advanced coursework of engineering students can be predicted by theiracademic performance in first-year courses [9]. In addition, these courses can help studentsidentify areas of engineering that interest them and guide their career choices [10]. Thus, thesignificance of the first-year engineering courses extends beyond mere academic introduction;they are integral in shaping the future academic journeys of aspiring engineers.Understanding how instructors' pedagogical knowledge affects their classroom practices iscrucial. Pedagogical knowledge includes a wide range of pedagogical strategies to effectivelymanage a classroom and engage students [11]. This includes the use of instructional strategiesthat accommodate diverse student needs, the design
because they were more efficient at problem-solving. Additionally, to address bothtechnical and personal disagreements, interviewees said they were comfortable speaking openlyin meetings and after incidents occurred, indicating good psychological safety with teammates.We hope to use the results of this work to develop recommendations and best practices forstudent-organized engineering design project teams to provide a welcoming and effective learningenvironment for all students involved.IntroductionEngineering design teams are common in the industry, so students need to have experientialdesign team experiences to learn and develop critical skills needed for their careers. These skillsgo beyond the technical content in core engineering courses and
potential for improving learningoutcomes for diverse students by helping them connect theoretical concepts with practicalengineering applications [28]. When utilized in introductory level engineering courses, project-based learning has been shown to be beneficial for student performance in subsequentengineering courses [28]. The social component of project-based learning has also beenobserved to be an effective tool in helping students develop and refine soft skills such ascommunication, collaboration, creativity, and critical thinking that will be very important to theirfuture success in a career [3].Assessment MethodsPre- and Post-Participation SurveysPre- and post-participation surveys were developed by the project’s evaluator based
finding himself, coming to terms with his engineering identity. So, I like to tell people that when I went to Germany, I had no idea what I wanted to do as an engineer. Going through my one year in Germany I walked out of there knowing exactly what I want to do. […] the biggest positive I got of going abroad was figuring out what I want to do as a career in my engineering field […]. It was the research what, like, sparked it. JD, originally reserved and not used to advocating for himself, then developed theconfidence to ask his internship supervisor whether he could work on a project related to hisnewly found area of interest: “At Siemens, I asked my boss, if it was possible for me to do somehardware tests
, non-profit agencies, and government organizations, including tDr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela (Angie) Minichiello is a military veteran, licensed mechanical engineer, and associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University. Her research examines issues of access, equity, and identity in the formation of engineers and a diverse, transdisciplinary 21st century engineering workforce. Angie received an NSF CAREER award in 2021 for her work with student veterans and service members in engineering.Dr. Ronald W. Welch P.E., The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He
. He earned his PhD in Educational Psychology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign with a focus in Engineering Education. His interests are centered around mentorship, mental health, and retention in STEM students and faculty. Additionally, he helps support the development of new engineering education scholars and researches quality in mixed methods research methodologies.Dr. Karin Jensen, University of Michigan Karin Jensen, Ph.D. (she/her) is an assistant professor in biomedical engineering and engineering education research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests include mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering
technologies and environmental changes.Step 4: By having categories, considering the number of respondents per category was beimportant. For instance, all the respondents should not only be from industry – there should bea balance between industry, government, and academia. Based on these numbers, theconsensus building function is equipped to attach confidence levels to the categorymodifications. For example, if the curriculum is for undergraduates with the goal of makingthem prepared for industry and government careers, then perhaps a larger number of industryand government respondents should be emphasized / weighed / required (requested for input).However, if the curriculum is geared towards PhD students, then a larger respondent pool ofacademics
introduces globalization and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [14]. Thegoal of this module is to help students recognize the implications their design decisions mayhave outside of their immediate community and identify ways their careers as designers couldinclude work toward addressing some of the SDGs.The lesson plan for this module first introduces the concept of globalization, including bothpositive aspects like economic growth and cultural exchange and negative aspects likeoverconsumption and exploitation. The UN SDGs are then presented as an international effort toalign countries and major organizations toward positive globalization outcomes. After a briefhistory of the development of the SDGs, students are encouraged to evaluate the
energy and conversion to electricity in high school students in a rural community, remotely implementing the teaching-learning process through STEM-oriented project-based Learning (PBL)? 2) What is the change in attitudes towards STEM careers of high school students in a rural community who remotely implement the teaching-learning process through STEM-oriented Project-Based Learning (PBL)?4.1 Design of the Content ExamTo answer the first question, the project designed an exam of 20 multiple-choice questions following thetopics covered in the Didactic Sequence. To validate the exam, the project followed the ValidationProcess (Coral, 2009) [16]. After developing the first draft, the exam was presented to two
usingtrial and error to fine tune their IM selections over time (Go It Alone). We also found complexPower dynamics were involved. Instructors often teach more than one course over an academicyear or a career, and thus we expected to see multiple strategies mentioned. As noted earlier,there is expected overlap between responses and instructors in the Power and the Peers andColleagues themes. However, we did not see overlap between instructors with responses in thePower or the Go It Alone themes. Perhaps those who employ a Go It Alone strategy for their IMselection also opt to teach courses without a strong Power dynamic at play. Also, one instructor'sresponses are in both the Go It Alone and the Peers and Colleagues themes, as they use a mix ofself
practices by recognizing the richness of students' emphasizes storytelling, reflection, and stories and experiences and how it contributes to the creation of a shared vision. student outcomes. The anticipatory principle aligns with asset-based practices by focusing on the potential formation The anticipatory principle involves of professional identities among students. For envisioning and actively anticipating a instance, students' visions of their future careers positive future. or contributions
were established, HBCU’shave historically provided Black students with safe learning environments which affirm theirtalents in the context of their race, especially in STEM subjects [6], [23]. Students are alsosupported along their journey toward the doctorate by more readily receiving advising andmentorship from faculty who are of their same race, which matters in the mentorship andadvising of Black students. Only a few HBCUs are classified as doctoral granting institutions,yet these institutions are responsible for producing large numbers of doctoral students who mayaspire to pursue careers as academics [6]. This work offers a chance to explore further into howstudents navigate transitioning between these two seemingly conflicting cultures
faculty member at Northern Arizona University.Dr. Kyle Nathan Winfree, Northern Arizona University Dr. Winfree is the Associate Director for Undergraduate Programs in the School of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems as Northern Arizona University. His research focuses on wearable technologies as applied to health assessment and rehabilitation.Dr. Corinna Marie Fleischmann P.E., United States Coast Guard Academy CAPT Corinna Fleischmann is a licensed Professional Engineer with military, academic and research experience in water resources engineering, environmental engineering, coastal resiliency, construction project management and engineering education. CAPT Fleischmann is a career educator who has been a
of Virginia Patent Foundation. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Paper ID #48048 Chris received his doctorate in nuclear physics from the University of Virginia in 2001. In 2003, he became a registered U.S. Patent Agent and in 2008 he became a Certified Licensing Professional. He is also an active member of the Association of University Technology Managers and helped create and manage the AUTM TransACT database for deal comps. Chris also provides guest lectures for entrepreneurship classes at Vanderbilt. Prior to his graduate school career, Chris worked as a software design
: Students decompose a problem to explore, design, and implement creative solutions, continuously evaluate progress, and navigate uncertainty. Develop scientific habits of the mind: Students apply scientific content from diverse fields to appropriately design experiments, gather and manage data, analyze and draw conclusions. Develop personal and professional identities: Students reflect upon their experiences to further their sense of self in order to become confident career-ready leaders.1B. The InSciTE modelTo accomplish the program objectives, InSciTE was designed as a stand-alone undergraduatecertificate housed by CSE. This provides the independence and flexibility necessary to navigatethe barriers that marginalized students face in
, thereby influencing diversity and inclusion in academia (Onyeador et al., 2021;Russell et al., 2019). For example, Degner et al (2019) found that the use of gender-specificlanguage or the stereotyping of particular ethnic and racial groups may unintentionally convey amessage of exclusivity, leading certain groups to feel marginalized in their engineering educationstudies and careers. Apart from that, such biases can be subliminally present in instructionalmaterials, research papers, and everyday communications, leading to a persistence of bias thataffects individuals’ opportunities in a variety of settings (Llorens et al., 2021; Schnierle et al.,2019). In consequence, researchers and educators in the field of engineering education
: metacognition, study abroad, undergraduate, intercultural competence, globalmindset, higher education, gender differences1. BackgroundIntercultural competence is an increasingly prominent skill that needs to be taught by highereducation institutions to foster global-mindedness in students [1], [2]. Intercultural competencerefers to an individual’s ability to communicate effectively and appropriately with people fromdifferent cultural backgrounds [3]. In higher education, students’ intercultural development isnow a necessary skill, whether they pursue global careers or not, because the scope of issues andwork individuals encounter today has grown on a global scale [4], [5]. Research shows that withhigher education institutes prioritizing
students to connect their education totheir lived experiences and societal needs. Some things that I get really excited about as an instructor is showing them the relevance of the material they're learning beyond why they thought they were taking the class. So oftentimes students come in with a very kind of narrow perspective on why they have to take the course. Either it's just to graduate or get units or throw something on their TV, or they want to learn one specific skill for applying for a job, and so on. But I want to demonstrate to students that the topics that I'm teaching could be relevant more widely in their everyday lives, or help them think more broadly about their career opportunities
centers both STS and non-academic perspectives.Prof. Emily Liu, Rensselaer Polytechnic InstituteDr. James Olson, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute After a twenty year Engineering career inventing and operating advanced technology in various private sector and military environments, Jim Olson returned to Academia to formalize and publish the methods and best practices he developed while mentoring and training Early Career individuals in the practical application of STEM concepts. Jim’s research if Engineering Education centric and he is currently pursing a Doctorate of Engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, NY ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Development of a Pre
Undergraduate Programs in Canada. University Goals/Objectives Curriculum Structure Program Overview Carleton To provide a strong - AI/ML stream within the - Focuses on modern University foundation in Bachelor of Computer AI/ML techniques such as computer science with Science (Honours). data mining, natural specialized training in language processing, and Artificial Intelligence deep learning. (AI) and Machine - Prepares students for Learning (ML) [5] careers in AI, software
and computing-related communication curricula, highlighting the critical role of security in contemporary communication systems. • Encouraging Careers in Secure Communication: Through a detailed explo- ration of emerging technological advancements, this research seeks to inspire undergraduate students toward pursuing careers in the field of secure commu- nications, showcasing promising professional opportunities and pathways. • Identifying and Analyzing Communication Vulnerabilities: The initial phase of this research involves an in-depth examination of vulnerabilities inherent in unsecured communication systems, providing a comprehensive understanding of potential security threats, weaknesses, and their
instructor adaptability at the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Following the completion of her undergraduate education, Hayden will be pursuing her master’s degree in structural engineering at the University of Nebraska - Lincoln. She then hopes to pursue a PhD in engineering education.Grace Panther, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dr. Grace Panther is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln where she conducts discipline-based education research. Her research interests include faculty change, 3D spatial visualization, gender inclusive teamwork, and studying authentic engineering practice. Dr. Panther was awarded an NSF CAREER
image generator, MicrosoftCopilot is available to all faculty, staff, and students with enterprise-level security and privacy.Courses and CurriculaKSU offers a number of degrees and certificates, each requiring students to take several coursesthat prepare students for technical careers related to artificial intelligence. These include: ● Advanced Intelligent Systems Programming (undergraduate certificate) ● Applied Machine Learning (undergraduate certificate) ● Computer Science (Bachelor of Science, Master of Science, Doctor of Philosophy) ● Data Analytics (Master of Science, graduate certificate) ● Machine Learning and Autonomous Systems (Bachelor of Science, graduate
with whichtraditional engineering courses can integrate the principles of HCD while meeting ABETrequirements [18]. Lawrence et al. created an HCD taxonomy for trans-disciplinary learning [20]while Shehab and Guo have validated metrics for assessing the impact of HCD on learning inhigher education courses [21].Case studies on HCD have shown that the HCD process can improve students’ perception thatuser-research and input is a critical component of the design process [22]. HCD has also beenshown to greatly benefit the creative problem-solving ability of students over the duration of aclass [23], and engage students more thoroughly to retain them in STEM when introduced to HCDearly in their engineering careers [24].2.2. Project-Based
educational and career pathways of engineers. In The National Academy of Engineering (Vols. 2018-June). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25284[2] ASEE. (2024). Cooperative and Experiential Education Division. Retrieved from: https://ceed.asee.org/[3] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097[4] Power, J. (2021). Systematic reviews in engineering education: a catalyst for change. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(6), 1163–1174. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2021.1980770[5] Phillips, M., Reed, J. B
transition- ing to an education-focused career track, Melissa taught at Stanford University, Santa Clara University, and Foothill College. These engagements have included courses within and outside the major, aimed at undergraduates at all years, high school students, and working adults. Melissa is now the Science and Engineering Education Fellow (SEEF) for the Bioengineering department, where she works on broader educational research projects and curricular change. Her work includes trying to better understand and support student development as ethical and quantitative thinkers. Through work with Stanford’s Center for Teaching and Learning (CTL), Melissa has also developed diversity and inclusion content for instruc
“effectivelydisrupt the systematic categorization of alternative neurological and cognitiveembodiment(s)”and “offers an emancipatory lens for representing and embodying neurologicaldifferences beyond traditional special education’s deficit-based discourses and practices.”C. INCLUDE ProjectThe INCLUDE project funded by the Revolutionizing Engineering Departments program of theNational Science Foundation has been established to transform department-wide practices andcreate an inclusive learning environment that empowers the diversity of learners present ininstitutions of higher education. This project aims to develop and refine a range of interventionstargeted towards multiple aspects of academic life, from recruitment to career development. TheINCLUDE team
the National Society of Black Engineers (NSBE) Student Retention Toolkit [5] are cited and shared with Fellows.Objective #3: Build partnerships with stakeholders who are engaged in recruitment, admissions,retention, graduation, hiring and career development of women and BIPOC engineering studentsat their own institutions and in their regional hubs. This third objective focuses on building partnerships with stakeholders, such as LSAMP networks and new regional hubs, graduate schools at other institutions, and industry partners. Other stakeholders include national professional engineering societies such as ASEE, Society of Women Engineers (SWE), NSBE, National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering (NACME), American Indian
: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.” Psychological review, vol. 84, no. 2, p. 191, 1977.[17] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Social cognitive career theory,” Career choice and development, vol. 4, pp. 255–311, 2002.[18] A. Bandura et al., “Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales,” Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 307–337, 2006.[19] S. W. McQuiggan, B. W. Mott, and J. C. Lester, “Modeling self-efficacy in intelligent tutoring systems: An inductive approach,” User modeling and user-adapted interaction, vol. 18, pp. 81–123, 2008.[20] S. Fancsali, M. Bernacki, T. Nokes-Malach, M. Yudelson, and S. Ritter, “Goal orientation, self-efficacy, and “online measures” in intelligent
slowlyincreased (Cunninghame et al., 2016), this group still remains largely underrepresented in STEMdisciplines (Moon et al., 2012). This discrepancy in representation reflects larger issues ofmarginalization in STEM fields and higher education at large. Current support structures fordisabled people remain ineffective, as accessing necessary resources requires navigatingphysical, cultural, and bureaucratic barriers (Groen-McCall et al., 2018). These barriers onlycontinue to widen for disabled students planning to pursue engineering careers (Prema & Dhand,2019), as seen in the high unemployment rate for disabled scientists and engineers, which isgreater than that of the entire U.S. labor force (Lee, 2010; NSF, 2017). Yet, disability is rarelyincluded