objectives. Attainment of these outcomes prepares graduates toenter the professional practice of engineering. There are seven student outcomes: 1. An ability to identify, formulate, and solve complex engineering problems by applying principles of engineering, science, and mathematics 2. An ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors 3. An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 4. An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of
their overall success as aresearcher. We also created multiple opportunities for the students to develop relationships withtheir peers and build community through a myriad of social events. Social activities weredesigned to take place during off hours and on weekends to avoid conflicting with studentresearch.MethodsThe mentors identified research project ideas for the participants prior to them arriving oncampus. Students participated in professional development opportunities that were eitherintegrated into their research immersion or separate activities. The students participated in theseactivities multiple times per week including workshops to inform them about how to besuccessful in the application process and graduate school, ethics, and
environment have benefited in terms of flexibility, aptitude in remotecommunication technology, presentation ability and an independent work ethic. However, acertain loss in sophistication has occurred in the experiments offered at the University ofMinnesota Duluth. Moreover, communication is not as good as in face-to-face instruction. To © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conferenceremedy some of these shortcomings, more synchronous content, Arduino experiments in heattransfer and a satisfactory chemical reaction experiment have been recommended.References[1] M. MacKay, “Physics Students and Staff Develop ‘Lab in a Box’ experiments for Home Study
hiring of strongresearch faculty which resulted in little to no emphasis on practical application and a heavyemphasis on math and sciences theory [7]. In 1976, Harrisberger and Others, as a part of the American Society of EngineeringEducators expressed that a experiential learning program should support the following: “problemsolving skills, interpersonal awareness, creative expression, communication skills, technicalskills, self-confidence building, computation skills, engineering fundamentals, organizationalskills, leadership skills, planning skills, professional ethics, engineering judgment” [6, p. 7]. Inthe late 1980s, the clash between higher education engineering or engineering technologyprograms and employers emerged. Feedback
” “Provide industry speakers to emphasize the importance of communication skills, leadership, management, and teamwork”The ASCE Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge 3rd Edition (BOK3)3, published in 2019, alsorecognizes this need; it includes six outcomes related to professional skills: communication,teamwork and leadership, lifelong learning, professional attitudes, professional responsibilities,and ethical responsibilities.It is, perhaps, not surprising that multiple generations of educators and practitioners (1955, 1995,2019) recognized the necessity for professional skills in the successful civil engineer. TheSummit participants were no different in this regard. It is curious, however, that these multiplegenerations were all moved to
GPAs were higher for thosestudents who participated in honors experience. Further research would need to be conducted todetermine if the retention and academic success of the honors experience students were due toincreased involvement in the engineering community and the additional skill set obtained © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section Conferencethrough the honors experience course objectives. It is also possible that the students who self-select to participate in these courses just have better work ethic and are naturally higherachieving than those who select the typical introduction to engineering course.Of the over-prepared students who choose
number of calls for student training in this area. To respond to this challenge to civil engineering education, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) states that “The Code of Ethics of ASCE requires civil engineers to strive to comply with the principles of sustainable development in the performance of their professional duties…” (ASCE, 2001). Figure 2. Sustainable Futures Model (from Mihelcic and Hokanson, 2005) 32007 ASEE North Midwest Section Conference, Educating Engineers for a Sustainable Future, September 20-22, 2007 Challenge and Opportunity Even though PBE and sustainable design concepts are still in their early development stages, it
istransmitted can impact the environment by the type and quantity of resources consumed, theamount of energy used, and the magnitude of the generated waste. There is also a financial costto each of these metrics. Socially, learning needs to be done ethically and for a purpose thatbenefits society. These attributes (among others) lead to sustainable learning systems that areproposed as an evolution from mass production learning systems (Cheah & Cheah, 2002). A fulldiscussion of such systems, however, is beyond the scope of this paper as only a couple of theattribute could be applied within the context of these presentations.4. Presentation Objectives and GuidelinesSince the importance of understanding sustainability and human impact has been
-representative sampling based on informant andsite selection.MethodsEthnographic methods are intended to add structure, language, and a framework around ourability to evaluate people’s language and behavior. Ethnography strives to extract truths based onholistic, sensitive, and richly detailed subjective appraisals of small populations. Ethnography isan active form of research that requires the researcher to respond to variables like the changingmood of the respondent, non-verbal behavioral cues, and sensitivity to ethical constraints. All thewhile, the ethnographer must be aware of their influence on respondents’ behavior and how itmight skew results. Questionnaires, observation, interviews, focus groups, and identifying visualstereotypes are powerful
NAS9945 team that faculty teaching AWE will receive additionaleducation and practice in airworthiness engineering and aircraft certification. This wouldinclude participation in case studies and ethical standards related to airworthiness. To fill thecurrent gap in experience, airworthiness engineering subject matter experts currently practicingin industry should be used to educate the students and future faculty in this program. Thisworking together approach is expected to enhance the efforts of all involved and optimize theeducational experience of those completing their educations.6 References[1] D. Haulman, Wings of Hope: The USAF and Humanitarian Airlift Operations, 2007.[2] K. Lange, “The Berlin Airlift: What It Was, Its Importance in the
debris: A [Accessed September 30, 2020] targeted plan for understanding and [13] C. Sers and M. Mughal, “Covid-19 outbreak and quantifying interactions with marine life,” the need for rice self-sufficiency in West Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, Africa,” World Development, Vol. 135, Vole. 14, no. 6, p. 317-324, August 2016. November 2020. [Online] Available: 7 ScienceDirect, https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0305750X20301972. [Accessed October 30, 2020].[14] E. Ulusoy, I Think, Therefore I am Vegan: Veganism, Ethics
the students believed that the project provided them an opportunity to apply theoreticalconcepts to a real-world engineering application and welcomed the new venture. They were ableto incorporate concepts they are not as familiar with, such as doing a cost analysis andconsidering legal or ethical issues in their selection. While some needed guidance on researchfor the project, students generally were able to find relevant technical specifications and usethose in analysis and comparsions. Many students thought that this was a novel approach forthem in their coursework. Some groups put forth a considerable effort to comment on thecriteria, including one group that called a township office of the town mentioned in the project tofind out what
[6]. These codes, standards, and regulations arenecessary requirements for the installation and building safety of hardware, though our projectconsists of making a prototype rather than a complete installation. The applicable codes are theInternational Building Code (IBC), National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), Life SafetyCode (LSC), and the Underwriter Laboratories Certification for access control standardrequirements. Otherwise, all ACM, IEEE, and applicable ethics codes are followed. Lastly, we researched the major components that make up typical control access systems,leading our team to the creation of viable design solutions. A door access control system consistsof software including at minimum: a database and management
demonstration purposes. Introduction In this ever-changing world, the need for alternative power systems and buildingsupplies has been increasing. Future generations will benefit from those who make moreenvironmentally-conscious choices on how they leave their footprints on Earth. One way tobe more environmentally conscious is to build sustainably, whether through ethically sourcedminerals, recycled plastics, reusing items that would otherwise be deemed single-use, or evenusing industrial waste products to build a structure. While sustainable development's primarygoal is to rationalize the use of natural resources, utilizing other materials that are consideredwaste is also living sustainably. Through this
exposure on stem and non‐stem student engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(7), 410–427. doi: 10.1111/jasp.12371Shin, J. E. L., Rosenthal, L., Levy, S. R., Lytle, A., London, B., & Lobel, M. (2016). The roles of the Protestant work ethic and perceived identity compatibility in graduate students' feelings and attitudes toward STEM and non-STEM fields. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 22, 309-327.Shively, R. L., & Ryan, C. S. (2013). Longitudinal changes in college math students’ implicit theories of intelligence. Social Psychology of Education, 16(2), 241-256. doi: 10.1007/s11218-012-9208-0Usher, E. L., Li, C. R., Butz, A. R., & Rojas, J. P. (2019
technical ability was noted in EE students over the MEs. Figure 4. Show average scores with improved DNA Technology Self-AwarenessQ1**= Interested in the DNA Bio Tech Fields** (P< 0.001)Q2= Interested in societal and ethical issues (medical and health applications)Q3=** Confident in my ability to understand scientific and engineering conceptsQ4= Comfortable asking for help from others (professor, peers, TAs)Q5**= Interested in collaborating with peers from different Eng. MajorsPhase 2 Survey ResultsThe Fall 2020 semester students were surveyed for the same reason, to quantify scores in self-awareness.However, for this case, we were to select our UR candidate from our process review. Table 1 depicts thelarge gain in self-awareness and
, P. Cornwell, D. T. Kawano, J. E. Mayhew and S. Moseley, "The Impact of Scaffolded Writing Instruction on Followup Course Assignments," in ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual, 2020.[6] L. G. Kisselburgh, J. L. Hess, C. B. Zoltowski, J. Beever and A. O. Brightman, "Assessing a Scaffolded, Interactive, and Reflective Analysis Framework for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering Students," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, 2016.[7] T. Kunberger, C. Geiger and K. A. Reycraft, "Structured Introduction to Information Literacy Using a Scaffold Project in an Introductory Engineering Course," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, 2016.[8] J. Hammond and P
energy laboratory. They will research topics that could be of significant impact to energy consumption/production and energy economics on campus.The purpose of the proposed Energy ELG is to give Baylor students a foundation upon which tobuild an informed understanding of complex energy issues. With understanding comes the ability tobegin answering the questions confronting society. Specifically, the four overarching learningobjectives are:1.) To develop scientific energy literacy;2.) To closely examine the production and consumption of energy in both developed and developing countries;3.) To examine the social, political, environmental and ethical problems of an energy-dependent civilization.4.) Understand, hypothesize, propose
, such as overly principles. uses sustainable expensive, materials, and difficult to does not trigger implement, poor ethical, social, choice of political, or materials, or environmental triggers other concerns. concerns.A similar rubric is under development for the ACCE criteria listed in Table 3
is the“number of levels of detail,” [23, p. 42] under the assumption that modeling deeper levels of asystem enables the expression of more complex system behaviors. In addition, consideration ofdepth was implicit across all the attributes in Lavi et al.’s assessment in that each attribute wasscored on a scale from zero, or “no expression of attribute understanding”, to three, that was “fullexpression of attribute understanding” [23, p. 42].A couple assessments examined the breadth in terms of types of issues considered across all theidentified elements. In Rehmann et al.’s assessment the evaluation of rich pictures includedwhether there were elements from at least five of the following seven types of issues:“engineering, social, ethical
purpose. We argue that when such design problems fall short, it notbecause they are not authentic, but because they may be missing other elements. Perhapssurprisingly, even in the popular culture design problems, this missing element may bemeaningfulness or relevance [15], a central tenant of constructionist learning [6].Engineering courses tend to privilege the technical aspects of engineering [16], though analysisof authentic engineering design practice characterizes this work as sociotechnical [17, 18], andresearch has increasingly suggested reflecting this in engineering programs is valuable [19, 20],providing students with opportunities to grapple with complex factors and ethics [21, 22]. Suchproblems create opportunities to connect with the
citationpractices belie a more complex system of relationships. Historically, they have established powerrelationships among authors, ideas, and larger sociotechnical systems within the university[26].Our citations reflect our reading practices while establishing field boundaries and contours andultimately funneling into the larger economy of the university. They undergird this universityeconomy in a number of ways: (a) we form communities of practice/discourse communities inhow we cite, excluding and including particular ways of knowing; (b) we give particular ideaspower and visibility in how we cite; (c) we decide whose work matters, who should be tenuredand promoted, who belongs; and (d) we teach ethics and intellectual property through citations.These
more design alternatives to better solve the problem. It isagreed that such attribute can only be developed by exposing students to the experience of open-ended problem solving which includes linking engineering science knowledge to complex, real-life design problems. Apart from the engineering and technical issues, these problem solvingactivities should include extra- and trans-disciplinary and soft factors, such as economic,environmental, sustainability, manufacturability ethical, health and safety, social and politicalconsiderations. It is well-accepted that such problem-based learning type is only achieved byusing quite complex project scenarios, and therefore requires careful planning and integrationinto the rest of the curriculum in
between 1 and 2. Fourth, the participants valued theelements of working in tandem including enhancing mindsets about believing and thinking, developingskillsets about learning and applying knowledge. By mindsets, the key ingredients identified includecreative inquiry-led approach, design thinking, systems thinking, global citizenship, and ethical decisionmaking.There was unanimous agreement that more engagement can only be achieved by bringing social innovationinto the classroom through projects that ask students to work on real problems. This is consistent withBloom’s Taxonomy [12]. Some of the emerging constructs or prescriptions include what is now termed,“Fruits of Innovation,” i.e., what are the students tasked with creating – knowledge
; classrooms wiped down between usages; windows and doors open to provide maximum ventilation E Indoor classroom where students will be less than six feet apart – same as D; students wearing masks and face shieldsThe Lecture Usual format: The weekly lecture is held in person in a large lecture hall with allstudents in attendance. The presentation mode is PowerPoint with occasional videos ordemonstrations included. Each of the ten weeks is devoted to a specific topic that are in order:Introduction, Structural Systems, Reinforced Concrete, Timber, Steel, Foundations and SiteCivil, Architectural Coverings and Cladding, Electrical and Lighting, Mechanical and Plumbing,and Ethics and Professional
(communication, creativity, empathy, entrepreneurial mindset,ethics, global/cultural awareness, grit/persistence/resilience, leadership, lifelong learning, riskmanagement, systems thinking, and teamwork). Although most students at this institutionparticipate in experiential learning, the framework aims to provide students with richer, moremeaningful experiences through intentional engagement and reflection. Through several informalconversations, both students and employers have expressed the need for students to reflect andbe able to better communicate the value of their experiences in relation to their technical skillsand career aspirations. This point is reinforced by recent industry reports which emphasize thedifficult time employers have in finding
% Totals 215 100% 181 100%4.1 Self-Efficacy BeliefsTo collect data on student self-efficacy beliefs, students were asked in both the SOT and end ofterm (EOT) survey in both years to rate their level of ability from 1-8 in 11 areas including1 This study was conducted with Office of Research Ethics approval, ORE# 30293programming, design, and teamwork. Table 3 summarizes the mean and standard deviation forstudent self-efficacy beliefs at start, and end of term.Table 3 Summary of student self-efficacy beliefs, mean (std dev.) SOT EOT Programming Design Teamwork Programming Design Teamwork 2019 3.28 4.20
) instrument was an exception in that it employed qualitative methods offocus groups and interviews with engineering students and faculty as part of its development.This instrument was designed to measure the curricular and co-curricular events and experiencesthat would affect the ethical development of undergraduate engineering students [18].Instruments that have been developed in engineering to measure non-cognitive skills have mostlyused the traditional development process of reviewing the literature on existing instruments toguide their own scale development. Here, the conceptual domain is developed through literaturereviews, expert consultation, peer review, and conversations with target groups [19]. These arewell-established and validated
professionals. She is passionate about improving engineering education and practice and has been working in the areas of innovation, leadership development, diversity, equity, and inclusion, ethics, and, faculty development. Previously, she also worked for companies including Deloitte, Sprint, ProStem and Credit Suisse, both as an internal and external research consultant focusing on areas of leadership development, performance management, competency development and people analytics. She integrates her research in Engineering Education with prior background in Human Resource Management and Engineering to understand better ways to develop STEM workforce both in universities and companies.Dr. Carol B. Muller, Stanford
principles of engineering, science, and mathematics 2. The ability to apply engineering design to produce solutions that meet specified needs, with consideration of public health, safety, and welfare, as well as global, cultural, social, environmental, and economic factors 3. The ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences 4. The ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts 5. The ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborative and inclusive environment