practice the professionalskills they require for their careers and introducing global perspectives is a recognized method to helpstudents understand these skills in other contexts/cultures. Through comparing local and internationaldesign projects in classrooms, alongside international experiences through design based study abroadprograms and extra-curricular projects we aim to seek to understand the level and role of internationalexperiences in engineering student’s global competence. This paper will outline the current research andliterature in this area and propose a methodology to compare global competencies of students across fourdifferent learning models; a US based, non-development project on campus as part of their curriculum
University of Denver Jeremy C. Schwartz West Virginia UniversityThis research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF): AwardNumber 1432601. The thoughts and opinions expressed do not necessarily represent those ofNSF. Inclusive Engineering Identities: Two New Surveys to Assess Engineering Students’ Inclusive Values and BehaviorsThe under-representation of women and people of color in engineering careers is not fullyexplained by their lower representation in engineering degree programs. There is also attritionfrom the profession after engineering degrees are earned. Currently, 20% of engineering degreesare awarded to women, and
UGA. She is engaged in mentoring early career faculty at her univer- sity and within the PEER National Collaborative. In 2013 she was selected to be a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Faculty Member.Dr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Interim Dean of Cross-Cutting Programs and Emerging Opportunities and Pro- fessor of English, at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include technical commu- nication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for faculty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, International Journal of En- gineering Education
in different context and at different levels. As aresult some of the acquired knowledge may be forgotten by the time student graduates or it maynot be placed in the context of the overall program outcomes, thus material presented may notseem to have relevance to student’s career. An effective method to address this issue is arequired capstone course that combines a number of different disciplines into a singlecomprehensive experience. In addition to required capstone experience, authors havecollaborated in development of an elective course on modeling and simulation of mechatronicsystems. The course introduces modern computer tools and techniques which integrates numberof different areas including statics, strength of materials, dynamics
Education.Tsai, J. Y., O’Connor, K., Myers, B. A., Sullivan, J. F., Reamon, D. T., & Anderson, K. M. (2018). Scaling Up or Scale-making? Examining Sociocultural Factors in a New Model for Engineering Mathematics Education.Turpen, C. A, Gupta, A., Radoff, J., Elby, A., Sabo, H., & Quan, G. M. (2018). Successes and Challenges in Supporting Undergraduate Peer Educators to Notice and Respond to Equity Considerations within Design Teams.Villanueva, I., Nadelson, L. S., Bouwma-Gearhart, J., Youmans, K. L., Lanci, S., & Lenz, A. (2018). Exploring Students’ and Instructors’ Perceptions of Engineering: Case Studies of Professionally Focused and Career Exploration Courses.Waugaman, K., Tsai, J. Y., & Zarske
experiences and creating portfolios [20].Based on the extant literature, we expect our analysis of the leadership portfolios, in whichstudents reflect on and describe their experiences in the program, will help us understand whatwas most meaningful to them and what impact the program had on their development as leaders.MethodologyThe focus of the last semester of the program is lifelong learning, and students create personalleadership portfolios to document their development over the course of the program. In theprocess, students explore who they are, what they value, and how they will use what they learnedover the course of the program to shape their careers, personal lives, and contributions to theircommunities. Students review past reflections
and students were exposed toresearch collaborations in different STEM fields.Undergraduate research experiences have been shown to increase confidence, sense of belongingand prove a pathway to a scientific career for minority students, and the data indicate that mostof these students intend to continue on this path [20, 21, 22]. In addition to engaging students inresearch projects, the likelihood of women and minorities to continue in a scientific discipline isfurther increased if the problems have a valuable connection to society [23, 24]. Our real-worldproject topics were of high interest to the students who appreciated their practical, scientific andenvironmental importance. The cross-course disciplinary setup encouraged teamwork
intermediate study, we redefined the comparison tofocus on students with longevity in the major, to avoid stigmatization of certain groups (e.g., firstgeneration students) who may be more likely to drop out of college early in their careers (Reyes& Nora, 2012). Our institutional research data request allowed for all students who had evermajored in the target major at one of the four-year institutions, and included course enrollmentand first time enrollment results (e.g., A-F, I, W) across 6 courses needed for the major. S-STEMstudents were identified by the institutional research office and they were indicated in adichotomous variable labeled “S-STEM.”Our comparison study was further refined to focus on students with initial success in the
purpose of this paper is to recommend adapting new pedagogical methods to theaccepted topics in an introductory probability and statistics course for engineeringundergraduates—methods that better match the learning characteristics of Millennial students inour courses. In a nutshell, those characteristics may be summarized as: (1) They want relevanceto their major, and future engineering career; (2) They want rationale (for the textbook selected,and for specific course policies and assignments); (3) They revel in technology (to collect data,compute, communicate, and multi-task); (4) They want a relaxed, hands-on environment; (5)They prefer instructors who rotate among several classroom delivery methods.Considering the “Five R‟s” learning
she played 2 years of women’s basketball at Bevill State Community College in Fayette AL and her last 2 years at the University of West Georgia in Carrollton GA. She was a 4 year Academic All American.Dr. Sarah B. Lee, Mississippi State University Sarah Lee joined the faculty at Mississippi State University (MSU) after a 19 year information technology career at FedEx Corporation. As an assistant clinical professor and Assistant Department Head in the Computer Science and Engineering Department, she is co-founder and co-director of the Bulldog Bytes program at MSU that engages K-12 students with computing and provides professional development to K-12 teachers in computer science and cybersecurity. She is the PI for the
. Her current appointment is as Associate Professor and former Chairperson of the Department of Psychology at Delaware State University. She specializes in areas surrounding social justice. Her current application of social justice principals is in the area of the access/success of women/girls to science, technology, engineering, and math education and careers for which she recently served two years at the National Science Foundation as a grant adminis- trator. Dr. Rogers provides statistical and methodological consulting on a variety of research, evaluation, and assessment projects.Prof. James C. Baygents, University of Arizona James C. Baygents is the associate dean of the College of Engineering at the University
and 36% outside of STEM), 7% reported increased interest in STEM, and20% lost their initial interest in STEM fields. This suggests that the club provides students withinsights about STEM, helping students to choose their careers. Table 2. Criteria used to evaluate the Summer Research Program, classified as general statements (G1-G8), specific statements for teachers (T1-T3) or students (S1-S3), and open questions (O1-O5) with preliminary results. Percent Type Evaluation Item Agreement G1 The summer program successfully provided
also teaches courses in the Computer Network Systems and Security degree. Mark holds a Master’s in Career and Technical Education (Highest Distinction) from Ferris State University, and a Bachelor’s in Workforce Education and Development (Summa Cum Laude) from Southern Illinois University. Mark is a retired Chief Electronics Technician (Submarines) and served and taught as part of the Navy’s Nuclear Power Program. Mark is active with SkillsUSA and has been on the National Education Team for Mechatronics since 2004.Prof. Aleksandr Sergeyev, Michigan Technological University Aleksandr Sergeyev is currently an Associate Professor in the Electrical Engineering Technology program in the School of Technology at Michigan
from: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_326.10.asp.[4] American Society for Engineering Education. (2016). 2015 ASEE Profiles of Engineering and Engineering Technology Colleges. Washington, DC: Brian L. Yoder. Available online at: https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles.[5] Martin, D.C., Arendale, D.A., & Associates. (1992). Supplemental Instruction: Improving first-year student success in high-risk courses. Columbia, SC: National Resource Center for The Freshman Year Experience, University of South Carolina.[6] Mau, Wei-Cheng, (2003). Factors That Influence Persistence in Science and Engineering Career Aspirations. The Career Development Quarterly, 51: 234–243.[7
Economics, University of Utah, holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University. He started his career as a member of the erstwhile Civil Service of Pakistan (CSP), and served in a number of positions, including as the Director, UN Division for Sustainable Development, founder and first Executive Director of the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), Islamabad, Director, Asia Centre of the Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), and Executive Director of the Global Change Impact Studies Centre (GCISC). He has served as Coordinating Lead Author on the Nobel Prize winning Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), member of the UN Secretary General’s Advisory Group on Energy and Climate Change (AGECC
our internship opportunities it allowed the students exposure to a business that routinely hires KSU engineers.According to the sponsor, the major student outcomes from this project were, Meeting a deadline, provide a valuable solution to an existing problem, practical experience with the engineering process.The sponsor also indicated that the industry-sponsored project helped the students with outcome(f) — Learn effective communications: I noticed improved communication with the students by the end of the process.The students were polled after obtaining and working in engineering positions, in order to gaugethe impact of MTRE 4800 on their careers. The responses show that their professional experiencereinforces the
critical decisions.3.3 Case 3: Assessing interview data with automated ranking In the final case, the Data Ranking Algorithm was applied to interview transcripts in anexploration of the use of algorithm-generated association strengths and concepts in comparisonto interviewee self-assessment and traditional qualitative thematic coding. At its best, automatedranking could potentially enrich qualitative coding through suggesting subtle underlyingconnections to concepts, as well as enable combing through larger amounts of data. In this case, the assessed data consisted of 35 interview transcripts (totalling in 367pages) of early career engineers describing their experiences at their workplace. (These had beenproduced for a qualitative
Campus DEDP Campus Q14 2.29 2.21 4.00 3.84 1.71 1.63 Q15 2.43 2.63 4.07 4.21 1.64 1.58 Q16 2.14 2.58 3.93 3.84 1.79 1.26Comparison of On-campus and Distance End-of-Term Survey ResultsTable 7 shows the reasons students reported for enrolling in the course. Results add to more than100% because students were allowed to select as many reasons as desired. The largest categoryof responses for both the campus and distance cohorts was the applicability of the coursematerial to their career field. The second highest motivation reported for campus students was atie between course
Paper ID #21766Coordinate Transforms and Dual Bases: a Teaching Aid for UndergraduateEngineering Students ¨Dr. Gunter Bischof, Joanneum University of Applied Sciences Throughout his career, Dr. G¨unter Bischof has combined his interest in science and engineering appli- cation. He studied physics at the University of Vienna, Austria, and acquired industry experience as development engineer at Siemens Corporation. Currently he teaches Engineering Mathematics at Joan- neum University of Applied Sciences. His research interests focus on automotive engineering, materials physics, and on engineering education.Benjamin Edelbauer
. Strimel, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Dr. Greg J. Strimel is an assistant professor of engineering/technology teacher education in the Purdue Polytechnic Institute at Purdue University in West Lafayette, Indiana. His prior teaching experience includes serving as a high school engineering/technology teacher and a teaching assistant professor within the College of Engineering & Mineral Resources at West Virginia University.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) enay Purzer is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education. She is the recipient of a 2012 NSF CAREER award, which examines how engineering students approach innovation. She serves on the editorial boards
Paper ID #18951Traditional versus Hardware-driven Introductory Programming Courses: aComparison of Student Identity, Efficacy and SuccessProf. Wesley G. Lawson, University of Maryland, College Park Prof. Lawson has earned five degrees from the University of Maryland, including a Ph,D, in Electrical Engineering in 1985. In his professional career at College Park, where he has been a full professor since 1997, he has worked on high-power microwave devices, medical devices, and engineering education. He is an author or coauthor on 5 books and over 70 refereed journal articles and 200 conference presentations and
behavioral engagement (demonstration of interest), emotional engagement (positive reactions), and cognitive engagement (student investment in learning). Example: “I enjoy my STEM coursework.”44 2. Institutional Commitment – Previous research has indicated that institutional commitment is a strong indicator of student persistence. Example: “I am committed to completing my program of study at this institution.”45,46 3. STEM Identity and Belonging – A sense of belonging and identifying with STEM contributes to student pursuit of STEM careers. Example: “I can see myself in a STEM career.” 47 4. Encouragement – Studies attempting to get at influences that lead students to major in STEM have elucidated
Paper ID #18434Developing a National Research Agenda: A Data Collection and CommunityEngagement ModelDr. Julie P Martin, Clemson University Julie P. Martin, Ph.D. is an associate professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson Univer- sity. Her research agenda has focused on diversity and inclusion in engineering education. In particular, her NSF-funded CAREER work has investigated how social relations—operationalized as social capi- tal—influence student academic decisions and success, especially for underrepresented and underserved students. Her CAREER research supports the need for continued proactive
participantswere not actively recruited but rather were selected from those students who had alreadymatriculated. Two first-year students were chosen, along with one sophomore and one junior toprovide the opportunity for peer mentoring within the cohort. For the 2013-14 school year, eightnew first-year students and one existing sophomore were selected for participation. The final groupof six first-year students started in 2014-15. Because of attrition, three existing RWU studentswere added in 2015-16 and one more at the start of 2016-17. The numbers are summarized in Table1. In total, the STILAS program has funded 23 different students, including 9 for their entirecollege career. Table 1: Number of STILAS Participants, by Year and
Paper ID #26660Building Your Dream Team for ChangeDr. Cara Margherio, University of Washington Cara Margherio is the Assistant Director of the UW Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE). Cara manages the evaluation of several NSF- and NIH-funded projects, primarily working with national professional development programs for early-career academics from groups underrepresented in STEM. Her research is grounded in critical race and feminist theories, and her research interests include community cultural wealth, counterspaces, intersectionality, and institutional change.Kerice Doten-Snitker, University
Higher Education Coordinating Board to develop a statewide articulation com- pact for mechanical engineering and chaired the councils for developing articulation compacts in other engineering and science disciplines. He also served on the Texas State Board of Education committee preparing the standards for career and technical education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Civil Engineering: A Liberal Education Degree of the 21st CenturyAbstractIn the 2004 report “The Engineer of 2020,” the National Academy of Engineering makes thebold contention that engineering is the liberal education of the 21st-Century. This contentionstands in contrast to more widespread notions about
Toronto. His primary role is coordinating and teaching an award winning first year design and com- munications course (Engineering Strategies and Practice). As well he conducts action-based research into improving the learning experience of undergraduate engineering students and increasing diversity in the profession, particularly women and Indigenous peoples (Native Americans). Professor Bazylak started his career as a manufacturing engineer in a new product introduction division of a large telecommunication manufacturer. He returned to academia joining the University of Victoria first as an engineering co-operative education coordinator and then as an engineer-in-residence. He joined the University of Toronto as a
Paper ID #25880Cross-Cultural Training and Engineering: An Illustration Using VietnameseEngineering Faculties’ Responses to Nature of Engineering Instrument (Workin Progress)Amanda Vazquez, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Amanda Vazquez is a fourth-year mechanical engineering undergraduate student at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She is working as a research mentee under the R.A.M.P. (Research and Mentorship Program) at UNLV. This research is focused on Nature of Engineering View’s of Professional Engineers. Prior to the R.A.M.P. program she worked on NSF EPSCoR STEM K-12 outreach programs, including: a STEM career
towards STEM, increase STEMknowledge, and increase likelihoods of pursuing STEM careers [2].As described by Freisen et. al. [3], an inquiry based approach to learning is generally taken aslearning by exploring a question, issue or problem. Connected knowledge applied to multiplediscipline related activities provides better frameworks for students to learn and developconceptual understandings [4]. In a transdisciplinary approach, discussed in detail in [5],learners are required to think across and beyond academic disciplines to incorporate knowledgethat can be shared and implemented into design. Learning environments that focus on design andproblem solving can engage and help students learn core STEM concepts while connectingscience and
some point later on in their careers, and also a generalquestion as to whether or not successful venture creation should be the primary metric by whichthe success of entrepreneurial education is judged. The Kern Entrepreneurial EngineeringNetwork (KEEN) model suggests that venture creation is just one potential aspect of successfulentrepreneurship education, and that the development of an ‘entrepreneurial mindset’, in whicheducators work to foster creativity and opportunity identification, results in graduates that arebetter prepared to solve meaningful problems within existing workplaces, in addition to startingnew ventures to address challenges [7], [8].A more recent review by Nabi, Liñan, Fayolle, Krueger, and Walmsley [9