is also known as visual-spatial skills and these are different from other forms ofintelligence such as verbal ability, reasoning ability, and memory skills. Spatial skills are linkedto professional and academic success [3], [4]. For example, when designing or constructing apumping station or piping systems within a treatment plant, it is always challenging to develop athree-dimensional mental picture of the space when looking at plan view and section views of aspace. Those who are skilled in developing that clear mental picture make fewer mistakes andare more efficient designers or constructors. Spatial training has been shown to have a strongimpact on developing these visual-spatial skills as measured by success on standardized
their householdincome.The agenda (see Figure 1) for the camp provides scaffolded activities throughout the morning toallow students to build background knowledge and understanding of engineering concepts. In theafternoon, students are given adequate time to collaborate and utilize the engineering designprocess to complete an engineering challenge based on a book that identifies a real-worldproblem that needs to be solved.Scaffolding activities are selected to support the larger activity that is planned for the afternoon.Scaffolding activities break down the components of the larger activity enough that a focus canbe made to gain perspective and mastery before having to manage doing all of the elementstogether. Scaffolding activities are similar
noteveryone could attend even at that.The approach to scheduling meetings is discussed in the Activities section, and data collectionmethodologies are discussed in the Assessment Plan and Results section. 52.2.1 ActivitiesThe NFLC held weekly meetings during the semester for the faculty. Each meeting was structured toaddress one of the three outcomes, and the outcome addressed was rotated regularly. A schedule forthe Spring 2017 semester is presented in Table 1 to illustrate this. In order to address outcome 1, on-campus speakers were invited to discuss specific topics, such as creating instructional videos, activelearning techniques, and the learning management system. Sessions addressing
with industry-defined requirements and emphasizes both technical and non-technicalskills and competencies. Rigorous assessment methodologies have been included in bothprograms and will ensure the consistency of learning outcomes between both institutions. Boththe associate and baccalaureate degree are supported by an applications database that directlylinks course content with industry practice in a clear and effective manner. The project’ssustainability plan will be highlighted, including: increased enrollment and the use of student-generated tuition and fees; the leveraging of existing resources, including equipment, facilities,and personnel; outreach, recruitment, and job placement supported by industry partners; and anonline tutorial for
is also used in group advising sessions. The goal of group advising is to communicate the basic information students need to start prepare their study plans. Social Constructivism is an advising approach that is based on the concept that learners build (or construct) knowledge based on what they already know or believe. In a Social Constructivist approach to advising, the adviser takes time to understand what a student already knows, or believes, about their educational experience, and helps the student build on that knowledge. In this approach, the student can seek out knowledge from multiple sources, and verify what he thinks he knows with his adviser. Each of these advising approaches is used within Northwestern
Adapting a Freshman Manufacturing Course to Different Learning StylesIntroductionOur mechanical engineering curriculum includes a freshman course in Design ForManufacturing (DFM). This course introduces project management skills via a curriculumemploying project-based learning. These skills include product design, resource planning,process planning and cost analysis, but the primary focus is in producing a design that ismanufacturable. The most recent offering of this course gives the student an option of lab seriesin which to develop the concepts of DFM. One series uses manual machining processes and theother uses Computer Numerical Control (CNC) manufacturing. Ideally each student can learnusing the method they are
that an individual has in creative and generative processes. It describes an individual's push to search for ways to be innovative and design and test out new ideas for all or a component of a system based on a set of constraints. Project Management The skill set an individual needs to help them bring projects to life, including organization, planning, and decision-making skills. Analysis An individual’s ability to apply math and science and solve the relevant governing equations during design and evaluation. Collaboration Those skills that are necessary for working with other
industryadvisors serve as mentors and coaches. The event climax is an intensive one week work periodthat simulates the construction industry environment they will experience after graduation.During this sprint to the finish, students complete their design and construction plans, assembletheir final deliverables, and brief a panel of judges to include real project stakeholders. The paperoutlines assessment of both the event and the student deliverables, with linkages to ABEToutcomes. This case study should prove useful to educators exploring innovative approaches totheir capstone course, those looking to conduct a culminating event in a compressed timeframe,as well as those interested in providing leadership development opportunities for
educational experiences that meet the needs of all learners.Self-reflection is an often-cited yet underutilized reflective practice. This is due, in large part, tothe challenges inherent to making “reflection from within” a regular part of the teaching practice.For some, self-reflection is the first method to be abandoned when planning, instruction, andassessment tasks demand increasing time and effort to move the course forward. After all, thenext lesson, activity, exam cannot be delayed while an instructor stops to think about theiridentity, goals, and interactions with students. But then again, can any of these experiences befully realized as effective and impactful learning opportunities for all students in the absenceself-reflection?Another
approaches to equity. Titled “Power, Equity,and Praxis in Computing,” the course plan is discussed and assessed through three facets: thecourse’s purpose, its content, and its (intended) learning environment. The purpose of the courseis to make space for undergraduate computing students to explore how systems of power arecoproduced with computing so that students can practice making social justice-centeredtransformations as critical participants of their field. The content of the course plan is organizedthrough modules that overview opportunities and considerations for intervention in computing.The learning environment is discussed through commitments to queer and critical racepedagogies, interdisciplinarity, and mixed methods in which teacher
university-level engineering [31]. Given the context of theclassroom in the camp, as well as the challenge of teaching engineering in a politicallycomplicated and highly regulated environment, we followed a course methodology based onrecent studies about education in fragile contexts and previous experience from the researchers inteaching engineering [32] [33] [34]. Also, we designed our intended outcomes, content,assessment, and pedagogy with the goal of fostering social responsibility so that the coursewould be meaningful and applicable to students’ local community. For example, we consideredexisting engineering problems in the community and pedagogical constraints in the classroom aspart of our course planning based on democratic basis
coded based on the four themes: Educational Activates, Hobbies and Interests,Future Plans and Relationships. During this cycle of coding, the coders and faculty advisorfound and discussed the sub-themes which was used in the second cycle of coding. During boththe first and second cycles of coding, the coders met to arbitrate the results until agreement wasmade on the codes. The target was an interrater reliability Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.8 [14].The results from coding the qualitative data was then interpreted in conjunction with those fromthe quantitative portion. This was completed according to recommendations from the literatureabout mixed methods research, such as Creswell’s book, Designing and Conducting MixedMethods Research [15
implementationactivities.Dialogues was grounded in an institutional strategic planning process and occurred as part of arange of gender equity activities implemented during an NSF funded ADVANCE project. TheADVANCE program provides significant funding to institutional change efforts that recruit,retain and promote women faculty in science, technology, engineering and math fields. TheDialogues process consisted of a series of sessions (ranging from three to eight) that engageddepartmental faculty in a total of eight hours of facilitated reflection activities and discussionsabout implementing the university’s strategic plan to meet the vision of the respectivedepartment. At each meeting, facilitators guided faculty through a series of activities aimed atdefining the
. Early respondents were offered a $5 Starbucks gift card for participating. Table 2. Outline of survey questions. Part Description # of Questions 1 Demographics (gender, race/ethnic background, age, etc.), family 13 background, and basic information about current educational activities 2a Undergraduate students only: Experiences during their civil, architectural, 45 or structural engineering education; memberships in student organizations, and future plans 2b Graduate students
wasacceptable at both time points (T1 α = .715, T2 α = .91). Items were averaged so that higherscores indicated greater confidence in abilities to work in teams.Education intentions. Three questions (Estrada et al., 2011) assessed participants’ educationplans in engineering. Questions were answered on a scale from 1 (Very unlikely) to 6 (Verylikely) indicating students’ plans to attend an MS program in engineering, a PhD program, and togain experience working in an engineering lab. Items were averaged such that higher scoresrepresented greater intentions to pursue additional education and were analyzed individually.Career intentions. A 7-item measure (Estrada et al., 2011; Schultz & Estrada, 2010) evaluatedstudents’ career intentions in the field
plan, building and testingdesigns, making improvements, and assessing completion. In this study, facets of engineeringawareness of learners were determined by examining their ability to identify engineering-relatedpractices, strategies, and processes they used; and associating those practices, strategies, andprocesses with the construct of engineering.To conduct this exploration, researchers implemented three approaches to measure facets ofengineering awareness: observations, interviews and surveys. These methods provided data toaddress the following research questions: 1. What engineering practices do researchers observe visitors exercising? (Related to a facet of procedural knowledge) 2. From a list provided, what engineering
that there werethree main curricular activities within engineering that had the potential to encourage EBR in theclassroom: the report to the client at the end of the unit, the types of questions the teacher askedof the students (i.e., asking students to further explain the “why” or “how” of their answers), andstudent discussions. However, this research did not address actual implementation of thecurricula. Mathis et al.18 explored students’ use of EBR during solution generation of anengineering design challenge in a seventh-grade classroom. The study found that students usedEBR most while planning a design idea and evaluating the tested design solution; also, instancesof EBR were found in student worksheets and group discussions. Both the
among Underrepresented Scholars through Engagement with the Sustainable Development Goals in Global ContextsIntroductionOpportunities to participate in international engagement experiences broaden students’perspectives and perceptions of real world problems [1]. A strong sense of “global engineeringidentity” can emerge when students are part of international teams that consider solutions tohumanitarian challenges [2], [3]. To encourage retention in engineering among undergraduateand graduate students from underrepresented groups, a multi-campus team of faculty andadministrators developed a plan to expose students to humanitarian engineering perspectiveswithin global contexts. Through the University System
communicating information, (3) planning and carrying out investigations, (4)analyzing and interpreting data, (5) engaging in argument from evidence, (6) developing andusing models, (7) using mathematics and computational thinking, (8) constructing explanationsand designing solutions.The first engineering epistemic practice is that engineering is a social field and requires real-world context [11], [12]. Engineers work directly with clients to develop a set of criteria andconstraints (time, money, resources, etc.) and to define the problem [8], [11]. Before any projectcan begin, engineers must see the problem in context [11]. Therefore, every EiE lesson beginswith a narrative which allows students to gain interest in the topic, understand the need
extensive con- struction projects, organic farming, and currently works as a mechanical engineering technician designing and building automated production equipment at Smith and Vandiver. He plans to transfer to UC Davis after completing his studies at Cabrillo College. Upon receiving his BSME degree, Brandon would like to work designing machines and processes that address issues such as renewable energy, potable water systems, bio-remediation, and sustainable agriculture.Sarah E. Kalman, Cabrillo College Sarah Kalman is a civil engineering student at Cabrillo College. During the 2014-15 academic year she was selected to be part of Cabrillo College’s first Engineering Abroad Program. After the abroad experi- ence
Envision online scoresheets introduce 64sustainability and resilience credits which the design teams used to assess the sustainability ofthe proposed designs. The emphasis on sustainability by incorporating both the UN SDG’s andEnvision expanded the focus of the design to consider the overall plan, construction,maintenance and life cycle of the projects. The incorporation of both criteria helped to guidestudent decisions, evaluate the environmental impact of the designs and address the benefits theproposed design had on their respective communities. The exposure to both the UNSDGs andthe Envision Rating System was supported by the professional mentors. One company evenprovided funding to support students to complete the Envision training and
reviewed and considered efforts toredesign first-year engineering experiences at colleges and universities across the country andidentified skills that would better prepare first-year students for success in their future coursesand careers. A major recommendation was the adoption of a new two-course sequence for first-year students. This sequence will replace the current one-unit introductory seminar course forfirst-year engineering and computer science students.A backward design process — that began with student learning outcomes and produced contentand assignments that would support these outcomes — was used by a subsequent summerworking group to develop plans for the two-course sequence. This backward course design wasfacilitated using the TiLT
authority, in a coordinated way, in order to foster systemic change.13Prior to commencing a CI initiative, it is recommended that three preconditions be in place tomotivate and enable the work, i.e.: “…an influential champion, adequate financial resources, anda sense of urgency for change.”14 From there, five conditions are adopted:12 1. A Common Agenda: Participants work together to develop a shared understanding of both the problem and how best to solve it collectively. 2. Mutually Reinforcing Activities: Participants engage in different activities, each determined by the strengths/areas of focus of the individual participating groups, all contributing to a coordinated plan
changes within engineering departments. Based on this work, we developed thePOWER protocol (Privilege and Oppression: Working for Equitable Recourse), a workshop thatguides engineering educators to identify and understand the intersectional nature of power andprivilege before planning strategies to disrupt, disarm, and dismantle it. In this paper, we presenta design case to show how this workshop has evolved. We provide the POWER protocol in theappendix so that others can adapt this workshop for their own contexts.In the interactive session at CoNECD, we will take attendees through part of the POWERprotocol (we will scope the workshop to fit in the time allotted; the full workshop is 1.5 hours) toexamine how power, privilege, and
, introductory engineering courses. He has had experience in the classroom as an adjunct professor at Rowan University. In this role, he helped develop a series of experiments for a freshman engineering course that explored introductory engineering concepts through chocolate manufacturing, and another series of experiments involving dissolvable thin films for a similar course. Alex is also the president of the Syracuse University Chapter of ASEE, and has been working diligently with his executive board to provide seminars and workshops for their fellow graduate students. Alex’s plans upon graduation involve becoming a professor or lecturer, specifically at a primarily undergraduate institution.Mr. Alexander J. Johnson
skills of Self-Advocacy within the client/student structure was found to help minoritizedstudents reach academic success. This practice has been used extensively within the learning disability (LD) communities to helpstudents advocate for themselves in the creation and implementation of their IndividualEducational Plans (IEPs). A comprehensive review of evidence-based practices for teaching self-advocacy within the LD communities found that there are three critical factors that, whencombined result in increased academic success: empowerment or a sense of agency (havingcontrol over decisions and life events), strong self-awareness (knowing what is right for oneselfand setting goals based on this criteria), and social justice (knowing how to
activities at a range of gradelevels, though had not yet used SeaGlide in a camp setting. SeaPerch activities in a number ofcontexts are well documented in ASEE literature, including presentations to the Pre-CollegeEngineering Education, Women in Engineering, Ocean and Marine Engineering, MechanicalEngineering, and Multidisciplinary Engineering Divisions (see, for example: 2-17), though lessinformation is available on implementation of SeaGlide programs. The sections below describethe planning and scheduling aspects of both the SeaPerch and SeaGlide camps, which built offprior experience, and also capture feedback and lessons learned for future camp planning.PlanningPlanning considerations focused on five key areas: venue, working with minors
welcomed; (ii) engage students from different backgroundsto learn about each other and come together to solve computational problems; (iii) to strengthenthe communication between students early on in their computing experience and student who arerelatively new to the field of computing. This paper will discuss the design of inclusively themedHackathons, the logistics involved during planning, the execution, the challenges faced, and theimpact it created to broaden the participation of underrepresented, underserved, andunderprepared community college students in computing related activities.IntroductionHackathons have grown in popularity as a venue for computer enthusiasts and aspiring inventorsto network and realize their ideas. Hackathons are
pilotstudy indicates our curriculum’s potential to introduce students to engineering and its related careerpaths. The pilot also provided insight to the method of surveying used and justified for us the use of aretrospective survey in a full scale planned study. This program may serve as a pathway to engage adiversity of students in robotics and engineering leveraging new materials and applications.IntroductionGender disparities persist across engineering disciplines. This is especially true in traditional disciplinessuch as mechanical engineering (MechE) and electrical engineering (EE) [1]. Nationwide, ~15% and~14% of undergraduate MechE and EE degrees are awarded to women, respectively [2]. Alternatively,bioengineering and biomedical engineering
while alsomaking enough time to study for this class.The ApproachAn immediate recognition of my own situation from a few years prior came back to me. Iremembered how I felt in the office of my former advisor, and I remember what I wished wouldhave happened when I was under similar circumstances. I could have just nodded sagely, a lookof disappointment but understanding in my eye, and wished the student well in their academicendeavors, saying it was for the best. But I did not. Instead, I asked the student how they plannedon meeting their goals. What was their study plan? How did they study for exams or classregularly? How do they know how much time to put aside for studying? What I learned was thatthis student did not have a clear plan to meet