involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction.Mr. Luis Miguel Procter, University of Texas, El Paso Luis M. Procter is currently pursuing a B.S. degree in engineering leadership with the University of Texas at El Paso, where he is an undergraduate Research Assistant.Anita D. Patrick, University of Texas, Austin Anita Patrick is a STEM Education Doctoral Student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, and Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. She received her BS in Bioengineering from Clemson University where she tutored undergraduate mathematics and science courses, and mentored undergraduate
that has been done. An engineer-leader identify the engineer-leader as the is usually fairly easy to spot because they are able to guide people person who is communicating the most in the right direction without having to force them to do what they with others. (score = 1) want. (score = 3) As a team, completing a craft we’re ... I would define success for my team as seeing student members Teamwork proud of in time for the competition from multiple disciplines working together on the various sub- would be a success, even if we don’t teams to design, build, and test a working & competitive
of education is likely tolead to a career in an engineering related field, there is a clear need to understand the factorswhich influence female students’ decisions to enroll in higher education engineering courses.There are many influences on students’ choices to pursue specific career paths. For example,how students conceive a particular discipline or career will influence this decision, as what theybelieve it to involve will likely affect their interest in engaging with it. In engineering, studentsoften have misconceptions regarding what it means to be an engineer and the Draw-an-EngineerTest (DAET) has frequently been used to investigate these misconceptions.Studies using DAET have found that young students typically conceive engineers
, discussing the nature of concepts beinglearned, and connecting the present with past learning. The verbal and nonverbal responses ofgroup members provide valuable feedback to a student’s performance. Promotive interaction alsofacilitates the formation of personal connections between group members. In the originalframework [20], the authors emphasized face-to-face interactions as being the catalyst drivingpromotive interaction. Therefore, this is one aspect of cooperative learning that should beseverely affected by the pandemic.Interpersonal and social skills refer to various skills that a student needs to successfullycooperate in a group. Some of these skills include leadership, decision-making, trust-building,communication, and conflict management
Member.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University Dr. Samantha R. Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor within The Polytechnic School, one of six schools in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. She is a mixed-methods researcher with focus on the preparation and pathways of engineering students. Her specific research interests include engineering student persistence and career decision-making, early career engineering practice, faculty pedagogical risk-taking, and entrepreneurial mindset. She completed her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering at Northeastern University and her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. Prior to ASU, she worked as an engineer at A
PoliciesKindness in teaching can begin when a faculty member considers the rules for the class,articulated on the syllabus. Being clear about the expectations in the course by providing adetailed syllabus can be viewed as an act of kindness [59]. For example, there was no penalty instudents’ perceptions of instructor support even when fairly restrictive policies were articulated[60]. Inviting students to attend office hours, explaining policies for office hours, and extendingthe potential to meet with students beyond pre-established meeting times are all practices thatembody kindness. Inviting students to meet at self-arranged times may be particularly importantfor non-traditional students who may be juggling a complex array of work, personal health,and
persist in theprogram.The second hypothesis takes into consideration the factors in the student’s experience. Theliterature shows that the sense of belonging is an important factor in URM students because ithas an impact on productivity and motivation [6]. The hypothesis drawn in this case is that thereare factors in the academic system that increase the sense of belonging in URM students whichcan create a positive loop that led to persistence.Finally, we use the factors in the category of faculty-student interaction. The literature shows thatmentorship increases success in graduate students, especially if the mentor is from the sameethnicity as the URM student. Interaction with faculty members increases the students’ exposureto information, and
University of Michigan in 1985 and her M.S. in 1988 and Ph.D. in 1991 in chemical engineering both from Pennsylvania State University. Dr. Karen’s educational research emphasis includes faculty development and mentoring, graduate student development, critical thinking and communication skills, enhancing mathematical student success in Calculus (including Impact of COVID-19), and promoting women in STEM. Her technical research focuses on sustainable chemical process design, computer aided design, and multicriteria decision making. She also has extensive experience in K-12 STEM education and program evaluation and assessment. She has held a variety of administrative positions: 1) Director of STEM Faculty Development
STEM majors and careers. Some of the factors they found to influence theundergraduate experiences of women of color in STEM persistence were: STEM enrichmentprograms, interactions with peers and faculty, academic sense of self, and personal agency anddrive7. Edzie developed a 15-question survey instrument based on the Motivated StudentLearning Questionnaire8, 9, and additional qualitative research findings. This instrument was usedto gather undergraduate student data regarding student self-efficacy as compared to pre-collegiate factors potentially contributing to STEM persistence. Although Edzie’s work wasconducted at a Midwestern university, amongst a population of predominately white students, thesurvey includes probing questions relevant
stand out that affected your choice to pursue engineering? This program? 18. Do you think being a woman will help your hinder your career as an engineer? Why? 19. Are male and female engineers equally rewarded for the same work?” 20. Do you think there are preconceived expectations of your performance because you are a woman? If yes, can you think of an example? 21. Do you feel you have to prove yourself as a woman? 22. Do you think female students are taken less seriously? 23. Do you feel like you’re going to be equally compensated? 24. As a female, do you feel that it hurts you’re chances of being an engineering/having an engineering future? 25. Do you plan on going to graduate school, working in
and Information Technology, mentoring is “a relationshipwhere one person invests time and effort in enhancing another person’s growth, knowledge, andskills” so that they may reach “greater productivity or achievement in the future” 12. Mentorshipis an exceptionally effective method that is important for both the mentor and the mentee aslearning usually occurs on both ends. The CSRL implements mentorship by consistently providing equal opportunities forinvolvement regardless of the amount of experience an individual may have, or which genderthey might be. New students meet regularly with a faculty mentor, but are also encouraged toseek peer mentors. Almost immediately, mentees are given opportunities to work with theirmentors in helping
-learning project that would keep students engaged. TheEngineering Leadership Program objectives were to: • Provide monthly exposure to successful women in engineering, including practicing engineers, engineering alumni, and engineering faculty members whose presentations featured their latest research, experiences, and personal journeys with students • Utilize an individual and group-mentoring model designed to match sophomore- engineering majors with junior and senior engineering majors to specifically target feelings of isolation in engineering. This adapted a mentoring program for all STEM students at Douglass that was already being planned for the 2013-2014 year to target engineering students
Paper ID #32486Evaluation on a New Virtual Program Format: How Does an EngineeringSummer Program Evolve and Adapt to Meet the Needs of an IncreasinglyDiverse Student Population During a Pandemic? (Evaluation, Diversity)Mrs. Maria Manzano, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Maria Manzano is the Director of Engineering Special Programs and EPIC program where she works to develop programs to reach out to pre-college students to encourage them to pursue engineering in college. She is involved with a variety of diversity and inclusion efforts in the college of Engineering ranging from student support programs
Leadership Program, Fish Aides, Horizons Consulting Guild, and Engineering Honors. Upon graduation, Kiersten hopes to use her internship, study abroad, and organization experience to pursue a career in the energy sector. Having grown up abroad, she hopes to live internationally again sometime in the future.Jiacheng LuLori L. Moore, Texas A&M University Dr. Lori Moore is an Associate Professor in the Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communications at Texas A&M University. Dr. Moore teaches introductory leadership, leadership the- ory, adult education, and methods of teaching courses and supervises students completing their supervised American
the discussion, the facilitator asked if thefacial jewelry led to certain assumptions by the students. It is important to keep a sense of humorin this discussion and the facilitator to be comfortable with hearing untrue or unfair stereotypesbased on their appearance. By keeping it light and laughing or agreeing with the assumptions,students feel able to be more honest in their biases about the facilitator. This kind of discussionmay be more difficult for students to have with an authority figure and so faculty may need to bemindful of this as they are preparing for such a discussion. Similarly, this discussion may bedifficult for faculty members whose career is subject to students’ evaluations. Future study couldexplore the effect of having a
given field, and their level of attainment defines how well-prepared they are to meet jobdemands and excel in the future [16-17]. The general (meta) competencies are skill sets that enable themto function globally, such as to work with others, function in systems and meet organizational demands,and transfer task-specific skills to new challenges or tasks they have not encountered before [18-19].Thus, our goal is to revolutionize our learning community to develop an intentional culture of reflection,wherein members (both students and faculty) develop dispositions of metacognition and self-regulation.The competencies required by future engineers vary from industry sectors and even companies in thesame sector. In addition, recent graduates will
with the faculty members supervising their projects, graduatestudents, and one or two industrial mentors. Students also take part in other activities such asindustrial research lab and facilities tours, weekly group meetings, meetings with workingengineers and automotive researchers, an SAE conference, and seminars. The summer researchexperience is then capped with students giving oral and/or poster presentations of their researchprojects both at OU and at research conferences.Students participating in the REU program receive a stipend, free on-campus housing, as well asa small meal allowance and membership to the campus recreational facilities. Travel expenses toOU are reimbursed and if students get a conference paper accepted, funds are
undergraduate research experiences[10].In a 2004 three-year study, researchers interviewed 76 students, mostly rising seniors in eightscience disciplines across four small private STEM-serving institutions [11]. They conductedthree interviews: two before graduation and the third post-graduation. For students who hadcompleted an undergraduate research experience, 91% of them reported gains after graduating.Gains were based on a checklist of possible faculty-defined benefits derived from literature.There were seven different kinds of gains including: personal/professional, thinking and workinglike a scientist, and gains in various skills. Seventy-four percent of the comments in thepersonal/professional gains category referenced increase in confidence
electrical engineering at Texas A&M University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Paper ID #31171Miss Samantha Asbell, Texas A&M University Samantha Asbell is a graduate student at Texas A&M University currently pursuing her Masters of Science in Business. She received her undergraduate degree in Communication at Texas A&M. Following a research internship with the department of communication, Samantha applied for a role with the College of Engineering as an assistant for the I-Corps Site program. Samantha has a continuing interest in research as well as digital and
officialpolicy or position of William Beaumont Army Medical Center, Department of the Army,Defense Health Agency, or the US Government.Introduction This project will advance middle school student math and sciences progress through itsinnovative use of non-invasive personal and familial data collection and analysis. Usingaccessible technologies such as: non-contact infrared thermometers with memory function, pulseoximeters with Bluetooth that painlessly clip on to your finger, electronic digital calipers, andhousehold tools including tape measures, students will learn to collect and analyze their personaland familial health-data. Using laptops and tablets with MS Excel software, students will uploadtheir data and explore it with simulation and
women felt theyhad benefitted from the program and all the students wanted it to be offered to them during theirsophomore year. Fall semester, 2014, the COE and MSGC implemented an expanded programjointly funded by the college and the consortium. The program was designed and managed by afemale faculty member in Mechanical Engineering, the Associate Dean for Student Success inthe college, and an academic adviser from the Department of Education. All eligible freshmenand sophomore females were included in the program and in all information and invitations sentout by the program, but their responses and participation were voluntary. In parallel withestablishing a peer mentoring program, data has been collected to track if the program canimprove
expectation source. However, that clarity is tempered by the stress of the academicexpectations themselves, as well as the potential implications of failure to fulfill them.Besides academics, expectations can also come from engineering superiors, who were definedas entities within the engineering major with influence to directly and professionally influence astudents’ grades, learning environment, career-related decisions and other engineeringexperiences. These entities range from individuals such as professors to small organizations suchas the student advising center.For example, if an instructor unknowingly creates a hostile learning environment with rigidexpectations and methods, the learning experience can become extremely stressful
skills. The firstcase considers both skills within a higher range of decision-making, where teamwork, togetherwith one's own awareness as influencer within the organization, are closely linked. The secondcase considers technical skills which are present at a lower or operational rank within theorganization, and they are therefore not faced with definitive decision-making, probablyadopting a more consultative leadership style, which lists among its characteristics that of notmaking decisions without first consulting thers.Conclusions, future directionsThe present work was geared to study leadership styles in senior students of the IndustrialEngineering program of an Engineering Faculty of an important Chilean university. Theobjective was to
achievement and career development.30 A total of 1,479 seniorengineering students participated in the survey. The results revealed that the students with moreworking experiences had a higher starting salary after graduation and were more likely to get ajob offer prior to graduation. But the influence of work experiences on GPA is minimal. Inaddition, the work experiences equally benefit male and female students. Samuelson and Litzlerspecifically explored the influence of work experiences on female students.31 They interviewed27 female engineering students with an internship or co-op experience. The internship and co-opexperiences influenced students’ perceptions of the engineering field, persistence in engineering,and career decisions. Overall, the
enormous amount of content thatrevealed the political, economic, cultural, and social nature of engineers' personal andprofessional lives.Surveys and Interviews YTT members completed 360 surveys that helped the project team understand how to communicate with them, what their unique perspectives on being a student, the future, making decisions, careers, university, STEM. They interviewed 100 female engineers, 26 engineering students, 7 engineering romantic Page 26.772.12 couples, and over 700 peers, parents and teachers to develop insights about perceptions of engineering, communicating with teens and gender issues and
mentorship. Today, as an engineering faculty member ata large Midwestern university, Dr. James continues to engage in mentoring relationships throughher informal mentoring relationships with engineering undergraduates and her work with a peer Page 26.1146.6mentoring program she helped to initiate that pairs incoming graduate students with currentgraduate students. Dr. James develops relationships with her protégés so that they are more opento sharing which can open the door to them accepting her guidance. In her mentoringrelationships and experiences, she: (1) works to develop personal relationships with her mentorsand protégés, (2) recognizes that
. Despite this, the nation still struggles to produce the ENG talent it needs. Given this, programs to increase the number of ENGs that graduate have been promoted across the nation [1]-[3]. Such programs focus on recruitment [4], retention principles [5], persistence [6], as well as practices that help students with critical thinking [7]-[8], academics [9]-[10] and professional development [11]-[12]. The latter includes mentoring by faculty [13]-[14], peer mentoring [15], project-based learning [16]- [26], research experiences for undergraduates (REUs) [27]-[28], internships [29], preparing for graduate school [30], career planning [31], etc. We at Arizona State University’s (ASU’s) Fulton Schools of Engineering, have
majors at our university. Studentsparticipated in team-building activities that prompted research into their engineering majors andcareer options. In Week 3, we organized an industry career panel with a diverse mix of recruitersand alumni that currently work as engineers. The students asked questions about the panel’s pastcollege experiences, internships, graduate school, and careers. Students also had the opportunityto practice their “60 second pitches” with the panel members to help prepare for a career fair.Throughout the quarter, we incorporated activities that addressed global perspectives ofengineering, current events, and social justice. In Week 4, we collaborated with an EthnicStudies faculty member and her students from a Gender, Race
Paper ID #16444Design of an Interactive Multidisciplinary Residential Summer Program forRecruitment of High School Females to EngineeringDr. Paula Ann Monaco, Texas Tech University Dr. Paula Monaco, E.I.T., successfully defended her dissertation research Spring 2016 and will begin a career in the water/wastewater reuse treatment. Paula has led multiple outreach summer programs at TTU and provides support to student organizations within the college of engineering. Her technical research focuses include; anti-fouling and scaling RO technology and pharmaceutical and personal care product screening to predict environmental
rewarding career path 4) Prepare students to make informed choices about their academic and career options by providing them with information regarding the vast number of engineering career paths 5) Help students identify “false positives”- that is, allow students who think they want to be engineers to explore the field and to figure out if engineering is for them within the safe environment of their high school classroom ENGR 102 HS benefits high school students by allowing them to: 1) Explore an introduction to engineering and the engineering profession without having to commit to a semester’s worth of engineering courses at the University