Conference Session

CANCELLED: Track 2: Technical Session 6: Exploring Gender Dynamics in Intercultural Competence Development through a Study Abroad Program

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Aparajita Jaiswal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Sakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Vidya Reddy Madana, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

Conference Session

Track 1: Technical Session 5: Motivations for Engineering Faculty Engagement in an Inclusive Pedagogy Program

Collection

2025 Collaborative Network for Engineering & Computing Diversity (CoNECD)

Authors

Renee M. Desing, University of Washington; Joyce Yen, University of Washington; Karen Thomas-Brown, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

2025 CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

, “Exploring inclusive pedagogy,” Br. Educ. Res. J., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 813–828, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1080/01411926.2010.501096.[8] D. E. Chubin, G. S. May, and E. L. Babco, “Diversifying the engineering workforce,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 73–86, 2005, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00830.x.[9] G. Light, S. Calkins, M. Luna, and D. Drane, “Assessing the Impact of a Year‐Long Faculty Development Program on Faculty Approaches to Teaching”.[10] R. M. Felder and R. Brent, “The National Effective Teaching Institute: Assessment of Impact and Implications for Faculty Development,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 121– 134, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01049.x.[11] Y. Steinert et al., “A systematic review of faculty

Conference Session

Undergraduate Research and a Force and Moment Lab

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michelle Audrey Pang, Sandia National Laboratories; Carolyn Conner Seepersad, University of Texas, Austin; Sheldon Landsberger, University of Texas, Austin, Department of Mechanical Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

another and with their mentor(s). The written charter also allows teamsto agree to a code of conduct with which they are expected to adhere and also to determine teammeeting times. A signed copy of this document is submitted to the teaching staff as a reference forthe duration of the program. (iii) Research Background Presentation. Two weeks after teams are formed and students haveample time to meet with their mentors to discuss the background and project details, they providea 5 minute presentation to the class. This presentation provides background information on theresearch project, details for what they intend to accomplish during the semester, and a briefoverview of their research plan. (iv) Final Research Poster. Teams present their

Conference Session

Action on Diversity - Supporting Students at Multiple Levels

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beverly Louie, University of Colorado, Boulder; Beth A Myers, University of Colorado Boulder; Janet Y Tsai, University of Colorado Boulder; Tanya D Ennis, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mark V. Huerta, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Conference Session

Internship, Co-Op, and Professional Development Programs

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Austin Barnes, Institute for Scientist and Engineer Educators; Tamara Ball, University of California, Santa Cruz; Christine R. Starr, University of California, Santa Cruz; Scott Seagroves, The College of Saint Scholastica; Kauahi Perez, University of Hawaii, Manoa; Lisa Hunter, University of California, Santa Cruz

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education

formalized as part of communitybenefit packages agreed to by advocates of proposed telescopes and representatives from thelocal community [1]. Opposition to the observatories has existed since the 1960’s when thegovernor and legislature, enthusiastic about development, set aside land for construction.Protests, demonstrations and litigation challenging previous and proposed construction of newtelescopes in Hawai‘i have focused on environmental protection and the sites selected as beingsacred to natives. For example, controversy over choosing Maunakea for the site location of anew Thirty Meter Telescope emphasizes that this is considered the most sacred mountain of theNative Hawai‘ian religion and culture. Yet a local workforce is also highly desired

Conference Session

CEED Technical Session II: Developing Research and Design Skills Through Experiential Learning

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicole Bowers, Arizona State University; Michelle Jordan, Arizona State University; Kate Fisher; Zachary Holman, Arizona State University; Mathew D. Evans, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Cooperative and Experiential Education

Conference Session

Communication in Pre-College Engineering Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christine M. Cunningham, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Gregory John Kelly, Pennsylvania State University ; Natacha Meyer

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

equitable opportunities by allowing the students who are English learners toenvision futures for themselves as engineers. [S]tarting early allows the students to bridge the opportunity gap by having shared experiences and picturing themselves and as engineers and problem solversAffordance 7: Engineering activities provide unique opportunities for English learners to applytheir science content knowledge in meaningful ways, even if they learned that science content inanother language.Engineering activities can invite or require students to draw upon science content knowledge, inwhatever language they learned it. They can demonstrate their understandings through artifactsor multiple modes of communication. Applying the concepts in an engineering

Conference Session

Engineering Professional Development using Robotics Activities

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Veena Jayasree Krishnan, NYU Tandon School of Engineering; Sheila Borges Rajguru, NYU Tandon School of Engineering; Vikram Kapila, NYU Tandon School of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

effective in building and honing students’ leadership and teamwork skills.Finally, robotics activities were not deemed to be universally applicable for all science and mathconcepts. Additional methods that teachers used to identify the suitability of robotics lesson aresummarized in Table 3.Table 3: Methods used to identify the suitability of robotics lessons. S. No. Methods used to identify the suitability of robotics lesson Analyze various aspects of a lesson to establish if a robot can perform a role to effectively 1. contribute to the lesson’s objective. Assess and ensure that the robotics activity is appropriate for the grade level and aligns 2. with the learning

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Ohanian Perez, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

Conference Session

Energy Conversion, Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Huiye Yu, UNSW Sydney; Hua Chai, University of New South Wales; Jayashri Ravishankar, University of New South Wales

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Conservation and Nuclear Engineering Division (ECCNE), Energy Conversion

: https://aemo.com.au/-/media/files/major-publications/isp/2022/2022- documents/2022-integrated-system-plan-isp.pdf?la=en[4] C. Council, "Renewable energy jobs: Future growth in Australia," 2016.[5] C. Briggs, J. Rutovitz, E. Dominish, and K. Nagrath, "Renewable energy jobs in Australia: stage one," ed: Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, 2020.[6] J. Rutovitz et al., "E3 opportunity assessment: developing the future energy workforce: final report 2021," 2021.[7] H. Chai, J. Ravishankar, S. Krishnan, and M. Priestley, "Work-in-Progress: A Holistic Approach to Bridging the Gap between Power Engineering Education and Electric Power Industry," in 2022 IEEE Global

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division (WIED) Technical Session 7

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexis Nicole Barney, Iowa State University; Benjamin Ahn, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Matthew Nelson, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering Division (WIED)

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) Technical Session 11

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Glenda T. Kelly, Duke University; Joshua Granek, Duke University; Claudia K. Gunsch, Duke University; Joseph L. Graves Jr., North Carolina A&T State University; David Singleton, Duke University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)

with scientists across different disciplines. 2.94 3.40 2.93 3.55 3.33 *(Yr2, 4 and 5 all >Yr1; Yr4 > Yr3) Received adequate IBIEM faculty support for learning goals. 2.50 3.60 3.13 3.69 3.69 *(Yr2, 3, 4 and 5 all >Yr1; Yr4 and Yr5 >Yr3) FACULTY & PEER IBIEM mentor(s)/peers actively involved in my training/learning 2.63 3.60 2.93

Conference Session

Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 7

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kiana Alexa Ramos; Julia Gardow; Emanuel Joseph Louime; Eunice Yujin Kang; Avneet Hira, Boston College

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity

Conference Session

Software Engineering Division Technical Session II

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elise Deitrick, Codio; Joshua Ball, Codio; Megan McHugh, Codio

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Division (SWED)

Conference Session

Exploration of Written and Team Communication

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristin L. Schaefer P.E., UH; Jorge Rosales; Jerrod A. Henderson, University of Houston

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

. Pennebaker, D. S. Berry, and J. M. Richards, “Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles,” Pers Soc Psychol Bull, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 665–675, May 2003, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029005010.[12] S. C. Kalichman and J. M. Smyth, “‘And You Don’t Like, Don’t Like the Way I Talk’: Authenticity in the Language of Bruce Springsteen,” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Jun. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000402.[13] D. Monzani et al., “Emotional Tone, Analytical Thinking, and Somatosensory Processes of a Sample of Italian Tweets During the First Phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, p. e29820, Oct. 2021, doi

Conference Session

International Division (INTL) Technical Session #2: Global Engagement

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brad Putman, Bucknell University; Khaled A. Al-Sahili, An-Najah National University; Alia Gilbrecht, An-Najah National University; Karen Bunch Franklin; Shilpa Girish, Clemson University; Fabricio Leiva; Abdelhaleem Khader, An-Najah National University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

International Division (INTL)

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 3

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Swetha Nittala, Uber Technologies; Sheri D. Sheppard, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

Nathaniel E. Agharese, Andrea Banuet, Dave Beach, David L. Jaffe,Melissa Ko, Tammy Liaw, Irene Lo, Amanda Modell, Brett Newman, Jesse Streicher,Gloriana Trujillo, Jeff Wood, Sonia Martin, Ahmed Mohamed, Lawrence Domingo, AndreaCuadra, Brendon Reynante were invaluable in getting this checklist project off the ground, aswas funding from the Stanford Science and Engineering Education Fellows program. Wehope the list of contributors to this checklist will continue growing.References[1] M. K. Brown, C. Hershock, C. J. Finelli, and C. O’Neal, “Teaching for retention in science, engineering, and math disciplines: A guide for faculty,” Occasional paper, vol. 25, pp. 1–12, 2009.[2] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Bridges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, and M. K

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 10

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Johanna Naukkarinen, Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT; Susanna Bairoh, TEK (Academic Engineers and Architects in Finland); Sanna Putila, TEK (Academic Engineers and Architects in Finland)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

[Divergingemployment outcomes of higher education], Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Education andPsychology, University of Jyväskylä, 2018. [Online]. Available: http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-39-7529-6.[6] I. Tanhua, Teorioita sukupuolenmukaisen segregaation syistä [Theories of gendersegregation], Research report by SEGLI project, 2018. [Online]. Available:https://www.kaikkienduuni.fi/teorioita-segregaation-syist/ [English translation of graphprovided by Tanhua to the Authors].[7] R. Hutt, “These 10 countries are closest to achieving gender equality,” World EconomicForum, 17 Dec 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/12/gender-gap-equality-women-parity-countries/.[8] S. Singh and S. Peers, “Where are the Women in the Engineering

Conference Session

The Best of First-year Programs Division

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sydney Anne Morris, Northeastern University; Hannah Boyce, Northeastern University; Caroline Ghio, Northeastern University; Amanda Dee, Northeastern University; Alexis Pathwick-Paszyc, Northeastern University; Paul DiMilla, Northeastern University; Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Conference Session

Community-Engaged Engineering Education Challenges and Opportunities in Light of COVID-19 Paper Presentations 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Whitney Gaskins, University of Cincinnati; Paula Davis Lampley Esq., University of Cincinnati; Krizia Leonela Cabrera-Toro, University of Cincinnati

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division, Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

, “Stereotyping and its threat are real.,” American Psychologist, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 680–681, 1998. 6. C. L. Walker and S. J. Rakow, “The Status of Hispanic American Students in Science: Attitudes,” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 225–245, 1985. 7. A. Meador, “Examining Recruitment and Retention Factors for Minority STEM Majors Through a Stereotype Threat Lens,” School Science and Mathematics, vol. 118, no. 1-2, pp. 61–69, 2018. 8. D. Sadegh, S. Perkins-Hall and K. Abeysekera, “Tested Strategies for Recruiting and Retention of STEM Majors” in International Association for Development of the Information Society: Proceeding of the 5th International Association for Development of the

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kristen Moore, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Casey E. Wright, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Erica M. Stone, Middle Tennessee State University; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University at West Lafayette

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

writing,” Coll. English, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 610–617, 1979.[20] J. Colwell, J. Whittington, and C. F. Jenks, “Writing Challenges for Graduate Students in Engineering and Technology,” 2011, doi: 10.18260/1-2--18722.[21] A. Selzer King, K. R. Moore, S. Frankel, and A. Hardage Edlin, “Drawing Strategies for Communication Planning: A Rationale and Exemplar of the Geometric Page Form (GPF) Approach,” ACM'S Spec. Inte. Group on the Des. of Info., 2017.[22] A. S. King and A. H. Edlin, “Structured drawing tasks support research ideation : A mentor-mentee report on iteration, invention, and collaboration,” ACM'S Spec. Inte

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Erika A. Mosyjowski, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session

ofpractices described above in which participants are asked to look through the deck (or virtualdisplay) of practices to identify the three to six practices they feel are most emphasized or valuedand an additional three to six they perceived to be emphasized or valued in a given engineeringcontext. Participants are asked a series of follow up questions after these card sorts. Afterdiscussing the practices emphasized in the engineering context(s) in which they engaged,participants are asked to sort through the deck once again to identify the top practices theypersonally deem to be most important in addressing a complex problem in their field. In addition,participants are asked to reflect on the extent to which the valued aspects of engineering work

Conference Session

Women in Engineering Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kairys Grasty, University of Massachusetts, Boston; Shivani Sakri, Arizona State University; Amanda C. Arnold, Idaho State University; Jennifer M Bekki, Arizona State University; Kerrie G. Wilkins-Yel, University of Massachusetts, Boston; Madison Natarajan, University of Massachusetts, Boston; Bianca L. Bernstein, Arizona State University; Ashley K. Randall, Counseling and Counseling Psychology, Arizona State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, Jun. 2020, vol. 2020-June, doi: 10.18260/1-2--34617.[7] L. Torres, M. W. Driscoll, and A. L. Burrow, “Racial microaggressions and psychological functioning among highly achieving African-Americans: A mixed-methods approach,” J. Soc. Clin. Psychol., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1074–1099, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.10.1074.[8] T. M. Evans, L. Bira, J. B. Gastelum, L. T. Weiss, and N. L. Vanderford, “Evidence for a mental health crisis in graduate education,” Nat. Biotechnol., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 282–284, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1038/nbt.4089.[9] J. K. Hyun, B. C. Quinn, T. Madon, and S. Lustig, “Graduate student mental health

Conference Session

Remote Physical Laboratories: Experimentation and Laboratory-oriented Studies

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Oludare Adegbola Owolabi P.E., Morgan State University; Jumoke 'Kemi' Ladeji-Osias, Morgan State University; Mehdi Shokouhian, Morgan State University; Oludayo Samuel Alamu, Morgan State University; Seong W. Lee, Morgan State University; Gbekeloluwa B. Oguntimein P.E., Morgan State University; Adedayo Ariyibi, Morgan State University; Hye Jeong Lee, Morgan State University; Krishna Bista, Morgan State University; Mulugeta T. Dugda, Morgan State University; Sotonye Ikiriko, Morgan State University; Celeste Chavis P.E., Morgan State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies

Doing L Listening to instructor/taking notes, etc. AnQ Student answering a question posed by the instructor with the rest of the class listening SQ Student asks a question WC Engaged in whole class discussion by offering explanations, opinion, judgment, etc Ind Individual thinking/problem solving. CG Discuss clicker question in groups of 2 or more students WG Working in groups on worksheet activity OG Other assigned group activity, such as responding to instructor question Prd Making a prediction about the outcome of demo or experiment SP Presentation by student(s) TQ Test or quiz W Waiting O Other – explain in comments Instructor is Doing Lec Lecturing RtW Real-time writing on board, doc. projector, etc

Conference Session

Perspectives on Engineering Education During COVID-19

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ziyan Bai, University of Washington; Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Shruti Misra, University of Washington; Morgan Anderson, University of Washington, Seattle; Neha Kardam, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Conference Session

Development Around Diversity

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rebekah Oulton P.E., California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo ; Tessa Gail Gallagher, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo ; Claire Katherine Anovick, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

Conference Session

Social Justice: Pedagogy, Curricular Reform, and Activism

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joseph Valle, University of Michigan - Ann Arbor; Israa Ali, University of Michigan ; Corin L. Bowen, California State University, Los Angeles; Donna M Riley, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

educationresearch [13]. Figure 1 leverages this model to show how the engineering and labor theory ofchange fits into this study of engineering graduate students engaging in a strike. The modelconnects Mejia et al.’s critical consciousness model [17], which engages Freire’s principles ofcritical pedagogy [18], with Hassan’s model of learning-assessment interactions [19]. “Mejia etal.’s model is represented in the center of this model, showing relationships between theory,action, reflection, and concepts of scholarship, praxis, concientização, and liberation that resultfrom their overlap. Hassan’s model of learning-assessment interactions is overlaid, with theoverlap taking the form of reflection as an assessment method and action as a learning method”[13

Conference Session

Exploration of Broad Issues and Promotion of Engineering and Technological Literacy

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

John Heywood, Trinity College Dublin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

require to be proficient intechnological literacy? That is a central issue of this discussion.As a matter of policy in the 1980’s governments seem to have taken the view that it is amatter of the economic good that students should study technology in schools [15], and by1992 a World Council of Associations for Technology Education had been founded. Theconference proceedings associated with the founding of this organization, had the title“Technological Literacy, Competence and Innovation in Human Resource Development”[16].Yet, in this extensive report there are only two papers that mention technological literacy[17; 18]. Both authors are American; one, Michael Dyrenfurth is a member of ASEE. Hisdefinition was,“Technological literacy is a concept

Conference Session

CoNECD Session : Day 3 Slot 3 Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 CoNECD

Authors

Justin Charles Major, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Allison Godwin, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno

Tagged Topics

CoNECD Paper Submissions, Diversity

author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF. The ideas we present here are part of a much larger thought process (Authors, 2021, in progress) in which we are thinking about the ways in which we use quantitative methods in engineering education, and how they might be better realigned or reformed to achieve the same diversity and equity outcomes we feel are more readily achieved by qualitative methods at the time. Our treatment and presentation of demographic data variables here represent a starting point. 1 The “doing” of engineering education is full of many delicate power