Percentage To get advice in career planning 15.5% To polish up my résumé 12.3% How to network with professionals from industry 11.5% To gain knowledge of opportunities related to my career interest 10.7% To know more about the profession related to my major 10.4% To improve my interviewing skills 10.4% To learn about work expectations in industry 10.1% To get general guidance and tips
situations like the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) satellitemishap [36]. Table 2 lists several important modes of communication that engineers employ.Table 2: Modes of communication covered by the lecture. Mode Definition Design Reviews A way for teams to communicate their progress and concerns about a design Contain numerous photographs depicting an artifact to help the audience Inspections visualize an artifact's condition Presentations Verbally and graphically present designs/results to colleagues Public Meetings Communicate what plans or decisions are being made on a project Lab Reports Factual presentations of
lectures to the end of identifying andmodeling systems requirements in addition to developing security plans and implementing adatabase.Intercultural Competence InterventionInorder to help students understand the need and importance of intercultural competence, twoportable intercultural modules (PIM) focused on intercultural competencies were integrated intothe course. These PIMs were introduced in the 6th and 10th week of the semester, respectively.Both PIMs required students to view videos and complete activities and readings, followingwhich their knowledge was tested in the form of quizzes and written reflections. The two specificPIMs that were utilized in this course, and they are titled “Productive Conflict” and “TrickyCommunication: Intent
, preparation program, roboticsBackgroundTo foster industrial projects, collaboration among academia, industry partners, and students isessential. However, such collaborations present challenges, including disparate outcomeexpectations, limited support, and a common deficiency in contemporary technicalknowledge and hands-on competency among students. In response to these challenges, theengineering faculty at the University of Hong Kong established the Tam Wing FanInnovation Wing (also known as the HKU Inno Wing) [1]. The aim is to engageundergraduates in interdisciplinary experiential learning and tackle real-life technologicalchallenges. Inno Wing first establishes a mutually beneficial collaboration plan, includingclear objectives and commitments
college plans, facing significant challenges such as technologicalbarriers, financial hardships, and inadequate learning environments at home due to COVID-19[10], [11]. These issues were compounded by increased food and housing insecurities and mentalhealth struggles due to the stress of the pandemic [12]. Despite some support from institutions andorganizations, such as ScholarMatch, many students lacked sufficient resources and assistance,exacerbating educational inequalities, and underscoring the need for targeted support to ensuretheir academic success [13], [14]. A study by Lee et al found that students from low socioeconomicbackgrounds greatly valued the ability to study at their own pace, citing it as the primary benefitof online learning
needs. As such, program leaders must work to (1) provideeffective, accurate, and personalized support; and (2) provide information and recommendationsfor curricular developments and resource management. Both efforts rely on a strong foundationof data to inform decision-making. As such, this paper describes the quantitative portion of alarger mixed-methods project, from which the authors identified initial baseline conditions ofstudents’ academic performance in the focal course and revealed potential influential factors asrevealed in a logistic regression model predicting the likelihood of a student to receive a passinggrade. Future plans for educational data mining beyond the focal course are discussed. This worksuggests some opportunities for
nights and design challenges, were woven throughoutthe PMP’s programming to foster students’ social support and associated sense of belonging[19]. To encourage faculty relationships, the program hosted mixers that featured opportunitiesfor students to meet and engage with engineering faculty outside of the classroom [27]. The PMPoffered at least one event or seminar each week throughout the academic year, all of whichfeatured content designed to support students’ transition to college. While widely-recognizedpractical skills, such as time management, degree planning, financial literacy, and professionaldevelopment, were included in the programming schedule, the PMP also featured a strongemphasis on student thriving [28]. Specifically, a portion
. 10In the Engage phase, LbE markedly improved student engagement, stimulating early involvement withdesign thinking tasks. However, this initial enthusiasm requires careful moderation to prevent it fromeclipsing the core content goals and to mitigate the risk of activity fatigue, which can emerge fromrepetitive LbE use. A critical issue noted was the difficulty in connecting these engaging activities withthe design thinking framework comprehensively. During the Explore phase, LbE effectively facilitateddesign ideation, promoting hands-on exploration. Yet, the efficacy of this phase hinged on the structureddelivery of LbE sessions. Without meticulous planning, students struggled to express their experientiallearnings, highlighting a gap in
undergraduate researchers and not large ambiguousresearch aims that is more commonly done in graduate school training.STEM Research - Future ThinkingWe next sought to understand the impact of undergraduate research on ND and NT individualfuture career plans. Previous research has indicated that participation in undergraduate researchopportunities significantly increases the chance of individuals pursuing graduate school [23].With the desire to increase representation and diversity in graduate school programs, we soughtto understand if participation in undergraduate research impacts career plans differently from NDto NT individuals. Both ND and NT participants had similar low percentages for disagreeing andstrongly disagreeing that they received quality
Engineering Science at Trinity University in San Antonio, Texas.Alyndra Mary Plagge, Trinity University Alyndra Plagge is an undergraduate Psychology student at Trinity University. She is majoring in Psychology and minoring in Education and set to graduate in May 2025. After graduation she plans to pursue her master’s degree.Shea E. Lape ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Building an Identity in the MakerspaceAbstractThe purpose of this complete research paper is to analyze the impacts of an open makerspace onthe development of students’ engineering identities. This paper seeks to build upon currentbelonging analyses about makerspaces and shift the focus towards
students’ minds within 2-4 years. Therefore, hard, and soft skills need to be introduced at the K-12 stage. 2. Bringing real-world problems into the classroom via capstone problems and other hands- on exercises is not only the most effective way to spark interest in engineering, but also teaches soft skills like problem solving and collaboration. 3. With so much screen time on mobile phones, computers, and other electronic devices, engaging with students and incorporating soft skills into lesson plans is very difficult. 4. Internships and paid employment are great opportunities and motivators. However, a strong, skills-focused program can easily mold future engineers as well.Faculty
then develop original multi-day engineering design-based lessons for enactment in their classrooms over the following two semesters. Following theirNUWC visit, teachers participate in ongoing professional learning workshops (i.e., fall andspring) where they learn to use the 7E model of STEM instruction (Eisenkraft, 2003) to guidetheir lesson planning and implementation and reflect on their lesson development with theirpeers. Aligned with our framework, engineering design-based instruction is at the core of thismodel. Teachers self-identify their Naval STEM lesson topics and form teams of 3-5 teachers(based on these interests) to develop their lessons. “Naval STEM” tasks are those contextualizedusing Naval research that include NUWC-based
Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research(“Mercer on Mission Program Evaluation”, H2304083).Results & DiscussionThis study evaluates the summer 2023 cohort of the MOM program at Mercer University.Service-learning projects for the summer of 2023 ranged in scope from examining clean wateraccess, teaching English or STEM topics to communities, fitting prosthetics to aiding in buildingsmall business plans for beginning entrepreneurs, etc. In total, 224 students participated in theprogram during the summer of 2023. Of those that participated in the program, 65% were femaleand over half were from the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (44%) and the School ofEngineering (21%). Thirty-seven percent of participants were in their first or
present narratives drawn from traditionally feminine hobbies and interests,such as caring for animals, planning parties, and focusing on friendships, which assume aspecific set of life experiences and interests. Using stereotypes in marketing these toys may beharmful to young children, especially those who are already less likely to see themselves inrepresented in engineering, and are also developing their engineering identity, sense of self, andfuture career aspirations.This review concludes by describing areas of future research, namely, the need to understand therelationship between toy narrative, engineering identity, and children’s interest in and access toSTEM toys. Understanding the relationships between these constructs can help girls
planning for the worst case scenarios, andthe use of some analytical software such as NVivo. In addition to these hard skills, someparticipants also referred to soft skills they had gained during their training. Some examples theyprovided were related to working with others in a team and communication skills. For instance,one participant reported: I feel like I'm better at communicating things. Almost like I have a better vocabulary. I have better communication skills because of the institute. I'm trying to think of like specific things, having the social reality was really nice, being able to show that to my students, being able up to get them to kind of wrap their head around what that looks like and what that means
application of the collaborative inquiry process was in alignment with the liberatorypedagogy of the Highlander Research and Education Center (the popular education centerfounded by Horton) detailed in their “Methodologies en Color” brochure [22]: “Start withparticipant experiences, look for patterns between those experiences that can highlight sharedstruggle, add new information/theory, practice skills, strategize and plan, take action to changethe world, reflect, and return to the beginning of the spiral!” [p. 1].To help facilitate this process, we borrowed from the “Deepen” experience utilized in theRemaking Education event hosted by Olin College of Engineering and Emerson College whichSarah had attended in Boston in 2018 [45]. We shared stories
course. As part of the course, students completed a 90-minute online module introducing the principles of social justice and the realities of hostiledesign in urban planning and reflected on how they plan to combat systemic racism in their ownlives, workplaces, and communities. These written reflections were analyzed qualitatively,coding for common themes and noteworthy differences across genders. Gender Schema Theorywas applied as an analytical framework to interpret the findings.Results: The analysis revealed both similarities and differences in how male and femaleengineering students reflected on their roles in combating systemic racism. Both gendersemphasized the importance of education, self-reflection, and advocacy. However, male
hype myself up, but just like assure myself and like plan it and like Okay, “here's what I'm gonna say” like in my head.Megan’s recognition of the importance of fostering a relationship with her professors and difficultyapproaching them echoes the responses of the other participants, like Elena and Charlie, whodescribe feeling too shy to approach their professors during office hours. On the contrary, Abrahamemphasized his disposition to approach professors without hesitation, jokingly stating, “I just, like,ask. Yeah. Like, what are they going to do? We can fight if they don't like me. [Laughs].”Despite how the obstacle to approach faculty was described, participants leveraged theirlinguistic and aspirational capital to help them initiate
disciplines (engineering, biology, sociology,geography, planning, etc.) that study water resources, quality, treatment, and management.Anecdotally, we have seen that of a pool of approximately 100 water-focused students, only thesame small subset participates in every event while over 70% of those invited never volunteer.Therefore, there is a need to assess why we see this occurrence. This study aims to surveyundergraduate and graduate student water scholars’ motivations and barriers for participating involunteer broader impact outreach events outside of their degree requirements. This studycollected quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data were collected through Likert-scaletype responses to motivating and hindering factors. Qualitative
. Thisdesign problem was inspired by regional events such as the Gold King Mine Spill that occurredin 2015, where over 3 million gallons of AMD contaminated water was accidentally released intothe Animas River, impacting water supplies for rural and Indigenous communities. In NewMexico, there are 15,000 abandoned mines, many of which are co-located with vulnerablecommunities, and there is risk of current and future environmental contamination [11]. Studentswork in teams of 3-4 to research AMD, the Gold King Mine Spill, and novel treatment options.Next, they plan a lab experiment to raise the pH of 200 mL of AMD water from 3 (acidic) to 7(neutral), using their choice of 4 materials: limestone, calcium carbonate, activated carbon, andsoda ash. Students
to the online version. Furthermore, dividingparticipants into two in-person sections based on difficulty levels proved beneficial, as tailoredactivities enhance both interest and engagement. This approach ensures that the program meetsparticipants’ diverse needs and fosters a more inclusive learning environment.6 – Roadmap for Replication and Broader ImplicationsImplementing a program like GirlSET requires systematic planning, collaboration, and strategicuse of resources. Below, we provide a roadmap as a guidance for replicating a similar program:Secure Faculty and Institutional Support: Start by generating interest among facultymembers. We recommend initiating discussions during department meetings, where the majorityof faculty members are
into five groups: artificialintelligence (AI)-assisted technologies, advanced manufacturing, smart tools, digital simulationand visualization, and data acquisition and detection [1]. Examples of technologies included inthese groups are digital visual capture of drone images, use of augmented reality on jobsites,digital twins, blockchain, and the use of artificial intelligence systems for predictive analyticsand Building Information Modeling (BIM). These technologies often work in tandem and spanseveral phases of the planning, design, construction, and operations building life cycle [1].Because of the pervasive nature of emerging technology, the construction industry might alsoincur transformations of its business models and production
self-efficacy and senseof belonging for Engineering and Computer Science (ECS) students using the campusmakerspace as a central hub for cohort activities. The scholars received financial assistance eachsemester, intentional advising, mentoring and transfer support. Weekly study hall/tutoringsessions were made available to all ECS students and were strongly encouraged for the scholars.In addition, scholars were advised to complete the Introduction to Engineering course whichemphasizes research on engineering disciplines, team building activities, academic planning andinternship preparation.Reviewing the academic outcomes of these scholars compared to other ECS students from springof 2020 to spring of 2024 demonstrates the positive impact of the
thesediscussions. If students perceive their current advisor as less supportive or engaged, they may beless inclined to initiate discussions about changing labs [3], contributing to the lower percentageof students who report discussing their plans with their current advisors. Additionally, thecompetitive nature of academic environments, particularly in STEM fields, may furtherdiscourage open communication between students and advisors [11]. Students might fear thatdiscussing their desire to change labs could be interpreted as a lack of commitment ordissatisfaction with their current research group, leading them to avoid such conversations [33].While both women and men engage in a variety of lab change behaviors, women did not reportdiscussing with
integrated curriculum. The National Mission for Manuscripts (NAMAMI), setup in 2003, has listed 3.5 million manuscripts out of the estimated 40 million in India. Two-thirds of these are in Sanskrit and 95% are yet to be translated [10]. As a result, India is still atthe tip of its ancient knowledge iceberg as a large part of its ancient literature is in Sanskrit[9]. According to Kaul and Bharadwaj, ‘India needs a strategic plan with focusedinterventions to establish science and technology as a continuation of the legacy of the past,instead of an import from the West’, and they acknowledge that ‘the establishment of theIndian Traditional Knowledge Systems Division in the Ministry of Education at All IndiaCouncil for Technical Education in October
Paper ID #48406Assessing the impact of a Bridge program: A mixed methods longitudinalapproachDr. Andri Christodoulidou, University of Connecticut Dr. Andri Christodoulidou is a Visiting Assistant Professor at University of Connecticut’s College of Engineering. She holds an MPhil in Educational Research Methods and PhD in Education from the University of Cambridge, UK. Dr. Christodoulidou is the Director of Impact Assessment at the Vergnano Institute of Inclusion. In her position she designs and leads research plans to assess the impact of the Institute’s one-day and residential STEM educational programs. Also, she works with
(Equity Action Plan, 2022). Additionally, cultural misalignment between standardized engineering curricula and Indigenousvalues presents a significant barrier for Native students. Schools often lack Indigenous educators and rolemodels, and educators may not receive adequate training in culturally responsive pedagogy, limiting theirability to design inclusive curricula (Whitcomb et al., 2021; Ong et al., 2020). This misalignmentreinforces preconceptions of engineering as disconnected from community-centric values, furtherdeterring Indigenous students from pursuing an engineering career.Local vs national perspectives on inclusion in engineering education. The systemic barriers to inclusive education in engineering education in South
Paper ID #45807Examining the Effects of Gender on Capstone Team CohesionMadeline JoAnna Szoo, Northeastern University Madeline Szoo is a 5th year undergraduate Chemical Engineering and Biochemistry major at Northeastern University (graduation May 2025). She is the current President of the Northeastern University Chapter of Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Honor Society, and outside of engineering education research, she studies the development of predictive vascularized tumor models for preclinical assays. She plans to pursue her PhD in Biomedical Engineering starting Fall 2025.Dr. Courtney Pfluger, Northeastern
wasexecuted. The class size was 185 students and they were divided into teams of 5 students, with atotal of 37 teams. Studies have shown that teams with a size of 5-7 students are ideal for learningand higher sizes can be ineffective [5]. The team formation was randomized and was done at thestart of the semester. The same teams continued until the end of the semester. Each team alsosigned a group contract at the start of the semester about group expectations, rules andcontingency plans (Appendix).Grading PolicyWe introduced the following course policy for the team assignments. The course consists ofthree team-based assignments, multiple individual assessment quizzes and lab work. For eachteam-based assignment, the team is required to submit a
. CraigMarianno, assistant professor in nuclear engineering and Deputy Director Center for NuclearSecurity Science and Policy Initiative (NSSPI) at Texas A&M University; and special guest NASAAstronaut Captain Stephen Bowen who served on a US Navy nuclear submarine - the firstsubmarine officer selected for the astronaut program with three missions to the ISS. The post-campNPSI survey results from the high school students indicated a 95% increase in understanding ofnuclear science. In July 2021, the Nuclear Science Summer Institute was shortened to two daysonline and the Day of Science was held separately face to face.Our paper describes the methods used to transform what was initially planned as a face-to-facesummer camp on the PVAMU campus to an