engineering early in their academicpathway. However, while the class connects students to peers, campus resources, and morecontext for what a career in engineering might look like, it does not actively incorporate largeportions of the math curriculum as other first year programs have attempted [6]. Traditionally,students who place into Intermediate Algebra (MATH 099) in the fall of their first year ofcollege must take this course as well as a two-part Precalculus sequence (MATH 141 and MATH142) before being ready for a Calculus 1 (MATH 151) class. Students can enroll in ENGR 101concurrent with MATH 141.The Engineering in Context learning community changes this sequencing by offering students amultidisciplinary cohort experience over two quarters [7
Studies and Hands-on Learning to Empower Non-Engineers to Excel in a Tech-Driven WorldAbstractThis paper presents an experience report on a new general education course designed to buildconfidence in students across all academic majors, most of which are non-STEM, in exploring,evaluating, and adopting emerging technologies for their future careers. The modular coursecombines case studies with hands-on learning activities that incorporate generative AI, equippingstudents to thrive in an era of rapid technological change. Results from pre- and post-coursesurveys show a marked increase in student confidence in achieving the course outcomes.Furthermore, module-specific surveys indicate positive student perceptions, highlighting
simple to implement in the classroom, it integrates several valuablecomponents including critical thinking, interdisciplinary teamwork, and innovation. Pre- andpost-activity surveys (n=15) were administered. Qualitative and quantitative analysis(Wilcoxon Signed-Rank) were performed on the survey results, which included both shortanswer and Likert-scale data. Results indicate the majority of the teachers felt the activityimproved their understanding of sustainable engineering design and was useful and importantto them in their career. Further, most teachers felt that the activity would be useful and engagingfor K-5 students in their learning about sustainable design. Six of 14 teachers responded thatthey are likely to adopt this activity in their
STEM fields and enhancing retention by reducing dropout rates, particularly inmale-dominated environments through supportive and collaborative settings 6 . Creating gender-aware courses that promote participation across technical and managerial roles and introducingrole models can build STEM self-efficacy, encouraging young women to pursue and remain inengineering careers 7,8 . Addressing unconscious bias and providing fair role assignments furtherenable female students to confidently take on technical responsibilities while fostering a strongsense of community and professional commitment 9,10 .Ultimately, this project highlights how practical, student-led initiatives in engineering educationdrive real-world skill development and meaningful
within the overall nationalpopulation. Faculty members and administrators play key roles in academia, from deciding whogets hired in faculty roles to teach and advise students, to deciding policies and practices thatsupport student retention and graduation. Thus, the beliefs of STEM faculty members andadministrators about who belongs in their institutions, in their disciplines, and the types ofopportunities and access they should have speak to the decision-making that shapes the exclusionthat occurs in STEM.PurposeThis study is part of a larger research project designed to investigate factors that help or hinderindividuals from minoritized racial and ethnic identities when pursuing careers in the STEMprofessoriate. The research questions that
PD program, an application was shared withengineering faculty and engineering graduate program coordinators before the start of the spring2024 semester. The application also was sent directly to engineering graduate students assignedas TAs for the semester. Six engineering graduate students submitted applications and wereaccepted to participate (Table 2). All participants expressed interest in inclusive teaching and/orfaculty careers. One of the graduate students served as a TA in the fullest capacity (i.e., taughtweekly recitation sessions). As mentioned above, challenges with TA appointments preventedmost of the participants from actively teaching in a TA role.Table 2. Demographics of engineering graduate student participants in the pilot
Aeronautics and Astronautics, for which her research focuses on fracture mechanics models for composite materials. She hopes to pursue a career in developing cutting-edge composite materials for aerospace applications. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Work in Progress: Compatibility of Mentoring Pairs in an Undergraduate Peer Mentoring ProgramIntroductionThis paper is a work in progress on a Women in Engineering Program practice that outlines a peermentoring matching process and quantitatively assesses participant satisfaction.BackgroundFormal peer mentoring for women students in higher education has been shown to provide impor-tant benefits such as significant improvement in psychological
to enter careers in science, engineering, andtechnology. Most daunting is harmoniously integrating the three dimensions of science learninghighlighted by NGSS: Core ideas, science and engineering practices, and cross-cutting concepts.While the core ideas are similar to previous standards, the emphasis on students’ understandingof the approach and methods employed by engineers and scientists and the demand thatengineering and technology be integrated into the structure of science education by “raisingengineering design to the same level as scientific inquiry” [15] presented new challenges toscience teachers.The integration of these standards provides math, science, and engineering teachers theopportunity to develop students’ knowledge and
achievement is specified fordifferent students. A course, which provide advanced education for upper division undergraduatestudents as well as early career graduate students, should include the ability to analyze thesustainability of an engineered system using tools such as lifecycle assessment. As previouslyreported, lifecycle assessment was integrated as part of the semester long course in modeling [8].In addition, the environmental engineering body of knowledge includes Outcome 14, “EffectiveCommunication”. Effective communication includes interactions with the public as well as thetechnical community. The level of achievement specified for upper division undergraduatestudents as well as early career graduate students specifies, “plan, composed
face in their careers [6] andmay promote motivation in learning [7]. Also, real-world problems often require knowledgefrom various disciplines, promoting interdisciplinary collaboration. This exposure helps studentsappreciate the interconnectedness of engineering with other fields, such as social sciences andenvironmental studies [8]. Finally, addressing real-world issues encourages students to considerthe ethical implications of their engineering solutions, instilling a sense of social responsibilityand awareness of the impact their work has on society [6].Engaging Clients in Design Courses – Client-Based PedagogyClient-based pedagogy encompasses an educational framework wherein students activelyparticipate in real-world projects that
[4]. An interview-based study by the Clayman Institute for GenderResearch at Stanford University also showed significant mental health damage due to NDAspreventing employees from talking about their experiences with friends, family, colleagues andothers. The misuse of NDAs contributes to career damage, and reduced prospects foremployment, as those who sign NDAs are not able to speak truthfully about a previous job [5].The UK Department for Business Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) stated that NDAs thatprevented the disclosure of wrongdoing or other workplace grievances often resulted in silencedindividuals experiencing extreme feelings of isolation and negative mental health impacts [6].This misuse of NDAs violates the first
University and a M.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Cornell University. Among other awards for her research, she was awarded a National Science Foundation CAREER Award in 2022 to study epistemic negotiations on interdisciplinary engineering education research teams.Aaron Livingston Alexander, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Aaron is a third-year undergraduate student at the University at Buffalo working towards his Bachelor’s of Science in Electrical Engineering. He has assisted in several qualitative research projects during his time at the university. Aaron also serves as a student ambassador of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion for the School of Engineering and Applied Sciences
. The student has always been intriguedby the field of aerospace engineering and to one day work for and help lead a significantcompany in furthering the exploration and development of the relationship between earth andspace. This opportunity was introduced and encouraged by one of her engineering professorsafter sharing her interest in aerospace and NASA, and the student later became a selectee toparticipate in the program at the Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, during thesummer entering her junior academic year as a mechanical engineering student. Upon applyingfor the NASA internship, the student was given a list of projects to choose from that fit heracademic and career goals the best, choosing a project that was
Women’s SuccessPrograms to increase women's participation in software engineering emphasize both technicaland non-technical skill development. Women-focused coding boot camps, online platforms, andcommunity programs significantly impact participants’ confidence and persistence. Researchsuggests that creating a sense of community in these settings boosts self-confidence andmotivates women to pursue careers in STEM [20]. For example, Black Girls Code providesparticipants foundational coding skills, preparing them to succeed academically andprofessionally [26]. Similarly, boot camps like Ada Developers Academy provide project-basedlearning experiences that mirror real-world challenges, fostering adaptability and criticalthinking, as well as
integration of HCD principles offers numerous opportunities for innovation.Broadening the initiative to interdisciplinary programs in civil, electrical, or biomedicalengineering could foster a culture of human-centered problem-solving across engineeringdisciplines. Extending HCD integration to graduate-level courses and professional developmentprograms would further reinforce these principles throughout the engineering educationcontinuum.Developing robust assessment tools is an important goal. Surveys, rubrics, and portfolio-basedevaluations could better measure the development of empathy, creativity, and problem-solvingskills in students. Longitudinal studies tracking graduates’ career trajectories would providevaluable insights into the lasting
Identity-Inclusive Computing Education (AiiCE). She also serves as senior personnel for the NSF-funded Athena Institute for Artificial Intelligence (AI). Her career in higher education began at Howard University as the first Black female faculty member in the Department of Computer Science. Her professional experience also includes Winthrop University, The Aerospace Corporation, and IBM. She is a graduate of Johnson C. Smith University (B.S., ’00) and North Carolina State University (M.S., ’02; Ph.D., ’05), becoming the ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Paper ID #46099first Black woman to earn a
Engineering at Virginia Tech and a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education where she has also served in key leadership positions. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and leadership related to graduate student mentoring and faculty development. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, received the College of Engineering Graduate Student Mentor Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is
are best suited for teaching the different components of their courses. Giventhe importance of Introductory Thermodynamics in many students’ engineering careers,individual learning activities need to be effective, easy to implement, and optimally enjoyable.Students, especially struggling students, need activities that help them learn the fundamentalconcepts that will guide their reasoning when they are later performing calculations. Learningtechnology developers need to understand which technologies and approaches are the mostpromising so they know where to invest their efforts.In this paper, we provide some empirical evidence that may help instructors and designers makethese decisions. We explore the development, deployment, use and student
interests and schedule; sign-ups were completed through the Learning Management System.Workshops were limited to 50 attendees each; total course enrollment was 252 students. Studentsthen attended their selected workshop and were required to submit a half to one page writtensummary, worth 5.2% of the final course grade, detailing what they did at the workshop, whatelements they liked and disliked, what they learned, and how the workshop related to their majoror career goals (if at all). To receive credit for their summary, students were also required to signa physical sign-in sheet to verify attendance. Half of the student summaries, representing allsubmissions from three out of the six course laboratory sections, were read by the courseinstructor
curiosity,skill acquisition, and deep understanding. Students are rarely shown how calculus can be acreative, powerful tool for solving real-world engineering problems. Instead, they areburdened by repetitive manual computations that fail to connect with the complex,technology-driven tasks they will face in their careers. Moreover, outdated assessmentmethods, such as high-stakes exams, reinforce this disconnect, often producing medianscores below 40% and fostering frustration rather than confidence.This experimental course aims to reframe calculus education to emphasize not justtheoretical principles but their practical applications. Traditional timed exams have beenmostly replaced with three major projects that focus on solving real-world
motivated by the need to enhance student engagement with sustainability principles andsocial responsibility, preparing them for careers that increasingly demand consideration of thesefactors. The redesign also aimed to foster an entrepreneurial mindset by encouraging students toidentify market-driven solutions to societal challenges.3.1 Core Design PrinciplesThe course followed a structured engineering design process that required teams toconceptualize, design, and test innovative processes addressing societal needs. Students engagedin iterative design thinking, which allowed them to refine their ideas based on feedback and newinsights.3.2 Project SelectionProjects were sourced from alumni, faculty, and industry partners, ensuring that they
, we expand access tovaluable manufacturing education beyond traditional classroom settings. Metal casting is oftenperceived as resource-intensive and inaccessible to many students due to equipment costs andsafety concerns, but this module democratizes learning by providing step-by-step guidance anddemonstrations in a digital format [16]. Through YouTube, students, educators, and hobbyistsworldwide can learn about foundry techniques, engage with the content through discussions, andapply the knowledge in their own learning environments. Making this module freely availablesupports the broader mission of engineering education by fostering inclusivity, promoting hands-on learning, and encouraging interest in manufacturing careers. By leveraging
master's A second strong sense of place that comes particularly from graduates to fuel the growth of the state’s high-tech industry and provide every Washington citizen, especially those in the Southstudying engineering in the Pacific Northwest is the fact that the Puget Sound, convenient access to a degree to prepare them forUWT campus has the distinction of being the nation’s closest a career in the field. A second unique charge of the Institute wasfour-year civil engineering program to one of the world’s most to reach out to women and other underrepresented groups.famous civil
designed will help STEM instructors across SUNY explore ways to teachwith AI tools toward greater knowledge about its potential to support STEMeducation–while also exploring its pitfalls such as inaccuracy, context-blindness,harmful content (generation), and “knowledge drift” due to AI recycling its owncontent. We call this first dimension “critical AI literacy for effective STEMeducation.” Second, we will support participating faculty to enhance diversity,equity, and inclusion (DEI) by recognizing and mitigating potential harms of AI-integrated science to DEI goals in science education and careers. We call thisdimension “AI-assisted inclusive STEM education.” Scaling up our 2023-24project, we developed and shared video discussions, online games
(anxiety etc.).There have been many studies on gender differences. Jones [5] studied how gender differencesaffect student motivation constructs, achievement, and career plans, along with the interactionsamong them. Jones found that female students did have lower self-efficacy, but not necessarilyto a statistically significant level. In Hutchison et.al. [4], it was found that females who persist inSTEM have lower self- efficacy perceptions than their male colleagues. These were also brokendown by race and ethnicity. Fraley et.al. [3] assessed confidence and competency of first yearengineering students. It was found that many students enter class with a pre-conceived notion ofalready knowing the material. It was also found that female students
from the University of Benin, Benin City.Dr. Jessica Deters, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dr. Jessica Deters is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical and Materials Engineering and Discipline Based Education Researcher at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. She holds her Ph.D. in Engineering Education and M.S. in Systems Engineering from Virginia Tech and a B.S. in Applied Mathematics and Statistics from Colorado School of Mines. Her research focuses on engineering culture, workplace preparedness and career trajectories of undergraduate and graduate students, and student well-being. She is the 2025 recipient of the Harold and Esther Edgerton Junior Faculty Award and the Henry Y. Kleinkauf Family Distinguished
to secure their educational persistence and long-term career success. Trying to bridge the gap between theory and practice, she is currently involved in an NSF-funded project aimed at fostering the persistence and retention of low-income engineering transfer students.Dayana Rivas, University of California, IrvineAnalia E. Rao, University of California, Irvine ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 A Summer Bridge Program Tech Challenge for Improving Self-Efficacy of Diverse Incoming Engineering First-Year and Transfer StudentsAbstractThis Complete Evidence-Based Practice Paper evaluates a summer bridge program foracademically talented
engineering.The high-level objectives of NEET are to: • Reimagine what and how our students learn, to better prepare them to address critical societal challenges in the 21st century. • Strengthen MIT’s contribution to engineering education worldwide.NEET is based on the following four principles: • Our education should focus on preparing our students to develop the new machines and systems that they will build in the middle of the 21st century. • We should help our students to prepare themselves to be makers, discoverers or along this spectrum, and we should teach engineering fundamentals as a foundation for careers both in research and in practice. • We should build our education around the way our students best learn
Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Grant. She also was an NSF Graduate Research Fellow for her work on female empowerment in engineering which won the National Association for Research in
• the sharing of best practices in the content, teaching, certifications, articulation and career pathways for renewable energy technicians among participants and with their international peers • the use of an online learning collaborative site for knowledge-building activities and to share and disseminate curricula and other learning materialsGermany in particular presented an interesting case. The German Energiewende – or “energytransition” – is an on-going, nationally coordinated, comprehensive undertaking that has twofundamental drivers: the development and deployment of renewable energy sources and anincreased and widespread implementation of energy efficiency measures, all of which isoccurring in a relatively