]. Page 26.720.4 Figure 2. Kolb’s cycle of experiential learning[16].According to the Kolb’s cycle, the four experiential learning stages are Concrete experience,Reflective observation, Abstract conceptualization and Active experimentation. In this project, theKolb’s Experiential Learning Theory is applied during the EMDLS design and implementation toimprove student learning and professional development.2. Project OutlineThis project focuses on the design and deployment of a microprocessor based EMDLS to collectenvironmental data from the 3,000 L raceway tank which forms the basis of the microalgae andshrimp aquaculture system. The data provided by the system will be used in the daily managementof the operation as well as
statement needs to incorporate the needs of theconstituents and the strategic plans of the city and state officials. Save your brainstorming map asthis will form part of your deliverable. Create a strategic sustainability vision statement (2 to 3sentences) that will reflect the needs of the City of Goodyear.Part B: 10 year strategic sustainability plan for transportation systemsUsing the vision statement your group has crafted, create a high-level 10 year strategic andsustainable transportation system feasibility plan for the City of Goodyear. You have a budget of$500,000 dollars to develop this feasibility plan. Be sure to address the functional areas outlinedin this link: http://www.goodyearaz.gov/government/city-manager-s-office/strategic-plan
traffic crash reconstructions wherestudents used concepts from engineering dynamics to determine specific answers to how theevent occurred. This project was part of the lab component of a junior level Machine Dynamicscourse. The student completed the analyses and consolidated their findings in a report followingUS Code 26 (Rule 26 report). A Rule 26 report should disclose the data and other informationconsidered by an expert including exhibits and charts. The report should reflect the testimony tobe given by the expert and must be signed by that expert. We have used versions where thestudents either worked alone or in teams. The student was then then “hired” by a law studentwho was role-playing an attorney and deposed to render their opinion on
accomplishments in projects,competitions and other activities that stretch well beyond the usual classroom exercises. Theseaccomplishments reflect more on students’ abilities and talents in solving issues that arecontemporary and within areas that are recognized by the profession as critical and challengingto today’s engineering design and practice. The records of these accomplishments in performingunique and timely activities are expected to place our graduates a step ahead of the “usualcrowd” in the job market and especially during the interview process.2. Employers: The IIT engineering portfolio helps a potential employer to better understand astudent’s aptitude and preparedness for the position (he/she is applying for) and to identify anyspecific
,24 among other attributes. Ithas been suggested19 that designers of learning environment draw inspiration from game designprinciples to engender active learning, reflection, collaboration, diverse learning opportunities,motivation, etc.As evidenced from the above, there exists a compelling opportunity to integrate the technologyof robotics and student interest in gaming to teach computer programming to K-12 students andto enhance their lateral creativity for creative problem solving.25,26 The idea of constructing andprogramming a physical robot makes the classroom come alive, allowing the students tounderstand that classroom math and science concepts are critical to solve real-world problems.Even as robot games are used to enrich students
academic units Page 26.22.3 Investment of resources in communication Felicitation of opportunities for community building and multicultural interaction Holding meaningful dialogue Felicitation of outreach, workshops, and services Assessment of satisfaction, needs, and outcomesClearly, there seems to be a subtle difference between graduate and undergraduate education on aphilosophical level. If there is a difference in student engagement, it is likely to be reflected instudent performance in a same academic course.Other Factors of Student PerformanceEven though the purpose of this study was to find out the effect of
data analysis, reflects on the benefits of visualizingbibliometric data, and future plans.IntroductionAs every librarian knows, department and subject knowledge are requisite for a successful liaison practice.This was not the case, however, when I became the Civil Engineering (CE) department’s liaison: I wasunfamiliar with the resources specific to the discipline and the department was not communicative. At thetime, the CE department’s webpage had not been updated in some time, so very little accurate informationabout the department was available. To further complicate matters, the nine faculty members had minimal (ifany) interaction with the library: no purchasing or subscription suggestions, no cancelation complaints. Thesame was true for
alarger workload on the student’s side. This misconception was addressed multiple times duringthe semester to explain to the students that the workload is the same and that learning (whetherdeductive or inductive) requires the same amount of work, and that the only difference betweenthe two is the chronological order of the learning activities. As the semester progressed, studentsappeared to gradually believe this to be the reality. This was reflected in the feedback inQuestion 3 of the survey where not a single student felt that they are overburdened withworkload in the class. A total of 11 students either agreed or strongly agreed that the workloadfor the class was comparable to other courses with equal credit and 2 students were neutral
) Program (Curricula) 26 (19) Course 64 (47) Pedagogy Active Learning (Group-Based) 11 (8) Reflections on Methods 31 (23) Experiential Learning (Project-Based) 68 (50) Investment Level/Duration Support: Grant 0 (0) Preparation Time 2 (1
-14889. Carberry, A.R., Krause S.J., Ankeny C.J., and Waters, C. (2013) Unmuddying” Course Content Using Muddiest Point Reflections. Frontiers in Education Proceeding.10. Krause, S.J., Baker, D.R., Carberry, A.R., Alford, T.L., Ankeny, C.J., Maass, S., Koretsky, M., Gibbons, B.J., Brooks, B.J., Gilbuena, D.M., Waters, C., Stuart, J. (2014) Characterizing and Assessing Student Learning Issues and Misconceptions (SLIM) with Muddiest Point Reflections and Fast Formative Feedback. American Society of Engineering Education. Indianapolis, IN. Reference: 10445 Page 26.159.9
approach for constructionmanagement education which requires students to be active participants in their own education.Students learn far more by doing something active rather than by simply watching and listening2.Therefore, to take advantage of the studio-laboratory format of the course proposed in the newcurriculum, the faculty was challenged with developing experiential learning experiences toenhance student learning. Page 26.455.3Experiential LearningExperiential learning is learning through reflection on doing, which is often contrasted withdidactic learning. Experiential learning is related to, but not synonymous with
efforts on the PLCs helps us learn by getting hands on experience Using the PLCs in class Being able to apply what I learn and check my understanding. To be able to learn hands on how the program interacts. Be able to check my understanding of the concepts and materials. being able to visualize the process Being able to actually see if our programs work. To get instant feedback on a program. Being able to see the ladder logic and how it reflects on the Portable PLC is the best way for me to learn this. The practice of programming The usefulness of this being used in a practical situation. It helps to keep the tools straight (i.e. which command is examine-if-closed, examine-if- opened, etc.). Seeing how
studentresponses to open format questions. Students “ink” their responses with pen-enabled Androiddevices, iPads, iPhones, or tablet PCs. Students can respond to in-class questions with words,drawings, graphs, or equations. Creating these responses gives an opportunity to interact withthe subject material and increase metacognition. The instructor gains real-time feedback aboutwhat students are thinking and can address misconceptions and questions10.Mobile apps like InkSurvey help promote active learning by encouraging students to reflect onsubject material and explain concepts in their own words. Studies of more than 5,000 scienceand engineering students found that active learning methods double conceptual learning gains11and give a 25% higher pass rate
, recommended clearances were not achieved between the PLC and VFD.The addition of the ASCII module and other supplemental devices would further limit the spaceavailable. A larger cabinet would allow for future expansions and would not incur a significantexpense since most of the hardware could be transplanted to the new cabinets.Comparison of student feedbackStudent feedback was collected from two classes for comparison using a student evaluation ofinstruction course survey. This survey asked students to rank a series of questions related to theclass and instructor on a five point scale ranging from ‘Strongly Disagree’ (weight of 1) to‘Strongly Agree’ (weight of 5). Three questions were selected as being reflective of the survey’sresults, and are
to counteringthem. We developed a workshop that does not take a great deal of class time but alerts studentsto the erroneous beliefs, illustrates their harmful effects on writing, and introduces beliefs andpractices more consistent with engineering practitioners’ writing. The workshop demonstrates tostudents that effective writing and effective engineering practice are interconnected. More Page 26.552.2specifically, the workshop incorporates the following: quotations from students that reflect the myths and samples from student papers that exemplify how the myths lead to ineffective writing quotations from practitioners
(fill plant) have a larger variance than sales tothe buyer (distribution branch) (Lee, Padmanabhan, & Whang, 2004). The two major causes ofthe bullwhip effect seen at Red Ball Oxygen are demand signal processing, in which a surge ofdemand in one period is interpreted as a signal of high future demand, as well as the rationinggame, in which the buyer issues an order that exceeds the quantity reflecting demand in responseto a situation in which demand potentially exceeds supply (Lee et al., 2004).The team created a centralized purchasing function for the distribution branches called a branchstock planner. This branch stock planner will use sales history to create an inventorystratification that informs stocking levels for the distribution
focused oncommunication and collaboration, as the benefits to the construction process by improvement inthese areas is obvious 18, 11. Two types of technology have dominated in these areas, buildinginformation modeling (BIM), which has established a solid reputation for collaboration 2, andcloud computing, which has emerged more recently as a solution for collaboration 1, 10, 12. Whileaspects of BIM and cloud computing continue to emerge, in general they are rapidly becoming atypical component in the construction process, whereas a few years ago they were cutting edge.Because of this rapid pace of change knowing what direction technology is heading is vital.Technology in construction education should reflect that of the industry, but a variety
StudentOutcomes7,8,9Student Outcomes are closely tied to the PEOs. In a general sense,students who achieve the abilities in the 11 ABET Engineeringoutcomes should be prepared to attain the PEOs a few years aftergraduation.Several assessment methods, both direct and indirect, are used formeasuring the degree to which Student Outcomes are beingachieved and for continuously improving the program. Directassessment methods require students to demonstrate their knowledgeand skills, and provide data that directly measure achievement ofexpected outcomes. Indirect assessment methods, such as surveys andinterviews, gather reflection about learning. These methods are likely tosuffer from validity and reliability problems as individual perception oftheir actual performance may
children whowere vastly different from typically developing children, but as individual children who, like allchildren, have needs, abilities, strengths, hopes, and dreams. Written reflections from theengineering students revealed the following comments: “When I saw (the child’s name) try out the Play and Mobility Device, it was wonderful to see the smile on her face.” - Biomedical Engineering Student Page 26.628.9 “I learned that children with special needs can also develop gradually …and interact with their environment..” – Biomedical Engineering Student
Education, Life time member Society of Manufacturing Engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers PUBLICATIONS (i)Most Closely Related [1] W.J. Stuart ’Problem Based Case Learning - Composite Materials Course De- velopment – Examples and classroom reflections’ NEW Conference, Oct 2011 [2] W.J. Stuart and Bedard R. (EPRI) ’Ocean Renewable Energy Course Evolution and Status’ presented at Energy Ocean Pacific & Oregon Wave Energy Trust Conference, Sept. 2010. [3] W.J. Stuart, Wave energy 101, presented at Ore- gon Wave Energy Symposium, Newport, OR, Sept. 2009. [4] W.J. Stuart, Corrosion considerations when designing with exotic metals and advanced composites, presented at Corrosion Conference of Exotic Met
part.Measurement and Instrumentation course uses a variety of sensors and measurement techniquesto monitor machining processes (sensors including vibration, acoustic emission, cuttingdynamometers). Data acquisition and processing for tool breakage and quality control ofmachined parts has been added to the course curriculum. This course is a core curriculum coursefor all concentration for BSET. Similarly Quality Control course is a core curriculum one. Bothof them include laboratory experiments based on the equipment and instrumentation provided bythe funding of this project. The manufacturing and prototyping related courses reflect thecompetitive trend in the evolution of manufacturing towards increased flexibility, high speedmachining, remote quality
luncheonkeynote speaker, and concluded with a reception. The students enjoyed attending the conferenceto increase their knowledge about design-build and to interact with the industry. The studentswrote a reflection paper about their experience attending the conference.Outcomes and EvaluationStudents completed a course-specific evaluation at the end of the semester. This evaluation wasin addition to the standard university course evaluation given at the end of the semester. Theeight students who were enrolled in the course completed the evaluation. The students reportedthat they were very satisfied with their course and their experience attending the DBIA RockyMountain Chapter Annual Conference. When the students were asked whether or not they
equations and calculations. The curricularmaterials developed in our workshop specifically target research-identified misconceptions, andare intended to help students distinguish between similar concepts.Lessons LearnedWe will present three general lessons we’ve learned through our collaboration and reflection. Inpresenting these findings we distinguish between researchers and instructors, but note that mostengineering educators perform some combination of the two roles. Additionally, we note thatmany of these lessons refer to commonly held intuitions about the interactions of research andpractice in education. We seek here to surface and further develop these intuitions intoproductive public discourse.1. We need to attend to the differences in
American students more strongly than any otherminority group. AfA students were also influenced by social supports. Compared to the othergroups, AfA were less influenced by influence from others but had a higher level of influencefrom pre-college activities. The relatively high influence from interest in STEM as well as pre-college activities is mostlikely explained by the fact that many of the African American students in our sample went toSTEM focused high schools and were recruited specifically from them. Our data reflect thispotential explanation, as AfA were relatively more influenced by recruitment and financialavailability (scholarships) compared to their peers. The finding that exposure to STEM classesmotivated these AfA students to
) (b) Fig. 2: (a) Sample learning roadmap in Gridlock; (b) Sample KWS in GridlockIn the initial run of Gridlock, help was provided in a way that required students to actively seekanswers to their problems. Although there were mechanics to allow students self-reflecting theirlevel of proficiency, there was no connection between the learning roadmap and the identifiedstudent needs in KWS. When surveying students on the utility and usability of gameinterventions, they voiced their different views of system improvement. Some felt that thecurrent support was just right to provide necessary assistance in identifying domain knowledgeas “(KWS) concisely pointed you in the right direction", and "(Roadmap) contained volumes
cases, the spring represented the continuation of a project begun in the fall (e.g., for asenior design class). The semi-structured interviews 1) gathered background information aboutparticipants, 2) explored participants’ descriptions of the team functionality during the project,and 3) asked participants to reflect on the experience in the context of their engineeringeducation and identities. Each interview was audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Typically,the interviews lasted 45 minutes and each was conducted as least three weeks a part.For each participant, data analysis followed the process outlined by Hycner [9] and included thefollowing general steps: 1. Bracket or block out personal views of the phenomenon of interest to minimize
developed a STARS chemistry prep course. WSU has incorporated structured problem sessions where students work in small groups on problems directly related to their current math and chemistry classes. Each university also designed a year-long STARS Seminar series to build study and learning skills. Seminars include topics such as time management, group study, regular reflection on goal-setting and keys to success, learning to learn and cultivating an open mindset, note-taking, asking for help and utilizing resources, reading textbooks, and developing relationships with faculty.Figure 2: Sample UW and WSU First Year Curriculum University of Washington Sample STARS Washington State University Sample
accuracy (CE) beforecommunicating the solution (S). Finally, reflect on the process through self-assessment (S).Data Collection MethodsFaculty were not required to use PROCESS in their classes and the level of integration of thePROCESS problem solving structure into classroom lectures varied across instructors. Beforethe semester started, faculty were provided with Figure 1, the PROCESS rubric, and acomprehensive user guide complete with code definitions and grading examples to help themdetermine whether they wanted to utilize PROCESS in their classroom instruction as a problemsolving structure. In addition, all course sections were assigned a graduate teaching assistant thatparticipated in a four-hour interactive training session on grading with
progressing towardsexpectations. In addition, interpretations of student achievement could then be linked to the kindsof learning experiences that do or do not promote desired outcomes. Interpreting students’performance or achievement over time and sharing assessment results with students enablesstudents to understand their strengths and weaknesses and to reflect on how they need to improveover the course of their remaining studies. Assessing student learning at the end of a program orcourse of study known as summative assessment provides information about patterns of studentachievement, but without programmatic opportunity to improve achievement of assessedstudents, and without student opportunity to reflect on how to improve and demonstrate
parallelarrangements is used to demonstrate the underlying resistance addition rules. Although thisserves as a good hands on experiment to test the principles of resistance, it often leaves studentswith very few possible combinations to build in the lab, and does not reflect the innatecomplexity of even the most basic of modern circuits. Moreover, typically students aredisconnected from the theory when using rudimentary laboratory equipment to make fairlysimple measurements. Since it has been demonstrated that a more engaged and active approachto physics education has a more lasting effect on the retention of material [2], it was our goal to Page