, shop work and industrial experience. After Sputnik,engineering education took a decided swing toward a theoretical approach to instruction. Since Ibegan teaching in 1976, I have attempted to swing the pendulum back to more experientiallybased education.I view teaching as a joint adventure rather than a transmittal of information. An analogy of anexpedition guide comes to mind. Like a guide, I chart the course, prepare my students to meet thechallenges and guide them through. They garner knowledge along the way and discover whothey are and what their special
Planning Approach for the Society of Women Engineers Mentoring Girl Scouts Sue Ellen Haupt, Jessica D. Gregory Utah State University/ Pennsylvania State University Abstract Utah State University College of Engineering is actively working on recruiting and retaining women in engineering. This project is one that combines the two toward affecting both goals at once. The Society of Women Engineers (SWE) section at USU has organized a mentoring system with the local Girl Scout council. The primary idea is a top-down mentoring approach where activities are designed and run by women and girls that are a step ahead of the participants. In
Paper ID #10204Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Education for Engineering Stu-dentsDr. David Bayless, Ohio University Page 24.207.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014Assessing the Effectiveness of Leadership Education for Engineering StudentsAbstractRegardless of the approach taken to help engineering student develop their leadership potential,the engineering leadership development community faces challenges in assessing theeffectiveness of the educational approach. Soft skills, while assessable, are much
Paper ID #9871Integrating Community Engagement, Freshman Chemical Engineering, andan AIChE Student ChapterDr. Bill B Elmore, Mississippi State University Bill B. Elmore currently holds the Hunter Henry Chair and Associate Directorship in the Swalm School of Chemical Engineering at Mississippi State University. In his twenty-fourth year of engineering education, Bill focuses on project-based learning at all levels of the undergraduate chemical engineering curriculum and undergraduate research in energy and micro-scale reactor studies
screen(Figure 2).The informed engineering design pedagogy focuses on learning science and mathematicsconcepts through carefully designed specifications and constraints followed by learningactivities for the targeted content (Developing Knowledge; KSBs). This targetedapproach embedded in an engineering design cycle helps students focus and learnFigure 1. An informed engineering design model. The inner cycle represents how these processes are not necessarily Page 24.820.4stepwise and that design should encompass many iterations and refinements. The outer cycle makes engineeringhabits of mind such as collaboration and creativity
ConclusionCase studies are a valuable resource for teaching ethics to engineering students. Expertssay that when using case studies to teach, it is most effective to use studies that create aconflict within the students' minds. As a result of this, they will be prodded to resolve theconflict. Learning to handle ethical dilemmas and making ethical decisions are veryimportant elements of being a professional engineer. The dilemma of reconcilingenvironmental justice issues and engineering ethics not only provides conflict but alsoprepares students for dealing with a major societal issue. Another positive aspect of thisapproach to teaching ethics to environmental engineers is the level of interest andenthusiasm students have shown for the subject
An Experimental Course for First-Year Students: Leadership in Engineering Mary E. Goodwin Iowa State UniversityAbstractA first-year leadership course was created for engineering students. The purpose of the class wasto develop stronger leadership skills in undergraduate engineering students early on in theircollege career. This was done by actively engaging students in leadership activities that gaveopportunities for practicing skills while also providing classroom instruction on leadershiptheories, issues, and concepts. Industry has expressed a need for graduating engineering studentsto have stronger leadership
engineering types than for students of otherpersonality types. Page 10.200.8 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education"Bibliography1. Bransford, John D., et al., editors, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Expanded edition), National Academy Press, Washington, D. C., 2001.2. Felder, Richard et al., (1993) “A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and Retention: I. Success and Failure in the Introductory Course”, Journal of Engineering Education
: http://www.abet.org/images/Criteria/T001%2005- 06%20TAC%20Criteria%2011-29-04.pdf[4] O. Harrison, "Hands-On = Minds-On: Bringing Mechatronics to Life Without Laboratory Time," presented at 2002 ASEE Southeast Section Conference, Gainesville, Florida, 2002.[5] R. M. Felder, "Learning by Doing," Chemical Engineering Education, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 282-283, 2003.[6] "Forming Student Engineering Teams," Foundation Coalition. [Online]. Available: Page 10.570.7 http://www.foundationcoalition.org/publications/brochures/2002-Mar-01_Forming_Teams.pdf“Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for
.” “technology is something that makes it easyer for people so they won't have to do all that stofe”Other students explained that they knew it was technology because it was created by people. “you can find out if something is technology if it is made by human minds” “I know if something is technology because it takes lots of men to build something and because it takes a very long time.”DISCUSSIONThe results of our survey further bolster the findings of our previous work about some of theconceptions and misconceptions that students hold about engineering and technology. The topsix student choices of what engineers do are all rooted in activities that focus on construction,building, machinery, and vehicles, which suggests that students are