open to various other student populations on anoptional basis but will be mandatory for ELITE students:Enhanced Capstone ExperiencesAll Engineering Technology students are required to take a senior project course for theircapstone experience during the fall semester of their senior year. This course focuses on theprinciples and design methodology required to solve a significant design problem in a teamcontext. The project encompasses determining customer requirements, exploring and choosingdesign alternatives, scheduling, and project management. Significant milestones are the project'sconceptual, preliminary, and critical design reviews, which require written and oralpresentations. Often these projects are supported by local industry and they
Session 1532 Hardware Homework using a Student Data Acquisition System Christopher G. Braun Colorado School of MinesOverview A project developed by a student team under close guidance of a faculty memberis underway to build a very affordable yet highly functional data acquisition system. Ourplan is to introduce this system to our students in the Engineering Division's six week longSummer Field Session for students between their Sophomore and Junior year. Eachstudent would buy and build their own data acquisition system. In
self-confidence in achieving the anticipated learning outcomes. Ultimately this data will be triangulated with data from the rubrics and focus group interviews with students. 4. Collect baseline assessment data before implementation of the new program (using revised rubric and survey results) for written, oral, and visual communications in sophomore design courses and senior capstone design courses.FINAL OUTCOMESAnticipated results from the project fall into four categories: ≠ Development of new teaching materials and learning strategies: This project will upgrade the CPR web-based software to include oral and visual communication components, while also developing new teaching assignments
Accounting; Financial Accounting; CostAccounting; Eng. Accounting; Financial Management; Managerial FinanceB. EconomicsTypical Course Names: Eng. Economics; Macro or Micro or Managerial Economics4. Project Related CoursesA. Project ManagementTypical Course Name: Project ManagementB. CapstoneTypical Course Names: Capstone; Special Projects Page 11.102.3Major Functional Definitions; Sub Fields; Typical Course Names – cont.5. Functional CoursesA. Functional Technical ManagementTypical Course Names: Operations Management; Quality Management;Engineering Management; R&D Management; Marketing ManagementB. Functional Business ManagementTypical Course Names: Marketing
a variety of design objectives toensure long term sustainability of products and processes. Design for Environment (DfE), orecodesign [7,8] aims to reduce the environmental impact in the life cycle of a product byenhancing its design objectives. It may also aim to reduce resource consumption, in terms ofmaterial, energy, and pollution prevention. Other concepts, such as Design for Disassembly(DfD) and Design for Recycling (DfR) practices [9,10,11], would also allow the productdesigner to have a substantial positive impact on the environmental aspects of a product’slifecycle.This paper presents an approach to the use of energy efficiency in product design in junior andsenior level curriculums and capstone design projects. Because of the
curricular innovation to produce ECE graduates that can work in anenvironment that may rely on outsourcing a portion of its operations, and also make theknowledge base of these graduates stronger in areas that are not likely to be outsourced,or perhaps should not be outsourced for security reasons or for physical and logisticalconstraints. IntroductionThis paper focuses on changing the electrical and computer engineering (ECE)curriculum in response to outsourcing. The assumption is that outsourcing of certain ECEfunctions will continue in the short term and may perhaps strengthen to include moredesign related ECE projects [10]. Outsourcing of several technical responsibilities to theFar East is not only an
Professor and Research Faculty in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas (UNLV). He served as a Technical Advisor for the senior design project at UNLV. He teaches CAD, cap- stone design, and solid mechanics courses at the undergraduate and graduate level. He has been involved with the capstone design program at TU since his tenure in 2008. His course design projects are sponsored by industry and government laboratory which include GM, JOHN DEERE, AFRL, and NUCOR. He is the Lead-Faculty Contact for the Advancement of Collaborative Engineering Education (PACE) at TU. Page
an NSF (National ScienceFoundation) proposal based on the same approach utilizing animatronics for a grades 7-12project4. It is a weekend program complemented by a summer capstone experience. Even thoughthe program was not funded, it allowed authors to develop a better course plan to be reflectedupon two levels, college and secondary education. Since then the authors has gained recognitionand partners leading to funding of two small projects by Ohio Northern University and a majorsummer program for gifted and talented secondary school students by Ohio Department ofEducation. A three-day summer camp was also designed and successfully executed withparticipation of four local middle school students from the gifted and talented program
added and removed since the inception of the course.For example, linear regression was covered the first year, but was removed in subsequent yearssince essentially the same material is covered in Stoichiometry. Experimental design wasintroduced, including factorial analysis, but was removed in 1996 to make room for moreengineering economics and an expansion of the design project. One-hour lectures on safety andengineering ethics are also incorporated as time allows. The majority of the class, however, isdevoted to the five areas described above. Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences byMendenhall and Sincich1 is currently the textbook for this course.Descriptive statistics, probability fundamentals and probability distributions are covered
delivering the lecture content ofthe design process using videos and other media, class time is freed up for concrete progress on ateam’s specific project with support of faculty.The first goal of this project is to create educational materials to transfer the delivery of contentregarding the design process to an out-of-class environment and to develop in-class activelearning modules that clarify, elaborate, and expand on critical design process topics. Thesematerials will be widely available for others to use.Currently, limited research exists on the impact of the flipped classroom model in engineering,mathematics, or science courses at the university level. Thus, the second goal of this project is toanswer the engineering education research
discipline-specific tasks within their team. 3. Other Disciplines & Industry: CM or Architecture students collaborating with other disciplines and/or industry representatives.Table 2: Qualitative Analysis of Student Experience and Assessment Instruments Used Domain Dimensions/ Supporting Details Researcher Factor Notes Instruments 1. Summative 1. Test (no further details) (3A); reflection after team 1N Arch that assessment project (10A); capstone (8A), final project (5A,N); final involves CM 2. Formative reviews from industry
gain and sharpen skills such as: understanding requirement documents, defininggoals, synthesis, design evaluation, making decision, teamwork, written communication, oralcommunication, conduct patent search, creativity, innovation, perform in-depth mechanicalanalysis, problem solving, and machine design. Since the implementation of this approach,capstone project instructors have noticed significant improvement in the ability of studentssynthesize and analyze, and most importantly, the practice of design.Results and discussionTo evaluate the effectiveness of the aforementioned pedagogical approach, a self-perceptionanonymous short survey that consisted of 13 questions was administrated online to previousstudents enrolled in this redesigned
doing software engineering design or testingsoftware someone else coded3. An HCI course is typically an optional course, although a fewcomputer science programs are making it mandatory. As the user interface becomes morecentral to applications, some kind of integration between these two disciplines becomes moreimportant18.SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND HCI IN THE CLASSROOMUndergraduate students at Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi must complete a seniorcapstone course which requires the application of software engineering principles to develop asystem for a real community client4. Almost all of these capstone projects have had significantinteractive components. Some students also incorporate the optional HCI course into theiracademic programs
needs. Students work on a long term project for which they conduct research andinformation gathering, design ideation, prototyping, testing, and design communication anddissemination [9]. These courses are often offered early in the undergraduate program asCornerstone courses (e.g., [10]) or at the end as a Capstone course (e.g., [11], [12]). Engineeringdesign education operates through a constructivist model of learning [13], and the principle thatstudents learn best by doing design [14]. Design instruction is typically delivered in a flipped orstudio model, through collaborative group or parallel individual work sessions [15]–[17]. User-centered design courses may provide more hands-on experiential learning, but theydo not inherently
Paper ID #33745Evaluating Peer-led Feedback in Asynchronous Design Critiques: AQuestion-centered ApproachDr. Ada Hurst, University of Waterloo Ada Hurst is a continuing lecturer in the Department of Management Sciences at the University of Water- loo. Her research falls in the areas of design cognition, and design teaching and learning. She regularly teaches capstone design project courses in the Management Engineering program.Ms. Christine Duong, University of Waterloo Christine Duong is a third year student at the University of Waterloo in the Life Science Psychology program.Ms. Meagan Flus, University of Waterloo
implemented in an effort to determine whether the curriculum meets educationalobjectives set forth by ABET EC2000 as well as program criteria set forth by the AIChE. Theseare the eight tools: (1) a department “skills test” administered to graduating seniors who volunteerto take the test; (2) internal and external reviews of plant design reports and AIChE senior designprojects; (3) an exit interview of graduating seniors, conducted by the department head, regardingtheir views of the curriculum; (4) a survey, conducted by the College of Engineering, of alumnitwo and five years after graduation; (5) portfolio of written material in capstone andcommunications classes; (6) internal and external review of oral presentations in capstone courses;(7) student
Paper ID #24441Work In Progress: Synthesizing design challenges to improve student effec-tiveness in first year engineering design coursesJames R McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology James R. McCusker is an Associate Professor at Wentworth Institute of Technology in the Department of Electrical Engineering. Since joining Wentworth in 2010, he has been heavily involved with an array of interdisciplinary design courses that range from introductory to capstone courses.Prof. Aaron Carpenter, Wentworth Institute of Technology Professor Carpenter is an Assistant Professor at the Wentworth Institute of Technology. In 2012, he
seesuch projects as extremely valuable to student learning. Some of the more germanereasons are (1) an opportunity to reflect on the course materials and apply the knowledgelearned, (2) experience to improve independent learning skills, (3) a chance to solveopen-ended design problems, encouraging students to use their imaginations, and (4) anopportunity to exercise both software and hardware skills. The overall experiencesupports and enhances the students’ probability of success in their senior capstone designcourse.ConclusionIn this paper, we presented a case study of a student project, the Tetris game, in a secondmicrocontroller/microprocessor course at the US Air Force Academy. The projectprovided the student with ample opportunities to
Kathy Kasley, Ph.D, Emeritus Professor, Pamela Phillips, Professor, Joseph LaSalle, BSEE, Joe Bracha, BSEE, and Ashok Kavadapu. BSEE College of Engineering, Colorado Technical UniversityIntroductionThe key contribution is that two frameworks are described in this paper for an undergraduatecapstone course. The capstone project is the Compressed Air Controller Tire Inflation System(C.A.C.T.I.S.). The project’s intent is to design a system reducing the amount of time and effortinvolved in achieving proper vehicle tire inflation. The CACTIS uses a convenient touch screendisplay and a rugged air distribution box such that multiple tires can be inflated simultaneously.This project serves as another example in
instructors of each major’s seniordesign capstone project began holding multi-disciplinary “Engineering Ethics Lunches”.Students and faculty form small groups during scheduled lunches to discuss specificethical topics related to the engineering profession. The discussions are based uponassigned readings and suggested talking points developed jointly by the faculty.Afterwards, the students are required to submit essays reviewing their discussions andanswering an ethical question based upon the topic.Now in its fourth semester, the multi-disciplinary ethics lunches have receivedoverwhelmingly positive feedback from both the instructors and students. This paperwill discuss the format of the multi-disciplinary ethics discussions, the type of
Session Design of a Universal Robot End-effector for Straight-line Pick-up Motion Gene Y. Liao Gregory J. Koshurba Wayne State UniversityAbstractThis paper describes a capstone design project in developing an end-effector for robotic arm thatis capable of grasping objects of varying sizes. The design parameters are as follows. Thecenter point of end-effector should remain as close as possible to the same location, i.e. astraight-line path, over the range of gripper motion. The selected size and shape of the graspedobject are
Science, Fracture Mechanics, Process-Structure-Property Relationships, Finite Element Stress Analysis Modeling & Failure Analysis, ASME BPV Code Sec VIII Div. 1 & 2, API 579/ASME FFS-1 Code, Materials Testing and Engineering Education. Professionally registered engineer in the State of Texas (PE).Dr. Joanna Tsenn, Texas A&M University Joanna Tsenn is an Associate Professor of Instruction in the J. Mike Walker ’66 Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas A&M University. She earned her B.S. from the University of Texas at Austin and her Ph.D. from Texas A&M University. She coordinates the mechanical engineering senior capstone design program and teaches senior design lectures and studios. Her
aspects of the design process, including iterativebrainstorming, hands-on prototyping & fabrication, CAD, materials, machining, assembly, andbasic microcontroller design. Seniors then complete a yearlong capstone sequence in which theypursue a client-mentored project and apply the skills they have developed in the prior courseswithin the curriculum [2]. All projects in the introductory design skills course and the vastmajority of projects in the capstone are client-sponsored, pre-identified problems or need areasthat the client pitched to potential teams, such that students who take these core design coursestypically do not have the opportunity to identify clinical or patient-centered needs as part of thecourse structure. However, a growing
), specifically supported five of the 14 outcomes: a, b, e, g, andk. The assessment tools comprised prelab homework, exams, an experimental design project,written reports, oral presentations and team/peer evaluation. The senior capstone design course,taken in addition to ME Lab, accounted for another seven outcomes. It was decided by thefaculty that one or two courses are not sufficient to demonstrate the necessary assessment of theprogram outcomes. There were several outcomes, though, which made more sense to beassessed by a laboratory course. For instance, all accredited engineering programs must have acomponent of experimental design in their curriculum. ABET Criterion 3b states “Engineering
al., Technical Drawing, 7th Ed. (New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1980)9 Dym, op. cit., p. 11110 The percentage of the semester grade that is allocated for this project has changed in the six years the course has been offered. When the course was an elective course (2002-2004) there was an additional Project #4 that was an individual project usually tied to the capstone project that students took at the same time as this course.11 Artobolevsky, Ivan I., Mechanisms in Modern Engineering Design, Vol. II, Lever Mechanisms, Part 1, trans. Nicholas Weinstein (Moscow: Mir Publishers, 1976)12 ME 481 Syllabus, Fall 200713 Toogood, Roger, Pro/Engineer Wildfire 3.0 Mechanica Tutorial (Structure/Thermal), (SDC Publications
al., Technical Drawing, 7th Ed. (New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1980)9 Dym, op. cit., p. 11110 The percentage of the semester grade that is allocated for this project has changed in the six years the course has been offered. When the course was an elective course (2002-2004) there was an additional Project #4 that was an individual project usually tied to the capstone project that students took at the same time as this course.11 Artobolevsky, Ivan I., Mechanisms in Modern Engineering Design, Vol. II, Lever Mechanisms, Part 1, trans. Nicholas Weinstein (Moscow: Mir Publishers, 1976)12 ME 481 Syllabus, Fall 200713 Toogood, Roger, Pro/Engineer Wildfire 3.0 Mechanica Tutorial (Structure/Thermal), (SDC Publications
al., Technical Drawing, 7th Ed. (New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co., 1980)9 Dym, op. cit., p. 11110 The percentage of the semester grade that is allocated for this project has changed in the six years the course has been offered. When the course was an elective course (2002-2004) there was an additional Project #4 that was an individual project usually tied to the capstone project that students took at the same time as this course.11 Artobolevsky, Ivan I., Mechanisms in Modern Engineering Design, Vol. II, Lever Mechanisms, Part 1, trans. Nicholas Weinstein (Moscow: Mir Publishers, 1976)12 ME 481 Syllabus, Fall 200713 Toogood, Roger, Pro/Engineer Wildfire 3.0 Mechanica Tutorial (Structure/Thermal), (SDC Publications
professional network, courses, capstone design projects, and research. We describe thesemechanisms and respective activities to date in Table 1. Table 1: Engineering Exchange for Social Justice (ExSJ) Mechanisms and Activities.Mechanism Description Activities to Date Thematic gatherings on a specified issue like Hosted 2 community forums to bringCommunity “waste”, where community groups, non- various community and universityForums profits, engineers and other professionals, stakeholders together around the theme of faculty, and students are brought together to waste reduction. One was held on campus exchange
-based, active learning environmentsfor improvement of student comprehension and engagement.1,2,3 Active-learning requires Page 13.414.2students to be involved in key activities of analysis, synthesis and evaluation. 4 For universitystudents, these activities are most clearly present in the context of directed and independentresearch.5 While certain active-learning activities can (and should) be built into the structure ofwhat would normally be a lecture class (such as group discussions, demonstrations, and groupdesign projects), the level of student engagement supported by a research project would be hardto duplicate in a classroom environment
reflections is analyzed elsewhere but shows that overwhelmingly students felt a sense of vulnerability during the simulation which could have influenced their chosen design solution. Design Quality Rubric: Each final project was evaluated by two researchers using a design quality rubric, as described by Sobek and Jain [14]. The assessment rubric was developed to evaluate the outcome quality of engineering design capstone projects. The rubric is designed to be objective so only the prototype quality is assessed. For the present study, the satisfaction of the end user was not considered because there was