needs of potential users of the space. Potential users are a residencefor visiting artists and visitors for an art gallery.Journal 3: Write two typed paragraphs explaining your one word design concept. Please explainhow this concept reinforces our client's values and mission in the first paragraph, and providespecific examples how your design will reflect your one word concept in the second paragraph.Journal 4: The first paragraph will include the three most valuable points of feedback youreceived while presenting your color plans to our clients. The second paragraph will describetangible ways you are going to incorporate their feedback moving forward with your design.Journal 5: What have you learned about yourself? What have you learned about
(s)”, as in an industrial setting. In this way, we acknowledge the different nature of the dynamic between ourselves and the students while reminding them that we have the responsibility to evaluate their performance throughout this experience. It also sets the stage for how we establish the reporting structure as well as the self- and peer evaluations. 4. Discuss the syllabus and the expectations rubric in terms of an “employee evaluation”; in an industry environment, these would be the goals of the project as well as expectations of individual employee performance and attitude towards the task at hand as well as towards their colleagues. The rubric is more qualitative than quantitative, emphasizing
served as a primerto begin thinking about veteran issues and areas where ASEE can add support. After the affinitymapping exercise, a brain-writing [30] exercise was conducted, followed by a group discussion.In attendance during the sessions were a total of four session “scribes” that took detailed notes tocapture the conversation that occurred during the session. Three of those four people are co-authors of this paper.Centering the participants on veteran engineering educationThe workshop attendees, including the authors, participated in a modified affinity mappingexercise as a centering tool for veteran engineering education. As part of this effort, we co-constructed different ideas, policies, and concerns surrounding student veteran engineer
consulting and verification and validation. He has headed the corporate product and technology innovations and quality and delivery innovation departments. He has designed and delivered workshops in the areas of problem solving, project management and innovation management that were received very well by the participants. Pradeep was on the apex senior management group before proceeding on to pursue his academic, research and social interests. Before Patni, he has worked at IIT Delhi, IIT Bombay, SGGS College of Engineering and Crompton Greaves R & D Electronics in different research and academic positions. Pradeep Waychal has also published papers in peer reviewed journals, presented keynote invited talks in many
school.This course has six outcomes, assessed as part of the ABET process, that all sections must meet.The course outcomes are:―After completing the course, students will be able to: 1. Identify and describe the engineering field of specialization. 2. Explain the different career paths for engineers. 3. Practice the engineering approach to problem solving. 4. Identify the engineer’s ethical and societal responsibilities. 5. Practice technical writing and presentation using computer tools. 6. Work in a team.‖ Page 15.293.4Term project & how it relates to course outcomesThe course grade is based on assignments, an exam, and a term
biomedical systems engineering, including five years of design courses. He has conducted research, with peer-reviewed publications, in biomedical engineering in the areas of biomechanics, bioelectricity, and biomedical imaging, since 1992. Other research interests include renewable energy, optical fiber communications, and project-based multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary education. Page 22.810.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 IMPLEMENTATION OF AN INTEGRATED PROJECT-BASED APPROACH WITHIN AN ESTABLISHED EAC-OF-ABET ACCREDITED INTERDISCIPLINARY
GC 2012-5621: DEVELOPMENT OF A TEACHING LEARNING CENTREAND ONGOING FACULTY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS - A CASE STUDYDr. Prasad Edamana, Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT M), India Dr. Prasad Edamana is an Assistant Professor working at Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IIT M) since 2006. He did doctoral study at NIIST, Trivandrum, India during 1995- 2000. Subsequent to his Ph. D. program, Dr. Prasad had carried out post-doctoral study at Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX and University of Bonn, Germany. Dr. Prasad has published around thirty research papers in peer reviewed journals of Chemistry. At present, Dr. Prasad guides ten graduate students in his research group. Dr. Prasad
can beasked, for example, to state all they know about a certain topic. The lecturer should write downall the points offered by the students before any discussion of them is begun.The lecturer can also question the students to promote active learning. Either particular studentscan be targeted or the questions can be general. Multiple-choice questions can be answered byasking for a show of hands for each option in turn, or by asking students to hold up a flash-cardto display the letter of the answer19. Questions should be genuine, not rhetorical, and the lecturershould give students sufficient time to formulate answers rather than answer his or her ownquestions. Questions can be posed at the end of one lecture with a view to starting the
controlled.” 9 After discussing several casestudies, students were then invited to identify opportunities within the mobile app arena: whatneeds do they think that they, their peers, or their families have, that could be addressed withapps; how could existing apps be improved to better meet consumers’ needs? In the first twocourse offerings, students discussed their ideas and formed their own teams within the groupmembership policy presented earlier in this section. In the third and fourth course offerings, weformalized the team creation process by encouraging students to post their reflections on an“Idea Bounce” blog; the students then “pitched” their app ideas in class, and listed their threebest ideas in order of preference. The instructors then
participants expressed positive working relationships with peers in theircollaborative work projects. This was the first time I had a positive group experience in my engineering studies. I told my team, “If you can explain it to me simply, or in an analogy then I will understand. And then we can explain it to others.” So that was sort of our guide in writing our reports. And this was a really good team to work with. Google Group 17, focus group interview, March 7, 2013 Homogeneous Shared Work vs. Heterogeneous Autonomous Work The theme of homogeneous shared work versus heterogeneous autonomous work ispertinent to the first half of our first and second research questions, “Which instructionalscaffolds
solutions are encouraged [43–49]. In addition, use of small group work supportsalternative ways of knowing, often valued by for girls and underserved minorities [50–54].Through the design of engaging, meaningful engineering experiences, the intersectionalidentities of students otherwise marginalized across racial, gender, ethnicity, and languagepreference can thrive. Learning substantive knowledge and practices can foster changes inperceptions students perceptions of themselves and their peers as successful students and disruptclassroom hierarchies.Iterative design cycles of curriculum development based in design-based researchOur third analysis is a re-assessment of the lessons learned from over 20 years of design-basedresearch (DBR) on curriculum
, directories, books and monographs. • Engineering database - Compendex & Inspec (Engineering Village): 1884 - Current; Indexes 2,600+ international scholarly and trade journals and conference proceedings in all aspects of engineering. Compendex is Elsevier’s flagship engineering-focused database that provides comprehensive and trustworthy content to improve research outcomes and maximize the impact of your engineering research. • Engineering Education database - Papers on Engineering Education Repository (PEER): This is the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) conference proceedings database. For the first two databases, to ensure populated results were adequate in achieving
class to familiarize students with theonline lecture format. Students were encouraged to take notes when viewing the videos, just asthey would in a traditional lecture. Learning and retention benefits were cited for listening,watching, writing, and practicing course material to encourage practiced study. Students werealso strongly encouraged to review the online example problems, which were not required forcourse credit. The instructor also informed students the new out-of-class work would be balancedwith dedicated time in class towards homework.In 2021, students were given a one-page handout on the first day with information about thepedagogical benefits of a flipped classroom, as well as tips for successfully completing a coursein the flipped
pursuing her Masters of Science in Human Resource Management in the Krannert School of Management at Purdue University. She received her B.S. in Organizational Communication with a concentration in Human Factors Engineering from Purdue University.Matthew Verleger, Purdue University Matthew Verleger is a doctoral candidate in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his B.S. in Computer Engineering and his M.S. in Agricultural and Biological Engineering, both from Purdue University. His research interests are on how students develop mathematical modeling skills through the use of model-eliciting activities and in peer review as a pedagogical tool
an effective study environment (time and location), seeking helpfrom peers and teachers and engagement in planning and monitoring activities, to name a few5.Because SRL is so complex, there is not a single SRL approach or strategy that students can betaught that will be applicable in all situations. In fact, situation, or context, dependence is one ofthe areas in need of further research so we can better understand the contextual factors thatimpact engagement in SRL6. Research in SRL has already suggested that contextual factors suchas degree of instructor scaffolding7, pedagogical approach used in the classroom8, genderbalance9, learner’s interpersonal relationships as well as school policy or structure10, impactengagement in self-regulated
engineering students access, use, and understand information; identify gaps in theliterature, and how this can be used to support information literacy education in theengineering disciplines. Engineering students are required to create, problem solve, andimprove, using engineering principles to develop their skills in technical, environmental,socioeconomic and political aspects of the engineering process. They are increasinglyfaced with the availability of rapidly shifting information types, which are gathered fromsources like Google and Reddit. Finding and interpreting such information, even whenfound correctly through sources outside traditional research boundaries (technicaldocuments found online vs. peer review articles through a library catalog
Century [5], they confirmed thatNSBE, along with other ethnic student organizations for African American students, providedmuch-needed cultural enclaves on PWI campuses.Both research teams then came together to compare findings. Shannon joined the project afterthe grounded theory data analysis was already underway. As a result, she was able to view thefindings of both investigations from a new perspective with more clarity than the authors whohad been engaged with data analysis for a long time. She leveraged this perspective to helpsynthesize the findings of both studies, pinpointing and articulating commonalities and distinctdifferences in the results. Shannon produced the majority of the writing of the text based ondiscussions between the two
President Moon of South Koreaasking them to choose five renewable energy sources that they think are most efficient and suitablefor the economic and geological context of South Korea. Students individually work to rank fivechoices for renewable energy and write reasons including important values they considered fortheir choice. Then they are grouped in a single-gender group (boys or girls) and asked to discusstheir individual ideas to move toward a collective decision about what kind of renewable energythey will recommend as a group.Phase two. In phase two, more information about renewable energy is given to the students in asingle-gender group. They individually read the information and discuss their decisions in light ofthe new information
factor loading issues. One item,“incorporating feedback,” cross-loaded on both factors.Table 2. Factor structure and factor loadings for skill sets Item Communication Research Skills Skills Oral presentation 0.793 Writing technical reports, conference proceedings, or journal 0.788 publications Creating visual displays such as posters or prototypes 0.714 Networking with industry 0.442 Networking with my peers
these skills to be applied without the formal direction found in typicalengineering courses. Students are organized into design teams and are led by a student who actsas a project manager. Because of the variable nature of the proposed activities (i.e., field work,computer graphics, technical writing, oral presentations, etc.), the design teams identify therelative strengths of each team member. In addition to a final report, students prepare interimreports, attend business meetings, and give formal presentations. One or two faculty membersare assigned as the Senior Design Project Coordinator(s). However, all faculty members Page 6.10.3
, job shadowing programs still exist and have been documentedin the literature.In engineering, most job shadowing experience is in connection with industry. Job shadowingprograms have been found to have impacts on student career trajectories. Engineering programsare expected to help students find internships and job shadowing opportunities in industry becauseit is considered a best practice for students to have this experience early in their careers [3]. Whenpaired with a near-peer mentor and participating in a job shadowing experience, research showsthat there is a positive impact on student retention in STEM programs [4].Many different aspects can influence a successful job shadowing program. As in the definition,job shadowing should involve
create an inclusive learningenvironment that empowers neurodiverse learners. It was attempted to achieve this goal byimproving the accessibility of the content, promoting active (collaborative) learning, engagingstudents by using real world examples, and offering a variety of assessments in this course.Actions such as adding captions to the pre-recorded videos, posting class notes, recording andlive streaming the class, and using the class eBook were made to enhance the courseaccessibility.Active learning such as think-pair-share strategy, collaborative problem-solving activities, andbrainstorming were offered during class time to enhance peer-to-peer interactions, align students’progress with the class schedule, and improve student engagement
been actively involved in basic educational and instructional re- search by infusing several interactive and active learning techniques in classroom to teach introductory programming courses with a goal to improve the retention rate in the CS department. Dr. Rahman has published a book, two book chapters and around seventy articles in peer-reviewed journals and confer- ence proceedings, such as IEEE Transaction on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, etc. and presented his works in numerous conferences and workshops, such as ICPR, CBMS, CLEF, CIVR, HISB, SPIE, BIBE, IEEE FIE, etc. His current research is focusing on Crowdsourcing and Deep learning techniques and their
interestedto study for a university degree?”, and “why are you interested in learning about robotics? Whatare your career goals?”. The answers would help demonstrate the students’ writing and technicalskills, previous involvements, and interests. The students are selected from schools all aroundQatar that are interested in robotics and have shown to possess great group dynamics. Typically,the students are selected based on their performance in previous interactions from the STEMactivities and programs hosted by the university where the outstanding and skilled students areidentified and invited to be participate. However, there are instances where the students reach outto participate in such programs or schools would nominate their high-achieving
, networkingevents, and overall social interactions with colleagues in a technical atmosphere. Revitalizingthese efforts and advancing their development is crucial for student professional development,which has shown to be a significant contributor to successful entry into the workforce [12]-[15].We tried to overcome these limitations and leverage the advantages of online interactionsthrough the following events.Strategy for Success Seminars - These events were focused on expanding students’perspectives of resources and skills associated with the engineering fields. The ESC engaged inthree events: an Engineering Resources Fair, Students Orgs 101, and Technical Writing Seminar.These seminars presented the importance of connecting with University
technology, curriculum and instruction, leadership, and technical writing pedagogy.Dr. Jaafar M. Alghazo, Virginia Military Institute Dr. Jaafar Alghazo is an Associate Professor in Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute. He graduated from Southern Illinois University with a Ph.D in Engineering Sci- ence/Computer Engineering in 2004 and M.Sc. in Electrical and Computer Engineering in 2000 from the same university. He worked at the American University in Dubai, the University of Central Florida, and Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University before joining the Virginia Military Institute as a Tenure Track faculty member. His research interests are in Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
understanding Clean Water Access in the US.In the Analyze section, the students determined what sort of calculations, including economic, andvisuals were need to tell the story of Clean Water Access and present the data. By the end of theEngage and Analyze sections, students’ goal was to ensure that other readers could understandconflicting sides of the issue in the report.For the Reflect section, students were asked to write individual reflections on what they hadlearned in the Engage and Analyze sections. Here they answered the following questions. “Whatare your opinions about the issues?” “How did your opinions change while doing the assignmentand discussions compared to what you thought or knew about the topic before the project?” “Isthere a
relationships among STEM facultyacross central Pennsylvania.The mentoring network has grown to a 2017 cohort of 44 participants in seven STEMdisciplines, traveling up to 100 miles from 21 colleges and universities. Core workshop topicshave included Work/Life Balance, Writing Productivity, and Self-Advocacy, as well as annualSymposia on Collaborative Research Opportunities and Innovative Teaching and ImprovingTeaching Evaluations. Program evaluation shows almost all involved women have remained inacademia and advanced through the ranks while feeling less isolated. An innovative sustainablefunding model is being piloted by transitioning to a social business model that extendsprogramming to STEM women in industry and government. Industry sponsors gain
thinking, encouraged engage in a writing process to support students and teacher students to generate conjectures and arguments with evidence, Work in “Lessons where teachers alternate strategies pairs or small groups, explain their characteristically speak and reasoning or thinking using several students listen are not Student: Engaged in discussions with sentences orally or in writing reformed”. peers, asked questions of peers and/or teacherThe results are shown in
teacher familiarity or comfort with teachingdesign, engineering, and technology subjects [16] , and a focus on literacy and math standardizedtesting in the early grades, with STEM subjects like science not being assessed in [this state]until fifth grade. At the time of writing this paper, a search of the NSF-sponsoredTeachEngineering.org website--a peer-reviewed repository of standards-aligned engineeringactivities, lessons, and curricula--produced only 28 entries recommended for grades K-2, out of1660 total K-12 entries in the database [17].Camp designAdding the richness of a scenario and background via a storybook, campers connected theproject work they were doing with a broader cause. During the first day, we read Mr. BearSquash-You-All-Flat