Page 15.1064.2some material that would relate more directly to attendees’ projects as well as allow attendeeswith similar interests to brainstorm, discuss, and give and receive feedback on the variousinnovative ideas. The goal was to provide support for attendees to develop the sophistication oftheir ideas over the course of the symposium. Overall, the intent of combined activities was toempower faculty who were already leading innovative change in their classrooms to becomeagents of change in their institution or in the engineering education community at large. Thisempowerment stems from the information provided as well as the supportive community ofpractice that developed among attendees. The intent and initial outcomes of the first
AC 2010-944: DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF A REVISEDINTRODUCTORY ENGINEERING COURSEPhilip Parker, University of Wisconsin, Platteville Page 15.392.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Development and Assessment of a Revised Introductory Engineering Course: Work in ProgressIntroduction GE1030 (Introduction to Engineering Projects) is required of all engineering students atthe University of Wisconsin-Platteville, and is taken by most students in their second semester.Students who enroll in engineering at the University of Wisconsin-Platteville enter the GeneralEngineering Department, and do not matriculate into the degree-granting
theapparatus. This paper describes the design and operation of the device as well as teachingmodules and user surveys to match the results with laboratory outcomes. Such an inexpensivebut functional apparatus can enhance a traditional undergraduate fluids laboratory. Studentlearning was positive after using it for a laboratory exercise. Included drawings and teachingmodules may benefit other faculty members who want to take advantage of the current design.Keywords: Fluid mechanics, fluid statics, hydrostatic, buoyancy, laboratory, design.INTRODUCTION The senior machine design class includes capstone design projects done by teams ofstudents. These students had already taken the Fluid Mechanics laboratory class where theneed for a hydrostatic
, Villanova University, October 15-16, 2010Students taking a track must take a total of 21 credit hours worth of additional course work beyond thecore courses, 9 credit hours of which may be focused on a research project.While the tracks offer in-depth courses in specialized areas, the core courses offer a much morebroadening experience and the research projects that students perform in this program are much morecross-disciplinary. In the next section we describe the core courses in more detail, explain thepedagogical approach to teaching these core courses, and describe their impact on students to date.MS Sustainable Engineering Core Course SequenceThree courses make up the core courses of the MS Sustainable Engineering program:EGR 7110
mathematics in an NSF-funded Math-Science Partnership grant; serving as Director of the Master of Natural Science (Physics) program at ASU, including ASU’s Modeling Workshops and other summer courses; and leading a new summer research experience for forty math and science teachers project, funded by Science Foundation Arizona. He is also actively involved in a pilot project to provide a compact path to teaching certification for mainstream math and science majors. He has directed an NSF REU program in condensed matter physics, and he is actively involved in undergraduate education, including the teaching of the introductory courses for majors. His experience in teaching and expertise in physical
initiativedesigned to sequentially infuse S-L throughout engineering curriculum as a broad approach topromote development of better engineers, more engaged citizens, along with engineering thecommon good in communities. Chemical, Civil, Electrical, Mechanical, and PlasticsEngineering departments within the college integrated S-L activities into 192 course offerings (5intro, 65 ME, 32 EE, 47 CE, 31 PlE, 12 ChE) across the last five years that involved an averageof 753 undergraduate students each semester carrying out S-L projects. Half of the faculty hasbeen involved.In order to discover student views about S-L activities in engineering courses, and to betterunderstand why students seem more motivated to learn with S-L, administration of 399 pre-S-Lsurveys
Page 15.843.2learning some of the concepts of entrepreneurship. The students in our engineering classes areeager to learn about entrepreneurial opportunities and ideas. A recent survey 1 of undergraduateengineering students at five different schools showed that most (82%) were interested inpursuing some form of entrepreneurship after graduation. Students want to know how to taketheir ideas and get them into the marketplace. They want to use their engineering skills to helpreal people with real problems (and they see entrepreneurship as a means to that end). Theyunderstand that competing for engineering projects in a global context requires not only strongtechnical knowledge, but also business acumen. This strong interest translates into
create a Model-Eliciting Activity (MEA) in which the students were required todevelop multi-media example problems. This work in progress describes the basic objectives ofthe project and a preliminary assessment of its effectiveness through a thematic analysis ofstudent reports and a student survey. We will discuss what students thought was important inmultimedia example problems, show samples of what the students developed, and offerrecommendations for implementing this MEA.Course InformationThe Multi-Media MEA developed by the authors was used in an introductory, sophomore levelEngineering Dynamics course. The course format is three, 50-minute sessions per week insections of 35 students. Approximately 30 sections are offered each year, serving
pedagogical changes in a fluid mechanics and heat transfer course. It has been difficult tofind statistically meaningful results because of small sizes of the classes, a once per year course offering,and in maintaining experimental controls at partner institutions with variant implementations. Alongwith our problems, there is a poor history regarding random control testing in educational research.This has convinced us to move toward a different class model centered around a project-basedapproach with design discussions reviewed for critical reasoning by students and faculty within theexperimental site institution and industrial representatives outside the institution. We are also shiftingaway from traditional quantitative definitions of experimental
engineering careers. This project develops a supply-chainof high quality engineering students by 1) supporting the CCs’ HS student outreach activities, 2)supporting the CC engineering courses by providing materials, tutoring, local engineeringspeakers, and tuition scholarships, 3) conducting “Be an Engineer” events on the CC campusesto CC students and local HS students and their parents, 4) following up withclasses/workshops/seminars - exploiting time-tested techniques, assignments, as well as one-on-one and group mentoring - for all participants either via live teleconference or webcast, 5)providing an engaged community of mentors (with extensive experience and commitment) for allstudents, as well as remote tutoring and mentoring via phone, email
industry and academic institutions on theimportance and urgency of reflecting the impact of the SoC paradigm shift in engineeringeducation, as traditional programs, especially at the undergraduate level, have not keptpace with this evolution [1]. Recognizing the acute national demand for a new breed ofSoC engineers, our project proposes an innovative curricula prototype that cuts across theartificial course boundaries and introduces SoC knowledge through vertically-integratedand problem-oriented laboratory experiments [2]. In addition, we value the important rolethat community colleges play in starting students on the road to engineering careers, as Page
club (or how to find and read a research article), discussions on laboratory etiquette andresearch ethics. Participants were then integrated into their research mentors laboratory, andspent eight weeks on a research project. The program has two Peer Mentors, who areundergraduates with research experience, that live with the students and participate in theresearch project. The mentors are also responsible for additional social and academic activitiesduring nights and weekends. This paper describes the program, evaluations and critiques fromthe first year (from both research mentors and participants), as well as the challenges andopportunities the program presents to future “Research Experience for Undergraduates”programs. Surveys will continue
real world experiences which usually involves various motion controlcomponents. Therefore, various assignments using input/output (I/O) devices could be given tostudents to exercise development of ladder logic diagrams. But more dynamic applications withmotion control components are necessary to train and prepare students for the real world. Thedevelopment of the PLC controlled four-story elevator is the final project assignment forstudents in the advanced PLC course. This final project requires the following tasks: thedevelopment of interfacing software for the human machine interface (HMI) terminal, the designof a hoist using a stepper motor, the implementation of a position-sensing mechanism, thecompletion of a ladder logic diagram for
An Automated Natural Gas Shut-Off Valve System Benjamin Cadieux Lee Denaro Paul Ellsworth Adam Robert Salah Badjou, Ph.D. Department of Electronics and Mechanical Wentworth Institute of Technology, Boston, MA 02115 Session Topic: Teaching project based courses and design courses, including senior design course AbstractThere is no system on the market today that monitors a building or house for natural
future projects. Surveys also indicate strong agreement that extremeexperience interviews “inspired ideas that are better for average users as well.” An examinationof interview transcripts shows the extreme experience interviews are valuable not only foruncovering a much more comprehensive set of customer needs, especially with respect toproduct-user interactions, but also for obtaining innovative redesign suggestions from customersthemselves. The results collectively show extreme experience interviews are an effective andvaluable addition to the design process in these courses, with additional room for improvementin teaching technique.1 IntroductionIn the last decade the engineering design community has shown tremendous interest in
architecturaldesign studio focused on the design of efficient, elegant, expressive long-span structures.Examples of student design solutions for various projects are shown and explained. Anassessment of the benefits of teaching structures in a studio is presented. The studio projectsdemonstrate that structure is an important determinant of architectural form. Form should followforce, and not merely function.IntroductionTechnology is design. Technical concepts, especially in architecture curricula, should be taughtas design. However, structures courses in most architecture programs have long relied oncalculation based problem sets as their primary pedagogy. This approach is unrealistic and doesa disservice to students. It does not accurately represent the
studentsarrive in Karlsruhe between January and March, and start with a research project that has beenformulated by faculty at both institutions. Whenever possible, the US student is paired with aGerman student who will participate in the reciprocal phase of the exchange program. When thesemester begins in Karlsruhe in April, students transition to coursework and either finish theirresearch or decrease their laboratory workload.The engineering students from Karlsruhe, Germany, come to the University of Kentucky inAugust to take regular classes in the fall semester. Karlsruhe’s engineering students, who arerequired to complete a 500-hour research project for their degree, perform some of this researchin the fall semester, while also taking classes, and
AC 2010-1527: PERSONAL LAB HARDWARE: A SINE WAVE GENERATOR,LOGIC PULSE SIGNAL, AND PROGRAMMABLE SYNCHRONOUS SERIALINTERFACE FOR ENHANCING EDUCATIONJeffrey Richardson, Purdue UniversityJames Jacob, Purdue UniversityBrant Price, Purdue UniversityJeremiah Dole, Purdue University Page 15.951.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Personal Lab Hardware: A Sine Wave Generator, Logic Pulse Signal, and Programmable Synchronous Serial Interface for Enhancing EducationAbstract:This project developed a low cost solution to provide personally owned electronic test equipmentto students in an advanced analog electronics course to enhance their learning associated withelectronic
students and 30 Teaching Assistants, planningfive new and unique projects for each academic year and integrating community groupsinto real-world scenarios, the largest challenge facing the team is that of consistency ofassignment design and evaluation.This paper will describe a methodology for maintaining instructional and gradingconsistency across the many layers of student/tutorial assistant/instructor interaction.Due to the scope of the course, each of the five projects is developed by one or moreinstructors, with each of the 9 instructors contributing to at least one project. As theinstructors come from a variety of backgrounds, consistency has been problematic – whatone instructor considers complete assignment information, another considers
patterns. Second, they mentally representproblems largely in terms of underlying principles. Finally, experts plan solution strategies, anddetect constraints given in the problem statement. To incorporate these ideas into engineeringeducation, a project called “Reverse Engineering” was created, and employed in a sophomorefluids mechanics class. No different than taking a piece of equipment apart to better understandits operation, students can apply the same approach to chemical engineering problems. Briefly,students were asked to generate their own problems related to a concept discussed during class,and present the solution by breaking it down into its fundamental parts. We hypothesize thatstudents would improve their problem solving ability by
Engineering in 1980 and the Sc.D. in Electrical Engineering in 1987 from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Gennert is interested in Computer Vision, Image Processing, Scientific Databases, and Programming Languages, with ongoing projects in biomedical image processing, robotics, and stereo and motion vision. He is author or co-author of over 90 papers. He is a member of IEEE, ACM, NDIA Robotics Division, and the Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council Robotics Cluster.William Michalson, Worcester Polytechnic InstituteMichael Demetriou, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Page 15.85.1© American
: Choice of gradelevel based on literature review as well as timing of statewide standardized assessment (i.e., 4thand 8th grade), Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA)] Breaking the mold of thetraditional college semester-break trips, our program not only connects 3rd -7th grade students andcollege students, but also teachers, parents and a diverse group of community partners in thecollege academic experience. Important to note is that there is little to no cost to associates ofthe program through the use of publicly available and college-sponsored technology and low costsupport equipment (e.g. web cams). The semester-break trip is the project focal point in whichinquiry-based exchanges of science ideas, theories, and experiences take
compounds (VOCs), and high levels ofColiform bacteria. In attempts to remove these contaminants, students will research the naturalmaterials in the area that may be helpful or useful in their removal. Materials like coconut wasteto derive activated carbon and Malunggay, which are readily available throughout thePhilippines, will be tested for their contaminant removal capabilities. Not only will this researchand development project help the people of Nagcarlan, but also other rural, disadvantaged areas,where water contamination is of great concern. This research and service learning will also bebeneficial to the students, who will grow from this experience and provide an example forengineers to come.Introduction: In an age where information
, which we call CLIO,facilitates team-based student projects that can integrate sensors, embedded computing, energymanagement and wireless communications. The CLIO hardware and software package includesthe development board along with experiments that build upon each other. Experiments basedon the simulator are complementary, allowing students to explore circuit- and systems-levelwireless design parameters and the links between them. This paper describes the capabilities andsuggested use for the development board, associated simulation projects, and supporting coursematerial. We also present assessment results based on surveys and focus groups, conducted attwo universities in Fall 2009. Two additional universities will be implementing the course
designs of new machines and operator interfaces.Unfortunately, many engineers lack knowledge in areas of cross-discipline knowledge. Theybecome specialized in their own field to the fault of not considering (or even knowing) how theirrole in a project impacts the other participants. 17 If students can gain a strong understanding ofhow to apply control theory in real-world applications, they will diversify their knowledge set andcan communicate and design more effectively. Additional arguments have been made forincluding PLCs in controls education. 13,14,18BackgroundThis section highlights the history and context for the PLC and the motivation for pursuing thisinvestigation.HistoryPLCs were first developed by Information Instruments, Inc
a product to bringto market. Three cash prizes worth $3500, $1000, and $500 are awarded and winners meetwith business representatives and venture capitalists from such companies as Bose,Solutions F5, and M/C Venture Partners. The submission date for the contest had been inearly October but this past year, the submission date was moved to the end of November,thus allowing for the contest to be the major final project of the course.How did it work?To motivate the students, and to convince them that they can develop a winning product, theorganizer of the contest Dr. Sushil Bhatia of Suffolk University’s Business School spoke tothe students and answered their questions at the second class meeting of the semester. Ithen divided the students into
AC 2010-156: A CAPSTONE APPROACH TO EXPLORING TEACHEROUTCOMES FROM PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENTHoward Kimmel, New Jersey Institute of Technology HOWARD KIMMEL is Professor of Chemical Engineering and Executive Director of the Center for Pre-College Programs at New Jersey Institute of Technology. He has spent the past thirty years designing and implementing professional development programs and curricula for K-12 teachers in science and technology. At the college level, he collaborates on projects exploring teaching methodologies and assessment strategies in first-year college courses in the sciences, engineering, and computer science.Ronald Rockland, New Jersey Institute of Technology RONALD H
provides first-year engineering students with a broadintroduction to engineering design, the engineering profession and its expectations, engineeringproblem-solving skills and teamwork skills. It consists of two new first-year courses: EGR 100(Introduction to Engineering Design) and EGR 102 (Introduction to Engineering Modeling).EGR 100 is an addition to the existing core course requirement for admission to an MSUengineering program and is also a prerequisite to EGR 102. The broad goals of the new initiativeare: 1. Attract top students to engineering programs and retaining them; 2. Better prepare graduates to adapt to a quickly and constantly in a changing global engineering workforce by appreciating the importance of teamwork, project
-and Nano-Mechanics of Materials, the Laser Micromachining Laboratory, the Research Centerfor Advanced Manufacturing, and the Micro Sensor Laboratory. Each faculty member submitteda list of possible projects from their research laboratory in which REU students could participate.Some of the projects were similar to those from previous years, while other projects were new tothe REU program.The REU program was advertised through an email message that was distributed toundergraduate engineering students at the host institution, faculty contacts at other universities,and the Women in Engineering Program Advocates Network (WEPAN) nationwide list-serve.The email message referred potential applicants to a website* which was used as the centralsource
engineering design education, indigenous knowledge systems and systems thinking.Mary Lynn Brannon, Pennsylvania State University Mary Lynn Brannon, Instructional Support Specialist at the Leonhard Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Education at the Pennsylvania State University, has a Master of Arts Degree in Education and Human Development specializing in Educational Technology Leadership. Her work focuses on projects that measure and assess student perceptions of learning related to their experiences with engineering course innovations. She is a faculty development consultant with previous experience in instructional design, and instructor of the Graduate Assistant Seminar for