collectdata about the selected EM programs. The following questions were considered for this report:· Who is the target audience and what criteria should they meet? Some programs allowed admission to students just finishing a Bachelor’s Degree in Engineering while others required a minimum number of years of industry experience. Also, some programs required a degree in engineering while others were more flexible allowing persons with a degree in math or hard science acceptance into an MSEM program.· How many hours are typical for this type of program? The number of hours required varied slightly and sometimes depended on if a thesis was being incorporated into a person’s degree.· Should a thesis or capstone project be required
AssessmentThe CSET program utilizes an assessment process that relies on multiple measures andmultiple evaluators. Data used to demonstrate achievement include but are not limited to: • course grades (each term) • representative samples of student work (periodically) • co-op surveys of students and employers (each semester, an increasing number of students) • placement data (employment and graduate school) (annually) • class surveys (each semester) • senior capstone projects and reports • graduate exit survey (each semester) • feedback from alumni (annually)The assessment process follows the basic procedures as follows: • Course Assessment Data • Responsible Personnel: Program
project allowed students to work on topics of personalinterest, with many choosing their senior design capstone projects, while others focused onindependent research. Students were encouraged to propose real-world physical problems ofinterest, and then develop both two-dimensional models and simplified three-dimensionalrepresentations, focusing on either structural or thermal aspects.Questions 14 to 21 explore the impact of teamwork on learning. Approximately 73% of studentsdisagreed or strongly disagreed with the idea of removing the development of teamwork skillsthrough team projects from the course. Additionally, only about 24.3% of students agreed that theyshould be allowed to work individually on all projects, rather than just one. These
technology in a professional setting.Within engineering education, wikis have been used in several ways at several different levels.One example is the creation of ePortfolios in a freshman engineering design course8. Thestudents were given writing assignments in which they reflected on the human implications ofdesign. Another example can be found in a team-based capstone design project in which thewiki was used to document social knowledge and assess group performance9. A third example isa student-written online textbook5. In a senior level chemical engineering process controlscourse, an open-source text was written, edited, and reviewed by the students to allow them tolearn the course content though teaching it.This paper describes the use of a
pursued six entrepreneurial projects in the four years since theentrepreneurial SEC II project was implemented.VI: Summary and ConclusionMany engineering programs seek to introduce design skills into the lower levels of thecurriculum, rather than confining design to the capstone design course. This paper describeshow entrepreneurship was integrated into a sophomore design sequence. The “Create your ownentrepreneurial design project” is a semester-long design experience in which teams of 4-5students pursue entrepreneurial ideas. The goal of the project is to start with an idea and developit to the point where the team can make a compelling case that the idea has enough merit todeserve funding from either an internal or external source. The primary
Paper ID #30487WIP: A One-Page Ethical Checklist for EngineersDr. Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Elizabeth A. DeBartolo, PhD is the Director of the Multidisciplinary Senior Design Program at the Rochester Institute of Technology, where students from Biomedical, Computer, Electrical, Industrial, and Mechanical Engineering work together on multidisciplinary teams to complete their 2-semester design and build capstone projects. She received her graduate degree in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University and has worked at RIT since 2000.Prof. Wade L. Robison, Rochester Institute of
that provided the projects, and one of his engineers who worked on the project.During the students’ final team design project presentations, three (3) engineering faculty, three(3) industry professionals, and six (6) students provided feedback on the level of the team’s oralcommunication skills compared to those of other young professionals. They were also asked torate the team’s oral communication via the Association of American Colleges and UniversitiesOral Communication VALUE Rubric. Students were also asked to rate their teammates via theTeamwork VALUE Rubric (Association of American Colleges and Universities 2010). Theratings were made on a scale of 1 to 4, with 4 representing greatest communication or teamworkskill (i.e. capstone
Excel environment, but also included a briefintroduction to Finite Element Analysis (FEA) using CosmosWorks. A detailed description ofthese courses and some preliminary assessment results from the 2005 time frame were given byRyan and Ho in 20061.After this new course sequence was offered for several years, and feedback was collected via theDepartment’s assessment process, it was felt that a more comprehensive approach towardrevision of the design sequence was required. In particular, it was noted that our students’readiness for senior design was still very non-uniform, which left some students unable tocontribute effectively to their capstone projects. A faculty committee was formed which included
student-centred learning and project-based learning. He hopes to contribute to the transformation of engineering education so that students are well- equipped to face the challenges of the future in engineering, and can build core engineering competencies in a more self-motivated and confident manner in a diverse and inclusive learning environment. Dr Yu’s academic research interests and expertise focus on using an integrated design approach that in- volves the synthesis of material selection, finite element methods, rapid prototyping/additive manufactur- ing, and machine learning to improve the mechanical properties of hybrids materials (fibre composites, metal/metal hybrids, and cellular lattices) and biomedical
higher enrollments in subsequent years. Secondly, itwould offer our students a chance to work on a real-world engineering design problem thatwould make a lasting impact on the community. Along with the transport course, the potentialwould exist for students to complete their capstone design project by continuing their work onthe evaporator. For the syrup-making program, the main benefit would be an evaporator withimproved efficiency and/or safety, making the syrup production process easier and more flexible.They would also gain some insight into how the engineering field views the world, andpotentially increase their technical and scientific literacy. This could help to improve otheraspects of production not specifically addressed by the student
withgroup activities. They are assigned to teams of two, three, four or more students depending onthe nature of the project/activity at hand.The first discussions of group dynamics, of team development, and the interdependence of teammembers are held in the first engineering course in the first semester. These concepts are furtherdeveloped and repeatedly exercised and further polished in future classes [1]. As shown intable (1), students are involved in team work activities in twelve different courses prior to theirsenior year.Finally, in their two-semester "senior design project" (the capstone engineering design course),students review, reinforce, and synergize all the previously learned concepts of their education(including team work concepts
teams was not a waste.Seniors, however, agreed more strongly with the statements “I have a realistic understandingof the daily responsibilities,” “I feel well prepared for my future career,” and “I have a closeworking relationship with faculty.” These responses may have been due to the student’sinvolvement in capstone design projects, which typically provide the student greaterinteraction with individual faculty and more control of their project. Page 14.1055.17Figure 9. Effect of student status on their responses to the 2008 survey.As with the faculty, female students responded more positively (at the 5% level) to service-related work than male
intended to foster discussion within the software engineeringcommunity about developing and maintaining shared curriculum resources on an on-going basis.The paper approaches this topic by summarizing the experience of the SWENET project increating shared curriculum materials for software engineering. SWENET, The NetworkCommunity for Software Engineering Education, was an NSF funded project to developcurriculum modules for faculty members wanting to incorporate software engineering conceptsin new or existing courses. The paper discusses the project results, focusing on lessons learned.Although the benefit of sharing course materials is obvious, the practice is not particularly widespread in higher education. Reasons for this low level of sharing
the structuralconcepts to their future design projects, as well as build on their knowledge of structures.Architecture : Shading indicates level of Architectural Engineering Faculty contact/emphasis Page 8.690.1“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”Oklahoma State University’s School of Architecture offers five year professional degrees inArchitecture and Architectural Engineering. The first two years of the five year curriculumconsist of the pre-professional program, in which architecture and architectural
of environmentally-related design projects that we have used inour capstone senior design courses. Finally, we have indicated how we plan to assess the impactof the new course materials, new courses and design projects.Bibliography1. Allen, D. T.; Sinclair Rosselot, K., Pollution Prevention for Chemical Processes, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997.2. Lynch, H., A Chemical Engineer's Guide to Environmental Law and Regulation, available from the National Pollution Prevention Center for Higher Education (nppc@umich.edu).3. Draths, K. M.; Frost, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 1657.4. Draths, K. M.; Frost, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 399.5. Tanko, J. M.; Blackert, J. F. Science 1994, 263, 203.6. Morgenstern, D. A
advisory board,and the Society of Manufacturing Engineers. It is the intent of this article to discuss some of thechanges made to the course, and how it was transformed into a capstone course focused onflexible manufacturing. PRE BENCH-TOPThe lecture and laboratory courses were not concurrent. The former was offered in the springsemester of the sophomore year. The latter was offered during a summer session at thecompletion of the freshman spring semester. This created a problem for many students becausethe laboratory assignments were completed almost a full academic year apart. For example,many topics such as speeds and feeds for machining operations, jigs, fixtures, and die designwould not get proper
descriptions are supplied for eachcriterion/level combination. Achievement Levels Capstone Milestone Milestone Benchmark Criterion 1 Performance description Criteria Criterion 2 Performance description ... Performance description Criterion 5 Performance descriptionFigure 1: VALUE Rubric
NexOne, Inc., in the Center for Aircraft Structural Life Extension (CAStLE) located at the USAF Academy in Colorado Springs. He taught in the AF Academy Department of Engineering Mechanics for four years, where he earned his Assistant Professorship and served as the Director of the Applied Mechanics Laboratory. He currently works as an advisor for a senior capstone research team and mentor to multiple mechanical instrumentation project teams. He earned a B.S. in mechanical engineering with minor in engineering mechanics from the Pennsylvania State University and an M.S. in mechanical engineering from MIT. He spent 22 years on active duty in the U.S. Air Force and is a Flight Test Engineer graduate of the USAF Test
processingcourses in the curriculum that rely on it for foundational material. This includes advanced CADclasses MFGE 462 and 466 (elective), CAM classes MFGE 332 and 434, classes in design (333,463) and process planning (381) and as general support for the capstone senior project.Figure 2 presents an overview of the instructional components in the class. This includes use ofthe StudyCAD online training material developed by NewMarketLab [10] to support a flippedclassroom model where students are empowered to do self-paced learning. This enables classtime to be more focused on individual and team problem solving using the CAD skills studentslearn on their own. The class is also heavily infused with design content that is applied through aterm project. As
ifthey were hiring students for the summer and if not, provided a research project that could be ofinterest to the student. The LSAMP program provided potential support network contacts anddemonstrated the organization and flow of work within a modern research laboratory. Thesophomore seminar concentrated on communication skills and career selection.During the summer before their junior year, students typically conducted their own researchproject in a Multidisciplinary Engineering Research Fellowship (MERF). The MERF experiencewas crafted to resemble the capstone experience included in most STEM majors and provide aforeshadowing of the same project management and people skills necessary to be successful inindustry [18] [19]. The junior seminar
removing low and cross loading items [1], we identified six latentdimensions covered by 18 items: individual consequentiality, shared consequentiality, learningas consequentiality, constrainedness, shared tentativeness / ill-structuredness, and individualtentativeness / ill-structuredness.Introduction and research purposeUndergraduate engineering programs have increasingly incorporated design projects, not just asfirst-year and capstone experiences, but in core courses as a spine [2-5]. However, there aremany decisions to make in developing a design project and for those who lack the resources thatare sometimes invested in capstone experiences, many limitations. For instance, design projectsmay include clients and specific context, or they may be
wall panels. In the following Page 14.292.6week, they visited the construction site where these products were being erected. Prior to thefield trips, the first author was able to provide a brief presentation on the design of the buildingand the unique features that the students should observe during the site observation.During one of the senior capstone design projects, the first author directed the students to anarchitect-designer in her firm to discuss issues such as the American Disability Act, clearance forhallways, classroom sizes, etc. that needed to be followed in the academic building beingdesigned by the student structural group for
in the School of Applied Engineering and Technology at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He holds a PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Texas - Austin, an MS in Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern California, and a BS in Electronics and Communication Engineering from India. Dr. Shekhar also holds a Graduate Certificate in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Prior to his current appointment, he worked as a Postdoctoral Researcher and Assistant Research Scientist at the University of Michigan. He is the recipient of the 2018 Outstanding Postdoctoral Researcher Award at the University of Michigan; and serves as a PI/Co-PI on multiple projects funded by the National
at the Civil andEnvironmental Engineering and Construction Management Department at a University in theUnited States. The study was a four-week assignment integrated into two senior-level courses: 1.the capstone project course in two semesters, 2. the pre-construction management course in onesemester. This study uses participatory action research (PAR) as a data collection instrument.PAR is a qualitative approach in which researchers work collaboratively with the participantsubject population to collect data, reflect and take action. Photovoice, commonly linked to PAR,is used to collect and explore qualitative data, give a unique depth of understanding to theresearch questions identified, and offer new insights and perspectives toward
cannot start with a load [7]. To facilitate switching between these conditions, the system developed by C. Qian et al.measured SOC and load power [7]. The study developed a control system that used various loopsto control fuel cell current, charge current of battery, SOC of battery, input current, and busvoltage. The feasibility of the study’s control system and voltage bus performance was proven bycreating a simulation model in PSIM software. The capstone group intends to model the batterymanagement system and the active control system through Simulink. This study gave oneapproach to how a power switching system for a FCHEV could be controlled [7]. A conceptfrom this approach that could be used for the FCHEV capstone project is to break
theircurricula, and this travel course can be a technical elective. The other program does not include atechnical elective in its existing curriculum, so this travel course does not count as a majorcourse, but can still count towards the total credits for graduation.To answer the third question, it was agreed that the travel course should be an elective in thePBL course sequence, and a project would be an essential component. The PBL course sequenceranges from freshman seminar to senior capstone projects, and gradually deepens the students’knowledge to carry out practical projects, and prepares our students to succeed in their capstoneprojects as well as engineering jobs in industry after graduation. This travel course aims atincorporating the global
standards. Thisdiscipline includes, but is not limited to, the design of hot and cold water, storm, drainage and ventingsystems. Many documents, books and references are available covering the topics associated withplumbing. However, the majority of them are oriented toward plumbing techniques and practicalissues.Within this paper we discuss the integration of plumbing into the Architectural Engineering curriculum,as well as how high-rise plumbing can be taught for engineers. We also discuss how to combine thefundamentals, such as hydraulics, and different codes and standards, to create a successful class. Acomprehensive capstone project that will integrate various components of plumbing will be discussed inthis paper. The particularity of high
of the service theyprovide to their community and, in a broader sense, the impact they can have on the world. Researchhas shown that students participating in service learning have a higher comprehension of the coursematerial and also develop an awareness of their local community and the issues it faces. In engineering,there are many examples of service-learning programs ranging from freshman introductory courses tosenior capstone courses. Despite their successes, an area that the engineering education community hasyet to fully develop is the reflection component of service learning. This paper addresses thedevelopment of reflection activities and materials in the Engineering Projects in Community Service(EPICS) program at Purdue University
senior capstone projects, there's a demand to integratedesign across students' academic journey. The technical intensity of engineering curricula poseschallenges in dedicating courses exclusively to design thinking or applying the design process.An alternative approach is to reimagine laboratory courses by incorporating engineering design.This pilot study explored the integration of engineering design principles in a required 14-week'engineering analysis and design' laboratory course for second-year mechanical engineeringstudents. The course combines lectures with hands-on laboratory sessions, covering topics suchas gears, motors, dynamics, hydraulics, and engines. The course also introduces Ulrich andEppinger's engineering design process and
=Somewhat Agree I have the capabilities to identify industry 6 6=Agree and social needs 7=Strongly Agree My capstone project is professional 4.7 quality I have the knowledge required to be a 5 professional engineer I have the skills to be a professional 5.4 engineer I can succeed as a professional engineer 5.2 Overall Mean Engineering Self- 5.44 Efficacy ScoreNote: N=5 Analysis of the themes that emerged from the focus group was used to complement thedescriptive information from the exit survey above. Regarding self-efficacy and understandingof the design process, the students described the importance of patience and the value