References Bailey, R. W., Human Performance Engineering, Prentice-Hall, 1996 Certiport, “IC3", Certiport Plaza, American Fork, UT Gupta, U., Information Systems, Prentice-Hall, 2001 Leedy, P.D., & Ormond, J. E., Practical Research, Planning and Design, Prentice - Hall, 8th ed.Snyder, L., Fluency with Information Technology, Skills, Concepts, & Capabilities,Addison-Wesley TestOut Inc., Pleasant Grove, UT Page 10.342.15 13 AppendixCategory Tabulated Forms Page 10.342.16 14 QUESTION BANK BY CATEGORY CONTENT Computer and Management of
An Experiential and Inductively Structured Process Control Course in Chemical Engineering David L. Silverstein University of KentuckyAbstractAn inductive approach to teaching chemical engineering courses has been demonstratedto improve student learning in courses such as mass transfer and stoichiometry. Onecourse particularly well-suited to elements of inductive structure is chemical processcontrol, where experiential learning can also be applied to maximize student learning.This paper discusses the first two implementations of an inductive course structure in thisthree-hour senior-level course at the University of Kentucky Extended Campus Programsin
involvement in the trainingand assigning of visitors to engineering and engineering technology programs that do not havetraditional lead society sponsors. This paper describes the on-going developments as well as theopportunities these evolving new relationships may offer to ASEE members to provide valuableprofessional service to engineering and engineering technology education as program evaluators.ASEE & ABET Interactions and InvolvementASEE was almost 40 years old when it and six other professional societies established ABET’spredecessor, the Engineers Council for Professional Development (ECPD) in 1932 [1]. ASEEhas actively interacted with ABET ever since. ABET and ASEE are vitally interested in thequality of educational programs in
accreditation criteria as an instrument for fostering implementationof the BOK; it summarizes the development process leading to new draft BOK-compliantaccreditation criteria; and, finally, it provides a detailed description and analysis of theproducts—proposed Basic Level Civil Engineering Program Criteria, Advanced Level GeneralCriteria, and the associated draft ASCE Commentary.The ultimate purpose of this paper is to share the new draft criteria with a broader audience andto solicit feedback that will further improve the quality, relevance, and effectiveness of theseproducts.Background: Policy 465 and the Body of KnowledgeRapid technological advancement, globalization, and ever-increasing political, social,environmental, and economic constraints are
topics covered, adescription of the resource materials developed for use by the workshop participants in theirrespective classrooms, and follow-up school visits by ISU College of Engineering student-faculty teams. We conclude the paper with our thoughts on future extensions and improvementsin this program.Motivation for the project:It has been nationally recognized, and well documented, that the United States is facing alooming shortage of citizen engineers and scientists in the coming decades.1 Since the SecondWorld War, the US has relied on “technological innovation” in preserving our preeminent standin the world economy, and in ensuring our own security. The basis for this technologicalsuperiority has been our ability to train and retain
Session 1602 Identifying Specific, Measurable “Skills” Perceived as Requisite for Graduating Aerospace Engineers Kimble-Thom, M.A., Thom, J.M., Crossley, W.A. Purdue UniversityIntroductionIn the last 15 years engineering educators and industry practitioners have attempted to identifywhat skills a graduating engineer needs to acquire during his/her undergraduate education inorder to be successful at design activities. The efforts to identify these design skills are hamperedby both the lack of precision in the terms used to describe design skills and by the
many information technology executives who completed the survey indicated that theyroutinely overestimate by 150%, extending the project duration by a factor of 2.5, whenplanning project timelines and making commitments. By contrast, TSP teams generally reportsetting the most aggressive schedules that they believe can actually be met. Page 10.1124.8 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationIn assessing the quality of products produced by TSP teams, it may be useful to
. Theengineering based labs were designed to enhance and stimulate middle school students’interest in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) concepts. Lessonsare focused on increasing students’ awareness of engineering in daily tasks. Careeropportunities relating to the engineering lesson were presented. The importance ofeffective teamwork, critical thinking, problem solving, and sound technicalcommunication are emphasized. These engineering labs are available for future use bythe partner teacher and the GK-12 program.IntroductionThe National Science Foundation Graduate Teaching Fellows in K-12 EducationVanderbilt-Meharry-Tennessee State Program is now in its fifth full year1. The majorfocus of this program is to partner graduate
© 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Session 2639Industrial Engineering. His research concerns operations research, AHP, economic analysis, and lean manufacturing.Prior joining to California State University, he taught at Amirkabir University of Technology over 10 years.TAREK SHRAIBATI is a full time lecturer of the Manufacturing Systems Engineering and Managementdepartment at California State University at Northridge with 17 years of full-time teaching experience in engineeringcourses. He received his M.S. degree in Materials Science from USC. Prior joining to California State University, heworked at Rocketdyne
achieved in the bread-and-butter sophomore-level Materials Science course required of all engineering majors. This two-credit course now has asone of its primary objectives that ‘The student will have an understanding of, atomic and crystalstructure and chemical bond types, and understand how these affect material properties and aspectsof nanotechnology.’ This is being achieved by supplementing the classroom lectures and text4 withguest lectures by researchers from UIUC as well as A&T’s CAMSS.Manufacturing Processes (MEEN 446)This junior-level course, required of all mechanical engineering majors, uses a textbook5 thatdevotes a chapter to small-size manufacturing technologies and discusses the two approaches ofmolecular engineering and
Engineering and Director of theFreshman Engineering and Computer Science Program. He holds the Ph.D. from the University of Missouri,Columbia and is a PE. He has been in academia since 1970. Among his many activities he served as the Chair of theASEE/BMD 1987-1988 and is a reviewer for NSF. His research focuses on rehabilitation engineering and teaching.THOMAS L. BAZZOLI is Assistant Dean for Fiscal Affairs and Research. He holds the MS in Nuclear Scienceand Engineering from the Air Force Institute of Technology. During his Air Force career he directed diverseresearch programs in modeling and testing of system performance, compositional mapping of submicron materialsand machine translation of text. He was instrumental in establishing the college’s
educational processdetermines the quality of the educational outcome. Educational quality, however, is themost difficult attribute to define, measure and properly control. In the following thefactors causing the difficulties in defining educational quality in the receivers domain arediscussed. By following the lean thinking approach an educational quality measures andcontrol are discussed.Lean Academics ApproachUnder the pressure to stay competitive improve quality and eliminate waste and focus onthe end customer several industrial institutions adopted the lean thinking methodology[1]. With increasing pressure to produce high quality industry ready engineers, reducethe curriculum time, and include mastery of new technologies educational institutions
Software Engineering Design: A Laboratory in Building Team Management Skills Susan E. Conry and Douglas J. MacIntosh Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Clarkson University Potsdam, NY 13699-5720Introduction “Engineering is problem recognition, formulation, and solution. In the next 20 years, engineers and engineering students will be required to use new tools and apply ever- increasing knowledge in expanding engineering disciplines, all while considering societal repercussions and constraints within a complex landscape of old and new ideas. They
the College of Engineering and Information Technology. WithDr. Rhonda Grego, she developed the Writing Studio Program, which provided an early prototype for the ResearchCommunications Studio. She continues to pursue her academic research interests in applying cognitive andmetacognitive learning theory to communications instruction. She participates actively in the education of graduateteaching assistants.LORALEE DONATH is a Ph.D. candidate in linguistics at the University of South Carolina and a graduate assistantfor the RCS. Her research interests span the sub-fields of discourse analysis, sociolinguistics, and linguisticanthropology.MICHAEL MATTHEWS, Principal Investigator for the Research Communications Studio, is a Professor ofChemical
College — The roles of an upper division service-learning course, such as OutreachCorps, in the overall college-wide curriculum lies in its interdisciplinary nature, in itsrequirement that students integrate subject matter from a wide range of prior courses, and that thecourse itself has embedded assessment to ensure that it is challenging. The Outreach Corps classfurther fits into the college curriculum because it advances science and math through engineeringin the K-12 setting, and it aligns with the national priority of boosting the nation’s science,mathematics engineering and technology workforce.For Undergraduate Students — This course provides an upper-division service-learningexperience that puts junior and senior engineering students in a
peers, but also through interacting with other people in different kinds ofout-of-class contexts by technology-based activities such as discussions and forums in web,workplace or even community-based experiences in partnership with different professionalsacross disciplines so as to widen their scope of horizon in learning. This kind of teaching andlearning belief is compatible with a constructivist approach. It must be firmly held by teacherswhen group project-based teaching strategy is adopted. Page 10.699.11 “Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education, Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright
. studies at Penn State, he majored in Curriculum and Instruction and minored inScience, Technology, and Society (STS).JEANINE CASLER is a Lecturer in the Writing Program at Northwestern University. She received her B.A. fromRosemont College, her M.A. in English literature from the University of Pennsylvania, and her Ph.D. from theUniversity of Georgia.JOHN C. ANDERSON is the Instructional Technology Coordinator for IDEA, Northwestern University's Institutefor Design Engineering and Applications. He is also a Lecturer in the Writing Program. He received his B.A. fromthe University of Michigan, and his M.A. from Northwestern University.JOHN B. TROY, Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Northwestern University, chaired the undergraduateprogram for
. Recommendations are made toaddress student concerns that include active and cooperative learning approaches, and thedevelopment of learning communities.Introduction In today’s technological society the need for engineers in the workplace is at an all timehigh. In the next ten years it is estimated that the United States will need to train an additional1.9 million workers in the sciences [1], a significant portion of which will need to be engineers.Not only it is important to train larger numbers of engineers, it is also necessary to attract a moreprevalent representation of women and minorities in the engineering workforce. Identification ofthis need is certainly not new or unique to this study, yet simply highlights the need to beinterested in
, Z.T., Mobasher, A., and Jalloh, A., Synthesis of Engineering Best Practices and ABET AC2K into a New Mechanical Engineering Curriculum, Session 2266, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, St. Louis, MO, June 18-21, 2000.5. Karunamoorthy, S. and Ravindra, K., Integrated Curriculum Design in Mechanical Engineering – Opportunities and Challenges, Session 2566, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle WA, June 28-July 1, 1998.6. Wood, J.C., An Interdisciplinary Problem-Based Engineering Technology Freshman Curriculum, Session 2248, Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle WA, June 28-July 1, 1998.7. Johnson, K.V. and Rajai, M., “Student in the
have to deal with increased complexity. Increasedcomplexity is being driven by many factors: new technologies, shorter applicationdevelopment life cycles, iterative development, more geographically distributedprojects and resources, increased tool diversity and higher risks [7]. In addition,business executives are placing increased emphasis on making sure that the solutionsdeveloped by IT are aligned with the business’ needs. Page 10.575.1 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering EducationEA issues, Changing
Engineering Change for Women in Engineering: The Role of Curricular and Instructional Change Sandra Spickard Prettyman, Helen Qammar, Edward Evans, and Francis Broadway University of Akron, Akron Ohio 44325IntroductionWomen currently make up 56% of all undergraduates but remain underrepresented in almost allscience, technology, engineering and math (STEM) programs. This trend certainly holds true inengineering at the University of Akron, where women constitute only 18% of the engineeringstudent population. In addition, while women’s representation in the workforce has increased,their representation in the science and engineering workforce has
understandhow engineering learning and educational experiences vary across populations and institutions,identifying significant factors related to gender, ethnic, and geographic diversity.APS addresses the following fundamental research questions: • SKILLS: How do students’ engineering skills and knowledge develop and/or change over time? How do the technological and mathematical fluencies of engineering students compare with those found in professional engineering settings? • IDENTITY: How do these students come to identify themselves as engineers? How do students’ appreciation, confidence, and commitment to engineering change as they navigate their education? How does this in turn affect how these students make
Department at Cal Poly StateUniversity, San Luis Obispo, CA. She received her bachelor degrees (in Chemistry and Materials Science &Engineering) from Michigan State University, and Ph.D. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. At CalPoly, she teaches undergraduate students Structures of Materials, Kinetics of Materials, and various other courses.LISA CHRISTENSENLisa Christensen graduated from California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo in 2004 with an MS inEngineering, specializing in Biomedical Engineering. Her thesis research focused on understanding fracture andfatigue behavior in cortical bone. Prior to her graduate studies, she earned her BS in Materials Engineering in 2002.Currently, Lisa works as a design engineer in
theproficiency exam procedure was instituted since so few students actually passed the exam. Page 10.645.2 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Youngstown State University College of Engineering and Technology ENGR 1555—Engineering Drawings and Visualization Proficiency ExamBase BracketSketch Sketch isometric andfront, top
. B.S., Industrial Engineering, M.S., Civil Engineering, Ph.D. student inIndustrial Technology. Address: 110 Marston, Iowa State University, 50011. Email: goodwinm@iastate.edu Page 10.172.8 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering Education”
ethics learning and practice, professors need to interlace ethicaldecision-making skills into their various engineering classes. The Accreditation Board forEngineering and Technology criterion three, part f requires that ethics topics be interlacedthroughout the various courses2. For example, a material science course could have studentswork problems and case scenarios about materials selection not only on stress properties but alsoon effects to the environment and resource sustainability. Another factor could involve the initialand long term cost of the decision involving the same environmental areas. This is especiallytrue where product design priority has been for lower cost, which makes the product easy tothrow away but too expensive to
currently enrolled as a doctoral candidate in the Department of Electrical Engineeringand Computer Science at Vanderbilt University. She is a student member of ASEE and IEEE. Her interests includeemploying learning models in engineering classrooms and laboratory.ARTHUR J. BRODERSEN is Professor Emeritus and former Chair of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceat Vanderbilt University. His recent technical interests have been the use of computer and network technology toenhance engineering education. Page 10.200.9 “Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
greatly enhanced.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge and thank the Ford Motor Company for its sponsorshipand continued support of the annual robotics competition at Tuskegee University. In addition,Ford Motor Company engineers have provided input through design reviews and encouragementto the student body.References[1] D. McGraw, "My Job Lies Over the Ocean," in Prism, December 2003, pp. 25-29.[2] "Profile of an Engineer," Transferable Integrated Design Engineering Education. [Online]. Available: http://www.tidee.wsu.edu/assets/engineer-profile.html[3] "2005-2006 Criteria for Accreditating Engineering Programs," Accreditation Board for Engineering & Technology (ABET). [Online]. Available
Mentoring Graduate Students In Engineering Education Through Team Teaching Jamie Phillips and Timothy Murphy The University Of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109AbstractThe preparation of science and engineering graduate students for careers in academia is ofconcern due to the lack of formal professional training in teaching required for new science andengineering faculty members. In this paper, a team teaching project resembling a teachinginternship is described. An undergraduate electrical engineering course was team taught by afaculty member and graduate student in the goal of preparing the graduate student for a futurecareer in academia. The
processes available for making the product using this material may then beconsidered and the best process chosen based on the technological and economic feasibilities ofthe process. Unfortunately this exercise is seldom simple on account of the enormous progress inthe development of materials and processes in recent times [1]. Fortunately, the monumentalwork done by Ashby and his associates [2] has paved the way for not only making these taskssimpler, but provide unambiguous guidelines for completing these tasks. A course with exampleshighlighting these aspects would be of great benefit to mechanical engineering students inlearning how to apply the knowledge in their profession. This paper was written as a preamblefor this goal.In this paper the