Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Maija A. Benitz, Roger Williams University; Lillian Clark Jeznach, Roger Williams University; Selby M. Conrad, Roger Williams University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

‐year, multi‐institution study of women engineering student self‐ efficacy," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 27-38, 2009.[9] Q. A. Blanco, M. Carlota, A. Nasibog, B. Rodriguez, X. V. E. Salana and F. Gagani, "Probing on the Relationship between Students' Self-Confidence and Self-Efficacy while engaging in Online Learning amidst COVID-19," Journal La Edusci, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 16- 25, 2020.[10] J. Heo and S. Han, "Effects of motivation, academic stress and age in predicting self- directed learning readiness (SDLR): Focuses on online college students," Education and Information Technologies, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 61-71, 2018.[11] N. Ramo, E. Hald and A. Huang-Saad, "Synchronous vs. asynchronous vs

Conference Session

Asset Sourcing for Remaking Engineering Learning

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Cara Margherio, University of Washington; Anna Lee Swan, University of Washington; Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Eva Andrijcic, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Sriram Mohan, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Litzler, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education, Equity

underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology,engineering, and math,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 12, pp.6476-6483, 2020.[5] C. Baillie, A. Pawley, and D. Riley, Engineering and social justice: In the university andbeyond. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press, 2012.[6] D. Riley, “Engineering and social justice,” Synthesis Lectures on Engineers, Technology, andSociety, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-152, 2008.[7] K. Scheidgen, “Social contexts in team formation,” Historical Social Research/ HistorischeSozialforschung, vol. 44, no. 4 (170), pp. 42-74, 2019.[8] S. C. Hsu, K. W. Weng, Q. Cui, and W. Rand, “Understanding the complexity of projectteam member selection through agent-based modeling,” International

Conference Session

Best Paper, Best Diversity Paper

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jeroen Pruyn, Delft University of Technology; Edwin van Hassel, University of Antwerp

Tagged Divisions

Ocean and Marine

conference: Envisioning future media environments, 2011, pp. 9-15.[13] F. F.-H. Nah, Q. Zeng, V. R. Telaprolu, A. P. Ayyappa, and B. Eschenbrenner, "Gamification of education: a review of literature," in International conference on hci in business, 2014: Springer, pp. 401-409.[14] D. Dicheva, C. Dichev, G. Agre, and G. Angelova, "Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study," Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 18, no. 3, 2015.[15] A. M. Toda, P. H. Valle, and S. Isotani, "The dark side of gamification: An overview of negative effects of gamification in education," in Researcher Links Workshop: Higher Education for All, 2017: Springer, pp. 143-156.[16] J. Majuri, J. Koivisto, and J

Conference Session

MASS: Mastery, Assessment and Success of Students

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Amie Baisley, University of Florida; Keith D. Hjelmstad, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

the course. Figure 1. Sample of a dashboard from Dynamics at the end of a semester. The mastery objectives are shown in the lower right portion of the dashboard.You can tell a lot about the student by looking at the dashboard. This student was reluctant to participatein the activities called Q&C and MA Self-Assessment and missed a few classes near the end of thesemester. The student mastered 12 of 16 objectives (note that H.1 is considered close enough in ourscheme). It appears that the student had some trouble finishing the module assessments because objectiveJ is the very last step in all problems. The student was well above the class in mastering conservation ofmomentum, likely because they worked hard on the associated

Conference Session

Undergraduate Students' Development of Computational and Programming Skills

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Morgan M. Fong, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Seth Poulsen, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Geoffrey L. Herman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Interdiscip. J. Hum. ICT Environ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 47–61, May 2008, doi: 10.17011/ht/urn.200804151352.[5] J. Parkinson and Q. Cutts, “Investigating the Relationship Between Spatial Skills and Computer Science,” in Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, Espoo Finland, Aug. 2018, pp. 106–114. doi: 10.1145/3230977.3230990.[6] M. Fisher, A. Cox, and L. Zhao, “Using Sex Differences to Link Spatial Cognition and Program Comprehension,” in 2006 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, Sep. 2006, pp. 289–298. doi: 10.1109/ICSM.2006.72.[7] P. J. Guo, “Online python tutor: embeddable web-based program visualization for cs education,” in Proceeding of the 44th ACM

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Tracy L. Yother, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Geanie Umberger, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Mary E. Johnson PhD, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

May 20, 2021].[16] L. Dickerson, “Unmanned vehicles forecast – Airborne systems”, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.forecastinternational.com/fistore/prod.cfm?FISSYS_RECNO=99&title=Unm anned-Vehicles-Forecast---Airborne-Systems. [Accessed May 20, 2021].[17] Deloitte, “2021 aerospace and defense industry outlook”, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEw iL85PI59jwAhVUG80KHRKDBg4QFjACegQIAxAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww2.del oitte.com%2Fcontent%2Fdam%2FDeloitte%2Fus%2FDocuments%2Fenergy- resources%2Fus-eri-aerospace-defense-industry- outlook.pdf&usg=AOvVaw16JFR3s11cTRIWHJBpDyGp. [Accessed May 20, 2021].[18] M. O'Hair

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Gretchen A. Dietz, University of Florida; Kayla Julianna Kummerlen, The University of Florida; Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. Commun. Q., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 350–380, Feb. 2002, doi: 10.1177/0893318902153002.[36] K. L. Meyers, M. W. Ohland, A. L. Pawley, S. E. Silliman, and K. A. Smith, “Factors relating to engineering identity,” Glob. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 14, no. 1, p. 13, 2012.[37] H. Stonyer, “Making engineering students-making women: The discursive context of engineering education,” TEMPUS Publ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1–8, 2002.[38] K. L. Tonso, “Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world,” Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 273–307, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s11422-005-9009-2.[39] J. P. Martin and C. Garza, “Centering the Marginalized student’s voice through autoethnography: Implications for

Conference Session

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 6

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meaghan Pearson, University of Michigan; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jacqueline Handley, University of Michigan; Joi-Lynn Mondisa, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

, technology, engineering and mathematics,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11365-020-00642-5.[38] F. Beal, Double Jeopardy: To Be Black and Female. New York, New American Library: The Black woman: An anthology, 1970.[39] S. M. Malcolm, P. Q. Hall, and J. W. Brown, “The Price of Being a Minority Woman in Science,” presented at the American Association, 1976.[40] M. Knight, “Race-ing, Classing and Gendering Racialized Women’s Participation in Entrepreneurship,” Gend. Work Organ., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 310–327, 2016, doi: 10.1111/gwao.12060.[41] E. O. McGee and L. Bentley, “The troubled success of Black women in STEM,” Cogn. Instr., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 265–289, 2017.[42] L. J

Conference Session

Assessment in Multidisciplinary Learning Environment

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ryan Striker P.E., North Dakota State University; Mary Pearson, North Dakota State University; Ellen M. Swartz, North Dakota State University; Enrique Alvarez Vazquez, North Dakota State University; Lauren Singelmann, North Dakota State University; Stanley Shie Ng, Biola University

Tagged Divisions

Multidisciplinary Engineering

complete their tasks slowly. Tokens(then and now) are not allowed to exit PR until three (or more) reviews have been completed.Under the assignment model, five reviewers were assigned. If three of a token’s assignedreviewers fail to complete their review, the token is stuck. Several students expressed frustrationwith tokens in this state.Keep It FunA personal PR statistics dashboard was added. This feature seeks to enhance intrinsic motivationfor PRs by applying gamification. Instructors can give a star to a student’s PR. Students earn athumbs-up when a token is revised in response to their PR comment. Students also see the totalnumber of PRs they have completed and a Q (quality) statistic which is computed based on thewords used in their review

Conference Session

Motivation, Goal Orientation, Identity, and Career Aspirations

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ellen Zerbe, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University; Kyeonghun Jwa, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Livingstone, D. Ramirez, E. B. Barko, and A. L. Johnson, “Racial Identity and Body Image Among Black Female College Students Attending Predominately White Colleges,” Sex Roles, vol. 63, no. 9–10, pp. 697–711, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11199-010-9862-7.[41] S. Mir, “Not Too ‘College-Like,’ Not Too Normal: American Muslim Undergraduate Women’s Gendered Discourses,” Anthropol. Educ. Q., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 237–256, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01043.x.[42] L. D. Patton and S. L. Simmons, “Exploring Complexities of Multiple Identities of Lesbians in a Black College Environment,” Negro Educ. Rev., vol. 59, pp. 197–215, 2008.[43] V. Purdie-Vaughns and R. P. Eibach, “Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive

Conference Session

Bringing a Different Perspective

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eli Broemer, Michigan State University; Geoffrey Recktenwald, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

the end of the semester.What is Chegg and how do students use it to cheat on exams?To begin, the authors must again emphasize that Chegg is not unique. Many companies providesimilar services for students. The services detailed here are not the only services Chegg offers tostudents, they are the ones that were used to cheat on exams in this class.Students sign up for a Chegg account for a monthly fee. This subscription gives them access tomany services, but the two used for cheating are “homework solutions” and “expert Q&A”.The homework solutions section allows students to search Chegg’s vast database of solvedhomework problems. Students can search for questions by key words or typing phrases from theproblem into Chegg’s search engine. For

Conference Session

Academic Success and Retention

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nong Ye, Arizona State University; Ting Yan Fok, Arizona State University; James Collofello, Arizona State University; Tami Coronella, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Applied, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 229- 245, 2011.[17] E. C. Kokkelenberg and E. Sinha, “Who succeeds in STEM studies? An analysis of Binghamton University undergraduate students,” Economics of Education Review, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 935-946, 2010.[18] Q. Li, H. Swaminathan, and J. Tang, “Development of a classification system for engineering student characteristics affecting college enrollment and retention,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 361-376, 2009.[19] K. Klopfenstein and M. K. Thomas, “The link between advanced placement experience and early college success,” Southern Economic Journal, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 873-891, 2009.[20] P. Kauffmann, C. Hall, G. Dixon, and J. Garner, “Predicting

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Zachary Riggins Del Rosario, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Riya Aggarwal, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Caitlin Anna Coffey, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Arwen Sadler, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Stephanos Matsumoto, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Alison Wood , Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Paul Ruvolo, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; C. Jason Woodard, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

as the unit tests for aspecific function passing without error). To provide the flexibility to allow each student todemonstrate their learning in the way best suited to them, the grading category (quizzes,assignments, Projects 1 and 2, and Project 3) in which the student scored highest was double-weighted in the final grade (i.e., 40% of the final grade instead of 20%).5. Space. Class meetings and office hours were held exclusively on Zoom. Information regardingthe class was distributed among several platforms: GitHub for the content and rubrics forassignments, worksheets, and projects; Canvas for grades, announcements, anddiscussions/Q&A; and a course website for readings and project descriptions. While meeting onZoom worked overall

Conference Session

Design Pedagogy

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Leandra Ramos, United States Military Academy; Heather J. Yoshii, United States Military Academy; Kyle Beyer, United States Military Academy; Morgan R. Corliss, United States Military Academy; Brad C. McCoy, United States Military Academy; Aaron T. Hill Jr., United States Military Academy; Kevin P. Arnett P.E., United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Funke. Complex Problem Solving: The European Perspective. Psychology Press, 2014, Books.google.com, books.google.com/books?id=O- ZHAwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_atb#v=onepage&q&f=false.[9] Gehringer, Edward F. “Peer Grading Over the Web: Enhancing Education in Design Courses.” North Carolina State University, 1998, pp 1-11.[10] McAlpine, Iain, and Carl Reidsema. "The role of student peer review and assessment in an introductory project-based engineering design course." ConnectEd, International Conference of Design Education. 2007.[11] CATME Smarter Teamwork, Purdue University, 2021, https://info.catme.org/.[12] Iris Cushing, M.F.A. Assistance given to the authors, review of electronic work through the

Conference Session

Research Methods and Studies on Engineering Education Research

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Johanna Naukkarinen, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology; Marja Talikka, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

engineering: research and practice of an interest-based engineering challengesframework", European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 44, no. 1-2, pp. 103-122.Krüger, M. & Diercks-O'Brien, G. 2013, Cooperative and self-directed learning with thelearning scenario VideoLearn: Engineering education using lecture recordings.Liu, W., Tan, R., Peng, Q., Li, H., Li, Z. & Yang, B. 2020, "Impact of TRIZ learning onperformance in biologically inspired design", International Journal of EngineeringEducation, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 974-987.Lönngren, J., Adawi, T. & Svanström, M. 2019, "Scaffolding strategies in a rubric-basedintervention to promote engineering students’ ability to address wicked problems", EuropeanJournal of Engineering Education

Conference Session

Remote Physical Laboratories: Experimentation and Laboratory-oriented Studies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

John Whitefoot, University of Pittsburgh; Jeffrey S. Vipperman, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies

see a measurabledifference in reverberation time between the two states of the room, particularly in the higher-frequency octave bands.The required materials for the lab included: 1) a smart phone with a sound recording app (e.g.,Hi-Q MP3 Voice Recorder), 2) a reverberant room in a home (bathroom or garage), 3) soundabsorbing materials that can be added and removed from room (towels, carpets, curtains,blankets, etc.), and 4) MATLAB with the Signal Processing Toolbox for filtering and dataanalysis, 5) an impulsive sound source, such as a balloon pop or hand clap.The lab handout included basic acoustic theory, including for room acoustics, an explanation ofreverberation time, and how to compute instantaneous sound pressure level, 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆

Conference Session

Undergraduate Students' Professional Skills and Reflection

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jacob Allen Cress P.E., University of Dayton; Patrick W. Thomas, University of Dayton

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

asked questions to thateffect, the audience and client were able to probe deeper into the assumptions and analysismethodology for the second team.Mentioned previously, during the proposal presentations, students in the class played the role ofthe client’s engineering team. They were tasked with assessing the proposal pitch from atechnical perspective and reporting to the client on how effective the product was described,assessing the technical merits of the proposed heat transfer analysis, and rating the ability of theteam to complete their stated deliverables. Completing this assessment necessitated the reviewersto ask questions and probe deeper into the presented proposal. An interesting phenomenonemerged between the in class Q&A and the

Conference Session

Tech Tools and Tips

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sotiria Koloutsou-Vakakis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Eleftheria Kontou, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Christopher W. Tessum, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Lei Zhao, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Hadi Meidani, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

outcomes that correspond to the undergraduate pathway (i.e., receiving andresponding).     Table 2. SEE course: Bloom’s taxonomy cognitive student outcomes (Q: video quiz, WS: in-class worksheet, HW: weekly homework). Student Assessment type Assessment type Demonstrated ability (Comprehension) outcomes (Knowledge) Identify basic concepts and methods in solving civil and environmental Knowledge engineering problems from a systems

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Heydi L. Dominguez, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Vibhavari Vempala, University of Michigan; Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University; Jacob Frederick Fuher, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Experience, Proceedings of the ASEE 126th Annual Conference and Exposition,” 2019.[8] S. Luryi et al., “Entrepreneurship in engineering education,” in 2007 37th annual frontiers in education conference-global engineering: knowledge without borders, opportunities without passports, 2007, pp. T2E-10.[9] N. Duval-Couetil, T. Reed-Rhoads, and S. Haghighi, “Engineering students and entrepreneurship education: Involvement, attitudes and outcomes,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 28, no. 2, p. 425, 2012.[10] Q. Jin et al., “Entrepreneurial career choice and characteristics of engineering and business students,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 598–613, 2016.[11] M. W. Ohland, S. A. Frillman, G. Zhang, C. E

Collection

ASEE 2021 Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference

Authors

Celena Miller, University of Texas Austin - Center for Space Research ; Margaret Baguio, University of Texas at Austin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

over the 11 subject matter expert presentations. Students were guided in career and degreediscovery as well as their exploration of: • How is COVID affecting major industries and the media? • How do we separate space fact from fiction? • What are the directives for NASA’s Human Exploration Missions? • How are meteorite samples curated and classified? • What is NASA’s Moon to Mars mission? • How do meteors provide clues to Earth’s past? • What are basic star formations and how are they formed?The internship concluded with student research teams presenting their projects to an audience of UT scientists andengineers, as well as other interns and their guests via a live Zoom webinar and Q&A. Over the

Collection

ASEE 2021 Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference

Authors

Andres Enriquez Fernandez; Louis J Everett P.E., University of Texas at El Paso; Miguel Cedeno, The University of Texas at El Paso

Collection

2011 North Midwest Section

Authors

P. B. Ravikumar

percent 1Extroverts 18 51 percent Thinking 18 51 percentIntroverts 17 49 percent Feeling 17 49 percentSensing 17 49 percent Judging 6 17 percentIntuitive 18 51 percent Perceiving 29 83 percentTask 4: Analyze and Interpret the DataRe e ac ed f de e e Q e I f eQ e a e e ad e -line KTS-IItest result of personality type of each student in the

Conference Session

Bridging Content and Context in the Classroom

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego; Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego; Mark A. Chapman, University of San Diego; Bryce Fledderman, University of San Diego

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education, Equity

gender in engineering," Social studies of science, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 759-792, 2000.[18] W. Faulkner, "Nuts and Bolts and People' Gender-Troubled Engineering Identities," Social studies of science, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 331-356, 2007.[19] M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd. ed ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1990.[20] "Essential Project Design Elements Checklist." https://cpb-us- w2.wpmucdn.com/wp.wpi.edu/dist/e/220/files/2017/06/Essential-Project-Design- Elements-Checklist.pdf (accessed July 2, 2020).[21] L. A. Gelles, S. M. Lord, G. D. Hoople, D. A. Chen, and J. A. Mejia, "Compassionate Flexibility and Self-Discipline: Student Adaptation to Emergency Remote

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Jennifer Shaffer Brown, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Student

. 144–152, 2013.[10] I. Drewelow, “Exploring graduate teaching assistants’ perspectives on their roles in a foreign language hybrid course,” System, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1006–1022, 2013.[11] J. Paulsen and A. C. McCormick, “Reassessing Disparities in Online Learner Student Engagement in Higher Education,” Educ. Res., vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2020.[12] K. Sobel, S. Avery, and I. J. Ferrer-Vinent, “Teaching Them to Teach: Programmatic Evaluation of Graduate Assistants’ Teaching Performance,” Public Serv. Q., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189–213, 2016.[13] B. C. O. Neal, M. Wright, T. Perorazio, and J. Purkiss, “The Impact of Teaching on Student Retention in the Sciences,” 2002.[14] B. Melton and Y. Bodur, “Effects of a

Conference Session

Computers in Education 4 - Online and Distributed Learning 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sunay Palsole, Texas A&M University; Jeff Chernosky, Texas A&M University; Randy McDonald, Texas A&M University Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

, M.H. Cho, C.L. Tsai, and R. Marra, “Unpacking online learning experiences:Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction,” Internet and Higher Education, vol. 19,no. 2013, pp. 10-17, 2013, doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001[10] Q. Kreth, M.E. Spirou, S. Budenstein, and J. Melkers, “How prior experience and self-efficacy shape graduate student perceptions of an online learning environment in computing,”Computer Science Education, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 357-381, 2019.[11] B.H. Chaney, J.M. Eddy, S.M. Dorman, L. Glessner, B. L. Green, and R. Lara-Alecio,“Development of an instrument to assess student opinions of the quality of distance educationcourses. American Journal of Distance Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 145–164, 2007,doi.org/10.1080

Conference Session

Computers in Education 8 - Video Technology

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Dule Shu, Carnegie Mellon University; Christopher Doss, RAND Corporation; Jared Mondschein, RAND Corporation; Denise Kopecky, Challenger Center; Valerie A. Fitton-Kane, Challenger Center; Lance Bush, Challenger Center; Conrad Tucker, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

, and T. Aila, “Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04958, 2019.[19] Z. Wu, G. Lin, Q. Tao, and J. Cai, “M2e-try on net: Fashion from model to everyone,” in Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2019, pp. 293–301.[20] A. Siarohin, S. Lathuilière, S. Tulyakov, E. Ricci, and N. Sebe, “First order motion model for image animation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.00196, 2020.[21] D. A. Scheufele and N. M. Krause, “Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116, no. 16, pp. 7662–7669, 2019.[22] R. A. Nash, “Changing beliefs about past public events with believable and unbelievable doctored

Conference Session

Faculty Development Lighting Talk Session 1: COVID-19 Focus

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lance Leon Allen White, Texas A&M University; Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University; Samantha Ray, Texas A&M University; Kelly Brumbelow, Texas A&M University; Sherecce Fields, Texas A&M University; Luciana R. Barroso, Texas A&M University; Karan Watson P.E., Texas A&M University; Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

be ideal for exploring the various effects on education at TAMU, such as Q-drops during theSpring 2020 semester, retention and matriculation data of students, and choices of remote coursesover face-to-face courses during the subsequent semesters of the pandemic.ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has taken a toll on everyone in the United States, many have lost friendsand family to the virus, and even today, we cannot see an end to the pandemic-centric world welive in. Despite the circumstances dealt with, it seems that our faculty at TAMU are carrying onas best they can. Even as we write this an author’s student lost a family member to COVID thisweekend. Faculty continue to put their best effort in to adapt to this remote online world in

Conference Session

Computers in Education 10 - Technology 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Christian E. Lopez, Lafayette College; Omar Ashour, Pennsylvania State University; James Devin Cunningham, Carnegie Mellon University; Conrad Tucker, Carnegie Mellon University

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman, and L. J. Shuman, “Characteristics of freshman engineering students: Models for determining student attrition in engineering,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 139–149, 1997.[6] S. G. Brainard and L. Carlin, “A Six-Year Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering and Science,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 369–375, 1998.[7] S. S. Huang, G., Taddese, N., Walter, E., & Peng, “Entry and Persistence of Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education,” Educ. Stat. Q., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 59–60, 2000.[8] E. C. Kokkelenberg and E. Sinha, “Who succeeds in STEM studies? An analysis of Binghamton University undergraduate students,” Econ. Educ. Rev., vol

Conference Session

Pre-college Engineering Education Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Madhurima Das, NuVu Studio

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

. Available at ​https://www.sae.org/learn/education[11] TeachEngineering. STEM Curriculum for K-12. Available at https://www.teachengineering. org/[12] ​T. R. Kelley and E. Sung. Examining elementary school students’ transfer of learning through engineering design using think-aloud protocol analysis. ​Journal of Technology Education. ​28(2): 83-108, 2017.[13] ​M. Alemdar, J. D. Gale, Je. Lingle, S. Newton, R. Moore, J. H. Rosen, and M. Usselman. Students' Perceptions of a Middle School STEM Innovation and Design Course. ​American Society for Engineering Education,​ 2017.[14] ​J. Tafoya, Q. Nguyen, C. Skokan, and B. Moskal. K-12 Outreach in an Engineering Intensive University. ​American Society for Engineering Education

Conference Session

Emphasizing Communication and the Humanities in Environmental Engineering

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Caleb James McCollum, United States Military Academy; Andrew Ross Pfluger, United States Military Academy; Michael A. Butkus, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

. www.abet.org. Accessed 20 January 2020.Bercich, R., Summers, S. Cornwell, P., Mayhew, J. 2018. Technical Communication Across the MECurriculum at Rose-Hulman. American Society for Engineering Education 2018 Annual ConferenceProceedings, Salt Lake City, Utah, Paper #22687.Brinkman, G.W., van der Geest, T.M., 2003. Assessment of communication competencies in engineeringdesign projects. Technol. Commun. Q. 12 (1), 67–81.Conrad, S. 2017. A comparison of practitioner and student writing in civil engineering. J. Eng. Ed., 106(2), 191–217.Craig, J., Lerner, N., Poe, M. 2008. Innovation across the curriculum: Three case studies in teachingscience and engineering communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol. 51, no.3, pp. 280–301.Donnell