cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Comparison Between the New Bodies of Knowledge for the Civil Engineering Professional and the Civil Engineering TechnologistBackgroundCivil engineering relies on a strong formal knowledge and skills base acquired largely throughhigher education and experience. Central to the identity of civil engineering as a profession isthe need for such expert knowledge and skills, independence of thought and judgment, and anethos to serve the public good grounded in a sound code of ethics [1], [2]. The American Societyof Civil Engineers (ASCE) formally endorsed the
globalization is the internationalization ofhigher education. Governments are investing in international education and students’ mobility [1]leading to the increase of the international students’ population in U.S. universities. Among manychallenges faced by those students (related to their different cultures, languages and social habits),the most demanding are the settlement in the new environment, the adaptation of their informationprocesses and communication skills [2]. Often non-native English speakers may not feel fit orcapable to interact with their domestic counterparts in class activities.However, the implications of the internationalization of the campuses populations goes far beyondthe issues of adaptation and socialization; issues related to
the total HECI and their respectivesub-tests than those who used computer simulations. This same pattern was seen with conceptarea and gender.Introduction and Background Heat and temperature concepts are found at all levels in the science curricula [9] and arewell-known for creating conceptual difficulties for learners [28]. Carlton [1] found manystudents described temperature as “…a measure of how hot or cold something feels” (p. 102).Others found students believed there is no difference between heat and temperature or that heatis a form of energy [6], [7], [25], [29]. While it could be hypothesized that the more courseworktaken, the greater the conceptual understanding, Jasen and Oberem [9] found that the number ofcourses/semesters
each year were surveyed. Participants were also asked for their CEE preferencessuch as which types of courses (technical, management, EH&S, legal, other) they would prefermore of and what was their preferred delivery format (face to face, hybrid, online). Thisinformation should be invaluable to those developing curricula and designing and deliveringcontinuing professional development for engineers.IntroductionThe need for CEE has been well-documented [1]. Continuing education is critical for workingengineers because of the breadth of processes and equipment they design and use and because ofrapid changes in technology [2]. For example, plant engineers take courses to learn how tooperate different types of equipment specific to their
” (or, in the context of differentialforms, “1-forms”2) for stacks, “contravariant vector densities” for sheaves, and “covariantvector capacities” for thumbtacks.It cannot be the objective of introductory courses to teach that full menagerie. Nevertheless,the concept of co- and contravariance and dual bases strikes the authors as essential enough tobe embedded into the course content of undergraduate engineering mathematics. Dual basesemerge in a variety of contexts, reaching from solid state physics over continuum mechanicsto multiresolutional analysis.In solid state physics, for instance, one takes advantage of the fact that the atoms are arrangedin crystalline lattices. When considering waves propagating through such a lattice (x
enrollments in VIP at the GeorgiaInstitute of Technology, and examines the number of semesters students (N = 869) participate in VIP bypolicy, by academic rank, and by matches-mismatches between student and instructor departments. In asecondary analysis, persistence rates are compared for a degree program before and after an incentivizingcredit-use policy was established (N = 45). Results show correlation between higher persistence and twopolicies: 1) allowing all VIP credits to count as in-major electives after a minimum number are earned;and 2) allowing students to fulfill a design sequence requirement through VIP, with no additionalplanning/requirements beyond the normal design sequence. The study employed chi-square analysis forall but one
(SAT/ACT) and high school GPA are often the primary measures ofperformance by which potential for success is evaluated. In other institutions, students areadmitted to an ME program after completing certain pre-requisite courses within theundergraduate curriculum. Pre-requisite courses may include a series of math and sciencecourses that provide a solid foundation for upper-level ME courses. In both cases, data-drivenadmission criteria may provide a more informed quantitative measure of student potential forsuccess.Others studies have examined relationships between various measures of performance andstudent success in college [1], [2], [3], [4]. A study conducted at the University of Michigan’sCollege of Engineering concluded that ACT math
to AMtechnologies [1], [2]. The Combat Direction Systems Activity (CDSA) at Dam Neck is atechnical lead for Print the Fleet, and has provided feasible and cost-effective solutions to issuesencountered by sailors, like adapter brackets for phone boxes and models to use in the flight deckcontrol board [2]. More recent efforts to support future Navy innovations and problem-solvingskills include 3D Print-a-thon events, and the establishment of the Marine Maker community,which includes Maker Labs, Maker Units, Mobile Training, Collaboration Portals, and courses[3] – [5].The Creating the Fleet Maker (CFM) project is an effort supported by the Navy and MarineCorps Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education, Outreach and
understandings ofinnovation processes and focus areas (technical, human, and enterprise)13. A follow-up studyidentified three overarching themes representing different ways students came to those diverseunderstandings, but also several contextual and individual characteristics that were unique toeach category of innovation approach and understanding14.This study presents a third approach that builds upon and complements these previous findings.We combine thematic analysis procedures15 with critical incident technique16,17 to (1) explorefine-grained experiences and aspects therein that contributed to new ways of understandinginnovation and (2) identify similar types of experiences they may be applicable across settings.By utilizing these qualitative
correlation with students’ intrinsicmotivation and curiosity.IntroductionPresented with the option to teach curious and intrinsically motivated students, most facultywould take it. While both of these states have dispositional elements that are unlikely to changemuch over the course of a semester in our classrooms, both motivation and curiosity are alsosituational – dependent on immediate environmental factors in the moment. While faculty wouldprefer to work with curious and motivated students, we may not be aware of the ways our courseenvironments cultivate or discourage either.The entrepreneurial mindset (EM), as defined by [1], rests on the three C’s of “Curiosity,Connection, and Value-Creation.” We use “curiosity” in this context as the habit of
development environment specificallydesigned for teaching and learning object-oriented programming. It consists of a simple interfacethat is interactive and designed for teaching. The majority of educational data mining researchfor introductory programming classes in Java utilizes the BlueJ system.Other free and commercial auto grading tools and platforms are emerging such as AutoGradr,HackerRank, Web-CAT, Vocareum, Taskgrader and more.4. CeMeCodeOur coding window, CeMeCode, is a lightweight web based coding environment, developed byour team. It integrates with Dartmouth’s single sign-on authentication systems and can beembedded into other tools such as our Learning Management System (see Figure 1) and our in-class response system.CeMeCode is
faculty involvement, laboratorycourse objectives, student assessments, and the industry support is covered in the paper.IntroductionIndustrial automation and control systems are critical assets to our nation as they interact with real-life aspects of our daily life. These systems often run 24/7 to control and monitor critical industrialand infrastructure processes. The demand to integrate them with the internet has opened them upfor cyber-attacks. The need for skilled expertise in defending these critical assets in the studentworld is high [1-3]. Supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) is commonly used inindustrial control systems (ICS) to remotely gather data in real time to automate and to controlnetworked equipment such as
. In the end, studentscreate a meaningful system that incorporates multiple course concepts and that demonstrates theidea of hierarchical design that is common in many areas of engineering. A large majority ofstudents (70-90%) report that the health monitor a) provided a socially relevant application ofdigital circuits, b) showed meaningful uses for individual course topics, and c) helped connectdifferent course topics.IntroductionDigital design courses are a common element of most electrical and computer engineering (ECE)programs and are recommended for many computer science programs [1, 2]. These courses covertopics related to combinational and sequential logic and how to design systems using theseelements. The example problems used in
familiar with to reduce thelearning curve to robot control success for the student. This paper will present the design andimplementation of this educational robotics platform as well as results of testing the initialprototype by discussing the creation of basic behaviors on the robot such as wall following andobstacle avoidance by using various languages and devices.Literature ReviewMany educational institutions use robotics and mechatronics for multidisciplinary and problembased learning [1]-[8]. These activities are reasonable considering robots are ideal for illustratingconnections between disciplines as well as for multidisciplinary teamwork, which is one of theABET criteria for engineering program graduates. This literature review will
bridge programs that addressed primarily the samemathematics content to support engineering calculus concepts and skills, we can see thepossibilities to adapt a program to different groups of students to achieve greater success. Thispaper describes the design, similarities, and differences of these programs along with quantitativedata results.IntroductionStruggles in mathematics knowledge and skills remain an issue for students in engineeringeverywhere [1]. One of the supports that many colleges have provided is a summer bridgeprogram. There are many variations on those programs [2] and reports of success [3], [4], [5], butrelatively little strong quantitative results [6]. Successful bridge programs generally utilize a lotof money, time, and
change. In the past, what we nowidentify as design thinking was often driven by tacit knowledge, intuition, and personalpreference of expert designers. The potential now is to enhance this approach through cross-disciplinary, evidence-based research.Due to the widespread use of design thinking, and the preponderance of practical and academicliterature, many conceptualizations exist. However, a recent study by Carlgren, Rauth, andElmquist7, sought to bridge these gaps by exploring the literature and conducting interviews withmembers of six leading organizations. The result was a framework, aligned with both theacademic literature and authentic practice, that presents design thinking activity across threelevels of abstraction: (1) mindsets that
in their own section(s) anddivide the classes up into student groups of 4-5 students. Our instructional team consistscompletely of teaching professionals (non-tenure track faculty) with a variety of backgroundsand industry experience. In order to make mentoring 10 to 20 teams tractable, all students teamscomplete the same design challenge. Creating a “good” design challenge is crucial, as the coursedoes more than simply teach the design process (see Figure 1). Teaming and leadership skills,project management, ethics, and technical communication are important outcomes for the course.All of these “Soft-skill” areas are made more palatable to our students if our design challenge isengaging and fun.With eleven different engineering disciplines
and solve problems without hardnumbers. Designing a curriculum that focuses on connectedness through narrative arcs will helpimprove retention and ultimately lead to higher achieving students and graduates. Theframework, challenges inherent in implementing it, and an example utilizing the delta functionwill be discussed.BackgroundFaculty in engineering departments have long lamented the miniscule amount of retentionstudents seem to have between courses. Students compartmentalize courses [1] and seldom applynew skills to other courses, therefore producing graduates who have segmented and disconnectedviews of Electrical Engineering. Spurlin and Ozturk found that only 30% of students retaingreater than 70% of fundamental information between
provided feedback about the designs tothe professor solely for the evaluation of the course.In addition to detailing the outcomes of the project, this paper discusses the merits anddrawbacks of short timeframe multi-disciplinary teaching collaborations along withrecommendations for further development.I. IntroductionA. Industrial design and usabilityIndustrial design is a user-centered discipline and has developed many tools in its rich historyto enhance usability by helping designers to make better design decisions [1]. This could bein the form of interviews, discussions, focus group studies, or co-design [2]. In one way oranother, the user is typically involved in the process. Specifically, for a project to besuccessful, one must fully
relatively constant over the last 30 years.While women represent about 50% of the workforce, women made up only about 27% of theSTEM professionals, in 2008. Additionally, women made up only about 12% of the workforcein engineering, in 2013 (McCauley-Bush). In a Leanin.org and McKinsey study, on average,women are promoted and hired at lower rates than men, so far fewer women become seniorleaders. At more senior levels, we see women shift from line to staff roles, so very few end upon the path to becoming CEO, and women remain underrepresented in the corporate pipeline.Women are 46% of the entry level workers, yet make up only 19% of the C-suite, at the highestlevels of executive leadership (Leanin.org, 2016). Women made up only 1% of the
of an RFID system are: an antenna, an RFIDreader, a transponder (RFID tag). RFID technology implemented in a business environment canbe used to track and record real-time in-transit visibility. The advantages of this technology overany other identification technology is that RFID can send and receive information remotelywithout human intervention, ability to read multiple tags, does not require line of sight, capableof maintaining higher amounts of digital data, and higher supply chain security [1]It is generally accepted by researchers and educators in horticultural science that horticulturalcorps include; tree, bush and perennial vine fruits, perennial bush and tree nuts, vegetables,aromatic and medicinal foliage, seeds and roots, cut
over awide range of institutions.The goal of all these efforts is to establish an effective and engaging concept-driven approach toteaching structural design which is backed up by convincing quantitative and qualitative evidence.IntroductionStructural engineering students are like any others, some are very naturally engaged and arrive inupper-level courses well prepared to take the next steps. However, based on experience andobservation, many are not well prepared and struggle to connect prerequisite material tosuccessfully form a meaningful understanding of structural design. But immediately upongraduation these new engineers are expected to be extremely well prepared to take on designtasks[1][2] which require skills beyond simple operation
feedback from eight researchers, with theinitial goal of attaining 10 responses. We identified ten statements that maintain at least 75%coding convergence across responses. Our results highlight key underlying assumptionsassociated with the TCC Framework and opportunities to improve the instrument to increaseclarity and reduce potential bias.Introduction and Literature ReviewOver the last two decades, there has been an increase in the number and extent ofengineering service-learning and community engagement programs. Associated research hasprimarily focused on student learning outcomes [1]. During this time frame, the widerservice-learning field has researched partnerships using methods that include analysis ofcommunity voice. Building from
of the program, with upheld focus on increasing interest, knowledge, andconfidence in STEAM, were as follows: 1. Increase young women students’ interest levels in STEAM fields 2. Provide an opportunity for young women to engage in coding and use coding as a platform for future STEAM inquiry in college and beyond 3. Increase student self-confidence and critical thinking skills in STEAM/coding 4. Incorporate coding into a topic in which students are interested in and experience daily such as music 5. Help students draw connections between their interests, passions, and STEAM disciplinesRationale for the Program and Literature ReviewWhen assessing the global proportion of STEM professional positions between
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress: Developing Communities of Practice to Serve Hispanic Students: Supporting Identity, Community, and Professional NetworksUnderrepresentation of women and students of color in science, technology, engineering, andmath is a national epidemic. The lack of socioeconomic, gender, and racial/ethnic diversity incomputer science is particularly pronounced—only 11% of recent computing graduates werewomen, while Hispanics comprised only 7% of all Bachelor degree earners [1]. Ethnic minoritieswho are also the first in their families to attend college are less likely to graduate than their peers,especially when they experience a lack
organization. As a former professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, her engineering and speech science research covered topics of accessibility. Her current research in Maryland looks at intersections of social science theories, STEM equity, and physics. She was a ”Cover Girl” for O’Reilly Media’s ”Women in Data” issue in 2015, a finalist for the 2015 Global Engineering Deans Council/Airbus Diversity Award, Sci Chic/Medium.com 35 ”Women STEM on Social Media Stars” (July 1, 2016), and 2016 winner of the Claire Felbinger Award for Diversity from ABET. She is a Tau Beta Pi ”Eminent Engineer,” and can be found online @Renetta Tull and https://renettatull.wordpress.com/.Ms. Shawnisha Hester, University of Maryland, Baltimore
student success and engagement are reviewed along with student perceptions of theprogram to extract key insights to inform future programs and best practices for maximumimpact.1. INTRODUCTIONDespite the growth of minority communities in America during the past few decades, trends inthe underrepresentation of minorities in science and engineering have persisted. In 2015,although the total U.S. population was comprised of 13% of African Americans, they represented5% of the science and engineering workforce. Similarly, although the percentage of Latinos inthe workforce increased significantly from 3% in 1970 to 15% in 2011, they represented 6% ofworkers in science and engineering1. Native American, Pacific Islander, Hawaiian, andSoutheast Asians
of MSE to broaden students’ academic pursuits and career aspirations.Through a series of interrelated program activities: recruitment, seminars, networking events,transfer guidance, and summer research, the Research Experiences and Exploration inMaterials Science (REEMS) program has changed both academic and career perspectives for asignificant number of students. REEMS has four objectives; each centered on providing new intellectual challenges andmotivational experiences for these students. 1. Identify and recruit talented and motivated students into the REEMS and REEMS REU program tracks 2. Immerse HCC students into a series of concurrent activities aligned with a fast-paced introduction to materials science and
, GlobalizationIntroductionIn today’s global marketplace, it is critical for engineering students to have an appreciation andunderstanding of different cultures. This is recognized by the National Academy of Engineeringwho state the 21st century engineer should have a sound understanding of globalization [1] andABET, who state in both the current and revised student outcomes that by the time of graduation,students should have an understanding of the impact of engineering solutions in a global,economic, environmental, and societal context [2]. Additionally, if our graduates are to becomeleaders in the profession, they need to understand and appreciate the diversity of cultures in theworld [3].Higher education has addressed intercultural development through multiple
crowded venues, and not necessitate the alteration of the user’s typical behavior. Example Student SolutionsFigure 1. First-Year Engineering Design Challenge Overview and Sample Student GeneratedSolutions. Once all 29 of the group presentations were collected, these video presentations wereuploaded to an ACJ system called CompareAssess for evaluation in three separate judgmentsessions—one session (N=104) for the students to serve as judges/assessors, one session (N=7)for the instructors to serve as judges/assessors, and one session (N=8) for the practicingengineers to serve as judges/assessors. The instructors for these students were all recruited forthis study (n = 6) and invitations were sent to three