used for building and testing ofWhat started with cruise control, then driver assist, and now projects. This year, the APM is being worked on by the thirdhighway autopilot, will soon develop into full autonomy. of three successive groups. In initial planning, theAutonomous vehicles will make our roadways safer, our functionality requested from each group or phase was brokenenvironment cleaner, our roads less congested, and our down as follows: Phase I- add remote control functionality tolifestyles more efficient. This paper describes a a golf cart; Phase II- add sensors required for autonomousmultidisciplinary capstone project that is working towards driving and limited
management, contracting business, or thesis (capstone).Table 4. provides further details on student respondents.Table 3.Faculty Respondent Data Program A Program B Program C Program D Program E Respondent 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 2 # Taught full No No No No No No No No course on ethics Taught Yes, Yes Yes, Yes, Introduction to Yes, Professional & Yes Yes, Yes, Project course(s) that Construction
of a technology. Several institutions in the United States are leveraging biomedical engineeringto impact global health through using human-centered design (Richards-Kortum, Gray, and Oden 2012;Oden et al. 2010; Malkin 2007). While interdisciplinary programs in global health have the potential to yield innovative solutionsfor the SDGs, the learners of engineering design comprise a relatively small pool of students. En-gineering design curricula have traditionally been taught in a capstone course in the final year ofcollege to engineering students (Todd et al. 1995; Zhan et al. 2018), the majority of whom are male(men received approximately 80% of all undergraduate engineering degrees awarded in the US in2
fromeach faculty member to use the materials they had submitted as part of the study.Courses included in the review process are listed below in Table 1. The review process includedonly undergraduate core (i.e. required for all students) courses with an MCEN prefix and did notinclude the department’s sophomore seminar or senior design capstone course. Non-MCEN corecourses were excluded because they are managed by other departments and are therefore largelyoutside the current initiative’s realm of influence. The sophomore seminar and senior capstonewere excluded because they are already highly industry focused, with nearly 100% of the coursecontent centering specifically on exposing students to processes, projects, and contacts within thenetwork
, andwelfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors. Thisimplies that they all need to be explicitly considered.This should be approached systematically; otherwise, one of these factors will be missed.The consideration of public health, safety and welfare are covered for most civilengineering design projects through the use of codes that govern a design. Codes andstandards were developed solely for that purpose.The most straight-forward approach is to require students to separately describe theglobal, cultural, social, environmental and economic considerations as a graded part oftheir design submission. It might be helpful for the instructor to preface the assignmentwith some examples of these considerations on a
-controlled Unit Operations experiments, and incorporating Design throughout the Chemical Engineering curricu- lum. She currently works as a freelance Engineering Education Consultant and Chemical Engineer. She is the Project Manager for NSF grant #1623105, IUSE/PFE:RED: FACETS: Formation of Accomplished Chemical Engineers for Transforming Society, for which she is advising and coordinating assessment.Dr. Abhaya K. Datye, University of New Mexico Abhaya Datye has been on the faculty at the University of New Mexico after receiving his PhD in Chem- ical Engineering at the University of Michigan in 1984. He is presently Chair of the department and Distinguished Regents Professor of Chemical & Biological Engineering. From
Research in 2006,” Des. Res. Q., Sep. 2006.[2] E. Sanders, “An Evolving Map of Design Practice and Design Research,” Interactions, pp. 13–17, Dec. 2008.[3] IDEO, The Field Guide to Human-Centered Design. 2015.[4] C. B. Zoltowski, W. C. Oakes, and M. E. Cardella, “Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 28–59, 2012.[5] I. Mohedas, S. Daly, and K. Sienko, “Design Ethnography in Capstone Design: Investigating Student Use and Perceptions,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 888–900, 2014.[6] R. P. Loweth, S. R. Daly, J. Liu, and K. H. Sienko, “Assessing Needs in a Cross-Cultural Design Project: Student Perspectives and Challenges,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 36, no. 2, pp
Paper ID #28754Reflection in Time: Using Data Visualization to Identify StudentReflection Modes in DesignDr. Corey T Schimpf, The Concord Consortium Corey Schimpf is a Learning Analytics Scientist at the Concord Consortium with interest in design re- search and learning, learning analytics, research methods and underrepresentation in engineering. A ma- jor strand of his work focuses on developing and analyzing learning analytics that model students’ design practices or strategies through fine-grained computer-logged data from open-ended technology-centered science and engineering projects. A closely related strand focuses
might be all but one. In this method,students can also choose to work towards the grade they want in order to spend their timeelsewhere (Nilson, 2015). Another instructor might use a mix of traditional grading and pass/failgrading. For example, to earn an A in a course, a student may have to receive an average examscore of 80%. The instructor can also set bars for specific grade levels such as a C resulting fromfailing a peer evaluation. In all of these systems, missing one element on the overall gradechecklist results in a lower grade.As all elements become pass or fail, the specifications for an assignment must be made veryclear. Writing good specifications is a lot like writing good requirements for a project. Just likerequirements in
Paper ID #30184Development of Employability Skills in Engineering Disciplines throughCo-opMs. Haaniyah Ali, York University Haaniyah Ali is a Mechanical Engineering undergraduate student from York University, class of 2020. She has worked on engineering co-op education research projects since September 2018 and presented her first paper at a conference in June 2019. She is passionate about understanding the co-op education system, to provide the best experience for students. She is also very involved in her school community and works with students and faculty alike to improve community engagement.Dr. Jeffrey Harris, York
1981-1989 Associate Director for Finance and Administration, Center for Electromagnetics Research (CER), Northeastern University. Pub- lications/Papers: Reenergizing and Reengaging Students Interest through CAPSULE; A Novel and Evolu- tionary Method on Educating Teachers to Promote STEM Careers Jessica Chin, Abe Zeid, Claire Duggan, Sagar Kamarthi (IEEE ISEC 2011); and ”Implementing the Capstone Experience Concept for Teacher Professional Development” Jessica Chin, Abe Zeid, Claire Duggan, Sagar Kamarthi (ASEE 2011). Rel- evant Presentations: ”K-12 Partnerships” (Department of Homeland Security/Centers of Excellence An- nual Meeting 2009); ”Building and Sustaining K-12 Educational Partnerships” (NSF ERC 2007 - 2010
, e.g., capstone projects.However, students would benefit from, and are interested in, integrating holistic educationthroughout the curriculum. Moreover, university engineering programs that are accredited byABET are required to meet these objectives. In their recent redevelopment of the student outcomescriteria, ABET [1], [2] identified seven primary outcomes for students. Of these, items two andfour focus on holistic engineering, emphasizing global cultural, social, environmental, andeconomic factors.To address all of the critical aspects of engineering projects, students must successfully analyze therequirements, synthesize information, and evaluate several design options for a given problem.These cognitive skills match well with Bloom’s
Paper ID #30242Algorithm for Consistent Grading in an Introduction to Engineering CourseProf. Joshua A Enszer, University of Delaware Joshua Enszer is an associate professor in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Delaware. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control, capstone design, and mathematical modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations: electronic portfolios as a means for assessment and professional
their senior capstone projects. His current projects include indus- try integration in the curriculum, undergraduate professional development, and entrepreneurial minded learning in the classroom.Dr. Nathan Hyungsok Choe, The Ohio State University Dr. Nathan (Hyungsok) Choe is a research assistant professor in department of engineering education at the Ohio State University. He obtained his PhD in STEM education at UT Austin. His research focuses on the development of engineering identity in graduate school and underrepresented group. Dr. Choe holds master’s and bachelor’s degrees in electrical engineering from Illinois Tech. He also worked as an engineer at LG electronics mobile communication company.Amena Shermadou
the extent to which creative ideation may be modulated by prior knowledge and training.Ms. Yushuang Liu, The Pennsylvania State University Yushuang Liu is a graduate student in Psychology and Language Science at Penn State. She is generally interested in natural speech processing using electroencephalogram. She has been actively involved in creativity projects examining how to facilitate divergent thinking abilities in engineering students.Dr. Danielle S. Dickson, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Dickson received her a Ph.D. from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2016 with a dissertation examining the memory system’s representation of numerical information, using behavioral and electrophysiological
. Specifically, allnew faculty participate in a ~6 weeklong initial summer training workshop run at the departmentlevel. Here, new faculty are given the opportunity to develop relationships with their facultycohort as they explore foundational teaching skills. New faculty members also completenumerous events designed to indoctrinate them into our university’s community. Beyond initialsummer training, our university maintains the Center for Faculty Excellence (CFE), whichprovides numerous faculty development opportunities throughout the academic year. The mostintensive CFE offering is the Master Teacher Program, which is a two-year program consistingof teaching-related classes and a required capstone project. To graduate, faculty members mustcomplete a
beginning were found to be Learning Styles andMotivation. Most end reflections focused on Time Management-Balance and Study Habits. Thisstudy helps elucidate what students think about when they reflect on themselves as learners andcould be used by faculty to increase student motivation or ease student concerns. Future studiescould investigate how student responses to these reflection prompts relate to their outcomes inthe course or try to better understand students’ reflections through interviews or focus groups.References[1] M. D. Marsolek and N. E. Canney, “Facilitating Habitual Reflection in Students - Application to an Engineering Capstone Project,” 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), E ire, PA, USA. 2016.[2] J.A
for engineering educators by providing atransferable, easy-to-implement reflection activity that can be implemented in any engineeringcourse that includes a presentation assignment.Reflection to Enhance Learning and AssessmentReflection as a teaching approach is becoming increasingly recognized in engineering education[1, 2], where it is often used to promote cognitive development and can help students learn morefrom projects, internships, and other educational experiences [3-7]. For example, a common in-class reflective activity is the “exam wrapper”: shortly after an exam, students articulate whatthey did that helped them do well on the exam and what they could do differently to improvetheir performance on a future exam.Recently, reflection
, and graphs, and to use related algorithms to solve social science problems.● ENGR 122. Data Technology introduces students to R with an emphasis on data frames and data analysis. Content includes basic statistics, linear and non-linear curve fitting, clustering, natural language processing, neural networks, databases, Structured Query Language (SQL), and data cleaning and management.● ENGR 195E. As a capstone project course, students apply computing skills acquired in the minor to solving problems or generating insights in their chosen area of study. Students work in self-selected teams and define their own project topics.Student ProfileA demographic profile of students enrolled in ENGR 120 (the first course in the minor) andENGR 195E
Drinking Water Treatment Process.ASEE Annual Conference, 2004.9. Chauhan, R., Rajaram, G., Pai, D. Illustrating Engineering Concepts With A Household WaterFilter Pitcher. ASEE Annual Conference, 2005.10. Gude, V. G., Truax, D. D. Project-based Learning of Environmental Engineering Principles.ASEE Annual Conference, 2015.11. Read-Daily, B. Using Backpacking Water Purification Systems as a Means of IntroducingWater Treatment Concepts to an Introduction to Environmental Engineering Course. ASEEAnnual Conference, 2016.12. Husanu, I. N. C., Mauk, M. G., Gold, P. B., Orfanelli, N. T. From Capstone Student-ledProject to Experiential Learning Module: Design and Manufacturing of an Integrated System ofPico-Hydroelectric Generator and Water Filtration. ASEE
activity for Applied Mechanics courses. She is coordinator and advisor for capstone projects for Engineering Technology.Kevin Frank, Drexel University Drexel University student studying Mechanical Engineering Technology. Currently on CO-OP and work- ing on the Unity3D implementation portion of this project.Ms. Ayanna Elise Gardner, Drexel University After graduating with her associate’s degree in Engineering Technology from Delaware County Commu- nity College in 2018, Ayanna transferred to Drexel University to continue her undergraduate career. Her interest in the hands-on applications of the Engineering Technology field was sparked during her time as an organizational-level helicopter mechanic for the United States
, research and presentations, and a final project, students learnedabout, explored, and sought to discern the ethical implications of cybersecurity within thecontext of society, especially as it pertains to military and law enforcement. Student feedbackvalidated that the course challenged them, offered them an opportunity to present their views,and extended what they had learned in their classic ethics class into the cyber domain. Basedupon lessons learned, adjustments are being made for the second offering of this course in orderto improve the flow and delivery of the class and the evaluation criteria. Changes are also beingmade to account for the increased class size from single to double digits.1. IntroductionAs engineering and technology become
Mechanical and Civil capstone and thesis courses. Norma is on a research leave this year.Dr. Anne E. Parker, University of Manitoba Anne Parker is an Associate Professor in the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice & Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, and has taught engineering communication in the faculty for over 30 years. Her earlier research has focused on collaborative projects in engineering and problem-solving in communication and design. More recently, she participated in a national study of writing assignments in undergraduate classes, including engineering, and a study of engineering students’ levels of confidence in their communication and lifelong learning skills. The
supportingdevelopment of teaching self-efficacy. Secondary school students visit university facilities intheir class cohorts, accompanied by their teachers, to execute project-based learning. A selectedoverarching global research topic is sub-divided into subject-specific research questions (i.e.,Biology, Chemistry, and Physics) that students work in small groups to address, iteratively on-campus and in-class, during a term-long project (Figure 1A). The Discovery framework providessecondary school students the experience of an engineering capstone design project (including amotivating scientific problem, a discipline-specific research question, and systematicdetermination of a professional recommendation addressing the needs of the problem posed)meanwhile
efforts of the curriculum. Annual assessment doesn’t need to be a burden if it’s organically rooted in a course. • EAMU provides a more robust system that is more than just a pass/fail criteria, leading to better assessment. • Currently, the Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Program is relying largely on analytic, in-class data for assessment. An additional layer that will be conducted through a capstone audience survey is planned to be implemented this year as a more holistic, qualitative approach, but the survey will be in the form of a rubric to overlay on the EAMU vector.ConclusionWhen programs adopt the new ABET Criterion 3 Student Outcomes, it is important to recognize that a robustassessment
Institute of Technology Simo Pajovic is a graduate student in the MIT Department of Mechanical Engineering, where his research focuses on nanoscale transport phenomena. In 2019, he graduated from the University of Toronto with a B.ASc. in Mechanical Engineering. His capstone project was to design and prototype a benchtop universal testing machine for educational use. As an undergraduate research assistant, he worked on micromechanical characterization of lubricants used in aerospace applications and later designing and prototyping medical devices.Mr. Cheuk Yin Larry Kei, University of Toronto Larry Kei obtained his BASc in Civil Engineering at the University of Toronto in 2019. He is currently working in the
Paper ID #29682Enhancing Instruction by Uncovering Instructor Blind Spots from MuddiestPoint Reflections in Introductory Materials ClassesProf. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept
research scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand concentrates on the relationship between educational policy and STEM education. His second research strand focuses on studying STEM classroom interactions and subsequent effects on student understanding. He is a co- developer of the Reformed Teaching Observation Protocol (RTOP) and his work has been cited more than 2200 times and he has been published in multiple peer-reviewed journals such as Science Education and the Journal of Research in Science Teaching.Prof. Stephen J Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is
decisionsimpact each individual project that collectively represents the construction industry which is oneof the largest economic sectors of most localities, states and countries around the globe.Although research has been done in decision making and some psychometric instruments exist inthis area, there was no tool that allowed to measure the decision making process of the AECpracticing professional and students. Thus, the focus of this research paper is to introduce theConstruction Decision Making Inventory (CDMI) that was recently developed by Dr. TulioSulbaran to fill this important gap in the AEC industry. The content of this paper is veryimportant as it helps better understand practicing professionals, educators and student. Thisunderstanding of
[17]. Even when facing an industry-sponsored capstone project,they may treat the problem as having a single correct answer [18]. Research suggests that whenstudents are supported to make consequential decisions, they feel a greater sense of ownershipover their work [19, 20]. Framing agency, therefore, can serve as a lens into whether students arelearning to negotiate the process of framing design problems. In our past work, we found thatstudents’ talk in their design teams was indicative of whether they treated the problems asframed for them and not open to reframing, or as problems they themselves needed to frame [18,21].MethodsResearch designIn order to meet our research aims, we first conducted discourse analysis and then explored