additional experience of customer discovery assistedthe RL in tailoring the research objectives and taught the faculty and graduate student mentorabout the commercial potential of this project.Case Study of the effects of combining REU research activities and I-Corps site customerdiscovery activities:Harvest-to-harvest: Novel clay-based adsorbents for poultry litter: The REU students processedand evaluated the efficacy of natural clay-based adsorbents to harvest phosphates and ammoniumions from poultry litter, and explored its application as a fertilizer. Besides turning a waste into auseful product, this waste management solution is expected to help poultry producers reduce thelevels of ammonia in chicken farm houses, thereby reducing energy
in a meaningful way to create an enriching learning experience. Moreover,designing assessments that stretches students’ thought-process is critical to engineeringpedagogy. This is implemented in the course as structured threaded discussion forums, governedby instructors that provide thought-provoking guiding questions followed by peer discussion.This essay also explores the design and implementation of virtual laboratory sessionscomplementing the bi-weekly homework assignments and a final project. It describes theassessment design decisions, based on the overall course learning outcomes, taken to suit theonline learners. The aim of this essay is to inform, the community of asynchronous onlinecomputer engineering educators, of assessment
notice, or in aself-defining time period. Personal ethics are tested when engineers are engaged inconvergent thinking and not paying attention to the sudden dilemma facing them. It isthen we conduct an “Unanticipated Moral Query.” There are several questions to beasked of students when they feel they have to make a major decision in their engineeringcareers. Questions such as: If this was my business, would I make the same decision? Ifmy action faced public scrutiny, would I be ashamed? Would it be acceptable forsomeone else to treat you in the same manner? How would you handle this situation ifyou knew the other person would find out? Would you treat this person this way if he/shewere a family member or friend? If you were going to purchase and
past few decades, there has been a push for engineering curriculum to better engagewith the global, ethical, and societal impacts of the field and to prepare students to engage in amulticultural and diverse workspace and world. In an effort to introduce diversity in design andto troubleshoot the concept of the universal user, we adapted the display compatibilityquestionnaire from Smith’s study of display-control stereotype designs, and presented the samedesign questions to 21st century first-year engineering students, non-engineering students, andnon-engineering professionals. This work explores current societal impacts such as gender, age,and occupation on the user expectation of a control’s display and user-interface design.Additionally, the
perceptions of students enrolled in the major or faculty in that major, thisdisconnect could lead to dissatisfaction and retention issues.This work will present initial findings from a single-institution study of an optional majorexploration course in engineering where students were asked to describe what engineers do for aliving both before and after completing the course. This work will later be expanded to illustratethe impact the major exploration course has on first year engineering students’ perceptions ofengineering. Additional future work will also connect course completion with future majorswitching or lack thereof and graduation rates.Literature ReviewIn Seymour and Hewitt’s seminal work, they conclude, among other things, that interest in
paper, looking at workplace practices that promoteengineering graduates going out into the world and generating these new ideas. We call thisoverlap or nexus between innovation and entrepreneurship the “Embracing New Ideas” (ENI)space and identify self-efficacy and behavioral measures that capture its essence. We alsoconsider how to promote these associated behaviors in the workplace, situating our model in theframework of Social Cognitive Career Theory. Our associated research questions are: ● RQ1: How can Embracing New Ideas (ENI) be operationalized into measures of self- efficacy and behaviors? ● RQ2: What workplace, self-efficacy and personal factors relate to these behaviors in a variety of organizations?For organizations that
professional development, group identity andbelonging, connections with faculty mentors, and academic success using a 25-question survey.The survey includes Likert scale questions, yes/no/unsure questions, and open-ended discussionquestions. While survey results show that students enjoy the lunches and believe the social andprofessional support activities are beneficial, the results are mixed on whether or not the lunchesplay a role in their decision to remain in an engineering major.IntroductionS-STEM, or Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, is a NationalScience Foundation program that seeks to increase the success of low-income, academicallytalented students. A university scholarship of up to $10,000 annually is awarded
Humanities, Arts & Social Sciences and an affiliate faculty member in the Department of Engineering, Design & Society and the Robotics Graduate Program at the Colorado School of Mines. Dr. Zhu is Editor for International Perspectives at the Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science, Associate Editor for Engineering Studies, Program Chair of American Society for Engineering Education’s Division of Engineering Ethics, Executive Committee Member of the Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum, and Treasurer of the Society for Philosophy and Technology. Dr. Zhu’s research interests include the cultural foundations of engineering ethics, global engineering education, and ethics and policy of computing
DataOverall, the data show that, regardless of status (i.e., student or faculty), respondents who useChatGPT for academic or research purposes viewed it as more accurate and more useful thanthose who use ChatGPT for personal or career related purposes. The data also show that bothstudents and faculty are critical of ChatGPT’s ability to answer engineering questions,particularly as questions were more complex or open-ended.Designing Observation SessionsWhile a survey provides useful insights regarding preferences and behaviors, the authors of thisproceeding recognize that it is also important to make direct observations and measurementswith regards to information-seeking behavior and information literacy and not to assume allself-reported information
early in life [7]. Amongunderrepresented groups like racial minorities, women and students with disabilities, additionalchallenges include financial and technological difficulties [2], [6], [9], [11], [12], [13], loweradmission test scores [11], racial or gender discrimination [14], [15], [16], [17], perception oflimited professional and personal growth opportunities in these fields [14], lack of suitablementors [13], [14], [16], [17] and self-reinforcement of low academic and professionalexpectations from peers [18].Students began making decisions about their abilities and career choices at least by adolescenceand even as early as elementary age [7]. STEM-focused summer middle and high school campshave increased in popularity in recent years
Page 23.1205.2with Professor X. Such positive impressions can aid promotion and tenure as well as increasingsuch faculty members’ influence on decisions of which classes they teach.This paper reviews the literature about student response units’ use and discusses prior researchinto their benefits. While this will touch on some best practices for using clickers, the focus isnot upon convincing instructors how to adopt or improve clicker usage. Much of the authors’prior experience with clickers has been in courses with a large quantitative component. Thispaper discusses the authors’ findings from their first application of clickers in a mainlyqualitative course. The results are consistent with previous results indicating that clickers are
phase of an initiative to shift more power tograduate students through community engagement, ensuring that graduate students will have avoice within PROTEGE. The phases of the project include: 1) Gaining graduate studentperspective for structuring graduate student engagement in PROTEGE, and 2) Developing a planfor involving graduate student perspectives in PROTEGE moving forward. This work is beingled by a graduate student working in the collective, who has experience with doing equity workand wanted to find a mechanism to give graduate students a voice.With community engagement, by involving community members in the decision-making andoutcome-production process, they can feel more invested in the results of the work and feel asense of
who interacts regularly with students and participates in evaluatingstudents’ project performance. Student accountability to the client is important. Real-worldproblems have been associated with increased student commitment to the project in comparisonto instructor-created problems2.Although industry-academic research collaboration and industry-based capstone experiences arewidespread, we found little guidance in the literature about strategies for incorporating an open-ended client project within a single graduate course. This paper describes the experiences of twofaculty members at different institutions, one industry partner, and our students with such aproject. In what follows, we discuss the ways that the project was integrated into our
Paper ID #29446Changing an Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Culture fromthe Bottom Up: Action Plans Generated from Faculty InterviewsElise A. Frickey, Iowa State University Elise is a graduate student at Iowa State University. As a doctoral student in Counseling Psychology, she has been involved with research on the application of self-determination theory to different domains to allow for better understanding of the relationships between contextual factors, basic psychological needs, and indices of well-being. Prior to attending Iowa State University, she obtained a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology and Spanish
graduatelevels. At the undergraduate level, students spend most of their time in classrooms completingdegree requirements as needed for their individual programs. Although undergraduates maydevelop meaningful relationships with a few key faculty members, those faculty have littleinfluence over student completion of degree requirements.At the graduate level, contact with faculty is more intense and relevant to degree completion. Afaculty member serves as the supervisory chair, helps students develop their own researchagendas, and provides critical introductions to the discipline. Much of a student’s professionaldevelopment and career trajectory depend on positive relationships with faculty in theirdepartment. While graduate students are required to take
trips) that give students hands-on experiences or enable them to see and/or experience science and engineering in action, and in ways that relate directly to their personal lives; 2) Bringing STEM professionals to class or providing other means by which students can talk directly to professionals with STEM careers; 3) Sharing science and engineering anecdotes and personal experiences in class and when meeting with students in one-on-one and small group interactions; and 4) Alerting students to STEM-oriented programs within and outside of school in which they (students) can participate. After exploring how teachers influence students towards STEM, we asked them tospeculate why they believe that the mechanisms of
students and faculty members with the tools to promote effective and inclusive learning environments and mentorship practices. Homero aspires to change discourses around broadening participation in engineering and promoting action to change. Homero has been recognized as a Diggs Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, a recipient of the NSF CAREER award, and was inducted into the Bouchet Honor Society. Homero serves as the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI), the Program Chair for the ASEE Faculty Development Division, and the Vice Chair
Paper ID #39472Board 113: Engineering Faculty’s Academic Influence on StudentPersistence: Faculty Use, Knowledge, and Comfort in ProvidingEncouragement to StudentsMs. Rachel Ziminski, University of Massachusetts Lowell Rachel Ziminski is a third year doctoral student in the Leadership in Education program at the Univer- sity of Massachusetts Lowell. Her research interests include understanding faculty influence on student persistence, faculty teaching preparation, and creating an environment of continuous learning in higher education. Her current research focuses on faculty influence on underrepresented minority student
explored how considerations of sustainability influences how project success is defined and measured, project risks, market opportunities, and portfolio management. Most recently, a lesson was introduced to the course focused on helping students understand effective negotiating abilities as a critical project management skill. We explain how negotiations are an important element of life in general, and specifically in project management. Example applications of negotiation in project management include: definition of project scope; development of budget and schedule; management of conflict between team members; analysis of requests for changes to scope, schedule, cost, and specifications; handling results of project audits; and
research avenues. The flexibility of theprogram makes it beneficial for tenure-track as well as non-tenure track faculty while givingstudents at all stages of their academic careers the opportunity to participate in hands-on researchprojects.CI projects are offered in each academic discipline, many of which offer a number of projectsfrom which students can choose. The program encourages student-centered projects that allowundergraduates to explore a topic of interest while developing a sense of independence.According to the CI Spring 2014 survey data, approximately 20% of projects result from ideasgenerated by students who then approach a faculty member to be the project mentor. Studentsreceive course credit for their participation which can be
learning community is for new faculty and instructional staff to gettheir careers off to an efficient and productive start. It is intended to provide a culture of supportfor (primarily) teaching, and (secondarily) research and service, in a relaxing and collegialenvironment. Specific goals of the community are to help faculty 1) plan, implement and manageeffective in-class and out-of-class instruction, 2) develop and use instructional materials, 3) applyresearch-based techniques of effective instruction, 4) plan and implement evaluations ofinstruction, 5) mentor students and be mentored by senior faculty colleagues, and 6) makeeffective use of departmental, college, and campus instructional resources.Staff members from the college’s Academy for
students from Civil (13), Environmental (4), Mechanical (7) andAerospace (1) Engineering were interviewed. Because the recruitment method relied onrecommendations from professors, all of the students were upperclassmen (One junior, 14 senior,and 14 graduate students) and were generally very active students in curricular and/orextracurricular activities. This was expected because the students who faculty would most likelyknow would be the most active or outgoing students. Ten of the interviewees were women and15 were men.Analysis –To relate the interviews to the survey, a rubric was developed to help identify bothwhen a person was talking about a certain dimension of the PSRDM and different degrees ofeach dimension. A preliminary rubric was created
the same four characteristics required of facultymembers as the original and adds a section on the obligations of the ideal educational institution.This institution will hire the faculty and will determine the rules for successful performance. Theinstitution therefore has some obligations to the faculty, the students and the profession7. Thecommitment and priorities of the university will in many cases dictate the quality, the prioritiesand the performance of the faculty.By the committee’s own admission, this chapter is still incomplete. Deficiencies that the Page 11.1260.3committee has identified include: • If an individual faculty member
question: How, if at all, arestudents connecting the Exploring Engineering topics to their learning as current engineeringstudents and future engineering professionals?MethodsTo answer our open-ended research question, an exploratory qualitative approach was taken [5].While the Exploring Engineering assignment series has been utilized in both in-person andonline formats, the current analysis focuses exclusively on outcomes from the virtual format bydrawing on the experience of the Fall 2020 cohort. While overall information about topic choicefor students enrolled in the introductory engineering course in the Fall 2020 semester (n=1085)and descriptive data related to end of semester evaluations for a subset of students (n=586) areoutlined for
counselors andteachers, by college faculty advisors and career center personnel, or could be made available tostudents in high school or college computing classes. (To order or download an easy-to-useresource for this purpose, see www.ncwit.org/resources/computing-get-most-out-your-college-degree.) But to gauge whether computing occupations are a good fit for their interests andambitions, students also need to be exposed to the nature and diversity of computingoccupations. In the following, we discuss other research-supported recommendations forinvolving girls and women, and more diverse students in general, in computing.Computing is often inaccurately stereotyped as a “geeky” or masculine endeavor. Classroompractices, both at the K-12 and college
Page 25.681.16lecture materials that can be used to further enhance student experience. The students ultimatelyprepare and present a business plan for judging using Power Point.Expected Outcomes: The goal of this elective unit is to have students integrate solving technicalproblems within the confines of the business world, by having students explore means formaking solar energy an economic renewable. Engineering students undergo a major designexperience in their last few months before graduation. At that point in their academic career it istoo late to pursue course work that will prepare them for competing in the entrepreneurial arena.This elective unit is intended to expose students, early in their academic careers, to theexcitement of
includesa 1-credit course devoted to selection of an engineering major. This includes hands-on activitieslead by faculty and industry professionals to learn about each of the engineering disciplinesoffered.At the Private institution, the students are exposed to a basic engineering design process throughmulti-week projects that are not intended to aide in engineering discipline selection. However,students complete a series of homework assignments throughout the semester that aid inselecting their major, understanding engineering career options, and integrating into the Collegeof Engineering.At the Large Land Grant, the students are exposed to a variety of engineering disciplines throughweekly laboratory experiences, but selection of a major is not a
Paper ID #38580Using Decision-based Learning to Develop Expert Information LiteracyBehaviors in Engineering UndergraduatesMr. David Pixton, Brigham Young University David Pixton is a subject liaison at the Harold B. Lee Library at Brigham Young University. In this role, he is responsible for providing research training and assistance to students and faculty within the majority of engineering and technology fields offered at the university. He holds degrees in Mechanical Engineer- ing and Library & Information Science. David’s current research is focused on improving learning in a library environment, including the
perceptions are what will eventuallyinform a student’s decision on where to enroll, making sure that the students have as muchinformation as possible is paramount so that they can make an informed decision of theenvironment that will best suit them. Whether students were able to set foot on campus prior toenrolling or not and the accompanying pre-college experiences inform the degree to whichstudents feel like they belong on campus, setting the starting point for their collegiate career. Thepurpose of this qualitative investigation is to compare the anticipatory socialization experiencesof eight students and understand how the experiences differed between those who were able tomake it to campus prior to enrolling and those who were not, to better
19 recipients of a $3.5 million, five yearADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant. Areas of emphasis for Virginia Tech’s Advanceprogram include preparing graduate students for faculty careers, providing support to searchcommittees to identify highly qualified female faculty candidates, developing women facultyinto leadership roles in the university, and ensuring that university policies and procedures createan environment in which all faculty members can achieve their career goals.Development of guidelines for dual career hires at Virginia TechOne of the areas of focus for Virginia Tech’s Advance program is university policies. A workgroup of faculty and administrators was established in late 2003 to review existing policies andtheir