]. Our study is focused on rewardpoints and leaderboard and evaluating their impact on student learning.Collaborative learning: Collaborative interactions among individuals, has shown positive resultsacross different levels of education, ranging from young children doing their school projects likecraft work in teams to university students working on development projects [17],[ 21]. At thesame time, it is essential to make a distinction between team performance and teameffectiveness. This is because team performance represents the results of group’s activities whilepaying little heed to how the group have accomplished the task. Team effectiveness, however,takes a more holistic point of view in considering not only whether the group
the final project. This section will introduce the topics under each of the fourcategories as well as provide references to the teaching materials.It is possible for our departments to provide hardware to students, but that was not done in thispreliminary case. Thus, the course will require students to purchase their own hardware to build afinal project. To offset this cost, the class will rely on open source teaching materials whenavailable. Consequently, most of the referenced books are available for free and provide thenecessary technical content that is appropriate for our students’ level.Section 1: Background (Weeks 1-3)This section refreshes analytical and programming topics that are needed for EAI.In terms mathematical content, we will
something real and direct formulates a concrete experience that standsto have more lasting memories and impact.B. Research Purpose and QuestionsPast efforts to foster inclusion have primarily focused on the numbers and been limited in theways we teach, train and expose people to learning inclusiveness and empathy. Moreover, suchefforts are also linked to the misconception that increasing demographic representationnecessitates an inclusive environment. Cultures must change to achieve inclusion. The role of thefaculty in shaping culture, specifically in engineering, is critical and yet, understudied. Throughfaculty, this project seeks to address a major area of engineering research, broadeningparticipation, in a novel way. Specifically, rather than
out.At the workshop, I was partnered with this Asian guy. They asked us to tell ourpartner, "What are you most aware of everyday?" And I said, "What I'm most awareof everyday is that I'm Black, I'm a woman, and I'm short."How does your gender impact your experience in your doctoral program?It impacts it a lot. As an example: I was in a group project last semester, and Imade some suggestions. Everybody ignored my comment. Some guy said thesame thing 10 minutes later, and they're were like, "That's a great idea." And Ithought, "I'm just going to shut up from now on and just.” I reverted back into thatminimization because it's like I literally said that's what we should do, and nobodypaid me any attention.What does it mean to be a Black woman in
werestereotypes based on the “double bind” of being a woman of color in engineering and leadership[12]. Finally, being unable to be authentic was also prevalent among the students of color in thisstudy. For example, a Latina woman discussed how she tailored her behavior when performingher leadership duties: “The way I converse, definitely a male thing. Because I definitely talk a littlebit differently when I'm with family and people I know very well.” Thus, failing to includeracialized and gendered experiences may overlook factors that can act as stressors on the leadershipexperiences and development of engineering students.AcknowledgementFunding for this project was provided by the National Science Foundation under grant EEC-ENG1738132. The views
. just communicate, just um, have a little bit problem.”Making Experiences of interactions and “In engineering especially, it is soFriends relationships with U.S students. hard to get close with people because you start talking to them and the subject just does not get any deeper.”Working in Academic experiences in “I was in high school we write ourTeams collaborating with U.S. peers in group paper by our own, and when I go here projects
The introduction of Team-based learning (TBL) in the 1980s marked a significant shift inaddressing the challenges of large class settings in educational environments [1], [2]. Originally abusiness school innovation, TBL has now permeated various disciplines including engineering,medicine, and social sciences globally. Some courses, such as first-year engineering, maycombine TBL with project-based learning (PBL) to introduce students to common engineeringthemes such as design, sustainability, and ethics. Despite its wide-ranging benefits, TBL'seffectiveness can be inequitable for a variety of reasons, including free riders, imbalances in taskallocation, and more broad communication issues [3], [4]. Thus, the application of teamworkassessment
instruction. Excellent teaching style, course organization, and commitment to expectations of adult learning applied to real world problems. 3 We’ve done many project assignments related to every topic in environmental engineering like air pollution, water pollution, etc., so this is a strong benefit and aspect of the course for students. 4 Without getting into the weeds of computer models, this course teaches us a great overall understanding of the fundamentals of modeling and the key elements. I never felt like we got bogged down with the non-material problems, such as learning programs or
safeguards to protect the privacy of medical records aswell as other identifiable health information. However, that information needs to be utilized by thesystem and be readily accessible. It is desirable that the underlying NLP models do not expose theprivate information contained in the training data. However, de-identification methods even whenapplied correctly yield data that sometimes retains the risks of identification [13]. Because mostITSs have not been geared towards patients, privacy of the models and user data has not been amajor concern, therefore the research gap we intend to address is that of maintaining privacy whilemaintaining accuracy and low latency during NLP model training that may be computationallyintensive.2 Project
has mentored dozens of graduate and undergraduate students in research and K-12 outreach activities and is the Director of the Excellence in Computing and Information Technology Education (ExCITE) program. She is a fellow of the Center for the Advancement of STEM Leadership Program (CASL) and the Opportunities for Under-Represented Scholars (OURS) post-graduate institutional leadership certificate program and an alumna of the Frontiers of Engineering Education program (FOEE) of the National Academy of Engineering. She has been serving on the Project Kaleidoscope (PKAL) Capital Area Regional Network steering committee since 2016.Rui Kang Rui Kang is Professor of Secondary Education (6-12) of Georgia College &
context of numericalanalysis and design tasks [6], [7]. These studies highlight the significance of these psychologicalfactors in shaping students' academic performance and learning outcomes in the field ofmechanical engineering [2][4].Several strategies could be employed to improve self-efficacy and motivation in MechanicalEngineering students. One effective approach is the implementation of active learning strategies[8], [9]. Active learning methods, such as flipped classroom model, problem-based learning,collaborative projects, and hands-on activities, have been shown to enhance students' self-efficacy and motivation by providing them with opportunities to apply engineering principles inreal-world scenarios [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. These
related to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), specifically investigating treatment outcomes through a combination of FEM simulation and clinical data analysis. Sherry has worked in industry in the role of a senior system design engineer at Lumedyne Technologies, where she developed a software model for a time-based MEMS accelerometer. She then gained significant academic experience through six years of teaching as an adjunct professor at the University of San Diego. Sherry has been collaborating on a bioengineering research project with the Jacobs School of Engineering at UC San Diego since 2016. In addition to technical research, she conducts engineering education research related to project based
Alignment of Community Engagement in STEM (SPACES) is acollaborative research effort under the National Science Foundation’s ADVANCE program. Theoverarching goal of SPACES is to build an inclusive academic culture to address intersectionalgender-race-ethnicity inequities in Environmental Engineering (EnvE) via the application ofevidence-based strategies for systemic change. The two main thrusts of the project are to addresssystemic problems that cause: (1) underrepresented minority women faculty (URMWF)experiences of isolation in and/or departures from STEM academia and (2) the devaluation ofresearch conducted by URMWF, especially community-engaged research (CER). SPACES is acollaborative effort of faculty and administrators from 11 universities
, Nigeria and the University of Cape Town, South Africa. Currently, His research focus is in the field of Computing and Engineering Education where he is involved with investigating team-based computational projects using qualitative, quantitative, and artificial intelligence-based tools. He is also involved with developing and redesigning a Team-Based transdisciplinary graduate course under the Purdue University EMBRIO Innovation Hub Grant project, where He has contributed by applying computational fluid dynamics methods in the development of partial differential equation (PDE) models to implement cell cytokinesis. His ongoing PhD research broadly investigates teamwork interactions and interdisciplinary learning in
to solve a problem than the workaround I’ve implemented. It would be beneficial if there were opportunities to explore alternative problem-solving approaches. Incorporating peer solutions into the learning process could provide valuable insights into optimizing engineering solutions.”Remote labs in driving creativity and collaboration among engineers. They emphasize howremote labs serve as collaborative tools that allow for teamwork and exploration of different skillsets, fostering creativity in engineering projects. P6: “Yes, absolutely. Like as an engineer to like help drives your creativity or like to improve on your quality you collapse with other people you work in a theme setting or like you work with
salient factors: precollege characteristics andexperiences (i.e., sociodemographic traits, prior academic preparation and performance, andstudent dispositions) and the three other factors comprising the student college experience:organizational context, the peer student environment, and the individual student experience(including curricular, classroom, and out-of-class experiences) [19]. For our study, we includedneurodiversity in pre-college characteristics and experiences and introduced other factors thatmay be particularly relevant for students with ADHD, such as creativity, having close friends,having short-term motivation, time management, and study skills (Figure 1) [20].In our project, we focus specifically on the individual student
tounderstand how different types of engineering literature can be used to discover the backgroundand current trends in a topic of choice, learn how to find relevant standards, technical reports,and patents in their field using both library and real-world resources, and how to properly citewhat they find in their own final reports. Students will have already been through the first-yearseminar session and will be expected to already know the topics that were discussed then. Thelesson emphasizes the following aspects of the INCLUSIVE ADDIE framework: • Needs – models and encourages discovery, student led-learning, and communicating findings. • Context – the capstone-level course revolves around completing a project (either in groups
Paper ID #41591WIP: A Novel Learning Log Application for Classifying Learning EventsUsing Bloom’s TaxonomyDr. Alex M. Phan, University of California, San Diego Dr. Alex Phan is the inaugural Executive Director for Student Success in the Jacobs School of Engineering at UC San Diego. Prior to his appointment, he has served as a project scientist, engineer, and lecturer, teaching across multiple divisions, including the Jacobs School of Engineering (Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Eng., Dean’s Office Unit) and UC San Diego Division of Extended Studies. His teaching interests and
sections of the course were sent to faculty at Colorado School of Mines and STEMlibrarians across the United States and Canada for review. We sought feedback on organization,breadth of coverage, and content depth that can be incorporated in the ongoing development ofthe course. This paper describes the development of RIS, initial feedback received, and lessonslearned in the design process that could inform similar projects at other institutions.IntroductionFaculty and scholars, especially in the United States and United Kingdom, are encouraged todiversify their teaching materials, consider more inclusive approaches to content, and incorporateculturally-responsive examples into their courses [1]–[4]. However, little guidance exists on howto go
complex systems using computational intelligence combined with probability, statistics, data sciences, and operations research. His research also involves active learning, entrepreneurship education, and the innovation mindset. Dr. Konak’s published numerous academic papers on a broad range of topics, including network design, system reliability, sustainability, cybersecurity, facilities design, green logistics, production management, and predictive analytics. He has been a principal investigator in sponsored projects from the National Science Foundation, the National Security Agency, the U.S. Department of Labor, and Venture Well.Dr. Sadan Kulturel-Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Sadan Kulturel
cultural ingenuity trees blocking solar panels. • Share your first impression and feelingsDay 1 about the case/project. • Does the neighborhood look familiar? • Who seems to have a better case? Students take roles (forensic engineer, Eliciting FIRST-PRINCIPLES reasoning to inform judge, jury, lawyer, etc.) and gather conscientious negotiation of risks and benefits evidence by learning daily scientific • What evidence do you recommend that theDay 2-4
engineering designprocess, including the designing and building of a physical prototype such as a prosthetic arm[32], soda can crusher [33], insulating cooler [16], rollercoaster [21], water filter [29], andluggage ramp [22]. The goal of each was to build a prototype that met specified design criteria.Using the ASEE performance expectations [9], Table 2 presents the engineering design practicespromoted in the literature. Most instruction included problem framing, information gathering,ideation, prototyping, decision-making, and design communication. Less than half (49%)described the use of engineering graphics, and only 2 studies included project management aspart of the intervention.Table 2. Engineering Design Practices Promoted in the Literature
strategies to aid students in these courses, ensuretheir preparation for future courses, and help them build connections with their chosen career.Themes from a comprehensive literature review revealed that many research efforts in improvingcalculus courses focused on improving the relevance of these courses, strengthening theconnections between mathematics and engineering faculty and coursework, increasing the use ofactive learning strategies, and utilizing non-traditional modes of teaching (e.g. project- andproblem-based learning or peer teaching) in calculus. While there are consistent themes among avariety of institutions, a consistent and accessible set of course materials for such interventionsremains lacking [3].Among the most time- and
IEEE Power & Energy Society (PES), and a member of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IES).Dr. Gloria Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology Gloria Ma is a Professor in Mechanical Engineering program at Wentworth Institute of Technology. She has been teaching robotics with Lego Mindstorm to ME freshmen for several years. She is actively involved in community services of offering robotics workshops to middle- and high-school girls. Her research interests includes dynamics and system modeling, geometry modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing, and engineering education.Pilin Junsangsri, Wentworth Institute of TechnologyDr. Anuja Kamat, Wentworth Institute of Technology Anuja Kamat
with a specialization in electrical engineering from Roger Williams University. Her research interests include developing professional skills for engineering students and understanding mathematics barriers that exist within engineering.Ms. Katherine Drinkwater, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Katie Drinkwater is a recent graduate of Duke University with a Bachelor’s in Mechanical Engineering. She is excited to begin working towards her Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in the Fall. Her interest in Engineering Education began through a project where she helped to design a makerspace inside a shipping container. Since then, she has explored design and engineering education through
university-based and consulting efforts have led to over $40M in funding for projects to support initiatives in STEM and changes to policies and practices of global engineering organizations. Pearson is a registered Professional Engineer, an ENVISION® Sustainability Professional, and a Commissioner on ABET’s Engineering Accreditation Commission. Among her awards and honors are ABET’s Claire L. Felbinger Award for Diversity and Inclusion, ASCE’s Professional Practice Ethics and Leadership Award, the Society of Women Engineers’ Distinguished Engineering Educator Award, the UT System Regents Outstanding Teaching Award, and ASCE’s President’s Medal, one of the highest honors awarded in this global organization of over
Aiswarya Acharath Mohanakrishnan, Ph.D. 1 Melanie Sattler, Ph.D., PE, Professor1 ,Kate Hyun, Ph.D., Associate Professor1 ,Victoria Chen, Ph.D., Professor 2 1 Department of Civil Engineering, 2 Department of Industrial, Manufacturing, and Systems Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington ABSTRACT METHODS RESULTS • This project develops
emphasizes that identifying unmet clinical needs must includeglobal healthcare settings, not just local communities. Many undergraduate BME programs offerglobal engineering experiences through extracurricular programs and international internships,collaborating with organizations like the International Federation for Medical and BiologicalEngineering [14], Engineering World Health [15], and Engineers Without Borders [16]. Someprograms incorporate capstone projects [17], where students work with clinical partners indeveloping countries. However, these capstones lack direct student immersion in foreignhealthcare settings before solution development. Internships and summer programs allow in-person observation but face high costs, housing challenges
program’s ties tomilitary projects (Figure 3), which conflict with his family’shistory. He states, “So, I'm Cambodian. My parents are Cambodian refugees—they survived the Vietnam War and the Khmer Rouge, which was a communist genocide. But a lot of that history had to do with the United States going into Southeast Asia and interfering. So, there's always been that identity tension for me where I'm Figure 3: Image of Corporate thinking I can't work for the military because the United Sponsors and Military Organizations States military caused harm to my parents in the past.”His story highlights how engineering education often overlooks political and cultural contexts,marginalizing
Civil Engineering at the University of Texas at Tyler. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. from Arizona State University in Civil, Environmental, and Sustainable Engineering focusing on Pavement Engineering. His fourteen years of experience are concentrated on pavement materials design, Fatigue Endurance Limit of Asphalt Mixtures, Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) mixtures, aggregate quality, field performance evaluation, maintenance and rehabilitation tech- niques, pavement management systems, cement treated bases, statistical analyses, modeling, and com- puter applications in civil engineering. Dr. Souliman has participated in several state and national projects during his current employment at the University of