government agencies. In 2010, Dr. Lambrinidou co-conceived the graduate level engineering ethics course ”Engi- neering Ethics and the Public,” which she has been co-teaching to students in engineering and science. She is co-Principal Investigator on a National Science Foundation (NSF) research and education project developing an ethnographic approach to engineering ethics education. Page 26.322.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Canons against Cannons? Social Justice and the Engineering Ethics ImaginaryAbstractWhat if social
students, ideally helping students connectwhat they are learning to their future goals. This information also can lead to recommendationsfor future survey questions that more fully capture the range of students’ actual perceptions,worries, hopes, and plans about their futures.IntroductionThe National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter) was launched in 2011on the premise that it is becoming more necessary for engineering students to learn skills relatingto innovation and entrepreneurship (I&E). The work of Epicenter aims to strengthenentrepreneurship education for engineers and expand understanding of how I&E learningenvironments influence students. As part of the Epicenter research projects collectively known
advanced degrees in science andengineering from prestigious American universities, and they trained me for academic successfrom a young age. I went to regular school during the day, but nights and weekends were dedi-cated to family school, a school in which my parents pushed me beyond any public curriculum.They tutored me personally, never outsourcing my education to teachers or private tutors, and Ireaped the fruit of their labor. I graduated from one of the best public high schools in the countryat the time and from the best engineering undergraduate program in the world. I also completedmultiple research projects during my undergraduate program, and I had stellar letters of recom-mendation from both course instructors and research advisors. I
that our perceptions of reality are socially constructed andthat by focusing on positive stories and experiences, particularly from people whose identitiesare marginalized, we can create a more positive reality in work and learning environments [4].Despite its prominence for over two decades, it is unknown to what extent APPI has been used inengineering education research. Further, there is limited to no evidence of utilizing APPI as aneducational intervention.1.1. APPI as a Research Methodology vs InterventionAs a part of an early-stage research project on evaluating the impact of asset-based practices inundergraduate engineering courses, we employed appreciative interviewing to elicit studentexperiences in applying their assets to projects
how others haveapproached empathy in curricula, projects, and practice. We applied Zaki’s model of empathy —which triangulates “sharing,” “thinking about” and “caring about,” as the theoretical frameworkguiding the inquiry — and performed a systematic literature review. We sought answers to thefollowing research questions: 1) How have educators integrated empathy development intolearning activities in STEM?; 2) What pedagogical approaches have been shown to promoteempathy of students in STEM?; and 3) How have scholars approached the development ofdifferent kinds of empathy in classrooms? After querying Google Scholar, analyzing more than10,000 publications, and applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, we identified 63 articles thatcentered
both from Michigan Tech. Her research program involves using complementary methods (e.g., statistical modeling and analytics, psychological assessment) to evaluate how individual differences are important and impact behaviors at a cultural, social, and behavioral level. She has served as a project evaluator in the multiple NSF funded projects. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 S-STEM Student Reflections and IDP ProcessIntroductionStudent reflections and using individual development plans (IDPs) for mentoring have been anintegral part of an NSF S-STEM project focusing on students pursuing baccalaureate degrees inEngineering
produced to give other faculty a starting point on etiquette in the virtualclassroom [83]. The Engineering Education Faculty’s weekly meetings have ranged from hearing prominentspeakers from around the country on their role in engineering education, book reviews on currenteducational resources, and open discussions on the current state of teaching online. This diversityand ability to be a part of the group has added to the tight-knit community we have developed.Multiple daily writing groups have been created to provide faculty with a small group to meet with.Usually, the meetings are one hour, writing for twenty-five minutes, taking a break, and writingagain. The focus gives you a set time to complete work, get feedback on a project or
in science learn- ing and educational change. Chandra pursues projects that have high potential for leveraging sustainable change in undergraduate STEM programs and makes these struggles for change a direct focus of her research efforts.Dr. Ayush Gupta, University of Maryland, College Park Ayush Gupta is Assistant Research Professor in Physics and Keystone Instructor in the A. J. Clark School of Engineering at the University of Maryland. Broadly speaking he is interested in modeling learning and reasoning processes. In particular, he is attracted to fine-grained analysis of video data both from a micro- genetic learning analysis methodology (drawing on knowledge in pieces) as well as interaction analysis
Engineering1 Historically, the undertaking of service projects – engaging marginalized individuals or communities in improving some facet of their lives – has been viewed by many as simply doing ‘nice things for poor people’. […] Showing ‘solidarity with the poor’ and making a human connection are necessary to sustain hope and thus affect change, and are powerful and essential elements in ‘making the world a better place’ 2 [p.6]. -T. Colledge Editor-in-Chief, Int’l Journal for Service-Learning in EngineeringEngineers as “benefactors” to society is a core value of engineering and central to how
Geneva, working on the West Area Neutrino Facility and North Area 48. Since then Jo˜ao has held several positions in teaching and management in higher ed- ucation at institutions across the UK, Middle East, Africa and Asia. At Leeds Becket University, Jo˜ao specialised in teaching Mobile and Fixed Networking Technologies and introduced compendium-based teaching practices and led the design and implementation of the first Mobile and Distributed Computer Networks postgraduate course in UK. Jo˜ao authored and managed a European Social Fund Project in Women in Engineering contributing to widening participation and inclusion of women engineers, developed and ran world-class innovative aca- demic practice methods in
of UND’s Center for Engineering Education Research. Her research explores strategies for broadening access and participation in STEM, focusing on culturally relevant pedagogy in science and engineering. She also investigates strategies for increasing access and participation in STEM through teacher professional learning opportunities and by exploring the impact of group gender composition on girls’ motivation and engagement. Dr. Robinson is a PI and Co-PI on several NSF sponsored grant projects which focus on teacher professional learning and self-efficacy with implementing culturally relevant engineering education, connecting to place and community, and centering culture and Indigeneity within STEM education
engineering education, global engineering education, and social issues in STEM research and practice. Recently, she has taken on new NSF projects to broaden participation in quantum engineering (IUSE Level 3), research abroad (IRES Track 1), and use-inspired research (Convergence Accelerator Track I). Having grown up in Australia, Canada, Korea, and Germany, she speaks three languages. Leveraging her international connections, she has served in leadership positions in the Korean-American Scientists and Engineers Association (KSEA, Vice President), Korean Society for Engineering Education (KSEE, International Relations Board Member), and the International Federation of Engineering Education Societies (IFEES, Executive
engineers see how they canstay true to their beliefs and lay the groundwork for improved outcomes.An example case illustrates how an early-career engineer stood up for their values in the face ofprofessional pressures. While an undergraduate student at the University of Virginia, that studentstudied the Dominion Energy Atlantic Coast Pipeline project and met residents of in the BlueRidge Mountains of Virginia who were to be directly impacted by the project. These personalencounters made the student question the ethics of the project’s development. She rememberedthat learning experience during her first job as an engineer when she was assigned to work on aconsulting project related to that same pipeline. Aligned with GVV pillars, she drew upon
/technical dualism have included revising stand-alone ethicscourses and adding more social components to previously purely technical courses, such asdesign courses [6-9].Research in this space is still identifying what to expect of students and how to support deeperengagement in sociotechnical topics. This is being investigated through, for example, analyzingstudent interviews and focus groups [10-13], in class whole-group discussion [7, 14], andstudents’ written work [15]. Here, we build on this research base by looking at small group in-class discussions.This study is part of an NSF-funded research project to implement and study integratingsociotechnical components throughout a first-year computing for engineers course. In oneiteration of the
ofwomen faculty in STEM. Much of it has emerged from projects funded by the National ScienceFoundation (NSF) under ADVANCE: Organizational Change for Gender Equity in STEMAcademic Professions, a program that has been active for more than twenty years. NSFADVANCE has funded more than 200 projects promoting systemic change to enhance genderequity and inclusion for STEM faculty, hosted by postsecondary institutions, STEMcollaboratives, and research organizations. However, project leaders and scholars rarely addresspolicies and practices that impact how welcoming and accessible faculty careers are to peoplewith disabilities.This area of study and practice is particularly important as the number of faculty with disabilitiessteadily increases as the
their professionalnetworks, and improve soft skills such as time management and teamwork [7]. It is clear thatemployers recognize those benefits: a recent survey by the National Association of Colleges andEmployers shows a projected 22.6% increase in interns hired in 2022, by far the highest increasein at least a decade [8].Our work focuses on experiential learning in cybersecurity, a field that is experiencing rapidexpansion in the labor market and shortages of qualified professionals. Between 2013 and 2021,the number of open cybersecurity positions worldwide increased from 1 million to 3.5 million[9]. This demand for professionals is not being met: in the U.S. it is estimated that there are onlyenough qualified applicants to fill 68% of the
), a fellow of the Opportunities for Under-Represented Scholars (OURS) post-graduate institutional leadership certificate program, and an alumna of the Frontiers of Engineering Education program (FOEE) of the National Academy of En- gineering. She has been serving on the Project Kaleidoscope (PKAL) Capital Area Regional Network steering committee as a founding member since 2016. She received her Ph.D. in Computer Science and Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno.Dr. Briana Lowe Wellman, University of the District of Columbia Dr. Briana Lowe Wellman is an associate professor and chair in the Department of Computer Science and Information Technology at the University of the District of Columbia. She joined
class, three different evaluation methods were used, such asclassroom observation, a signature assignment, and a Motivated Strategies for LearningQuestionnaire (MSLQ) survey. The Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM(COPUS) findings indicated greater student engagement when ECP is used; the Signatureassignment results indicated improved learning outcomes for students; and the MLSQ survey,which measures students' motivation, critical thinking, curiosity, collaboration, andmetacognition, determined a positive impact of the ECP on the CS participants.Keywords –CS education, active learning, experimental centric learning, collaborative learning,project based learning, retention.IntroductionSeveral critical factors influence student
such as Germanyhave advanced the concept of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, often referred to as Industry 4.0[1]. The intent is to integrate design, manufacturing, and consumer activities seamlessly toincrease productivity, reliability and customer satisfaction. An Industry 4.0 manufacturingsystem—also called a cyber physical production system (CPPS)—integrates Internet of Things(IoT), Internet of Services (IoS, or also called Cloud Computing) and cyber-physical system(CPS) technologies [2]. These changes will profoundly impact manufacturing work and workers.Industry 4.0 is projected to add $2.2 trillion to domestic GDP by 2025. The estimated maximumvalue of the operational transformation brought by Industry 4.0 to the global
student societies’ activities.This study was conducted as a senior capstone project by a team of four industrial engineeringand one mechanical engineering senior students. The capstone senior project spanned twoquarters, for a total of 22 weeks, and was sponsored by the OSU Department of EH&S, advisedby an industrial engineering faculty, and assisted by a PhD student in industrial engineering. Thecapstone senior project focused on identifying the root cause of the lack of near-miss reportingamong student societies within the COE through the development of research instruments andpreliminary data collection and analysis.Qualitative Approach of Current StudyExisting studies on academic laboratory safety either focus on formal learning settings
difficulty in getting student input and feedback on the contract initially, but we have now refined it over many iterations. The contract outlines the type of grading and what is expected of the students during the course. 2. Learning logs: The students were allowed to write learning logs reflecting on their learning experiences both in and out of the classroom. Two types of logs were used. The first type was a reflection on their learning based on the homeworks or projects that they did. The second type was a learning log in lieu of attending a live lecture or watching an asynchronous lecture. Students submitted weekly logs for the asynchronous learning and biweekly logs for the homeworks or
particularly beneficial to those with good time management skills and asense of high self-efficacy. As students and teachers were thrust into the world of distancelearning due to the global pandemic, high quality distance education that supports everyonebecame vital to the success of students.Course ContextThe 4-credit hour course that provides context for this study is a junior-level engineeringthermodynamics course based on mechanical engineering thermodynamics (as opposed to achemical engineering approach to thermodynamics) with some additional biological andbiomedical applications. This course itself has been offered annually at the Ohio State Universitysince 2012. A semester-long team design service-learning project was introduced to the coursein
to become more inclusive. NSF Revolutionizing EngineeringDepartments (RED) program awarded the Mechanical Engineering department of SeattleUniversity a grant in 2017. The goal of this five-year project is to build a culture that fostersstudents’ engineering identities. Many changes have been made to the curriculum and coursesthroughout the curriculum so students could experience real-world engineering with practicingengineers. Engineering design courses for senior design projects provide students not only theopportunity to work with industry engineers on real-world design problems, but also thepossibilities to learn the highest level of professionalism. In the past couple of years, notablechanges in Engineering Design courses include using
Paper ID #32829Introducing Communications to High School Students by Leveraging Zoomasa Communications PlatformProf. Curt Schurgers, University of California, San Diego Curt Schurgers is an Associate Teaching Professor in the UCSD Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. His research and teaching are focused on course redesign, active learning, and project- based learning. He also co-directs an undergraduate research program, Engineers for Explorations, in which undergraduates spearhead real-world engineering challenges that impact the world of exploration and resource conservation. Curt Schurgers received his B.S
share much in common with engineering, particularly in terms ofjob functions following graduation [21] such as project management; in both degree programsgraduates are trained to work with contingent problems. Two other degree programs are worthmentioning in terms of their need to deal with contingent problems and in which practitionersoften operate on heuristics rather than rules: teaching and nursing. Until fairly recently thesewere considered primarily occupations that women went into which associated them with lowerstatus than engineering or management given historical belief systems. However, the wayscontingent knowledge is used to manage highly contextualized problems is similar.An in-depth comparison of the educational methods used by
consistency. 3) we comparedthe practices emphasized across the student cases. We also developed short summaries for eachof the three participants focused on their emphasized practices, including excerpts from theirtranscripts for evidence.FindingsTable 1 shows three students’ desired engineering practices obtained via interview. The findingsrevealed that a wide range of engineering practices were identified as reasons for whyparticipants pursue ME. All three participants were excited about solving problems and buildingtangible artifacts in the engineering design projects. With a strong interest in design, Participant2 and Participant 3 named real-life application and design as motivators for pursuing anengineering career. These two participants also
HODAs used in the course. Lecture Assignments Due Systems Thinking Hands-on Activities Week Topics (Related to Archetypes) Archetypes Modeled by Students 1 CST. Mind Get textbook The Fifth Discipline Games led by instructor on mind grooves. Fieldbook and follow reading plan. grooving. 2 Systems zoo Description of an aviation or Games led by instructor on viewpoints and you aerospace system that has illustrates (CIRCLES IN THE AIR and MIND (Thinking in a reinforcing loop and draw the GROOVING). Previous years' projects Systems) system diagram. Class discussion 3
interests include computer science education, software testing, software engineering, and programming languages. He is the project lead for Web-CAT, the most widely used open-source automated grading system in the world. Web-CAT is known for al- lowing instructors to grade students based on how well they test their own code. In addition, his research group has produced a number of other open-source tools used in classrooms at many other institutions. Currently, he is researching innovative for giving feedback to students as they work on assignments to provide a more welcoming experience for students, recognizing the effort they put in and the accomplish- ments they make as they work on solutions, rather than simply
step towards the development of a repeatable and reliable experimental instrumentfor use in academic research and engineering classrooms.The research presented in this paper is a continuation of a NSF funded project to evaluate theimpacts of teaching functional modelling in an engineering design curriculum [4]. During theinitial phases of the project, students in engineering design courses were given a series ofexperimental instruments or homework assignments to assess their ability to recognize productfunctionality, interpret and understand customer needs, and to explain or decompose a complexsystem. Students in prior studies had either previously learned functional modeling [3] or weretaught functional modeling as an intervention between
will be noted in the Results and Discussion Section.Project ApproachThis section will cover five major areas to be considered when starting an undergraduateresearch program: • Sponsorship • Setting the goals & scope of the program (includes how goal attainment will be assessed) • Budgeting: program expenses & funding • Matching undergraduate research students with faculty • Logistics & implementationFor each topic above (with the exception of the last topic) there will be two sections: one with adescription of how to address the topic from a theoretical perspective, and one with the details ofhow the topic was implemented for the SURE program.SponsorshipPrior to starting any major project, sponsorship should be